Integrating a Performance-Based Observation Measure of Functional Status into a Population-Based Longitudinal Study of Aging

2003 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia Finlayson ◽  
Betty Havens ◽  
Margo B. Holm ◽  
Toni Van Denend
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
The Past ◽  
Report Data ◽  
Self Report Data

ABSTRACTOver the past 15 to 20 years there has been discussion and debate in the gerontological literature about the relative merits of self-report versus performance-based observational (PBO) measures of functional status. In 2001 the Aging in Manitoba Longitudinal Study had the opportunity to add a PBO measure of functional status and use it together with two self-report measures on a sub-sample of 138 participants. The PBO measure that was used was the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills, Version 3.1 (Home). Using ranks of the proportion of participants who were independent in nine different tasks, no significant correlations were found between the performance measure scores and either of the self-report measures. This finding suggests that using self-report data rather than performance data could lead program developers and policy makers to different conclusions about the extent of need for assistance among older adults.

Conceptual Disruption

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 451-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara I. McClelland
Keyword(s):  
Survey Research ◽  
Sexual Satisfaction ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Psychological Research ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Research Designs ◽  
Report Data ◽  
Self Report Data ◽  
Cantril’S Ladder

In research using self-report measures, there is little attention paid to how participants interpret concepts; instead, researchers often assume definitions are shared, universal, or easily understood. I discuss the self-anchored ladder, adapted from Cantril’s ladder, which is a procedure that simultaneously collects a participant’s self-reported rating and their interpretation of that rating. Drawing from a study about sexual satisfaction that included a self-anchored ladder, four analyses are presented and discussed in relation to one another: (1) comparisons of sexual satisfaction scores, (2) variations of structures participants applied to the ladder, (3) frequency of terms used to describe sexual satisfaction, and (4) thematic analysis of “best” and “worst” sexual satisfaction. These analytic strategies offer researchers a model for how to incorporate self-anchored ladder items into research designs as a means to draw out layers of meaning in quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods data. I argue that the ladder invites the potential for conceptual disruption by prioritizing skepticism in survey research and bringing greater attention to how social locations, histories, economic structures, and other factors shape self-report data. I also address issues related to the multiple epistemological positions that the ladder demands. Finally, I argue for the centrality of epistemological self-reflexivity in critical feminist psychological research. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684317725985

Young person’s well-being: Exploring material, subjective and relational factors

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margot Rawsthorne ◽  
Grace Kinsela ◽  
Karen Paxton ◽  
Georgina Luscombe
Keyword(s):  
New South ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Research Attention ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Relational Factors ◽  
Report Data ◽  
Self Report Data ◽  
Definition Of

AbstractYoung people’s well-being has attracted significant policy and research attention in Australia and internationally for at least three decades. Despite this, there is no consensus about what it means, how it can be measured or, most importantly, what supports young people’s well-being. This paper adopts a definition of well-being as a multidimensional process, comprising subjective, material and relational factors. Drawing on self-report data collected at two time points from young people (aged 9–14 years) living in rural and regional New South Wales (N= 342 at baseline andN= 217 Wave 2), this paper seeks to identify the salience of these factors to well-being, measured through Perceived Self-Efficacy. Our analysis suggests that a sense of belonging, safety and the presence of supportive adults all appear to support enhanced well-being. The paper concludes with recommendations for policy makers and communities wishing to better support the development of young people’s well-being.

Agreement Between Self-Reported Breast Cancer Treatment and Medical Records in a Population-Based Breast Cancer Family Registry

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (21) ◽  
pp. 4679-4686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly-Anne Phillips ◽  
Roger L. Milne ◽  
Saundra Buys ◽  
Michael L. Friedlander ◽  
John H. Ward ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Breast Cancer Treatment ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Breast Cancer Family ◽  
Cancer Family ◽  
Report Data ◽  
Self Report Data

Purpose Although self-report data on treatment for breast cancer are collected in some large epidemiologic studies, their accuracy is unknown. Methods As part of a population-based Breast Cancer Family Registry, questionnaires on initial breast cancer treatment and subsequent recurrence were mailed to Australian women diagnosed between 1991 and 1998. These self-report data were validated against medical records for 895 women. Results The median recall period was 3.2 years, mean age at diagnosis was 44 years, and 81% of women had early-stage breast cancer. Agreement between the two data sources was very high for general questions about type of treatment (100%, 99%, 99%, and 94% for surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, respectively). For more specific questions about details of each treatment received, agreement was: for radiation therapy, 96% and 99% for radiation to the breast and chest wall, respectively; for surgery, 83%, 97%, and 88% for lumpectomy, mastectomy, and lymph node dissection, respectively; for hormonal therapy, 94% for tamoxifen; and for chemotherapy, range between 76% and 93%. There was 97% agreement about whether there had been a recurrence, and agreement about the location of recurrence was at least 90% for all sites. Agreement regarding stage at diagnosis was 62%, with discrepancies mostly due to women with locoregional disease incorrectly reporting distant spread. Conclusion This self-report questionnaire can be used to collect accurate data on broad categories of initial breast cancer treatment and recurrence, and even for more detailed information on specifics of treatment and site of recurrence.

scholarly journals Are survey measures of medical careutilisation misleading?

2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ric Marshall ◽  
David Grayson ◽  
Anthony Jorm ◽  
Brian O'Toole
Keyword(s):  
Medical Care ◽  
Vietnam Veterans ◽  
Epidemiological Survey ◽  
National Health Survey ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Health Study ◽  
Veterans Health ◽  
The Past ◽  
Report Data ◽  
Self Report Data

found when estimates from self-report data from anepidemiolgical study were compared to actual cost data extracted from administrative records. Even though the fewsubjects who were actually provided with two or more services in the two-week self-report period substantially under-reportedtheir medical care consumption, a large net over-estimate of medical care consumption was produced by theself-report data. This finding has important implications for use of self-report data from surveys such as the AustralianBureau of Statistics (ABS) National Health Survey for estimating health service consumption.By combining epidemiological survey data from the Australian Vietnam Veterans Health Study (AVVHS), with dataon actual medical care for which the Health Insurance Commission (HIC) or the Department of Veterans' Affairs (DVA)paid benefits, we were able to directly compare self-reported medical care consumption with actual medical careutilisation. The comparison revealed that veterans' self-reports were a valid measure of relative medical careconsumption because those who reported care over the past two weeks were much more likely to have been recentconsumers than those who did not. This relationship became even stronger if the comparison of self-report was extendedto data on benefits paid beyond the two-week self-report period. However, the HIC and DVA data confirmed only 51%of veterans self-reporting medical care consumption during the past two weeks actually received a service.

Interview versus Self-Answer Methods of Assessing Health and Emotional Functioning in Primary Care Patients

2003 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 937-948
Author(s):  
Nancy Amodei ◽  
David A. Katerndahl ◽  
Anne C. Larme ◽  
Raymond Palmer
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Emotional Functioning ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Screening Criteria ◽  
Practical Standpoint ◽  
Primary Care Patients ◽  
Report Data ◽  
Self Report Data

The present study examined differences in health and emotional functioning when two different methods of gathering self-report data were used. Of 80 primary care patients who did not meet screening criteria for a psychiatric diagnosis, 44 were randomly assigned to have an interviewer read assessment items and record the participants' responses, and 36 were randomly assigned to have an interviewer read the items and have participants record their own responses directly on the test forms. There were negligible significant differences between the groups in reported symptomatology. From a practical standpoint, this suggests that the self-answer method is a more economical and efficient method of data collection since the data from more than one participant can be gathered at the same time. The findings also suggest that the measures in this study which were originally intended to be completed in a paper-and-pencil format can be used in a more traditional interviewer-administered format.

Self-Reported Alcohol Consumption; A Real Psychophysical Problem

1982 ◽  
Vol 50 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1027-1033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. M. Gregson ◽  
Barrie G. Stacey
Keyword(s):  
Alcohol Consumption ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Practical Reasons ◽  
Frequency Distributions ◽  
Know How ◽  
Report Data ◽  
Self Report Data ◽  
Over Time

There are good practical reasons for wanting to know how much alcohol people consume, at what rate, and in what patterns over time. Various measures of consumption and their associated frequency distributions are described. Self-report data on alcohol consumption present problems of interpretation. A detailed rationale for the use of the self-report method by Gregson and Stacey (1980) is presented. Measurement problems arising with the method, emphasized by Skog (1981), are discussed.

scholarly journals Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G Curran
Keyword(s):  
Survey Data ◽  
Experimental Psychology ◽  
Self Report ◽  
New Techniques ◽  
The Past ◽  
Report Data ◽  
Survey Results ◽  
Self Report Data ◽  
Data Collections ◽  
Online Measures

Self-report data collections, particularly through online measures, are ubiquitous in both experimental and non- experimental psychology. Invalid data can be present in such data collections for a number of reasons. One reason is careless or insufficient effort (C/IE) responding. The past decade has seen a rise in research on techniques to detect and remove these data before normal analysis (Huang, Curran, Keeney, Poposki, & DeShon, 2012; Johnson, 2005; Meade & Craig, 2012). The rigorous use of these techniques is valuable tool for the removal of error that can impact survey results (Huang, Liu, & Bowling, 2015). This research has encompassed a number of sub-fields of psychology, and this paper aims to integrate different perspectives into a review and assessment of current tech- niques, an introduction of new techniques, and a generation of recommendations for practical use. Concerns about C/IE responding are a factor any time self-report data are collected, and all such researchers should be well-versed on methods to detect this pattern of response.

Evaluation of Simulation Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-180
Author(s):  
Susan Prion ◽  
Katie Anne Haerling
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Education ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Future Research ◽  
The Past ◽  
Simulation Evaluation ◽  
Report Data ◽  
Self Report Data ◽  
And Training ◽  
Initial Focus

Simulation has been used in nursing education and training since Florence Nightingale's era. Over the past 20 years, simulation learning experiences (SLEs) have been used with increasing frequently to educate healthcare professionals, develop and increase the expertise of practicing professionals, and gain competency in key interprofessional skills. This chapter provides a brief overview of simulation evaluation history, beginning in the late 1990s, and the initial focus on learner self-report data. Using Kirkpatrick's Levels of Evaluation as an organizing model, four types of SLE evaluation are reviewed as well as suggestions for future research.

Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO-100

Assessment ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 543-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kibeom Lee ◽  
Michael C. Ashton
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
English Language ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Self Reports ◽  
The Hierarchical Structure ◽  
Report Data ◽  
Absolute Correlation ◽  
Self Report Data

Psychometric properties of the 100-item English-language HEXACO Personality Inventory–Revised (HEXACO-PI-R) were examined using samples of online respondents ( N = 100,318 self-reports) and of undergraduate students ( N = 2,868 self- and observer reports). The results were as follows: First, the hierarchical structure of the HEXACO-100 was clearly supported in two principal components analyses: each of the six factors was defined by its constituent facets and each of the 25 facets was defined by its constituent items. Second, the HEXACO-100 factor scales showed fairly low intercorrelations, with only one pair of scales (Honesty–Humility and Agreeableness) having an absolute correlation above .20 in self-report data. Third, the factor and facet scales showed strong self/observer convergent correlations, which far exceeded the self/observer discriminant correlations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document