scholarly journals Workforce participation in relation to cancer diagnosis, type and stage: Australian population-based study of 163,556 middle-aged people

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Thandrayen ◽  
Grace Joshy ◽  
John Stubbs ◽  
Louise Bailey ◽  
Phyllis Butow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Personal Characteristics ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Workforce Participation ◽  
Aged People ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Workforce Retention ◽  
Relationship Of

Abstract Purpose To quantify the relationship of cancer diagnosis to workforce participation in Australia, according to cancer type, clinical features and personal characteristics. Methods Questionnaire data (2006–2009) from participants aged 45–64 years (n=163,556) from the population-based 45 and Up Study (n=267,153) in New South Wales, Australia, were linked to cancer registrations to ascertain cancer diagnoses up to enrolment. Modified Poisson regression estimated age- and sex-adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) for non-participation in the paid workforce—in participants with cancer (n=8,333) versus without (n=155,223), for 13 cancer types. Results Overall, 42% of cancer survivors and 29% of people without cancer were out of the workforce (PR=1.18; 95%CI=1.15–1.21). Workforce non-participation varied substantively by cancer type, being greatest for multiple myeloma (1.83; 1.53–2.18), oesophageal (1.70; 1.13–2.58) and lung cancer (1.68; 1.45–1.93) and moderate for colorectal (1.23; 1.15–1.33), breast (1.11; 1.06–1.16) and prostate cancer (1.06; 0.99–1.13). Long-term survivors, 5 or more years post-diagnosis, had 12% (7–16%) greater non-participation than people without cancer, and non-participation was greater with recent diagnosis, treatment or advanced stage. Physical disability contributed substantively to reduced workforce participation, regardless of cancer diagnosis. Conclusions Cancer survivors aged 45–64 continue to participate in the workforce. However, participation is lower than in people without cancer, varying by cancer type, and is reduced particularly around the time of diagnosis and treatment and with advanced disease. Implications for Cancer Survivors While many cancer survivors continue with paid work, participation is reduced. Workforce retention support should be tailored to survivor preferences, cancer type and cancer journey stage.

Genitourinary disease risks among 5-year ovarian cancer survivors in a population-based cohort study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10073-10073
Author(s):  
Mia Hashibe ◽  
Yuji Chen ◽  
Brenna Blackburn ◽  
Yuan Wan ◽  
Kerry G. Rowe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Renal Failure ◽  
Acute Renal Failure ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
General Population Cohort ◽  
Disease Risks ◽  
After Cancer

10073 Background: In the US, there are approximately 235,200 ovarian cancer survivors today. Five-year survival for ovarian cancer has increased from 36% for women who were diagnosed in 1975-1977 to 46% for women diagnosed between 2005-2011. Long term follow-up studies among ovarian cancer survivors are uncommon and late effects have not been well characterized in a population-based cohort. Although genitourinary complications during treatment are well known, long term impacts need to be investigated. Methods: A total of 602 first primary invasive ovarian cancer cases diagnosed between 1996-2012 who survived for > 5 years were identified in the Utah Population Database and compared to a general population cohort of women. Genitourinary disease diagnoses were identified through ICD codes from hospital electronic medical records and statewide ambulatory surgery and inpatient data. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios for disease risks by time since cancer diagnosis with adjustments on matching factors, baseline BMI, baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and race. Results: The overall risk of genitourinary diseases for ovarian cancer patients in comparison to the general population cohort was 1.51 (95%CI = 1.30-1.74) 5-10 years after cancer diagnosis. Approximately 54.6% of ovarian cancer survivors were diagnosed with a genitourinary disease 5-10 years after cancer diagnosis. The most common genitourinary diseases among the ovarian cancer survivors were urinary tract infections (10.1%), acute renal failure (5.5%), and chronic kidney disease (4.4%). The greatest risks were observed for hydronephrosis (HR = 10.65, 95%CI = 3.68-30.80), pelvic peritoneal adhesions (HR = 5.81, 95%CI = 1.11-30.39), cystitis and urethritis (HR = 2.67, 95%CI = 1.21-6.38), and acute renal failure (HR = 2.30, 95%CI = 1.36-3.88). Conclusions: Ovarian cancer survivors experience increased risks of various genitourinary diseases in the 5-10 year period following cancer diagnosis. Understanding the multimorbidity trajectory among ovarian cancer survivors is of vital importance to improve their clinical care after cancer diagnosis and allow for increased attention to these potential late effects.

scholarly journals Successful Return to Work for Cancer Survivors

AAOHN Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 55 (7) ◽  
pp. 290-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy M. Nachreiner ◽  
Rada K. Dagher ◽  
Patricia M. McGovern ◽  
Beth A. Baker ◽  
Bruce H. Alexander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Return To Work ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Recovery Process ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Returning To Work ◽  
Female Cancer Survivors

This study investigated factors associated with successful return to work for cancer survivors in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. A focus group was held with seven female cancer survivors. Participants discussed return-to-work issues following a cancer diagnosis. Factors such as coworker support and job flexibility improved their experiences, whereas coworker and supervisor ignorance about cancer and lack of support made returning to work more stressful. Participants discussed personal, environmental, and cancer-related factors that influenced their experiences with returning to work following a cancer diagnosis. Knowledge of factors that support employees helps occupational health nurses ease their transition, and may improve quality of life for employees. Physicians and health care provider teams may play a critical role in the employees' positive evaluation of their recovery process. This pilot study serves as a basis for a larger, population-based study.

The relationship of body mass index with quality of life among endometrial cancer survivors: A study from the population-based PROFILES registry

2013 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 216-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte S. Oldenburg ◽  
Dorry Boll ◽  
Kim A.H. Nicolaije ◽  
M. Caroline Vos ◽  
Johanna M.A. Pijnenborg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

scholarly journals Risk of infertility in female adolescents and young adults with cancer: a population-based cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M P Velez ◽  
H Richardson ◽  
N N Baxter ◽  
Chad McClintock ◽  
E Greenblatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Female Adolescents ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Do female adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer have a higher risk of subsequent infertility diagnosis than AYAs without cancer? SUMMARY ANSWER Female AYAs with breast, hematological, thyroid and melanoma cancer have a higher risk of subsequent infertility diagnosis. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Cancer therapies have improved substantially, leading to dramatic increases in survival. As survival improves, there is an increasing emphasis on optimizing the quality of life among cancer survivors. Many cancer therapies increase the risk of infertility, but we lack population-based studies that quantify the risk of subsequent infertility diagnosis in female AYAs with non-gynecological cancers. The literature is limited to population-based studies comparing pregnancy or birth rates after cancer against unexposed women, or smaller studies using markers of the ovarian reserve as a proxy of infertility among female survivors of cancer. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We conducted a population-based cohort study using universal health care databases in the province of Ontario, Canada. Using data from the Ontario Cancer Registry, we identified all women 15–39 years of age diagnosed with the most common cancers in AYAs (brain, breast, colorectal, leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, thyroid and melanoma) from 1992 to 2011 who lived at least 5 years recurrence-free (Exposed, n = 14,316). Women with a tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy previous to their cancer diagnosis were excluded. We matched each exposed woman by age, census subdivision, and parity to five randomly selected unexposed women (n = 60,975) and followed subjects until 31 December 2016. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Infertility diagnosis after 1 year of cancer was identified using information on physician billing codes through the Ontario Health Insurance Plan database (ICD-9 628). Modified Poisson regression models were used to assess the risk of infertility diagnosis (relative risk, RR) adjusted for income quintile and further stratified by parity at the time of cancer diagnosis (nulliparous and parous). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Mean age at cancer diagnosis was 31.4 years. Overall, the proportion of infertility diagnosis was higher in cancer survivors compared to unexposed women. Mean age of infertility diagnosis was similar among cancer survivors and unexposed women (34.8 years and 34.9 years, respectively). The overall risk of infertility diagnosis was higher in cancer survivors (RR 1.30; 95% CI 1.23–1.37). Differences in infertility risk varied by type of cancer. Survivors of breast cancer (RR 1.46; 95% CI 1.30–1.65), leukemia (RR 1.56; 95% CI 1.09–2.22), Hodgkin lymphoma (RR 1.49; 95% CI 1.28–1.74), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (RR 1.42; 95% CI 1.14, 1.76), thyroid cancer (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.10–1.30) and melanoma (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.01, 1.35) had a higher risk of infertility diagnosis compared to women without cancer. After stratification by parity, the association remained in nulliparous women survivors of breast cancer, leukemia, lymphoma and melanoma, whereas it was attenuated in parous women. In survivors of thyroid cancer, the association remained statistically significant in both nulliparous and parous women. In survivors of brain or colorectal cancer, the association was not significant, overall or after stratification by parity. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Non-biological factors that may influence the likelihood of seeking a fertility assessment may not be captured in administrative databases. The effects of additional risk factors, including cancer treatment, which may modify the associations, need to be assessed in future studies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Reproductive health surveillance in female AYAs with cancer is a priority, especially those with breast cancer, leukemia and lymphoma. Our finding of a potential effects of thyroid cancer (subject to over-diagnosis) and, to a lesser extent, melanoma need to be further studied, and, if an effect is confirmed, possible mechanisms need to be elucidated. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Funding was provided by the Faculty of Health Sciences and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queen’s University. There are no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A

scholarly journals Risk of Suicide After a Cancer Diagnosis in England: A Population-Based Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 228s-228s
Author(s):  
K. Henson ◽  
R. Brock ◽  
J. Charnock ◽  
B. Wickramasinghe ◽  
O. Will ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Suicide Risk ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Psychological Support ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Icd 10

Background: Previous research has identified an increased risk of suicide among cancer patients, however this has not been investigated at a population level in England. Those subgroups of patients most at risk need to be identified to ensure appropriate access to psychological support. Aim: To examine the variation in suicide risk among individuals diagnosed with cancer in England. Methods: We identified 4,453,547 individuals (21 million person-years at risk) aged 18 to 99 years at diagnosis of cancer during 1995 to 2015 from the national cancer registry, and followed them up until 31 August 2017. The outcomes of interest were both suicide and open verdicts (ICD-10 X60-X84, Y87.0, Y10-Y34 [excluding Y33.9, Y87.2]). Population-based expected deaths were as published by ONS [2]. We calculated standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and absolute excess risks (AERs), and explored variation in suicide risk by cancer type, age at death, sex, deprivation, ethnicity, and years since cancer diagnosis. Results: 2352 cancer patients died by suicide. This was 0.08% of all deaths. The overall SMR for suicide was 1.19 (95% CI 1.14-1.24) and AER per 10,000 person-years was 0.18 (0.13-0.22). The risk was highest among individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma, with a 4.34-fold risk corresponding to 4.00 extra deaths per 10,000 person-years. This was followed by pancreatic (3.94-fold), esophageal (2.53-fold), lung (2.52-fold), and stomach (2.14-fold) cancer (all significantly elevated). Suicide risk was highest in the first 6 months following cancer diagnosis (SMR: 2.64 [2.42-2.89]), but a significantly increased risk persisted for 2 years (SMR: 1.21 [1.08-1.35]). Conclusion: Despite low numbers, the elevated risk of suicide in patients with certain cancers is a concern, representing potentially preventable deaths. The increased risk in the first 6 months after diagnosis, which is consistent with previous studies, highlights unmet needs for psychological support delivered alongside cancer diagnosis and treatment. Our findings suggest a need for improved risk stratification across cancer services, followed by targeted psychological support.

scholarly journals Alcohol Use Among Patients With Cancer and Survivors in the United States, 2000–2017

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina N. Sanford ◽  
David J. Sher ◽  
Xiaohan Xu ◽  
Chul Ahn ◽  
Anthony V. D’Amico ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Binge Drinking ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Moderate Drinking

Background: Alcohol use is an established risk factor for several malignancies and is associated with adverse oncologic outcomes among individuals diagnosed with cancer. The prevalence and patterns of alcohol use among cancer survivors are poorly described. Methods: We used the National Health Interview Survey from 2000 to 2017 to examine alcohol drinking prevalence and patterns among adults reporting a cancer diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to define the association between demographic and socioeconomic variables and odds of self-reporting as a current drinker, exceeding moderate drinking limits, and engaging in binge drinking. The association between specific cancer type and odds of drinking were assessed. Results: Among 34,080 survey participants with a known cancer diagnosis, 56.5% self-reported as current drinkers, including 34.9% who exceeded moderate drinking limits and 21.0% who engaged in binge drinking. Younger age, smoking history, and more recent survey period were associated with higher odds of current, exceeding moderate, and binge drinking (P<.001 for all, except P=.008 for excess drinking). Similar associations persisted when the cohort was limited to 20,828 cancer survivors diagnosed ≥5 years before survey administration. Diagnoses of melanoma and cervical, head and neck, and testicular cancers were associated with higher odds of binge drinking (P<.05 for all) compared with other cancer diagnoses. Conclusions: Most cancer survivors self-report as current alcohol drinkers, including a subset who seem to engage in excessive drinking behaviors. Given that alcohol intake has implications for cancer prevention and is a potentially modifiable risk factor for cancer-specific outcomes, the high prevalence of alcohol use among cancer survivors highlights the need for public health strategies aimed at the reduction of alcohol consumption.

Risk for Hospitalization With Depression After a Cancer Diagnosis: A Nationwide, Population-Based Study of Cancer Patients in Denmark From 1973 to 2003

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1440-1445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne O. Dalton ◽  
Thomas Munk Laursen ◽  
Lone Ross ◽  
Preben Bo Mortensen ◽  
Christoffer Johansen
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Early Recognition ◽  
Population Based ◽  
First Year ◽  
Central Register ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Diagnosis Of Cancer ◽  
Long Term Impact ◽  
Risk For Depression

Purpose As more people survive cancer, it is necessary to understand the long-term impact of cancer. We investigated whether cancer survivors are at increased risk for hospitalization for depression. Methods We linked data on all 5,703,754 persons living in Denmark on January 1, 1973, or born thereafter to the Danish Cancer Registry and identified 608,591 adults with a diagnosis of cancer. Follow-up for hospitalization for depression in the Danish Psychiatric Central Register from 1973 through 2003 yielded 121,227,396 person-years and 121,304 hospitalizations for depression. The relative risk (RR) for depression among cancer survivors relative to the cancer-free population was estimated by Poisson regression analysis with adjustment for age and period and stratified by sex, site of cancer, and extent of disease. Results The risk for depression in the first year after a cancer diagnosis was increased, with RRs ranging from 1.16 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.51) in women with colorectal cancer to 3.08 (95% CI, 1.88 to 5.02) in men with brain cancer. Decreasing but still significant excess risks during subsequent years were observed for most specific cancers. The risk remained increased throughout the study period for both men and women surviving hormone-related cancers, for women surviving smoking-related cancers, and for men surviving virus- and immune-related cancers. Conclusion This study confirms an increased risk for depression in patients facing a disruptive event like cancer. Early recognition and effective treatment are needed to prevent admission of cancer survivors for depression.

scholarly journals Food Insecurity and Forgone Medical Care Among Cancer Survivors

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e922-e932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean A. McDougall ◽  
Jessica Anderson ◽  
Shoshana Adler Jaffe ◽  
Dolores D. Guest ◽  
Andrew L. Sussman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Insecurity ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Treatment Adherence ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Prescription Medication ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Tumor Registry ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
After Cancer

PURPOSE: Financial hardship is increasingly understood as a negative consequence of cancer and its treatment. As patients with cancer face financial challenges, they may be forced to make a trade-off between food and medical care. We characterized food insecurity and its relationship to treatment adherence in a population-based sample of cancer survivors. METHODS: Individuals 21 to 64 years old, diagnosed between 2008 and 2016 with stage I-III breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer were identified from the New Mexico Tumor Registry and invited to complete a survey, recalling their financial experience in the year before and the year after cancer diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95%CIs. RESULTS: Among 394 cancer survivors, 229 (58%) were food secure in both the year before and the year after cancer diagnosis (persistently food secure), 38 (10%) were food secure in the year before and food insecure in the year after diagnosis (newly food insecure), and 101 (26%) were food insecure at both times (persistently food insecure). Newly food-insecure (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.02 to 7.79) and persistently food-insecure (OR, 3.04; 95% CI,1.36 to 6.77) cancer survivors were considerably more likely to forgo, delay, or make changes to prescription medication than persistently food-secure survivors. In addition, compared with persistently food-secure cancer survivors, newly food-insecure (OR, 9.23; 95% CI, 2.90 to 29.3), and persistently food-insecure (OR, 9.93; 95% CI, 3.53 to 27.9) cancer survivors were substantially more likely to forgo, delay, or make changes to treatment other than prescription medication. CONCLUSION: New and persistent food insecurity are negatively associated with treatment adherence. Efforts to screen for and address food insecurity among individuals undergoing cancer treatment should be investigated as a strategy to reduce socioeconomic disparities in cancer outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document