preferential recognition
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

68
(FIVE YEARS 11)

H-INDEX

21
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Olena Pikhurets ◽  
◽  
Stepan Lytvyn ◽  
Ivan Miroshnykov ◽  
Viktoriia Mykolaiets ◽  
...  

— The legal regulation of relations about software (computer programs) is conducted mainly in two directions: copyright and patent law. But despite lengthy discussions in scientific circles in almost all countries, there is no final and single solution to this issue. Historically, the model of copyright protection of the object under study offers a cheaper and faster procedure than the model of protection of software by patent law. Patent protection requires a rather expensive and lengthy examination of software for world (absolute) novelty, during which the object itself may become obsolete and become unpopular with potential users. Therefore, the copyright regime for the protection of software has received preferential recognition. Accordingly, the article attempts to investigate the problems of the existing in the world copyright model of software protection and the possibility of patenting them. Keywords— software, copyright, patent law, object of protection


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaibhav Tiwari ◽  
Ritesh Tandon ◽  
Nehru Viji Sankaranarayanan ◽  
Jacob C. Beer ◽  
Ellen K. Kohlmeir ◽  
...  

AbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 is in immediate need of an effective antidote. Although the Spike glycoprotein (SgP) of SARS-CoV-2 has been shown to bind to heparins, the structural features of this interaction, the role of a plausible heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) receptor, and the antagonism of this pathway through small molecules remain unaddressed. Using an in vitro cellular assay, we demonstrate HSPGs modified by the 3-O-sulfotransferase isoform-3, but not isoform-5, preferentially increased SgP-mediated cell-to-cell fusion in comparison to control, unmodified, wild-type HSPGs. Computational studies support preferential recognition of the receptor-binding domain of SgP by 3-O-sulfated HS sequences. Competition with either fondaparinux, a 3-O-sulfated HS-binding oligopeptide, or a synthetic, non-sugar small molecule, blocked SgP-mediated cell-to-cell fusion. Finally, the synthetic, sulfated molecule inhibited fusion of GFP-tagged pseudo SARS-CoV-2 with human 293T cells with sub-micromolar potency. Overall, overexpression of 3-O-sulfated HSPGs contribute to fusion of SARS-CoV-2, which could be effectively antagonized by a synthetic, small molecule.


eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Dong ◽  
Reiko Nakagawa ◽  
Kyohei Oyama ◽  
Yusuke Yamamoto ◽  
Weilian Zhang ◽  
...  

The Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) is a multicomponent histone H3K27 methyltransferase complex, best known for silencing the Hox genes during embryonic development. The Polycomb-like proteins PHF1, MTF2, and PHF19 are critical components of PRC2 by stimulating its catalytic activity in embryonic stem cells. The Tudor domains of PHF1/19 have been previously shown to be readers of H3K36me3 in vitro. However, some other studies suggest that PHF1 and PHF19 co-localize with the H3K27me3 mark but not H3K36me3 in cells. Here, we provide further evidence that PHF1 co-localizes with H3t in testis and its Tudor domain preferentially binds to H3tK27me3 over canonical H3K27me3 in vitro. Our complex structures of the Tudor domains of PHF1 and PHF19 with H3tK27me3 shed light on the molecular basis for preferential recognition of H3tK27me3 by PHF1 and PHF19 over canonical H3K27me3, implicating that H3tK27me3 might be a physiological ligand of PHF1/19.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Dong ◽  
Reiko Nakagawa ◽  
Kyohei Oyama ◽  
Yusuke Yamamoto ◽  
Weilian Zhang ◽  
...  

AbstractThe PRC2 (Polycomb repressive complex 2) complex is a multi-component histone H3K27 methyltransferase, best known for silencing Hox genes during embryonic development. The Polycomb-like proteins PHF1, MTF2 and PHF19 are critical components of PRC2 by stimulating its catalytic activity in embryonic stem (ES) cells. The Tudor domains of PHF1/19 have been previously shown to be readers of H3K36me3 in vitro. However, some other studies suggest that PHF1 and PHF19 co-localize with the H3K27me3 mark, but not H3K36me3 in cells. Here, we provide further evidence that PHF1 co-localizes with H3tK27 in testis, and its Tudor domain preferentially binds to H3tK27me3 over canonical H3K27me3 in vitro. Our complex structures of the Tudor domains of PHF1 and PHF19 with H3tK27me3 shed light on the molecular basis for preferential recognition of H3tK27me3 by PHF1 and PHF19 over canonical H3K27me3, implicating that H3tK27me3 might be a physiological ligand of PHF1/19.


Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 950
Author(s):  
Srijit Khan ◽  
Yanling Liu ◽  
Laura M. Ernst ◽  
Leslie Y. T. Leung ◽  
Patrick Budylowski ◽  
...  

CD38 is a multifunctional cell surface receptor expressed on multiple cell lineages of hematopoietic origin with high levels of expression on human plasma cells. Previously, we isolated the monoclonal variable lymphocyte receptor B (VLRB) MM3 antibody from the evolutionarily distant sea lamprey, which recognized the CD38 ectoenzyme exclusively on human plasma cells in a manner that correlated with CD38 enzymatic activity. The plasma cell-specific binding of VLRB MM3 contrasts with the broad pattern of expression of CD38-determined conventional antibodies specific for this antigen. In an effort to facilitate the application of this unique reagent in combination with conventional antibody panels, we explored a strategy to generate VLRB MM3 tetramers. The resulting reagent maintained the threshold-based recognition of CD38. Increased sensitivity achieved with VLRB MM3 tetramers also showed preferential recognition of germinal center centroblasts over centrocytes. VLRB MM3 tetramers thus provided a unique and versatile single-step staining reagent for the detection of human CD38 that is readily incorporated into multi-color flow cytometry panels.


FEBS Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 287 (13) ◽  
pp. 2723-2743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana O. Ribeiro ◽  
Aldino Viegas ◽  
Virgínia M. R. Pires ◽  
João Medeiros‐Silva ◽  
Pedro Bule ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-230
Author(s):  
Wenqi Xu ◽  
Jiahui Li ◽  
Bowen Rong ◽  
Bin Zhao ◽  
Mei Wang ◽  
...  

The author would like to add the below information in this correction. A similar study from Chao Lu group was published online on 5 September 2019 in Nature, entitled “The histone mark H3K36me2 recruits DNMT3A and shapes the intergenic DNA methylation landscape” (Weinberg et al., 2019). Although both the studies reported the preferential recognition of H3K36me2 by DNMT3A PWWP, ours in addition uncovered a stimulation function by such interaction on the activity of DNMT3A. On the disease connections, we used a NSD2 gain-of-function model which led to the discovery of potential therapeutic implication of DNA inhibitors in the related cancers, while the other study only used NSD1 and DNMT3A loss-of-function models.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 735-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastián M. Maller ◽  
Alejandro J. Cagnoni ◽  
Nadia Bannoud ◽  
Lorena Sigaut ◽  
Juan M. Pérez Sáez ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 118 (473) ◽  
pp. 628-645
Author(s):  
Edem Adotey

Abstract In recent policy frameworks, traditional authorities have been (re)assigned roles of directly representing civil society and local communities as key actors in development, leading to questions about the relationship between the chieftaincy institution and the state in governance. Using the example of a chieftaincy dispute between the Sokpoe and Tefle, a Tongu-Ewe people of Ghana, at the heart of which are claims to paramountcy status, this article argues that chieftaincy and the state are not always parallel institutions of governance that derive their legitimacy from different sources. Struggles over chieftaincy hierarchies have become struggles for the preferential recognition by and access to the state conveyed by membership in the Houses of Chiefs. In effect, the chieftaincy institution may be both parallel to and dependent on the state. The article draws attention to the importance of hierarchy in explaining state-chieftaincy relationships because an understanding of the nuances of legitimacy in chieftaincy will enrich how chiefs are engaged as key actors in development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document