far from equilibrium
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

937
(FIVE YEARS 158)

H-INDEX

62
(FIVE YEARS 7)

Author(s):  
Jorge Tabanera ◽  
Inés Luque ◽  
Samuel L. Jacob ◽  
Massimiliano Esposito ◽  
Felipe Barra ◽  
...  

Abstract Collisional reservoirs are becoming a major tool for modelling open quantum systems. In their simplest implementation, an external agent switches on, for a given time, the interaction between the system and a specimen from the reservoir. Generically, in this operation the external agent performs work onto the system, preventing thermalization when the reservoir is at equilibrium. One can recover thermalization by considering an autonomous global setup where the reservoir particles colliding with the system possess a kinetic degree of freedom. The drawback is that the corresponding scattering problem is rather involved. Here, we present a formal solution of the problem in one dimension and for flat interaction potentials. The solution is based on the transfer matrix formalism and allows one to explore the symmetries of the resulting scattering map. One of these symmetries is micro-reversibility, which is a condition for thermalization. We then introduce two approximations of the scattering map that preserve these symmetries and, consequently, thermalize the system. These relatively simple approximate solutions constitute models of quantum thermostats and are useful tools to study quantum systems in contact with thermal baths. We illustrate their accuracy in a specific example, showing that both are good approximations of the exact scattering problem even in situations far from equilibrium. Moreover, one of the models consists of the removal of certain coherences plus a very specific randomization of the interaction time. These two features allow one to identify as heat the energy transfer due to switching on and off the interaction. Our results prompt the fundamental question of how to distinguish between heat and work from the statistical properties of the exchange of energy between a system and its surroundings.


2022 ◽  
Vol 258 ◽  
pp. 05003
Author(s):  
Kirill Boguslavski ◽  
Tuomas Lappi ◽  
Sören Schlichting

Motivated by the quark-gluon plasma, we develop a simulation method to obtain the spectral function of (Wilson) fermions non-perturbatively in a non-Abelian gauge theory with large gluon occupation numbers [1]. We apply our method to a non-Abelian plasma close to its non-thermal fixed point, i.e., in a far-from-equilibrium self-similar regime, and find mostly very good agreement with perturbative hard loop (HTL) calculations. For the first time, we extract the full momentum dependence of the damping rate of fermionic collective excitations and compare our results to recent non-perturbative extractions of gluonic spectral functions in two and three spatial dimensions [2, 3].


2022 ◽  
Vol 258 ◽  
pp. 10007
Author(s):  
Sebastian Grieninger ◽  
Sergio Morales-Tejera

We study the real time evolution of the chiral magnetic effect out-ofequilibrium in strongly coupled anomalous field theories. We match the parameters of our model to QCD parameters and draw lessons of possible relevance for the realization of the chiral magnetic effect in heavy ion collisions. In particular, we find an equilibration time of about ~ 0:35 fm/c in presence of the chiral anomaly for plasma temperatures of order T ~ 300 - 400 MeV.


Soft Matter ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominik Schildknecht ◽  
Anastasia N Popova ◽  
Jack Stellwagen ◽  
Matthew Thomson

The control of far-from-equilibrium physical systems, including active materials, requires advanced control strategies due to the non-linear dynamics and long-range interactions between particles, preventing explicit solutions to optimal control problems....


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal D. Ndione ◽  
Sebastian T. Weber ◽  
Dirk O. Gericke ◽  
Baerbel Rethfeld

Abstract Free electron lasers offer unique properties to study matter in states far from equilibrium as they combine short pulses with a large range of photon energies. In particular, the possibility to excite core states drives new relaxation pathways that, in turn, also change the properties of the optically and chemically active electrons. Here, we present a theoretical model for the dynamics of the nonequilibrium occupation of the different energy bands in solid gold driven by exciting deep core states. The resulting optical response is in excellent agreement with recent measurements and, combined with our model, provides a quantitative benchmark for the description of electron-phonon coupling in strongly driven gold. Focusing on sub-picosecond time scales, we find essential differences between the dynamics induced by XUV and visible light.


2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (52) ◽  
pp. e2114551118
Author(s):  
Layne B. Frechette ◽  
Christoph Dellago ◽  
Phillip L. Geissler

Chemical transformations, such as ion exchange, are commonly employed to modify nanocrystal compositions. Yet the mechanisms of these transformations, which often operate far from equilibrium and entail mixing diverse chemical species, remain poorly understood. Here we explore an idealized model for ion exchange in which a chemical potential drives compositional defects to accumulate at a crystal’s surface. These impurities subsequently diffuse inward. We find that the nature of interactions between sites in a compositionally impure crystal strongly impacts exchange trajectories. In particular, elastic deformations which accompany lattice-mismatched species promote spatially modulated patterns in the composition. These same patterns can be produced at equilibrium in core/shell nanocrystals, whose structure mimics transient motifs observed in nonequilibrium trajectories. Moreover, the core of such nanocrystals undergoes a phase transition—from modulated to unstructured—as the thickness or stiffness of the shell is decreased. Our results help explain the varied patterns observed in heterostructured nanocrystals produced by ion exchange and suggest principles for the rational design of compositionally patterned nanomaterials.


2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Schnorr ◽  
O. Khoukhi ◽  
L. Berg ◽  
T. Heinzel ◽  
C. Rothfuchs-Engels ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Richard John Logan

<p>Whilst a lot of our strategic focus in the public sector is on linear policy approaches, many systems/ phenomena of importance are defined as non-linear or far from equilibrium. Traditional approaches to linear forecasting have not proved effective for non-linear systems, since non-linear systems follow a different set of rules. Historically, non-linear systems were too hard to forecast, but over recent decades some rules and approaches are starting to emerge. One important and clearly defined category of non-linear systems are those that follow a ‘power-law’ distribution rather than the ‘normal’ distribution, which is often associated with linear systems or systems in equilibrium. My research collects, analyses, and does a comparative analysis of the different power law populations, as well as the main strategic forecasting techniques that can be applied to those populations/ systems. Overall Conclusions and observations. Just as in science and mathematics, there is now a clearly defined separation and understanding of linear and non-linear systems and the rules that apply to each. My thesis has as its central theme, the idea that strategy as a subject also fits this same philosophical separation of approaches, which I have called the strategic planning versus the strategic thinking divide. Strategic planning is essentially the linear approach – being rational and assuming relatively stable conditions. Strategic thinking assumes the world is effectively non-linear and ‘far from equilibrium’. Non-linear approaches mean acknowledging concepts like; punctuated equilibrium, power law ‘log-log’ graphs, ‘scale-free’ characteristics, ‘self organising criticality’, accepting only pattern prediction (including 1/f formulas) and not precise prediction etc. Understanding non-linearity is essential to understand such things as ‘Black Swans’. Luck, serendipity and ‘bounded rationality’ are always involved in non-linear complex adaptive systems, whereas linear systems tend to comply with the so called ‘rational’ traditions in science and economics. Power law statistical distributions can be seen in a wide variety of non-linear natural and man-made phenomena, from earthquakes and solar flares to populations of cities and sales of books. This sheer diversity of effects that have power law distributions is actually an amazing fact that has only become evident over the last decade or so. Since the world contains aspects that are clearly linear and other aspects that are clearly non-linear, it is essential for someone interested in strategy to be able to understand both systems and be able to apply the correct techniques to each approach. The two parts of ‘punctuated equilibrium’ effectively link the two strategic approaches together as there is only one world and not two separate realities. It therefore follows that a strategist needs a good understanding of both strategic planning and strategic thinking, since both are needed for different phases or periods, and perhaps both are needed for any period when you can't tell what phase you are in, which can also happen. I suggest that under a linear phase, the strategic planning approach should be dominant, but supported by strategic thinking (since you never know when events will turn abruptly); whereas in a turbulent non-linear period the strategic thinking approach should be dominant, but supported by strategic planning (since you know that great turbulence will not last). This is a sort of a swapping dominant/ recessive situation, which has a loose parallel in the theory of the left/ right brain split, where it is not wise to use only one style of thinking, since there are two styles which suit different situations. The key is to pick the right thinking style for the right situation. Just as we have one brain, but two thinking styles, so in the strategy toolbox we also have two valid, useful and complimentary general strategic approaches. However for this thesis, I have focused on the non-linear power law aspects of life which have strong implications for strategic thinking, since that is the new area for me as well as one of the new knowledge frontiers for strategy as a subject (and for leadership, politics and many other areas).</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Richard John Logan

<p>Whilst a lot of our strategic focus in the public sector is on linear policy approaches, many systems/ phenomena of importance are defined as non-linear or far from equilibrium. Traditional approaches to linear forecasting have not proved effective for non-linear systems, since non-linear systems follow a different set of rules. Historically, non-linear systems were too hard to forecast, but over recent decades some rules and approaches are starting to emerge. One important and clearly defined category of non-linear systems are those that follow a ‘power-law’ distribution rather than the ‘normal’ distribution, which is often associated with linear systems or systems in equilibrium. My research collects, analyses, and does a comparative analysis of the different power law populations, as well as the main strategic forecasting techniques that can be applied to those populations/ systems. Overall Conclusions and observations. Just as in science and mathematics, there is now a clearly defined separation and understanding of linear and non-linear systems and the rules that apply to each. My thesis has as its central theme, the idea that strategy as a subject also fits this same philosophical separation of approaches, which I have called the strategic planning versus the strategic thinking divide. Strategic planning is essentially the linear approach – being rational and assuming relatively stable conditions. Strategic thinking assumes the world is effectively non-linear and ‘far from equilibrium’. Non-linear approaches mean acknowledging concepts like; punctuated equilibrium, power law ‘log-log’ graphs, ‘scale-free’ characteristics, ‘self organising criticality’, accepting only pattern prediction (including 1/f formulas) and not precise prediction etc. Understanding non-linearity is essential to understand such things as ‘Black Swans’. Luck, serendipity and ‘bounded rationality’ are always involved in non-linear complex adaptive systems, whereas linear systems tend to comply with the so called ‘rational’ traditions in science and economics. Power law statistical distributions can be seen in a wide variety of non-linear natural and man-made phenomena, from earthquakes and solar flares to populations of cities and sales of books. This sheer diversity of effects that have power law distributions is actually an amazing fact that has only become evident over the last decade or so. Since the world contains aspects that are clearly linear and other aspects that are clearly non-linear, it is essential for someone interested in strategy to be able to understand both systems and be able to apply the correct techniques to each approach. The two parts of ‘punctuated equilibrium’ effectively link the two strategic approaches together as there is only one world and not two separate realities. It therefore follows that a strategist needs a good understanding of both strategic planning and strategic thinking, since both are needed for different phases or periods, and perhaps both are needed for any period when you can't tell what phase you are in, which can also happen. I suggest that under a linear phase, the strategic planning approach should be dominant, but supported by strategic thinking (since you never know when events will turn abruptly); whereas in a turbulent non-linear period the strategic thinking approach should be dominant, but supported by strategic planning (since you know that great turbulence will not last). This is a sort of a swapping dominant/ recessive situation, which has a loose parallel in the theory of the left/ right brain split, where it is not wise to use only one style of thinking, since there are two styles which suit different situations. The key is to pick the right thinking style for the right situation. Just as we have one brain, but two thinking styles, so in the strategy toolbox we also have two valid, useful and complimentary general strategic approaches. However for this thesis, I have focused on the non-linear power law aspects of life which have strong implications for strategic thinking, since that is the new area for me as well as one of the new knowledge frontiers for strategy as a subject (and for leadership, politics and many other areas).</p>


Author(s):  
Frits Veerman ◽  
Moritz Mercker ◽  
Anna Marciniak-Czochra

Turing patterns are commonly understood as specific instabilities of a spatially homogeneous steady state, resulting from activator–inhibitor interaction destabilized by diffusion. We argue that this view is restrictive and its agreement with biological observations is problematic. We present two alternatives to the classical Turing analysis of patterns. First, we employ the abstract framework of evolution equations to enable the study of far-from-equilibrium patterns. Second, we introduce a mechano-chemical model, with the surface on which the pattern forms being dynamic and playing an active role in the pattern formation, effectively replacing the inhibitor. We highlight the advantages of these two alternatives vis-à-vis the classical Turing analysis, and give an overview of recent results and future challenges for both approaches. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Recent progress and open frontiers in Turing’s theory of morphogenesis’.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document