restriction modification systems
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

156
(FIVE YEARS 21)

H-INDEX

32
(FIVE YEARS 3)

Author(s):  
Yulia V. Diubo ◽  
Artur E. Akhremchuk ◽  
Leonid N. Valentovich ◽  
Yevgeny A. Nikolaichik

The methylation profile of Pectobacterium carotovorum 2A genome was studied using the Oxford Nanopore sequencing technology. The specificity of the methylase subunits of the three restriction-modification systems of this strain was determined. Analysis of homologous systems showed the uniqueness of the type I restriction-modification system and the type IV restriction system specific to methylated DNA of this strain. The work confirms the applicability of Oxford Nanopore technology to the analysis of bacterial DNA modifications and is also the first example of such an analysis for Pectobacterium spp.


Author(s):  
Julie Zaworski ◽  
Oyut Dagva ◽  
Anthony W Kingston ◽  
Alexey Fomenkov ◽  
Richard D Morgan ◽  
...  

Abstract The Salmonella research community has used strains and bacteriophages over decades, exchanging useful new isolates among laboratories for study of cell surface antigens, metabolic pathways and restriction-modification studies. Here we present the sequences of two laboratory Salmonella strains (STK005, an isolate of LB5000; and its descendant ER3625). In the ancestry of LB5000, segments of ∼15 and ∼42 kb were introduced from Salmonella enterica sv Abony 103 into Salmonella enterica sv Typhimurium LT2, forming strain SD14; this strain is thus a hybrid of S. enterica isolates. Strains in the SD14 lineage were used to define flagellar antigens from the 1950s to the 1970s, and to define three restriction-modification systems from the 1960s to the 1980s. LB5000 was also used as host in phage typing systems used by epidemiologists. In the age of cheaper and easier sequencing, this resource will provide access to the sequence that underlies the extensive literature.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0253267
Author(s):  
Iain A. Murray ◽  
Yvette A. Luyten ◽  
Alexey Fomenkov ◽  
Nan Dai ◽  
Ivan R. Corrêa ◽  
...  

We report a new subgroup of Type III Restriction-Modification systems that use m4C methylation for host protection. Recognition specificities for six such systems, each recognizing a novel motif, have been determined using single molecule real-time DNA sequencing. In contrast to all previously characterized Type III systems which modify adenine to m6A, protective methylation of the host genome in these new systems is achieved by the N4-methylation of a cytosine base in one strand of an asymmetric 4 to 6 base pair recognition motif. Type III systems are heterotrimeric enzyme complexes containing a single copy of an ATP-dependent restriction endonuclease-helicase (Res) and a dimeric DNA methyltransferase (Mod). The Type III Mods are beta-class amino-methyltransferases, examples of which form either N6-methyl adenine or N4-methyl cytosine in Type II RM systems. The Type III m4C Mod and Res proteins are diverged, suggesting ancient origin or that m4C modification has arisen from m6A MTases multiple times in diverged lineages. Two of the systems, from thermophilic organisms, required expression of both Mod and Res to efficiently methylate an E. coli host, unlike previous findings that Mod alone is proficient at modification, suggesting that the division of labor between protective methylation and restriction activities is atypical in these systems. Two of the characterized systems, and many homologous putative systems, appear to include a third protein; a conserved putative helicase/ATPase subunit of unknown function and located 5’ of the mod gene. The function of this additional ATPase is not yet known, but close homologs co-localize with the typical Mod and Res genes in hundreds of putative Type III systems. Our findings demonstrate a rich diversity within Type III RM systems.


mBio ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Wachter ◽  
Craig Martens ◽  
Kent Barbian ◽  
Ryan O. M. Rego ◽  
Patricia Rosa

The principal causative agent of Lyme disease in humans in the United States is Borrelia burgdorferi , while B. burgdorferi , B. afzelii , and B. garinii , collectively members of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato species complex, cause Lyme disease in Europe and Asia. Two plasmid-encoded restriction/modification systems have been shown to limit the genetic transformation of B. burgdorferi type strain B31 with foreign DNA, but little is known about the restriction/modification systems of other Lyme disease Borrelia bacteria.


mBio ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spiridon E. Papoulis ◽  
Steven W. Wilhelm ◽  
David Talmy ◽  
Erik R. Zinser

Harmful algal blooms (HABs), caused by cyanobacteria like Microcystis aeruginosa , are a global threat to water quality and use across the planet. Researchers have agreed that nutrient loading is a major contributor to HAB persistence.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Zaworski ◽  
Oyut Dagva ◽  
Anthony W Kingston ◽  
Alexey Fomenkov ◽  
Richard D Morgan ◽  
...  

The Salmonella research community has used strains and bacteriophages over decades, exchanging useful new isolates among laboratories for study of cell surface antigens, metabolic pathways and restriction-modification studies. Here we present the sequences of two laboratory Salmonella strains (STK005, an isolate of LB5000; and its descendant ER3625). In the ancestry of LB5000, segments of ~15 and ~42 kb were introduced from Salmonella enterica sv Abony 103 into Salmonella enterica sv Typhimurium LT2, forming strain SD14; this strain is thus a hybrid of S. enterica isolates. Strains in the SD14 lineage were used to define flagellar antigens from the 1950s to the 1970s, and to define three restriction-modification systems from the 1960s to the 1980s. LB5000 was also used as host in phage typing systems used by epidemiologists. In the age cheaper and easier sequencing, this resource will provide access to the sequence that underlies the extensive literature.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurosh S Mehershahi ◽  
Swaine Chen

DNA methylation is a common epigenetic mark that influences transcriptional regulation, and therefore cellular phenotype, across all domains of life, extending also to bacterial virulence. Both orphan methyltransferases and those from restriction modification systems (RMSs) have been co-opted to regulate virulence epigenetically in many bacteria. However, the potential regulatory role of DNA methylation mediated by archetypal Type I systems in Escherichia coli has never been studied. We demonstrated that removal of DNA methylated mediated by three different Escherichia coli Type I RMSs in three distinct E. coli strains had no detectable effect on gene expression or growth in a screen of 1190 conditions. Additionally, deletion of the Type I RMS EcoUTI in UTI89, a prototypical cystitis strain of E. coli , which led to loss of methylation at >750 sites across the genome, had no detectable effect on virulence in a murine model of ascending urinary tract infection (UTI). Finally, introduction of two heterologous Type I RMSs into UTI89 also resulted in no detectable change in gene expression or growth phenotypes. These results stand in sharp contrast with many reports of RMSs regulating gene expression in other bacteria, leading us to propose the concept of “regulation avoidance” for these E. coli Type I RMSs. We hypothesize that regulation avoidance is a consequence of evolutionary adaptation of both the RMSs and the E. coli genome. Our results provide a clear and (currently) rare example of regulation avoidance for Type I RMSs in multiple strains of E. coli , further study of which may provide deeper insights into the evolution of gene regulation and horizontal gene transfer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 367 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin T Militello ◽  
Lara Finnerty-Haggerty ◽  
Ooha Kambhampati ◽  
Rebecca Huss ◽  
Rachel Knapp

ABSTRACT In Escherichia coli, DNA cytosine methyltransferase (Dcm) methylates the second cytosine in the sequence 5′CCWGG3′ generating 5-methylcytosine. Dcm is not associated with a cognate restriction enzyme, suggesting Dcm impacts facets of bacterial physiology outside of restriction-modification systems. Other than gene expression changes, there are few phenotypes that have been identified in strains with natural or engineered Dcm loss, and thus Dcm function has remained an enigma. Herein, we demonstrate that Dcm does not impact bacterial growth under optimal and selected stress conditions. However, Dcm does impact viability in long-term stationary phase competition experiments. Dcm+ cells outcompete cells lacking dcm under different conditions. Dcm knockout cells have more RpoS-dependent HPII catalase activity than wild-type cells. Thus, the impact of Dcm on stationary phase may involve changes in RpoS activity. Overall, our data reveal a new role for Dcm during long-term stationary phase.


2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 655-671
Author(s):  
Kate L. Seib ◽  
Yogitha N. Srikhanta ◽  
John M. Atack ◽  
Michael P. Jennings

Human-adapted bacterial pathogens use a mechanism called phase variation to randomly switch the expression of individual genes to generate a phenotypically diverse population to adapt to challenges within and between human hosts. There are increasing reports of restriction-modification systems that exhibit phase-variable expression. The outcome of phase variation of these systems is global changes in DNA methylation. Analysis of phase-variable Type I and Type III restriction-modification systems in multiple human-adapted bacterial pathogens has demonstrated that global changes in methylation regulate the expression of multiple genes. These systems are called phasevarions (phase-variable regulons). Phasevarion switching alters virulence phenotypes and facilitates evasion of host immune responses. This review describes the characteristics of phasevarions and implications for pathogenesis and immune evasion. We present and discuss examples of phasevarion systems in the major human pathogens Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Helicobacter pylori, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae.


2020 ◽  
Vol 367 (16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhaskar Chandra Mohan Ramisetty ◽  
Pavithra Anantharaman Sudhakari

ABSTRACT Cell-dependent propagation of the ‘self’ is the driver of all species, organisms and even genes. Conceivably, elimination of these entities is caused by cellular death. Then, how can genes that cause the death of the same cell evolve? Programmed cell death (PCD) is the gene-dependent self-inflicted death. In multicellular organisms, PCD of a cell confers fitness to the surviving rest of the organism, which thereby allows the selection of genes responsible for PCD. However, PCD in free-living bacteria is intriguing; the death of the cell is the death of the organism. How can such PCD genes be selected in unicellular organisms? The bacterial PCD in a population is proposed to confer fitness to the surviving kin in the form of sporulation, nutrition, infection-containment and matrix materials. While the cell-centred view leading to propositions of ‘altruism’ is enticing, the gene-centred view of ‘selfism’ is neglected. In this opinion piece, we reconceptualize the PCD propositions as genetic selfism (death due to loss/mutation of selfish genes) rather than cellular altruism (death for the conferment of fitness to kin). Within the scope and the available evidence, we opine that some of the PCD-like observations in bacteria seem to be the manifestation of genetic selfism by Restriction–Modification systems and Toxin–Antitoxin systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document