The curriculum of our high schools, including the part dealing with mathematics, I might say, especially the part dealing with mathematics, is largely traditional. It is true that there have been new courses introduced in some places and old courses have been reorganized in some schools but one who attended a high school 25 or 35 years ago would have little difficulty recognizing the material being taught if he were to go back to the classroom. This is especially true in mathematics. Without having statistical data on the subject we would be safe in saying that the majority of high schools, small and large, teach about the same algebra, geometry, etc. as has been taught for many years. In fact, it is not difficult to recognize the geometry of today in a copy of Playfair's Euclid written in 1813 and still in use in some schools in this country less than 75 years ago. This is not necessarily bad. If students need the mathematics that was taught 75 years ago or 2,000 years ago, as in the case of Euclid's geometry, there is every reason that such subject matter should continue to be in cluded in our school curriculum. The important thing is the pupils’ needs now and in the future. We should find what those needs are for all citizens and for special groups who are segregated for special training.