Effectiveness of antimicrobial hospital curtains on reducing bacterial contamination—A multicenter study

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shik Luk ◽  
Viola Chi Ying Chow ◽  
Kelvin Chung Ho Yu ◽  
Enoch Know Hsu ◽  
Ngai Chong Tsang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Bacterial Contamination ◽  
Indirect Costs ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Colony Forming Units ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
Bed Days

AbstractObjectiveTo determine the efficacy of 2 types of antimicrobial privacy curtains in clinical settings and the costs involved in replacing standard curtains with antimicrobial curtains.DesignA prospective, open-labeled, multicenter study with a follow-up duration of 6 months.SettingThis study included 12 rooms of patients with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) (668 patient bed days) and 10 cubicles (8,839 patient bed days) in the medical, surgical, neurosurgical, orthopedics, and rehabilitation units of 10 hospitals.MethodCulture samples were collected from curtain surfaces twice a week for 2 weeks, followed by weekly intervals.ResultsWith a median hanging time of 173 days, antimicrobial curtain B (quaternary ammonium chlorides [QAC] plus polyorganosiloxane) was highly effective in reducing the bioburden (colony-forming units/100 cm2, 1 vs 57; P < .001) compared with the standard curtain. The percentages of MDRO contamination were also significantly lower on antimicrobial curtain B than the standard curtain: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 0.5% vs 24% (P < .001); carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp, 0.2% vs 22.1% (P < .001); multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp, 0% vs 13.2% (P < .001). Notably, the median time to first contamination by MDROs was 27.6 times longer for antimicrobial curtain B than for the standard curtain (138 days vs 5 days; P = .001).ConclusionsAntimicrobial curtain B (QAC plus polyorganosiloxane) but not antimicrobial curtain A (built-in silver) effectively reduced the microbial burden and MDRO contamination compared with the standard curtain, even after extended use in an active clinical setting. The antimicrobial curtain provided an opportunity to avert indirect costs related to curtain changing and laundering in addition to improving patient safety.

scholarly journals Colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms is associated with in increased mortality in liver transplant candidates

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0245091
Author(s):  
Philip G. Ferstl ◽  
Natalie Filmann ◽  
Eva-Maria Heilgenthal ◽  
Andreas A. Schnitzbauer ◽  
Wolf O. Bechstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplant ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Waiting List ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
Transplant Candidates ◽  
The Impact

Objectives Rising prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) is a major health problem in patients with liver cirrhosis. The impact of MDRO colonization in liver transplantation (LT) candidates and recipients on mortality has not been determined in detail. Methods Patients consecutively evaluated and listed for LT in a tertiary German liver transplant center from 2008 to 2018 underwent screening for MDRO colonization including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDRGN), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). MDRO colonization and infection status were obtained at LT evaluation, planned and unplanned hospitalization, three months upon graft allocation, or at last follow-up on the waiting list. Results In total, 351 patients were listed for LT, of whom 164 (47%) underwent LT after a median of 249 (range 0–1662) days. Incidence of MDRO colonization increased during waiting time for LT, and MRDO colonization was associated with increased mortality on the waiting list (HR = 2.57, p<0.0001. One patients was colonized with a carbapenem-resistant strain at listing, 9 patients acquired carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRGN) on the waiting list, and 4 more after LT. In total, 10 of these 14 patients died. Conclusions Colonization with MDRO is associated with increased mortality on the waiting list, but not in short-term follow-up after LT. Moreover, colonization with CRGN seems associated with high mortality in liver transplant candidates and recipients.

scholarly journals Investigation and Containment of New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase (NDM)–Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in a Hospital Intensive Care Unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s305-s305
Author(s):  
Karoline Sperling ◽  
Amy Priddy ◽  
Nila Suntharam ◽  
Adam Karlen
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Outpatient Surgery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
New Delhi ◽  
Point Prevalence Study ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Background: With increasing medical tourism and international healthcare, emerging multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) or “superbugs” are becoming more prevalent. These MDROs are unique because they are resistant to antibiotics and can carry special resistance mechanisms. In April 2019, our hospital was notified that a superbug, New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase(NDM)–producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), was identified in a patient who had been transferred to another hospital after being at our hospital for 3 weeks. Our facility had a CRE admission screening protocol in place since 2013, but this patient did not meet the criteria to be screened on admission. Methods: The infection prevention (IP) team consulted with the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) and gathered stakeholders to discuss containment strategies using the updated 2019 CDC Interim Guidance for Public Health Response to Contain Novel or Targeted Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) to determine whether transmission to other patients had occurred. NDM CRE was classified under tier 2 organisms, meaning those primarily associated with healthcare settings and not commonly identified in the region, and we used this framework to conduct an investigation. A point-prevalence study was done in an intensive care unit that consisted of rectal screening of 7 patients for both CRE and Candida auris, another emerging MDRO. These swabs were sent to the Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network (ARLN) Central Regional Lab at MDH for testing. An on-site infection control risk assessment was done by the MDH Infection Control Assessment and Response (ICAR) team. Results: All 7 patients were negative for both CRE and C. auris, and no further screening was done. During the investigation, it was discovered that the patient had had elective ambulatory surgery outside the United States in March 2019. The ICAR team assessment provided overall positive feedback to the nursing unit about isolation procedures, cleaning products, and hand hygiene product accessibility. Opportunities included set-up of soiled utility room and updating our process to the 2019 MDH recommendation to screen patients for CRE and C. auris on admission who have been hospitalized, had outpatient surgery, or hemodialysis outside the United States in the previous year. Conclusions: Point-prevalence study results showed no transmission of CRE and highlighted the importance of standard precautions. This event supports the MDH recommendation to screen for CRE any patients who have been hospitalized, had outpatient surgery, or had hemodialysis outside the United States in the previous year.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals 1764. The Gut: A Veiled Reservoir for Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) Below the Tip of the Iceberg

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S63-S63
Author(s):  
Teppei Shimasaki ◽  
Yoona Rhee ◽  
Rachel D Yelin ◽  
Michelle Ariston ◽  
Stefanie Ollison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Targeted Prevention ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
Clinical Culture

Abstract Background Clinical culture results are sometimes used to estimate the burden of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in hospitals. The association between positive clinical culture results and prevalence of MDROs in the gut is incompletely understood. Methods Rectal swab or stool samples were collected daily from adult medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients and cultured for target MDROs using selective media between January 2017 and January 2018 at Rush University Medical Center, a 676-bed tertiary-care center in Chicago. Resistance mechanisms were confirmed by phenotypic methods and/or polymerase chain reaction. Clinical culture results during MICU stay were extracted from the hospital information system. Target MDROs included vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). Patients with either a study or clinical culture positive for a target MDRO were analyzed. Results We collected 5,086 study samples from 1,661 unique admissions (1,419 patients) and included here data from 413 unique admissions (397 patients) with completed microbiologic analysis. Median (IQR) patient age was 65 (51–75) years and length of MICU stay was 3 (3–4) days. A total of 156 (37.8%) patients had a target MDRO detected from a study sample at any point; 57 (36.5%) patients had &gt;1 MDRO detected. Overall prevalence of these MDROs was found to be 22.5% VRE, 6.5% CRE, 19.8% ESBL, 4.4% CRPA, and 0.7% CRAB. New MDRO acquisition was observed in 58 (14.6%) patients (figure). Once a target MDRO was detected in a study sample, 82.2% of subsequent study samples were positive for that MDRO. Only 13 (5.8%) patients had a positive clinical culture for any target MDRO during their MICU stay (table). Conclusion Clinical cultures capture only the tip of the resistance iceberg and alone are insufficient to guide MDRO-targeted prevention strategies. Universal infection prevention measures are an alternative that may be preferred in settings where overall prevalence of MDROs is moderate or high and patients may be colonized with &gt;1 MDRO. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Single-stage treatment of chronically infected total hip arthroplasty with cementless reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (4) ◽  
pp. 396-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Ji ◽  
T. Wahafu ◽  
G. Li ◽  
X. Zhang ◽  
Y. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Recurrent Infection ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
Culture Negative

Aims Single-stage revision is not widely pursued due to restrictive inclusion criteria. In this study, we evaluated the results of single-stage revision of chronically infected total hip arthroplasty (THA) using broad inclusion criteria and cementless implants. Patients and Methods Between 2010 and 2016, 126 patients underwent routine single-stage revision with cementless reconstruction with powdered vancomycin or imipenem poured into the medullary cavity and re-implantation of cementless components. For patients with a culture-negative hip, fungal infections, and multidrug-resistant organisms, a direct intra-articular infusion of pathogen-sensitive antibiotics was performed postoperatively. Recurrence of infection and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Three patients died and 12 patients (none with known recurrent infection) were lost to follow-up. There were 111 remaining patients (60 male, 51 female) with a mean age of 58.7 (sd 12.7; 20 to 79). Results Of these 111 patients, 99 (89.2%) were free of infection at a mean follow-up time of 58 months (24 to 107). A recurrent infection was observed in four of the 23 patients (17.4%) with culture-negative infected hip. The success rate in patients with multidrug-resistant organisms was 84.2% (16/19). The mean postoperative Harris hip score was 79.6 points (63 to 92) at the most recent assessment. Conclusion Routine single-stage revision with cementless reconstruction can be a viable option for the treatment of chronically infected THA. The results of this study will add to the growing body of evidence supporting routine use of single-stage revision for the treatment of chronically infected THA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:396–402.

scholarly journals Systematic literature review of the burden and outcomes of infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms in Europe: the ABOUT-MDRO project protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e030608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blanca Anaya-Baz ◽  
Natalia Maldonado ◽  
Zaira R Palacios-Baena ◽  
Virginia Palomo ◽  
Maria Diletta Pezzani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Surveillance Systems ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Hospitalised Patients ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Incidence Prevalence

IntroductionDespite the increasing importance of infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), there is a lack of comprehensive information about the burden of disease and outcomes of key infections caused by these pathogens. The aim of the ABOUT-MDRO (A systematic review on the burden and outcomes of infections due to multidrug resitant organisms) project is to provide estimations of the burden of some key infections and their outcomes caused by the target MDROs.Methods and analysisA systematic literature search will be performed using MEDLINE/PubMed, Elsevier’s SCOPUS, Cochrane library, Clinical trials and Web of Science, as well as the Surveillance Systems from Public Health Institutions and Scientific Societies for Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-Associated Infections in Europe database of European surveillance systems, for data on prevalence/incidence, mortality and length of stay of target infections in hospitalised patients (including ventilator-associated pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections and bloodstream infections) and in specific populations (children, hospital wards, neutropenic patients) caused by cephalosporin-resistant or carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. The information retrieved will be tabulated and pooled estimates and 95% CIs calculated of rates and outcomes, using random effects models. Relationships between rates and outcomes in randomised control trials and epidemiological studies, and data of proportions and incidence/prevalence rates will also be analysed. The information collected in this study will be useful for identifying gaps in our knowledge in terms of incidence/prevalence and clinical outcomes of infections caused by MDROs, and for informing priorities in infection control and the research and design of appropriate studies.Ethics and disseminationThis study will be based on published data so we did not require ethical approval. Formal consent is not required. The results of this review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement. Data will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.Registration detailsPROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/) (CRD42019124185).

Multidrug-resistant organisms in a routine ward environment: differential propensity for environmental dissemination and implications for infection control

2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 766-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thean Yen Tan ◽  
Jasmine Shi Min Tan ◽  
Huiyi Tay ◽  
Gek Hong Chua ◽  
Lily Siew Yong Ng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Molecular Typing ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Genetic Relatedness ◽  
Healthcare Setting ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
Isolation Facilities

Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) pose significant infection-control challenges in settings with high prevalence and limited isolation facilities. This observational study in an 800-bed hospital determined the prevalence, bacterial density and genetic relatedness of MDROs isolated from ward surfaces, medical devices and the hands of healthcare professionals. The targeted MDROs were meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, and carbapenem-resistant (CR) Acinetobacter baumannii. During a 2-month period, microbiological sampling and molecular typing were performed on environment isolates, clinical isolates and isolates recovered from the hands of healthcare professionals. The target MDROs were recovered from 79 % of sampled surfaces, predominantly MRSA (74 % of all tested surfaces) and CR A. baumannii (29 %) but also VRE (2 %) and K. pneumoniae (1 %). MRSA was recovered from most tested surfaces throughout the ward, whilst CR A. baumannii was significantly more likely to be recovered from near-patient surfaces. Hand sampling demonstrated infrequent recovery of MRSA (5 %), CR A. baumannii (1 %) and VRE (1 %). Molecular typing of the study isolates identified seven MRSA and five Acinetobacter clonal clusters, respectively, and typing identified similar strains from the environment, patients and hands. Thus, in a healthcare setting with endemic circulation of MDROs, MRSA and CR A. baumannii were the predominant organisms recovered from ward surfaces, with MRSA in particular demonstrating widespread environmental dissemination. Molecular typing demonstrated the presence of related strains in patients, in the environment and on the hands of healthcare workers.

scholarly journals Predicting Antibiotic Resistance in Urinary Tract Infection Patients with Prior Urine Cultures

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (8) ◽  
pp. 4717-4721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaakov Dickstein ◽  
Yuval Geffen ◽  
Steen Andreassen ◽  
Leonard Leibovici ◽  
Mical Paul
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Resistant Organism ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Positive Urine ◽  
Tract Infections

ABSTRACTTo improve antibiotic prescribing, we sought to establish the probability of a resistant organism in urine culture given a previous resistant culture in a setting endemic for multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms. We performed a retrospective analysis of inpatients with paired positive urine cultures. We focused on ciprofloxacin-resistant (cipror) Gram-negative bacteria, extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producingEnterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistantEnterobacteriaceae(CRE), and carbapenem-resistant nonfermenters (CRNF). Comparisons were made between the frequency of each resistance phenotype following a previous culture with the same phenotype and the overall frequency of that phenotype, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. We performed a regression to assess the effects of other variables on the likelihood of a repeat resistant culture. A total of 4,409 patients (52.5% women; median age, 70 years) with 19,546 paired positive urine cultures were analyzed. The frequencies of ciprorbacteria, ESBL-producingEnterobacteriaceae, CRE, and CRNF among all cultures were 47.7%, 30.6%, 1.7%, and 2.6%, respectively. ORs for repeated resistance phenotypes were 1.87, 3.19, 48.25, and 19.02 for ciprorbacteria, ESBL-producingEnterobacteriaceae, CRE, and CRNF, respectively (P< 0.001 for all). At 1 month, the frequencies of repeated resistance phenotypes were 77.4%, 66.4%, 57.1%, and 33.3% for ciprorbacteria, ESBL-producingEnterobacteriaceae, CRE, and CRNF, respectively. Increasing time between cultures and the presence of an intervening nonresistant culture significantly reduced the chances of a repeat resistant culture. Associations were statistically significant over the duration of follow-up (60 months) for CRE and for up to 6 months for all other pathogens. Knowledge of microbiology results in the six preceding months may assist with antibiotic stewardship and improve the appropriateness of empirical treatment for urinary tract infections (UTIs).

scholarly journals Impact of infectious diseases consultation on the outcome of patients with bacteraemia

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 204993611989357
Author(s):  
Patricia Jiménez-Aguilar ◽  
Luis Eduardo López-Cortés ◽  
Jesús Rodríguez-Baño
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Early Evaluation ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
Immunosuppressed Patients ◽  
Infectious Diseases Consultation ◽  
The Impact

Bacteraemia or bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with much morbidity and mortality. Management of patients with bacteraemia is complex, and the increase in immunosuppressed patients and multidrug-resistant organisms poses additional challenges. The objective of this review is to assess the available published information about the impact of different aspects of management on the outcome of patients with BSI, and, specifically, the importance of infectious diseases specialists (IDS) consultation. The impact of management by IDS on different aspects, including interpretation of newer rapid techniques, early evaluation and treatment, and follow up, are reviewed. Overall, the available data suggest that IDS intervention improves the management and outcome of patients with BSI, either through consultation or structured unsolicited interventions in the context of multidisciplinary bacteraemia programmes.

scholarly journals 541. Factors Associated with the Persistence of Colonization by Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Cali, Colombia

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S258-S258
Author(s):  
Juan Diego Velez ◽  
Marly Orrego ◽  
Sofia Montes ◽  
Eric Tafur ◽  
Claudia M Parra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Previous History ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Anatomical Site ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background Colonized patients represent a reservoir for transmission to other non-colonized patients for health institutions, so surveillance measures and contact precautions have been taken in the worldwide to mitigate transmission. However, despite the different interventions implemented, factors associated with persistence have not been evaluated in our context. This study aimed to describe the persistence of colonization in patients with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) re-admitted to a health institution. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted. Patients re-admitted with a previous positive rapid test for MDROs, who had received chlorhexidine bathing and contact precautions during hospitalization were included. Samples were obtained from two rectal and one nasal swap. Colonization was defined as MDRO detection in at least one anatomical site, in the absence of symptoms or signs of infection. Persistence was defined as two positive screening for the same MDRO. Laboratory tests were chromID®, CHROMID® CARBA and MacConkey agar. VITEK MS® MALDI-TOF conducted MDROs genus identification, and carbapenem-resistant was evaluated through Sensi-Disc™. Logistic regression was performed to examine any association between persistence and clinical data. Results A total of 4,362 screening for MDROs was analyzed form July 2015 to December 2016, and 142 patients were included in the study; the median age was 39 years (IQR=12–62) and 56% were male. The most frequent MDRO was carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. There was a statistically significant difference in length of hospitalization (P = 0.003) and ICU (P = 0.035) between non-colonized and persistence of colonization. Factor associated with persistence of colonization included liver disease [OR=3.1; 95% CI: 1.068–9.019; P = 0.037], history of infection in the last year [OR=3.78; 95% CI: 1.036–13.839; P = 0.044], use of permanent urinary catheter [OR=6.48; 95% CI: 1.314–31.975; P = 0.022], history of gastrostomy before hospitalization [OR=5.37; 95% CI: 1.547–18.638; P = 0.008], and use of nasogastric tube [OR=5.14; 95% CI: 1.108–23.861; P = 0.036]. Conclusion It is necessary to consider the previous history of infection in the last year, and other patient’s comorbidities and conditions as risk factors of persistence to colonization by MDROs. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document