High-performance electrochemical sensing of circulating tumor DNA in peripheral blood based on poly-xanthurenic acid functionalized MoS 2 nanosheets

2018 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 116-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Zhichao Dai ◽  
Xue Liu ◽  
Jimin Yang
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 440-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahbubur Rahman ◽  
Daxiang Cui ◽  
Shukui Zhou ◽  
Amin Zhang ◽  
Di Chen

A high-performance electrochemical sensing platform inspired by a functional ‘green’ electrochemical reduction pathway was developed to identify and detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) of gastric carcinoma in peripheral blood.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 642-642
Author(s):  
Petra Minarikova ◽  
Lucie Benesova ◽  
Barbora Belsanova ◽  
Tereza Halkova ◽  
Jiri Cyrany ◽  
...  

642 Background: Patients with advanced stages of colorectal cancer have elevated levels of circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) in peripheral blood. Its presence can facilitate acquisition of DNA material for tumor molecular profiling without the invasive procedures. In this work we present utility of ctDNA for the determination of tumor phenotype within the basic division into the mutator phenotype (microsatellite instability, MSI and chromosomal instability, CIN) or methylator phenotype (CpG island methylator phenotype, CIMP). Methods: Tumor biopsy tissue and 5mL of peripheral blood samples were prospectively collected from 148 patients with colorectal tumors. In addition, plasma was extracted from peripheral blood immediately upon collection. Samples were then transported to the molecular laboratory where DNA and ctDNA were isolated from tissue and plasma, by a modified spin-column ctDNA extraction. Somatic mutations in tumor suppressors denoting CIN phenotype were detected by denaturing capillary electrophoresis (DCE), microsatellite instability was detected by MSI Analysis System, Version 1.2 (Promega corporation, Madison, WI) and DNA methylation (CIMP phenotype) was obtained by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MRC Holland, NL). Results: The samples included 75 adenomas and 70 carcinomas. The detected rates in tissues were: 4% for MSI, 32% for CIN and 7% for CIMP in adenomas and 10% for MSI, 36% for CIN and 32% for CIMP in carcinomas. In adenomas, none of the detected molecular types could be confirmed in ctDNA. In carcinomas, the concordance between tissue and ctDNA was 25% for MSI, 23% for CIN and 60% for CIMP. The success rates were related to the ctDNA concentration yields with a minimum requirement of ~0.2ng/uL. Conclusions: ctDNA may serve as alternative source for molecular classification of colorectal tumors (MSI, CIN and CIMP). A low concordance between tissue and ctDNA was found for CIN and MSI in comparison to 60% of CIMP-phenotypes found in both tissue as well as ctDNA. The results are predominantly dictated by disease stage and the corresponding levels of ctDNA. Supported by a Czech Ministry of health grant no. 14383.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. e186-e187
Author(s):  
Johannes M. Waldschmidt ◽  
Andrew Yee ◽  
Noopur Raje ◽  
Tushara Vijaykumar ◽  
Julia Frede ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3156-3156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex F. Herrera ◽  
Reid W. Merryman ◽  
Katherine A. Kong ◽  
Heather Sun ◽  
Jennifer R. Brown ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: High dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) cures a subset of patients with chemosensitive relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Several factors associated with post-ASCT outcome have been identified, including pre-ASCT PET status, but better biomarkers are needed in order to optimally select candidates for the procedure. In other lymphoma subtypes with defining chromosomal translocations, PCR detection of pre- and post-ASCT minimal residual disease (MRD) in peripheral blood and of tumor contamination in the stem cell product is associated with inferior outcome. Until recently, MRD detection in DLBCL was limited by the rarity of detectable circulating disease using conventional techniques. The immunosequencing platform (Adaptive Biotechnologies, Corp.) is a next-generation-sequencing (NGS)-based MRD assay that detects small amounts of circulating tumor DNA (CTD) in patients with lymphoid malignancies. The assay detects CTD at diagnosis in most DLBCL patients and CTD levels track with response to induction therapy (Armand, 2013). Persistence of CTD or recurrence of CTD after completion of therapy is highly associated with DLBCL relapse (Kurtz, 2015; Roschewski, 2015). We evaluated whether CTD in autologous stem cell grafts was predictive of outcome in patients with rel/ref DLBCL undergoing ASCT. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients with rel/ref DLBCL, including transformed indolent lymphoma (TIL), who had paired archival tumor and autologous stem cell specimens and underwent ASCT at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from 2003-2013. Genomic tumor DNA was extracted from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue and analyzed using the NGS-based MRD assay. PCR amplification of IGH-VDJ, IGH-DJ,and IGK regions using universal consensus primers was performed followed by NGS to determine the tumor clonotype(s), defined as having a frequency > 5% in the tumor specimen. DNA from all available autologous peripheral blood or bone marrow stem cell specimens from each patient was amplified using universal consensus primers and sequenced to determine the level of CTD, defined as the number of lymphoma molecules per diploid genome. Results: We identified 98 eligible patients with rel/ref DLBCL/TIL. The median age was 60 (range 22-77) years; 63% were male; 65% had DLBCL, 29% had TIL, and 5% had primary mediastinal DLBCL; the median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range 2-5); all had received prior rituximab; 38% had primary refractory disease; 60% were in complete remission at ASCT; 96% received CBV conditioning. Median follow-up was 56 (range 19-123) months. The 4y progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the entire cohort were 46% and 64%, respectively. Among 83 patients (85%) with sufficient DNA for clonotype determination, a clonotype was identified in 59 (71%). CTD data was complete in 53 patients (52 received peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) and 1 received bone marrow). Eight patients (15%) had detectable CTD (CTD+) in the stem cell autografts (all PBSC) and 6/8 relapsed after ASCT. One CTD+ patient had early non-relapse mortality less than 1 month after ASCT and was never restaged. Seven of 8 CTD+ patients had TIL histology, 5 of whom relapsed (4 with aggressive lymphoma). The 4y PFS and OS in CTD+ v CTD- patients were 13% v 48% (p=0.01), and 38% v 67% (p=0.013), respectively [Figure 1]. In multivariable models including CTD status and pre-ASCT characteristics, CTD+ was the only factor associated with OS (HR 3.1, p=0.018), but was not significantly associated with PFS. Discussion: In patients with rel/ref DLBCL undergoing ASCT, the presence of CTD in the autologous stem cell graft is associated with inferior survival. CTD detection in the autograft may be more common in patients with TIL. In studies evaluating CTD detection in DLBCL, the plasma compartment has been more sensitive for detecting CTD than mononuclear cells. The use of concentrated cell specimens in this study may have decreased the sensitivity of the assay. Nevertheless, if the present findings are confirmed in a larger population, CTD detection may permit the identification of a subgroup of patients with a particularly poor outcome after ASCT, for whom alternative approaches could be considered. Figure 1. Overall (A) and Progression-Free (B) Survival in CTD+ vs CTD- Patients Figure 1. Overall (A) and Progression-Free (B) Survival in CTD+ vs CTD- Patients Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Herrera: Sequenta, Inc.: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Kong:Adaptive Biotechnologies, Corp.: Employment, Other: Stockholder. Davids:Genentech: Other: ad board; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Rodig:Perkin Elmer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Faham:Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp.: Employment, Other: Stockholder. Armand:BMS: Research Funding; Infinity: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sequenta, Inc.: Research Funding.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel T. Ahuno ◽  
Lawrence Edusei ◽  
Nicolas Titiloye ◽  
Ernest Adjei ◽  
Joe-Nat Clegg-Lamptey ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongfei Chen ◽  
Yanfang Wu ◽  
Sharmin Hoque ◽  
Richard D. Tilley ◽  
J. Justin Gooding

This study introduces a new electrochemical sensing strategy for the rapid detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from whole blood in combination with a network of DNA-Au@MNPs with high sensitivity and excellent selectivity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 5522
Author(s):  
Alessia Cimadamore ◽  
Liang Cheng ◽  
Francesco Massari ◽  
Matteo Santoni ◽  
Laura Pepi ◽  
...  

Approximately 23% of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers (mCRPC) harbor deleterious aberrations in DNA repair genes. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) therapy has shown improvements in overall survival in patients with mCRPC who harbor somatic and/or germline alterations of homology recombination repair (HRR) genes. Peripheral blood samples are typically used for the germline mutation analysis test using the DNA extracted from peripheral blood leucocytes. Somatic alterations can be assessed by extracting DNA from a tumor tissue sample or using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) extracted from a plasma sample. Each of these genetic tests has its own benefits and limitations. The main advantages compared to the tissue test are that liquid biopsy is a non-invasive and easily repeatable test with the value of better representing tumor heterogeneity than primary biopsy and of capturing changes and/or resistance mutations in the genetic tumor profile during disease progression. Furthermore, ctDNA can inform about mutation status and guide treatment options in patients with mCRPC. Clinical validation and test implementation into routine clinical practice are currently very limited. In this review, we discuss the state of the art of the ctDNA test in prostate cancer compared to blood and tissue testing. We also illustrate the ctDNA testing workflow, the available techniques for ctDNA extraction, sequencing, and analysis, describing advantages and limits of each techniques.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document