Breast cancer: New drugs/regimes

2001 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 145-147
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
New Drugs

Endocrine Treatment of Breast Cancer: Current Perspectives, Future Directions

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tazia Irfan ◽  
Mainul Haque ◽  
Sayeeda Rahman ◽  
Russell Kabir ◽  
Nuzhat Rahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Ovarian Function ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Effective Control ◽  
Endocrine Treatment ◽  
Estrogen Production ◽  
Hormone Sensitive

Breast cancer remains one of the major causes of death in women, and endocrine treatment is currently one of the mainstay of treatment in patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Endocrine therapy either slows down or stops the growth of hormone-sensitive tumors by blocking the body’s capability to yield hormones or by interfering with hormone action. In this paper, we intended to review various approaches of endocrine treatments for breast cancer highlighting successes and limitations. There are three settings where endocrine treatment of breast cancer can be used: neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or metastatic. Several strategies have also been developed to treat hormone-sensitive breast cancer which include ovarian ablation, blocking estrogen production, and stopping estrogen effects. Selective estrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs) (e.g. tamoxifen and raloxifene), aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (e.g. anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane), gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH) (e.g. goserelin), and selective estrogen receptor downregulators (SERDs) (e.g. fulvestrant) are currently used drugs to treat breast cancer. Tamoxifen is probably the first targeted therapy widely used in breast cancer treatment which is considered to be very effective as first line endocrine treatment in previously untreated patients and also can be used after other endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. AIs inhibit the action of enzyme aromatase which ultimately decrease the production of estrogen to stimulate the growth of ER+ breast cancer cells. GnRH agonists suppress ovarian function, inducing artificial menopause in premenopausal women. Endocrine treatments are cheap, well-tolerated and have a fixed single daily dose for all ages, heights and weights of patients. Endocrine treatments are not nearly as toxic as chemotherapy and frequent hospitalization can be avoided. New drugs in preliminary trials demonstrated the potential for improvement of the efficacy of endocrine therapy including overcoming resistance. However, the overall goals for breast cancer including endocrine therapy should focus on effective control of cancer, design personalized medical therapeutic approach, increase survival time and quality of life, and improve supportive and palliative care for end-stage disease.

scholarly journals Recent Discoveries of Macromolecule- and Cell-Based Biomarkers and Therapeutic Implications in Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 636
Author(s):  
Hsing-Ju Wu ◽  
Pei-Yi Chu
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Normal Breast ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Therapeutic Implications ◽  
Whole Cells ◽  
Diagnosis And Prognosis ◽  
Novel Biomarkers

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer type and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women worldwide. Breast cancer is fairly heterogeneous and reveals six molecular subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, HER2+, basal-like subtype (ER−, PR−, and HER2−), normal breast-like, and claudin-low. Breast cancer screening and early diagnosis play critical roles in improving therapeutic outcomes and prognosis. Mammography is currently the main commercially available detection method for breast cancer; however, it has numerous limitations. Therefore, reliable noninvasive diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers are required. Biomarkers used in cancer range from macromolecules, such as DNA, RNA, and proteins, to whole cells. Biomarkers for cancer risk, diagnosis, proliferation, metastasis, drug resistance, and prognosis have been identified in breast cancer. In addition, there is currently a greater demand for personalized or precise treatments; moreover, the identification of novel biomarkers to further the development of new drugs is urgently needed. In this review, we summarize and focus on the recent discoveries of promising macromolecules and cell-based biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer and provide implications for therapeutic strategies.

Recent progress in immunotherapy of breast cancer targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522199163
Author(s):  
Homa Seyedmirzaei ◽  
Mahsa Keshavarz-Fathi ◽  
Sepideh Razi ◽  
Masoumeh Gity ◽  
Nima Rezaei
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Drug Conjugates ◽  
Heavy Burden ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Objective Breast cancer is responsible for most of the cancer-induced deaths in women around the world. The current review will discuss different approaches of targeting HER2, an epidermal growth factor overexpressed in 30% of breast cancer cases. Data sources We conducted a search on Pubmed and Scopus databases to find studies relevant to HER2+ breast cancers and targeting HER2 as means of immunotherapy. Out of 1043 articles, 105 studies were included in this review. Data summary As well as the introduction of HER2 and breast cancer subtypes, we discussed various aspects of HER2-targeting immunotherapy including monoclonal antibodies, Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cells and vaccines. Conclusions Despite several ways of controlling breast cancer, the need to investigate new drugs and approaches seems to be much significant as this cancer still has a heavy burden on people’s health and survival.

scholarly journals The Modern Landscape of Endocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Women with Breast Cancer

Breast Care ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 312-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Rossi ◽  
Olivia Pagani
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Ovarian Function ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Endocrine Resistance ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Ovarian Function Suppression

The optimal endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with early and advanced breast cancer still remains an important and controversial issue. For over 30 years, tamoxifen has been the gold standard in the adjuvant setting. New therapeutic options, such as the addition of ovarian function suppression to oral endocrine therapy (either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors), can improve outcomes over tamoxifen alone in well-selected patients. Treatment duration has also been revisited, and extended therapy is becoming a new standard of care, especially in high-risk patients. Endocrine therapy for advanced disease still represents a challenge and a research priority. New drugs and combinations able to overcome endocrine resistance are at the horizon, and their role in premenopausal women should be better elucidated. Side effects and quality of life (including family planning considerations) play an important role in treatment selection and in the patients' treatment adherence and should always be discussed before start of treatment. The paper will specifically focus on how to integrate all new treatment options in the current armamentarium of endocrine therapy of premenopausal women, with the aim of best fine-tuning treatment selections according to the individual risk/benefit evaluation.

scholarly journals Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Systemic Adjuvant Therapies for Early Breast Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (10) ◽  
pp. 1079-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Möbus ◽  
Susanne Hell ◽  
Marcus Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence ◽  
Adjuvant Therapies

AbstractOncologic therapy is currently undergoing significant changes. A number of innovative targeted medications currently in clinical development have raised high expectations. With that in mind, discussions about terms such as “clinical benefit” and “clinical relevance” are highly topical. This also applies to further developments in the field of adjuvant systemic therapies for early-stage breast cancer. As the treatment aim is curative, assessment of the clinical benefit of adjuvant therapies must be largely based on efficacy outcomes. The focus must be on improving disease-free survival rates and lowering the risk of recurrence. Because of the current low mortality rates, statements about overall survival rates are only possible after very long observation periods. Consequently, new drugs in adjuvant therapies should be considered as offering a clinical benefit, if they reduce the risk of recurrence below current low levels of risk. The evidence for established adjuvant therapy standards in early-stage breast cancer can be used as objective criteria for comparison. This review article considers the requirements for clinical benefit of new adjuvant therapies for early breast cancer, based on examples from adjuvant endocrine therapy, adjuvant polychemotherapy and adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy.

scholarly journals RepCOOL: computational drug repositioning via integrating heterogeneous biological networks

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghazale Fahimian ◽  
Javad Zahiri ◽  
Seyed Shahriar Arab ◽  
Reza H. Sajedi
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Biological Networks ◽  
Drug Repositioning ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Cancer Stage ◽  
New Drug ◽  
Approved Drugs ◽  
Fda Approved Drugs

Abstract Background It often takes more than 10 years and costs more than 1 billion dollars to develop a new drug for a particular disease and bring it to the market. Drug repositioning can significantly reduce costs and time in drug development. Recently, computational drug repositioning attracted a considerable amount of attention among researchers, and a plethora of computational drug repositioning methods have been proposed. This methodology has widely been used in order to address various medical challenges, including cancer treatment. The most common cancers are lung and breast cancers. Thus, suggesting FDA-approved drugs via drug repositioning for breast cancer would help us to circumvent the approval process and subsequently save money as well as time. Methods In this study, we propose a novel network-based method, named RepCOOL, for drug repositioning. RepCOOL integrates various heterogeneous biological networks to suggest new drug candidates for a given disease. Results The proposed method showed a promising performance on benchmark datasets via rigorous cross-validation. The final drug repositioning model has been built based on a random forest classifier after examining various machine learning algorithms. Finally, in a case study, four FDA approved drugs were suggested for breast cancer stage II. Conclusion Results show the potency of the proposed method in detecting true drug-disease relationships. RepCOOL suggested four new drugs for breast cancer stage II namely Doxorubicin, Paclitaxel, Trastuzumab, and Tamoxifen.

Continuing to work while receiving cancer treatment: A financial or a symbolic issue?

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6603-6603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard Ganem ◽  
Herve L. Naman ◽  
Nadine Dohollou ◽  
Thomas Facchini ◽  
Yvan Coscas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Median Number ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Health Care Center ◽  
Financial Gain ◽  
After Cancer ◽  
Cure Rates ◽  
Do So

6603 Background: As improved cure rates lead to longer life expectancy, occupational concerns during and after cancer treatment become important. The advent of new drugs with fewer side effects will increase the profile of this issue. We carried out a field survey to explore the question. Methods: We questioned 97 oncologists, and a subgroup of 216 patients treated for breast cancer who were working at the time of diagnosis and who wanted to continue to do so during at least part of the treatment period. Results: Data Collected from Patients: In total, 208 patients (96%) were satisfied or very satisfied with their jobs. Only 68 (31%) were able to achieve the goal of working without interruption while being treated (physicians estimated that figure at only 11%). For the remaining women, who did stop working (69%), the median number of days off work was 59. Data Collected from Physicians: A total of 87 physicians (89%) stated that having information regarding working conditions is very important when counseling patients about whether they could continue to work. Comparison of the answers given by patients and physicians: 36% of physicians thought that the initiative in addressing the work/job issue was taken primarily by themselves, while 53% felt it came from the patient. The patient perspective was different: 61% of patients thought they took the initiative themselves and only 13% of them thought the physician took the lead. The main reason behind the desire to continue working is thought by 56% of physicians to be “Financial gain”; while for patients it is “To feel the same” (42%). A total of 90 (92%) physicians feared that those patients continuing to work would face at least one type of medical difficulty; only 143 (66%) patients shared this fear. Lastly, although 94% of the physicians have access to psychological or psychiatric support workers at the health care center, only 62% have access to a social worker. Conclusions: Of the patients who really wanted to work while being treated for breast cancer, only 31% could achieve that goal without any interruption. There is also a difference of perception regarding patient motivation, with physicians believing that the reasons are mainly financial while the patients see it as more of a symbolic issue.

scholarly journals Have Changes in Systemic Treatment Improved Survival in Patients with Breast Cancer Metastatic to the Brain?

2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Carsten Nieder ◽  
Kirsten Marienhagen ◽  
Astrid Dalhaug ◽  
Jan Norum
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Active Treatment ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Recursive Partitioning ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Whole Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

Newly developed systemic treatment regimens might lead to improved survival also in the subgroup of breast cancer patients that harbour brain metastases. In order to examine this hypothesis, a matched pairs analysis was performed that involved one group of patients, which were treated after these new drugs were introduced, and one group of patients, which were treated approximately 10 years earlier. The two groups were well balanced for the known prognostic factors age, KPS, extracranial disease status, and recursive partitioning analysis class, as well as for the extent of brain treatment. The results show that the use of systemic chemotherapy has increased over time, both before and after the diagnosis of brain metastases. However, such treatment was performed nearly exclusively in those patients with brain metastases that belonged to the prognostically more favourable groups. Survival after whole-brain radiotherapy has remained unchanged in patients without further active treatment. It has improved in prognostically better patients and especially patients that received active treatment, where the 1-year survival rates have almost doubled. As these patient groups were small, confirmation of the results in other series should be attempted. Nevertheless, the present results are compatible with the hypothesis that improved systemic therapy might contribute to prolonged survival in patients with brain metastases from breast cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document