Quinones are found in the lipid-membranes of prokaryotes like E. coli and cyanobacteria, and are also abundant in eukaryotic mitochondria and chloroplasts. They are intricately involved in the reaction mechanism of redox phosphorylations. In the Mitchellian chemiosmotic school of thought, membrane-lodged quinones are perceived as highly mobile conveyors of two-electron equivalents from the first leg of Electron Transport Chain (ETC) to the ‘second pit-stop’ of Cytochrome bc1 or b6f complex (CBC), where they undergo a regenerative ‘Q-cycle’. In Manoj’s murburn mechanism, the membrane-lodged quinones are perceived as one- or two- electron donors/acceptors, enabling charge separation and the CBC resets a one-electron paradigm via ‘turbo logic’. Herein, we compare various purviews of the two mechanistic schools with respect to: constraints in mobility, protons’ availability, binding of quinones with proteins, structural features of the protein complexes, energetics of reaction, overall reaction logic, etc. From various perspectives, it is concluded that the chemiosmotic Q-cycle is an untenable hypothesis. We project the murburn proposal as one rooted in thermodynamics/kinetics and which provides tangible structure-function correlations for the roles of quinones, lipid membrane and associated proteins.
What is the role of lipid membrane-embedded quinones in ATP-synthesis? Chemiosmotic Q-cycle versus murburn reaction perspective