scholarly journals CTCF is a barrier for 2C-like reprogramming

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Olbrich ◽  
Maria Vega-Sendino ◽  
Desiree Tillo ◽  
Wei Wu ◽  
Nicholas Zolnerowich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Neural Progenitor Cells ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Pluripotent Cells ◽  
Embryonic Tissues ◽  
Binding Factor ◽  
Molecular Determinants

AbstractTotipotent cells have the ability to generate embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues. Interestingly, a rare population of cells with totipotent-like potential, known as 2 cell (2C)-like cells, has been identified within ESC cultures. They arise from ESC and display similar features to those found in the 2C embryo. However, the molecular determinants of 2C-like conversion have not been completely elucidated. Here, we show that the CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) is a barrier for 2C-like reprogramming. Indeed, forced conversion to a 2C-like state by the transcription factor DUX is associated with DNA damage at a subset of CTCF binding sites. Depletion of CTCF in ESC efficiently promotes spontaneous and asynchronous conversion to a 2C-like state and is reversible upon restoration of CTCF levels. This phenotypic reprogramming is specific to pluripotent cells as neural progenitor cells do not show 2C-like conversion upon CTCF-depletion. Furthermore, we show that transcriptional activation of the ZSCAN4 cluster is necessary for successful 2C-like reprogramming. In summary, we reveal an unexpected relationship between CTCF and 2C-like reprogramming.

scholarly journals CTCF is a Barrier for Totipotent-like Reprogramming

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Olbrich ◽  
Maria Vega-Sendino ◽  
Desiree Tillo ◽  
Wei Wu ◽  
Nicholas Zolnerowich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Embryonic Tissues ◽  
Chromatin Architecture ◽  
Molecular Determinants ◽  
Cell Embryo ◽  
Intimate Relation

SUMMARYTotipotent cells have the ability of generating embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues1,2. Interestingly, a rare population of cells with totipotent-like potential was identified within ESC cultures3. These cells, known as 2 cell (2C)-like cells, arise from ESC and display similar features to those found in the totipotent 2 cell embryo2-4. However, the molecular determinants of 2C-like conversion have not been completely elucidated. Here, we show that CTCF is a barrier for 2C-like reprogramming. Indeed, forced conversion to a 2C-like state by DUX expression was associated with DNA damage at a subset of CTCF binding sites. Endogenous or DUX-induced 2C-like ESC showed decreased CTCF enrichment at known binding sites, suggesting that acquisition of a totipotent-like state is associated with a highly dynamic chromatin architecture. Accordingly, depletion of CTCF in ESC efficiently promoted spontaneous and asynchronous conversion to a totipotent-like state. This phenotypic reprogramming was reversible upon restoration of CTCF levels. Furthermore, we showed that transcriptional activation of the ZSCAN4 cluster was necessary for successful 2C-like reprogramming. In summary, we revealed the intimate relation between CTCF and totipotent-like reprogramming.

scholarly journals Transcriptional activation of the H-ferritin gene in differentiated Caco-2 cells parallels a change in the activity of the nuclear factor Bbf

1995 ◽  
Vol 311 (3) ◽  
pp. 769-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
M A Bevilacqua ◽  
M C Faniello ◽  
P D′Agostino ◽  
B Quaresima ◽  
M T Tiano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Mobility Shift ◽  
Differentiated Cells ◽  
Binding Factor ◽  
H Gene ◽  
Ferritin Gene ◽  
Mobility Shift Assay ◽  
Promoter Interaction

In this paper, we examine the mechanisms that regulate the expression of the heavy (H) ferritin subunit in the colon carcinoma Caco-2 cell line allowed to differentiate spontaneously in vitro. The differentiation process of these cells in continuous culture is accompanied by an accumulation of the mRNA coding for the apoferritin H chain. The analysis of Caco-2 subclones stably transfected with an H-chain promoter-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) construct revealed that the mRNA increase is paralleled by an enhanced transcription of the H gene, driven by the -100 to +4 region of the H promoter. The H gene transcriptional activation seems to be a specific feature of differentiated Caco-2 cells, since the activity of other promoters did not change upon differentiation. The -100 to +4 region of the H promoter binds a transcription factor called Bbf (B-box binding factor); electrophoretic-mobility-shift-assay analyses showed that the retarded complex due to Bbf-H promoter interaction is significantly increased in the differentiated cells. We propose that the activation of H-ferritin gene expression may be associated with the establishment of a differentiated phenotype in Caco-2 cells, and that the H-ferritin gene transcriptional up-regulation is accompanied by a modification in the activity of the transcription factor Bbf.

scholarly journals Spatiotemporal Cascade of Transcription Factor Binding Required for Promoter Activation

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 688-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Yarrington ◽  
Jared S. Rudd ◽  
David J. Stillman
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
Regulatory Sequence ◽  
Factor Binding ◽  
Multiple Binding Sites ◽  
Dependent Cell ◽  
The Right

Promoters often contain multiple binding sites for a single factor. The yeastHOgene contains nine highly conserved binding sites for the SCB (Swi4/6-dependent cell cycle box) binding factor (SBF) complex (composed of Swi4 and Swi6) in the 700-bp upstream regulatory sequence 2 (URS2) promoter region. Here, we show that the distal and proximal SBF sites in URS2 function differently. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments show that SBF binds preferentially to the left side of URS2 (URS2-L), despite equivalent binding to the left-half and right-half SBF sitesin vitro. SBF binding at URS2-L sites depends on prior chromatin remodeling events at the upstream URS1 region. These signals from URS1 influence chromatin changes at URS2 but only at sites within a defined distance. SBF bound at URS2-L, however, is unable to activate transcription but instead facilitates SBF binding to sites in the right half (URS2-R), which are required for transcriptional activation. Factor binding atHO, therefore, follows a temporal cascade, with SBF bound at URS2-L serving to relay a signal from URS1 to the SBF sites in URS2-R that ultimately activate gene expression. Taken together, we describe a novel property of a transcription factor that can have two distinct roles in gene activation, depending on its location within a promoter.

scholarly journals The TEA Transcription Factor Tec1 Confers Promoter-Specific Gene Regulation by Ste12-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 514-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Heise ◽  
Julia van der Felden ◽  
Sandra Kern ◽  
Mario Malcher ◽  
Stefan Brückner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Regulated Gene Expression

ABSTRACT In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the TEA transcription factor Tec1 is known to regulate target genes together with a second transcription factor, Ste12. Tec1-Ste12 complexes can activate transcription through Tec1 binding sites (TCSs), which can be further combined with Ste12 binding sites (PREs) for cooperative DNA binding. However, previous studies have hinted that Tec1 might regulate transcription also without Ste12. Here, we show that in vivo, physiological amounts of Tec1 are sufficient to stimulate TCS-mediated gene expression and transcription of the FLO11 gene in the absence of Ste12. In vitro, Tec1 is able to bind TCS elements with high affinity and specificity without Ste12. Furthermore, Tec1 contains a C-terminal transcriptional activation domain that confers Ste12-independent activation of TCS-regulated gene expression. On a genome-wide scale, we identified 302 Tec1 target genes that constitute two distinct classes. A first class of 254 genes is regulated by Tec1 in a Ste12-dependent manner and is enriched for genes that are bound by Tec1 and Ste12 in vivo. In contrast, a second class of 48 genes can be regulated by Tec1 independently of Ste12 and is enriched for genes that are bound by the stress transcription factors Yap6, Nrg1, Cin5, Skn7, Hsf1, and Msn4. Finally, we find that combinatorial control by Tec1-Ste12 complexes stabilizes Tec1 against degradation. Our study suggests that Tec1 is able to regulate TCS-mediated gene expression by Ste12-dependent and Ste12-independent mechanisms that enable promoter-specific transcriptional control.

scholarly journals Positive and Negative Regulation of the Transforming Growth Factor β/Activin Target Gene goosecoid by the TFII-I Family of Transcription Factors

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (16) ◽  
pp. 7144-7157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manching Ku ◽  
Sergei Y. Sokol ◽  
Jack Wu ◽  
Maria Isabel Tussie-Luna ◽  
Ananda L. Roy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor Β ◽  
Related Factor ◽  
P19 Cells ◽  
Binding Factor ◽  
Opposing Effects

ABSTRACT Goosecoid (Gsc) is a homeodomain-containing transcription factor present in a wide variety of vertebrate species and known to regulate formation and patterning of embryos. Here we show that in embryonic carcinoma P19 cells, the transcription factor TFII-I forms a complex with Smad2 upon transforming growth factor β (TGFβ)/activin stimulation, is recruited to the distal element (DE) of the Gsc promoter, and activates Gsc transcription. Downregulation of endogenous TFII-I by small inhibitory RNA in P19 cells abolishes the TGFβ-mediated induction of Gsc. Similarly, Xenopus embryos with endogenous TFII-I expression downregulated by injection of TFII-I-specific antisense oligonucleotides exhibit decreased Gsc expression. Unlike TFII-I, the related factor BEN (binding factor for early enhancer) is constitutively recruited to the distal element in the absence of TGFβ/activin signaling and is replaced by the TFII-I/Smad2 complex upon TGFβ/activin stimulation. Overexpression of BEN in P19 cells represses the TGFβ-mediated transcriptional activation of Gsc. These results suggest a model in which TFII-I family proteins have opposing effects in the regulation of the Gsc gene in response to a TGFβ/activin signal.

scholarly journals JunD enhances miR-29b levels transcriptionally and posttranscriptionally to inhibit proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells

2015 ◽  
Vol 308 (10) ◽  
pp. C813-C824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tongtong Zou ◽  
Jaladanki N. Rao ◽  
Lan Liu ◽  
Lan Xiao ◽  
Hee Kyoung Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Intestinal Epithelial Cells ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Microrna Expression ◽  
Intestinal Epithelial ◽  
Gut Epithelium

Through its actions as component of the activating protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factor, JunD potently represses cell proliferation. Here we report a novel function of JunD in the regulation of microRNA expression in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs). Ectopically expressed JunD specifically increased the expression of primary and mature forms of miR-29b, whereas JunD silencing inhibited miR-29b expression. JunD directly interacted with the miR-29b1 promoter via AP-1-binding sites, whereas mutation of AP-1 sites from the miR-29b1 promoter prevented JunD-mediated transcriptional activation of the miR-29b1 gene. JunD also enhanced formation of the Drosha microprocessor complex, thus further promoting miR-29b biogenesis. Cellular polyamines were found to regulate miR-29b expression by altering JunD abundance, since the increase in miR-29b expression levels in polyamine-deficient cells was abolished by JunD silencing. In addition, miR-29b silencing prevented JunD-induced repression of IEC proliferation. Our findings indicate that JunD activates miR-29b by enhancing its transcription and processing, which contribute to the inhibitory effect of JunD on IEC growth and maintenance of gut epithelium homeostasis.

scholarly journals WAPL maintains dynamic cohesin to preserve lineage specific distal gene regulation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning Qing Liu ◽  
Michela Maresca ◽  
Teun van den Brand ◽  
Luca Braccioli ◽  
Marijne M.G.A. Schijns ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Regulation ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Release Factor ◽  
Factor Binding ◽  
Active Enhancer ◽  
Lineage Specific Genes

SUMMARYThe cohesin complex plays essential roles in sister chromatin cohesin, chromosome organization and gene expression. The role of cohesin in gene regulation is incompletely understood. Here, we report that the cohesin release factor WAPL is crucial for maintaining a pool of dynamic cohesin bound to regions that are associated with lineage specific genes in mouse embryonic stem cells. These regulatory regions are enriched for active enhancer marks and transcription factor binding sites, but largely devoid of CTCF binding sites. Stabilization of cohesin, which leads to a loss of dynamic cohesin from these regions, does not affect transcription factor binding or active enhancer marks, but does result in changes in promoter-enhancer interactions and downregulation of genes. Acute cohesin depletion can phenocopy the effect of WAPL depletion, showing that cohesin plays a crucial role in maintaining expression of lineage specific genes. The binding of dynamic cohesin to chromatin is dependent on the pluripotency transcription factor OCT4, but not NANOG. Finally, dynamic cohesin binding sites are also found in differentiated cells, suggesting that they represent a general regulatory principle. We propose that cohesin dynamically binding to regulatory sites creates a favorable spatial environment in which promoters and enhancers can communicate to ensure proper gene expression.HIGHLIGHTSThe cohesin release factor WAPL is crucial for maintaining a pluripotency-specific phenotype.Dynamic cohesin is enriched at lineage specific loci and overlaps with binding sites of pluripotency transcription factors.Expression of lineage specific genes is maintained by dynamic cohesin binding through the formation of promoter-enhancer associated self-interaction domains.CTCF-independent cohesin binding to chromatin is controlled by the pioneer factor OCT4.

scholarly journals Transcriptional Regulation in the G1-S Cell Cycle Stage in Fungi: Insights through Computational Analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-54
Author(s):  
Viktor Martyanov ◽  
Robert H. Gross
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Positional Distribution ◽  
Upstream Sequence ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
Binding Factor

The transcription factor complexes Mlu1-box binding factor (MBF) and Swi4/6 cell cycle box binding factor (SBF) regulate the cell cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. They activate hundreds of genes and are responsible for nor-mal cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase. We investigated the conservation of MBF and SBF binding sites during fungal evolution. Orthologs of S. cerevisiae targets of these transcription factors were identified in 37 fungal species and their upstream regions were analyzed for putative transcription factor binding sites. Both groups displayed enrichment in specific putative regulatory DNA sequences in their upstream regions and showed different preferred upstream motif loca-tions, variable patterns of evolutionary conservation of the motifs and enrichment in unique biological functions for the regulated genes. The results indicate that despite high sequence similarity of upstream DNA motifs putatively associated with G1-S transcriptional regulation by MBF and SBF transcription factors, there are important upstream sequence feature differences that may help differentiate the two seemingly similar regulatory modes. The incorporation of upstream motif sequence comparison, positional distribution and evolutionary variability of the motif can complement functional infor-mation about roles of the respective gene products and help elucidate transcriptional regulatory pathways and functions.

scholarly journals Rare genetic variation at transcription factor binding sites modulates local DNA methylation profiles

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e1009189
Author(s):  
Alejandro Martin-Trujillo ◽  
Nihir Patel ◽  
Felix Richter ◽  
Bharati Jadhav ◽  
Paras Garg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding Sites ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Factor Binding ◽  
Rare Genetic Variation

Although DNA methylation is the best characterized epigenetic mark, the mechanism by which it is targeted to specific regions in the genome remains unclear. Recent studies have revealed that local DNA methylation profiles might be dictated by cis-regulatory DNA sequences that mainly operate via DNA-binding factors. Consistent with this finding, we have recently shown that disruption of CTCF-binding sites by rare single nucleotide variants (SNVs) can underlie cis-linked DNA methylation changes in patients with congenital anomalies. These data raise the hypothesis that rare genetic variation at transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) might contribute to local DNA methylation patterning. In this work, by combining blood genome-wide DNA methylation profiles, whole genome sequencing-derived SNVs from 247 unrelated individuals along with 133 predicted TFBS motifs derived from ENCODE ChIP-Seq data, we observed an association between the disruption of binding sites for multiple TFs by rare SNVs and extreme DNA methylation values at both local and, to a lesser extent, distant CpGs. While the majority of these changes affected only single CpGs, 24% were associated with multiple outlier CpGs within ±1kb of the disrupted TFBS. Interestingly, disruption of functionally constrained sites within TF motifs lead to larger DNA methylation changes at nearby CpG sites. Altogether, these findings suggest that rare SNVs at TFBS negatively influence TF-DNA binding, which can lead to an altered local DNA methylation profile. Furthermore, subsequent integration of DNA methylation and RNA-Seq profiles from cardiac tissues enabled us to observe an association between rare SNV-directed DNA methylation and outlier expression of nearby genes. In conclusion, our findings not only provide insights into the effect of rare genetic variation at TFBS on shaping local DNA methylation and its consequences on genome regulation, but also provide a rationale to incorporate DNA methylation data to interpret the functional role of rare variants.

Multiple factors bind the upstream activation sites of the yeast enolase genes ENO1 and ENO2: ABFI protein, like repressor activator protein RAP1, binds cis-acting sequences which modulate repression or activation of transcription

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 4872-4885
Author(s):  
P K Brindle ◽  
J P Holland ◽  
C E Willett ◽  
M A Innis ◽  
M J Holland
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Regulatory Gene ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Deletion Mapping ◽  
Autonomously Replicating Sequence ◽  
Cis Acting ◽  
Binding Factor ◽  
Yeast Enolase

Binding sites for three distinct proteins were mapped within the upstream activation sites (UAS) of the yeast enolase genes ENO1 and ENO2. Sequences that overlapped the UAS1 elements of both enolase genes bound a protein which was identified as the product of the RAP1 regulatory gene. Sequences within the UAS2 element of the ENO2 gene bound a second protein which corresponded to the ABFI (autonomously replicating sequence-binding factor) protein. A protein designated EBF1 (enolase-binding factor) bound to sequences which overlapped the UAS2 element in ENO1. There was a good correlation among all of the factor-binding sites and the location of sequences required for UAS activity identified by deletion mapping analysis. This observation suggested that the three factors play a role in transcriptional activation of the enolase genes. UAS elements which bound the RAP1 protein or the ABFI protein modulated glucose-dependent induction of ENO1 and ENO2 expression. The ABFI-binding site in ENO2 overlapped sequences required for UAS2 activity in wild-type strains and for repression of ENO2 expression in strains carrying a null mutation in the positive regulatory gene GCR1. These latter results showed that the ABFI protein, like the RAP1 protein, bound sequences required for positive as well as negative regulation of gene expression. These observations strongly suggest that the biological functions of the RAP1 and ABFI proteins are similar.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document