Endovenous procedures in varicose veins

Phlebologie ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (05) ◽  
pp. 229-236
Author(s):  
N. Cayne ◽  
G. Jacobowitz ◽  
P. Lamparello ◽  
T. Maldonado ◽  
C. Rockman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Intense Pulse Light ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
The Past ◽  
Early Evidence ◽  
Endovenous Treatment

SummaryOver the past ten years endoveous treatment options for varicose veins have evovled considerably, offering clinicians a multitude of options to meet the needs of their patients. The endothermal ablation procedures have moved to the forefront as the choice modality for treating truncal reflux. Both radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation are widely accepted and interchangeable, showing comparable efficacy and safety. Although numerous endovenous laser wavelengths exist, the data indicates that the differences do not affect the efficacy or postoperative recovery of the procedure. The endovenous laser innovation that has shown early evidence of improved patient outcome is the jacket-tip fiber. The versatility of sclerotherapy makes it a critical component in the endovenous treatment of varicosities. Although not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (USA), the use of a foamed sclerosing agent is the fastest growing segment of sclerotherapy and an important treatment modality in the future of varicose vein treatment. Cutaneous lasers and intense pulse light devices contribute a crucial element, enabling clinicians to treat minute veins that may be impossible to treat with other therapies.

scholarly journals Biosimilars in an era of rising oncology treatment options

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Peeters ◽  
David Planchard ◽  
Mark Pegram ◽  
João Gonçalves ◽  
François Bocquet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evidence ◽  
Healthcare Expenditure ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Quality Data ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Cancer Treatments ◽  
Biologic Drugs ◽  
Oncology Treatment ◽  
Diagnostic Technologies

New diagnostic technologies, including molecular profiling, have enabled advances in treatments of various cancers; this has significantly improved clinical outcomes, including overall survival. However, the high cost of biologic drugs may prevent patients from having access to optimal treatment. Introduction of lower priced biosimilar agents into the therapeutic armamentarium brings the potential to ease the burden on healthcare expenditure and facilitate better access to effective cancer treatments. Oncology biosimilars have shown comparable efficacy and safety based on clinical evidence and physicochemical quality data as well as in real-world settings. This paper aims to review changes in the management of oncology treatment and their implication with respect to biosimilars.

scholarly journals Endovenous laser ablation for great saphenous varicose veins

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 4502
Author(s):  
Asser Abd El Hamid Goda
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Main Trunk ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Venous Clinical Severity Score ◽  
The Mean

Background: Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) is one of the most accepted treatment options for great saphenous varicose veins. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety EVLA in a 12 months follow-up.Methods: Patients with symptomatic great saphenous veins (GSV) reflux were undergo EVLA. The outcome measures the efficacy and safety along the follow up period (12 months). The efficacy assessed by measuring the occlusion rate of the GSV by duplex and by measuring the improvement in the mean venous clinical severity score (VCSS) by clinical examination. The safety assessed by clinical examination to detect the complications.Results: The rate of complete occlusion in the main trunk of the great saphenous vein was 34/35 (97.1%) at 6 and 12 months. The mean VCSS scores improved significantly after the procedure at 6 and 12 months. Complications detected within 1st week as pigmentation in 3 patients, local hematoma in one patient, and paresthesia in one patient but all complications disappeared within 6 and 12 months.Conclusions: EVLA is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of varicose great saphenous. 

scholarly journals OP24 A novel subcutaneous infliximab (CT-P13): 1-year results including switching results from intravenous infliximab (CT-P13) in patients with active Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S021-S022 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Ben-Horin ◽  
J Leszczyszyn ◽  
R Dudkowiak ◽  
A Lahat ◽  
B Gawdis-Wojnarska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Maintenance Phase ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Two randomised controlled trials of a novel subcutaneous (SC) formulation of infliximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis1 and in patients with active Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)2 confirmed comparable clinical efficacy and safety of CT-P13 SC with CT-P13 intravenous (IV) up to Week 30. We now present the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of CT-P13 SC over 1-year in the active CD and UC trial, including the outcomes of switching from CT-P13 IV to CT-P13 SC. Methods After loading doses of IV 5 mg/kg at Weeks 0 and 2, patients were randomised at Week 6 to receive either SC 120 mg (<80 kg) or 240 mg (≥80 kg) every 2 weeks (SC arm), or continued on IV 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks (IV arm). From Week 30, IV 5 mg/kg was switched to either SC 120 or 240 mg based on the patients’ body weight at Week 30. Patients who initially responded but experienced loss-of-response at Week 30 or beyond, were dose-escalated to SC 240 mg every 2 weeks. Results A total of 131 patients were randomised (66 to the SC arm and 65 to the IV arm); of whom, 105 (80.2%) patients completed the Week 54 visit (55 in the SC arm and 50 in the IV arm). The mean CDAI and partial Mayo scores decreased over time in the 2 arms until Week 30 and comparable improvement in clinical activity was observed at Week 54 after switching the remaining IV patients to SC (Figure 1 and 2). The rates of clinical response and remission were also maintained at Week 54 and the rate of mucosal healing in combined CD and UC was further improved at Week 54 (Table 1). The mean pre-dose serum concentrations in the IV arm increased to a similar level to SC arm after switching and maintained consistent levels until Week 54 (Figure 3). The safety profiles during the maintenance phase and on or after Week 30 were generally comparable between the 2 arms (Table 1). All of the localised injection site reactions were grade 1 or 2 in intensity and majority of patients recovered without any treatments. Conclusion These results of CT-P13 SC 1-year study in active CD and UC show comparable efficacy and safety of the SC and IV formulations, which were not affected by a switch of IV patients to SC route. The PK as manifested by trough concentrations of the drug, increased after switching from IV to SC. These observations support the first infliximab SC formulation as a viable therapeutic agent to expand patients’ treatment options. References

Conventional versus Mindfulness-based Interventions for Anxiety and Worry: A Review and Recommendations

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-67
Author(s):  
Deah Jo Abbott ◽  
Caleb Wayne Lack
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Third Wave ◽  
Stage Model ◽  
Pharmacological Treatments ◽  
The Past ◽  
Behavioral Therapies ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral Therapies ◽  
Specific Disorders ◽  
Psychiatric Problems

Anxiety disorders are among the most prevalent and most functionally impairing psychiatric problems experienced by the population. Both pharmacological and psychological evidencebased treatments exist for a number of specific disorders, but may fail to fully relieve symptoms, pointing to the need for additional treatment options. Often considered to be part of the “third wave” of cognitive-behavioral therapies, treatments incorporating mindfulness have emerged in the past two decades as increasingly popular with clinicians and frequently sought out by consumers. The present article reviews the extant literature regarding the efficacy and effectiveness of mindfulnessbased treatments for anxiety, worry, and related problems. Although they have not attained the solid empirical status of CBT or certain pharmacological treatments, the extant research shows mindfulness- based interventions appear to be a promising and useful treatment for people suffering from anxiety and worry. Further work should be done, levels 3-5 of the NIH stage model to determine whether or not they should be further implemented.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of gout flare prophylaxis and therapy use in people with chronic kidney disease: a Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN)-initiated literature review

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Huai Leng Pisaniello ◽  
Mark C. Fisher ◽  
Hamish Farquhar ◽  
Ana Beatriz Vargas-Santos ◽  
Catherine L. Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Interleukin 1 ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Clinical Trial Results ◽  
Gout Flare

AbstractGout flare prophylaxis and therapy use in people with underlying chronic kidney disease (CKD) is challenging, given limited treatment options and risk of worsening renal function with inappropriate treatment dosing. This literature review aimed to describe the current literature on the efficacy and safety of gout flare prophylaxis and therapy use in people with CKD stages 3–5. A literature search via PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE was performed from 1 January 1959 to 31 January 2018. Inclusion criteria were studies with people with gout and renal impairment (i.e. estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2), and with exposure to colchicine, interleukin-1 inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and glucocorticoids. All study designs were included. A total of 33 studies with efficacy and/or safety analysis stratified by renal function were reviewed—colchicine (n = 20), anakinra (n = 7), canakinumab (n = 1), NSAIDs (n = 3), and glucocorticoids (n = 2). A total of 58 studies reported these primary outcomes without renal function stratification—colchicine (n = 29), anakinra (n = 10), canakinumab (n = 6), rilonacept (n = 2), NSAIDs (n = 1), and glucocorticoids (n = 10). Most clinical trials excluded study participants with severe CKD (i.e. eGFR or CrCl of < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2). Information on the efficacy and safety outcomes of gout flare prophylaxis and therapy use stratified by renal function is lacking. Clinical trial results cannot be extrapolated for those with advanced CKD. Where possible, current and future gout flare studies should include patients with CKD and with study outcomes reported based on renal function and using standardised gout flare definition.

scholarly journals Therapeutic Advances in Oncology

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 2008
Author(s):  
Jinsha Liu ◽  
Priyanka Pandya ◽  
Sepideh Afshar
Keyword(s):  
Small Molecules ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Bispecific Antibodies ◽  
Gene Therapies ◽  
Therapeutic Modalities ◽  
The Past ◽  
Drug Conjugates ◽  
Novel Targets

Around 77 new oncology drugs were approved by the FDA in the past five years; however, most cancers remain untreated. Small molecules and antibodies are dominant therapeutic modalities in oncology. Antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, peptides, cell, and gene-therapies are emerging to address the unmet patient need. Advancement in the discovery and development platforms, identification of novel targets, and emergence of new technologies have greatly expanded the treatment options for patients. Here, we provide an overview of various therapeutic modalities and the current treatment options in oncology, and an in-depth discussion of the therapeutics in the preclinical stage for the treatment of breast cancer, lung cancer, and multiple myeloma.

scholarly journals Immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation and management of adverse events associated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110311
Author(s):  
Chiun Hsu ◽  
Lorenza Rimassa ◽  
Hui-Chuan Sun ◽  
Arndt Vogel ◽  
Ahmed O. Kaseb
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Antiangiogenic Agents ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line

In light of positive efficacy and safety findings from the IMbrave150 trial of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, this novel combination has become the preferred first-line standard of care for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Several additional trials are ongoing that combine an immune checkpoint inhibitor with another agent such as a multiple kinase inhibitor or antiangiogenic agent. Therefore, the range of first-line treatment options for unresectable HCC is likely to increase, and healthcare providers need succinct information about the use of such combinations, including their efficacy and key aspects of their safety profiles. Here, we review efficacy and safety data on combination immunotherapies and offer guidance on monitoring and managing adverse events, especially those associated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Because of their underlying liver disease and high likelihood of portal hypertension, patients with unresectable HCC are at particular risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, and this risk may be exacerbated by treatments that include antiangiogenic agents. Healthcare providers also need to be alert to the risks of proteinuria and hypertension, colitis, hepatitis, and reactivation of hepatitis B or C virus infection. They should also be aware of the possibility of rarer but potentially life-threatening adverse events such as pneumonitis and cardiovascular events. Awareness of the risks associated with these therapies and knowledge of adverse event monitoring and management will become increasingly important as the therapeutic range broadens in unresectable HCC.

scholarly journals FRI0116 COMPARABLE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TWO REGIMENS OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS TREATMENT WITH TOFACITINIB: DATA FROM RUSSIAN NATIONAL REGISTRY

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 639-639
Author(s):  
A. Babaeva ◽  
E. Kalinina ◽  
E. Nasonov ◽  
V. Mazurov ◽  
G. Lukina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Combined Therapy ◽  
National Registry ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Therapy Regimen ◽  
Conventional Dmards

Background:Current EULAR and national guidelines recommend use of synthetic target drug Tofacitinib (TOFA) for active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment in case of resistance or intolerance to metotrexate (MTX) or other conventional DMARDs. Two treatment regimens are approved: TOFA mono-therapy and combination with conventional DMARD, preferably with MTX.Objectives:Aim of presented study was to compare efficacy and safety of TOFA given in two regimens: as mono-therapy and in combination with MTX.Methods:We analyzed data from Russian national registry of RA. 450 patients (pts) treated with TOFA in dose 10 mg daily have been enrolled in this investigation. Among them 169 pts have composed TOFA mono-therapy group (mono) and 281 pts treated with TOFA plus MTX have been included in combo-therapy group (combo). Period of treatment varied from 6 months to 3 years and even more. Treatment efficacy was evaluated on the basis of clinical and laboratory indices of RA activity: CDAI, SDAI, DAS28, HAQ, GPA (general pain assessment), TJC, SJC, CRP, ESR monthly during first 6 months, than in 1,2,3 years and after 3 year period of treatment.Results:There were no significant differences in pts demographic characteristic and disease longevity and/or severity in two separated groups. Majority of baseline indices were identical in these groups aside from SDAI, CRP (were higher in combo-group) and HAQ (was higher in mono-group). Pts monitoring have shown dramatically decrease of all used indices during the first several months of therapy in both groups. Moreover all clinical and laboratory parameters after 6-months treatment were comparable in mono- and combo- groups. Positive dynamics remained during further 3-year period in both groups. Significant differences between baseline and ultimate data after 3 year course therapy were revealed in CDAI, SDAI, DAS28, HAQ, GPA, TJC, SJC, CRP, ESR in both groups. In particular DAS28 index decreased from 5.38±0.08 to 2.88±0.07 (p<0.05) in mono-group and from 5.54±0.09 to 3.40±0.21 (p<0.05) in combo-group. Along with this comparing of endpoints in two analyzed groups have shown that levels of CDAI, SDAI, GPA were significant higher in combo-group than in mono-group (p<0.05). Adverse effects were registered in 4.73% pts from mono-group and in 4.98% pts from combo-group (p>0.05). Spectrum of adverse reactions was similar in compared groups: respiratory infection (in 2.96% and 3.36% cases respectively) and herpes infection (in 0.59% and 0.71% cases, respectively) were registered predominantly.Conclusion:Data gained from National RA registry have demonstrated that treatment with TOFA in mono-therapy regimen has the comparable efficacy with regimen of combined therapy, included MTX and TOFA. Safety of both regimens can be qualified as good. Obtained results confirm high efficacy and safety of target therapy with TOFA and prove the recommendation for use it in different regimens – mono-therapy or combination with MTX.References:[1]Smolen JS, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;0:1–18. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715[2]Boyle DL, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:1311-1316. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206028Disclosure of Interests:Aida Babaeva: None declared, Elena Kalinina: None declared, Evgeny Nasonov Speakers bureau: Lilly, AbbVie, Pfizer, Biocad, R-Pharm, V Mazurov: None declared, Galina Lukina Speakers bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Abbvie, Biocad, MSD, Roche, Antonina Davydova: None declared, Irina Semizarova: None declared, Olga Slyusar: None declared, Tatyana Rasevich: None declared, Ruzana Samigullina: None declared, Diana Abdulganieva: None declared

scholarly journals 1578. Treatments for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative (GN) pathogens- a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA)

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S787-S787
Author(s):  
Tim Reason ◽  
Karan Gill ◽  
Christopher Longshaw ◽  
Rachael McCool ◽  
Katy Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Economics ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Global Public Health ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Support Unit ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background Antimicrobial resistance is a major and growing threat to global public health. Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a new siderophore-cephalosporin with a wide activity spectrum covering all aerobic GN pathogens including all WHO critical priority pathogens, that was recently approved by FDA for the treatment of GN cUTI in susceptible organisms. We aim to understand the relative efficacy and safety of current treatment options for cUTI caused by MDR GN pathogens. Methods We conducted a systematic review to identify all relevant trials that investigated the efficacy and safety of antimicrobial regimens, for the treatment of GN pathogens in cUTI. Outcomes of interest included clinical cure and microbiological eradication (ME) at time of cure (TOC) and sustained follow up (SFU), and safety. Evidence networks were constructed using data for outcomes of interest and analyses were conducted in a frequentist framework using NMA methods outlined by the NICE decision support unit using the netmeta package in R. Results A total of 5 studies, 6 interventions and 2,349 randomised patients were included in the final analysis. Interventions included CFDC, imipenem-cilastatin (IPM-CIL), ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI), doripenem (DOR), levofloxacin and ceftolozane-tazobactam (CEF/TAZ). Trials included predominantly Enterobacterales, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and very few Acinetobacter baumannii. The patient population presented some clinical differences across trials, which were not adjusted for the NMA. Overall, there were numerical differences (especially in endpoints at SFU favouring CFDC), but all treatments showed similar efficacy and safety, with exception of higher ME rate at TOC for CFDC vs IPM, Table 1, also observed at SFU, consistent with the data from the individual clinical trial. Table 1- Results for microbiological eradication Table 1- Results for microbiological eradication Conclusion This NMA, showed superiority of CFDC vs IPM-CIL in ME at TOC and SFU and similar efficacy and safety vs all other comparators, with numeric differences favouring CFDC for outcomes at SFU. These traditional methodologies for NMA, are only valid within a similar pathogens pool and population across the trials, and may not reflect the full value of breadth of coverage that new therapeutic options bring for the treatment of MDR GN pathogens. Disclosures Tim Reason, PhD, Shionogi (Consultant) Karan Gill, MSc, Shionogi BV (Employee) Christopher Longshaw, PhD, Shionogi B.V. (Employee) Rachael McCool, PhD, York Health Economics Consortium (Employee, YHEC was commissioned by Shionogi to conduct the systematic review) Katy Wilson, PhD, York Health Economics Consortium (Employee, Shionogi commissioned YHEC to conduct the systematic review) Sara Lopes, PharmD, Shionogi BV (Employee)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document