scholarly journals Marketing Agency/Client Service-For-Service Provision in an Age of Digital Transformation

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 265-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Hughes ◽  
Mario Vafeas
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 174-191
Author(s):  
Oleg Burba ◽  
Yuriy Kopytin ◽  
Olga Pasichnyk ◽  
Andriy Piskun

The article covers outputs of the research on development of methodological aspects applied under digital transformation of public services and based on the procedures suggested for formalizing the reengineering process used for related service provision administrative processes in accordance with the capacity delivered by advanced information technologies. The Introduction outlines the issue in general, which is mostly related to the fact that the most of the general population enjoy no public services at all despite the implementation of the e-governance concept. It also analyzes the reasons resulting in a problematic situation described above which, among others, include complicated procedures used to both provide and access public (administrative services); lack of related information; lengthy terms of service provision caused by unavailability of information systems capable of ensuring proper data exchange between state electronic information resources and administrative bodies or agencies; lack of state standardization efforts in public service provision, etc. The analysis used to study recent research and publications confirmed that only general aspects of administrative processes used prior to public service provision in the electronic format has been more or less fully processed so far. As for the formalization of public service digitalization implemented through methodological approaches deemed as compatible for use, the matter at hand remains open and requires further research. With the above in mind, the paper states the purpose of related research formulated as the development of methodological support to digital transformation of public services while objectives of the above are focused on the formalization of the reengineering process for public services and development of related procedures fit for practical use. The outputs of the research describe the general methodological approach to digital transformation of public services based on “as is” and “to be” models. The paper proposes to consider the Administrative Service Register as the information basis used to develop an “as is” model. A register as such contains unified service names, documents, standardized administrative process descriptions as well as results of an audit covering state electronic information resources. The developed “as is” model should be used as a frame to define service information links, to implement audit and streamlining (reengineering) of public service provision procedures (administrative processes) as well as to integrate real life services. As a result, there will be designed the vision of public service provision (a “to be” model) to be implemented further on. The vision is defined as a technical option used to provide public services as a synthesis of service provision administrative processes and information processing tools. At the same time, the objective implying the vision development for a set of public services involves the selection of a specific option used to implement a set of related administrative processes while ensuring ultimate performance in terms of provision of a public service set concerned. The idea of the formalized objective is to select a set of administrative processes used for public service provision at service providers and data exchange between them with the use of related technologies ensuring minimum costs for the whole service set. According to the objective defined and aggregative–decomposition method applied, a respective solution is brought down to two stages: building a graph-based structure for administrative process options used under a certain set of public services (the “as is” model) in accordance with their links; afterwards, the above graph-based structure allows tracking the shortest route to define the appropriate option for administrative processes to be applied under the whole set of public services with the use of respective information technologies (the “to be” model, vision). The Conclusion describes the major research outputs and further explorative prospects.


2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-132
Author(s):  
Jörg Bogumil ◽  
Sabine Kuhlmann

Deutschland landet in europäischen Rankings zur Verwaltungsdigitalisierung regelmäßig im hinteren Mittelfeld. Die bisherige Bilanz der Digitalisierung für die deutsche öffentliche Verwaltung ist trotz verstärkter Anstrengungen aller föderaler Ebenen, wie sie insbesondere in der Umsetzung des Onlinezugangsgesetzes (OZG) zum Ausdruck kommen, nach wie vor als eher ernüchternd einzuschätzen. Vor diesem Hintergrund beschäftigt sich der vorliegende Beitrag mit der Umsetzung, den Hürden und ausgewählten Wirkungsaspekten der Verwaltungsdigitalisierung auf kommunaler Ebene. Die empirische Basis bildet eine 2019 abgeschlossene Studie zur digitalen Transformation in einem Schlüsselbereich bürgerbezogener Leistungserbringung, den städtischen Bürgerämtern, welche die am meisten nachgefragten kommunalen Dienstleistungen bereitstellen. Aus der Analyse lassen sich wichtige Erkenntnisse für die zukünftige Entwicklung der Digitalisierung öffentlicher Leistungserbringung in Deutschland ableiten. Germany regularly lands in the lower midfield of European public administration digitalization rankings. Despite increased efforts at all levels of government, particularly in implementing the so-called Online Access Act (OZG), the digitalization record of the German administration continues to be rather sobering. Against this background, the following article analyses the practice, hurdles and selected effects of digitalization at the local level of government. It draws on data obtained from an empirical study carried out by the authors in 2019. The study investigated the digital transformation in local one-stop shops, a key area of citizen-related service provision which deliver the local public services most frequently requested by citizens. Based on our analysis, we draw some important conclusions regarding the future developments of the digital transformation in German public service provision.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1148-1161
Author(s):  
Camilo Maldonado ◽  
Alejandro Ashe ◽  
Kerri Bubar ◽  
Jessica Chapman

Background American educational legislation suggests culturally competent speech and language services should be provided in a child's native language, but the number of multilingual speech-language pathologists (SLPs) is negligible. Consequently, many monolingual English-speaking practitioners are being tasked with providing services to these populations. This requires that SLPs are educated about cultural and linguistic diversity as well as the legislation that concerns service provision to non-English or limited English proficiency speakers. Purpose This qualitative study explored the experiences of monolingual, American, English-speaking SLPs and clinical fellows who have worked with immigrant and refugee families within a preschool context. It investigated what training SLPs received to serve this population and what knowledge these SLPs possessed with regard to federal legislation governing the provision of services to culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) communities. Method Ten American clinicians with experience treating CLD children of refugee and immigrant families in the context of preschool service provision participated in the study. Semistructured interviews were utilized to better understand the type of training clinicians received prior to and during their service delivery for CLD populations. Additionally, questions were asked to explore the degree to which practitioners understood federal mandates for ethical and effective service provision. The data collected from these interviews were coded and analyzed using the principles of grounded theory. Findings The results of this study revealed that there was a general sense of unpreparedness when working with CLD clients. This lack of training also attributed to a deficiency of knowledge surrounding legislation governing service provision to CLD populations.


Author(s):  
Laura S. DeThorne ◽  
Kelly Searsmith

Purpose The purpose of this article is to address some common concerns associated with the neurodiversity paradigm and to offer related implications for service provision to school-age autistic students. In particular, we highlight the need to (a) view first-person autistic perspectives as an integral component of evidence-based practice, (b) use the individualized education plan as a means to actively address environmental contributions to communicative competence, and (c) center intervention around respect for autistic sociality and self-expression. We support these points with cross-disciplinary scholarship and writings from autistic individuals. Conclusions We recognize that school-based speech-language pathologists are bound by institutional constraints, such as eligibility determination and Individualized Education Program processes that are not inherently consistent with the neurodiversity paradigm. Consequently, we offer examples for implementing the neurodiversity paradigm while working within these existing structures. In sum, this article addresses key points of tension related to the neurodiversity paradigm in a way that we hope will directly translate into improved service provision for autistic students. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.13345727


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Hastings ◽  
Tracy J. Cohn ◽  
E. Janie Pinterits

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (09) ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
Sabine Schützmann

Am 17. und 18. Oktober findet im Hasso-Plattner-Institut (HPI) in Potsdam zum zweiten Mal die HIMSS Impact statt: Ein englischsprachiges Symposium, welches aktuelle Trends im Gesundheitswesen, digitale Strategien und jüngste Forschungserkenntnisse beleuchtet.


2020 ◽  
pp. 37-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Shastitko ◽  
O. A. Markova

Digital transformation has led to changes in business models of traditional players in the existing markets. What is more, new entrants and new markets appeared, in particular platforms and multisided markets. The emergence and rapid development of platforms are caused primarily by the existence of so called indirect network externalities. Regarding to this, a question arises of whether the existing instruments of competition law enforcement and market analysis are still relevant when analyzing markets with digital platforms? This paper aims at discussing advantages and disadvantages of using various tools to define markets with platforms. In particular, we define the features of the SSNIP test when being applyed to markets with platforms. Furthermore, we analyze adjustment in tests for platform market definition in terms of possible type I and type II errors. All in all, it turns out that to reduce the likelihood of type I and type II errors while applying market definition technique to markets with platforms one should consider the type of platform analyzed: transaction platforms without pass-through and non-transaction matching platforms should be tackled as players in a multisided market, whereas non-transaction platforms should be analyzed as players in several interrelated markets. However, if the platform is allowed to adjust prices, there emerges additional challenge that the regulator and companies may manipulate the results of SSNIP test by applying different models of competition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document