scholarly journals Association of dietary insulinemic potential and colorectal cancer risk in men and women

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred K Tabung ◽  
Weike Wang ◽  
Teresa T Fung ◽  
Stephanie A Smith-Warner ◽  
NaNa Keum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Insulin Response ◽  
Distal Colon ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
Cancer Development ◽  
Men And Women

ABSTRACT Background Insulin response may be important in colorectal cancer development. Diet modulates insulin response and may be a modifiable factor in colorectal cancer prevention. Objective We examined associations between hyperinsulinemic diets and colorectal cancer risk with the use of an empirical dietary index for hyperinsulinemia (EDIH), a food-based index that characterizes dietary insulinemic potential on the basis of circulating C-peptide concentrations. Design Diet was assessed every 4 y with food-frequency questionnaires in 46,210 men (Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, 1986–2012) and 74,191 women (Nurses’ Health Study, 1984–2012) to calculate EDIH scores. Multivariable-adjusted Cox regression was used to calculate HRs and 95% CIs for colorectal, proximal/distal colon, and rectal cancer risk. Results During 26 y of follow-up, we documented 2683 incident colorectal cancer cases. Comparing participants in the highest with those in the lowest quintiles, higher EDIH scores were associated with 33% (men: HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.61; P-trend = 0.0005), 22% (women: HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.45; P-trend = 0.01), and 26% (men and women: pooled HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.42; P-trend <0.0001) higher risk of developing colorectal cancer. The positive associations were limited to the distal colon and rectum in men and to the distal and proximal colon in women; however, combined risk estimates were significant for all anatomic locations except for the rectum. For example, comparing participants in extreme EDIH quintiles, there was no significant association for proximal colon cancer in men (HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.57; P-trend = 0.32), but the risk was elevated for distal colon (HR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.14, 2.32; P-trend = 0.002) and rectal (HR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.09, 2.44; P-trend = 0.01) cancer. Among women, the risk was elevated for proximal (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.63; P-trend = 0.03) and distal (HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.05, 2.03; P-trend = 0.03) colon cancer but not for rectal cancer (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.60, 1.29; P-trend = 0.61). Conclusion The findings suggest that the insulinemic potential of diet may partly underlie the influence of dietary intake on colorectal cancer development. This observational study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03364582.

scholarly journals Subsite-Specific Dietary Risk Factors for Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Cohort Studies

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anette Hjartåker ◽  
Bjarte Aagnes ◽  
Trude Eid Robsahm ◽  
Hilde Langseth ◽  
Freddie Bray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Distal Colon ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
Risk Estimates ◽  
Specific Risk ◽  
Dietary Components

Objective. A shift in the total incidence from left- to right-sided colon cancer has been reported and raises the question as to whether lifestyle risk factors are responsible for the changing subsite distribution of colon cancer. The present study provides a review of the subsite-specific risk estimates for the dietary components presently regarded as convincing or probable risk factors for colorectal cancer: red meat, processed meat, fiber, garlic, milk, calcium, and alcohol.Methods. Studies were identified by searching PubMed through October 8, 2012 and by reviewing reference lists. Thirty-two prospective cohort studies are included, and the estimates are compared by sex for each risk factor.Results. For alcohol, there seems to be a stronger association with rectal cancer than with colon cancer, and for meat a somewhat stronger association with distal colon and rectal cancer, relative to proximal colon cancer. For fiber, milk, and calcium, there were only minor differences in relative risk across subsites. No statement could be given regarding garlic. Overall, many of the subsite-specific risk estimates were nonsignificant, irrespective of exposure.Conclusion. For some dietary components the associations with risk of cancer of the rectum and distal colon appear stronger than for proximal colon, but not for all.

Limited time Interval between Symptomatic Presentation in Primary Care and Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josephina G. Kuiper ◽  
Myrthe P.P. Herk-Sukel ◽  
Valery E.P.P. Lemmens ◽  
Ernst J. Kuipers ◽  
Ron M.C. Herings
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Drug Users ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Distal Colon ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Time Interval

Abstract Background: Timely recognition of colorectal cancer related symptoms is essential to reduce time to diagnosis. This study aims to investigate the primary healthcare use preceding a colorectal cancer diagnosis.Methods: A population-based case-control study was conducted using data from a cohort of linked data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) and the PHARMO General Practitioner (GP) Database (NCR-PHARMO GP cohort). Primary healthcare use among colorectal cancer cases before diagnosis was compared with matched cancer-free controls. Information on primary health care use was derived from the GP Database of the PHARMO Database Network and included all GP consultations and prescribed medication. Mean monthly number of GP consultations and new drugs users was assessed in the year before index date (diagnosis date for cases). Results were stratified by colorectal cancer site: proximal colon cancer, distal colon cancer and rectal cancer.Results: While mean monthly number of GP consultation were stable through the year among cancer-free controls, a statistical significant increase was seen among colorectal cancer cases in the last 4-8 months before diagnosis. Proximal colon cancer cases showed the longest time interval of increased mean monthly number of GP consultations. This increase was largely driven by a consultation for malignant neoplasm colon/rectum. The number of new drug users was stable around 120 per 1,000 persons per month until 8 months before index date for proximal colon cancer cases, 4 months before index date for distal colon cancer cases and 3 months for rectal cancer cases. This increase was mainly driven by the prescription of laxatives drugs.Conclusion: A relatively short time interval of increased GP consultations and new drug users was seen before colorectal cancer diagnosis. The longest period of increased GP consultations and new drugs users was seen among patients diagnosed with proximal colon cancer. This can be explained by the difficultly to diagnose proximal colon cancer given the more subtle signs compared to distal colon cancer and rectal cancer. Therefore, faster diagnosis for this specific tumour subtype is only possible when clear clinical signs and symptoms are present.

scholarly journals A steep increase in healthcare seeking behaviour in the last months before colorectal cancer diagnosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Josephina G. Kuiper ◽  
Myrthe P. P. van Herk-Sukel ◽  
Valery E. P. P. Lemmens ◽  
Ernst J. Kuipers ◽  
Ron M. C. Herings
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Primary Healthcare ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Distal Colon ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
Healthcare Use ◽  
Healthcare Seeking

Abstract Background Timely recognition of colorectal cancer related symptoms is essential to reduce time to diagnosis. This study aims to investigate the primary healthcare use preceding a colorectal cancer diagnosis. Methods From a cohort of linked cancer and primary care data, patients diagnosed with primary colorectal cancer in the period 2007–2014 were selected and matched to cancer-free controls on gender, birth year, GP practice and follow-up period. Primary healthcare use among colorectal cancer cases before diagnosis was compared with matched cancer-free controls. Mean monthly number of GP consultations and newly prescribed medication was assessed in the year before index date (diagnosis date for cases). Results were stratified by colorectal cancer site: proximal colon cancer, distal colon cancer and rectal cancer. Results A total of 6,087 colorectal cancer cases could be matched to four cancer-free controls (N = 24,348). While mean monthly number of GP consultation were stable through the year among cancer-free controls, a statistical significant increase was seen among colorectal cancer cases in the last 4–8 months before diagnosis. Proximal colon cancer cases showed the longest time interval of increased mean monthly number of GP consultations. This increase was largely driven by a consultation for malignant neoplasm colon/rectum. The number patients receiving a newly prescribed medication was stable around 120 per 1,000 persons per month until 8 months before index date for proximal colon cancer cases, 4 months before index date for distal colon cancer cases and 3 months for rectal cancer cases. This increase was mainly driven by the prescription of laxatives drugs. Conclusion An increase in the healthcare seeking behaviour of colorectal cancer patients prior to diagnosis was seen. The longest period of increased GP consultations and newly prescribed medication was seen among patients diagnosed with proximal colon cancer. This can be explained by the difficultly to diagnose proximal colon cancer given the more subtle signs compared to distal colon cancer and rectal cancer. Therefore, faster diagnosis for this specific tumour subtype may only be possible when clear clinical signs and symptoms are present.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil-tegafur (UFT) for stage III colorectal cancer: Final results of randomized trials by the National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Colorectal Cancer (NSAS-CC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4049-4049 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Hamaguchi ◽  
K. Shirao ◽  
Y. Moriya ◽  
S. Yoshida ◽  
S. Kodaira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Resected Stage

4049 Background: In the latter 1990s, no consensus was reached as to whether adjuvant chemotherapy was standard treatment for completely resected stage III colorectal cancer in Japan. At that time, we started two randomized controlled trials to clarify the role of adjuvant chemotherapy of stage III colon and rectal cancer in the same time. Methods: Patients with completely resected stage III cancer of the colon or rectum (PS, 0 to 2; age, 20 to 75 years; no other adjuvant therapy) were eligible for these trials. Patients were registered within 6 weeks after surgery and were randomly assigned to receive surgery alone (control group) or surgery followed by treatment with UFT (400 mg/m2/day), given for 5 consecutive days per week for 1 year (UFT group). The target number of patients was 500 for colon cancer and 400 for rectal cancer (hazard ratio = 0.67, one-sided a= 0.05, β= 0.2). The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS), and the secondary end point was overall survival (OS). Results: Between October 1996 and April 2001, a total of 334 patients with colon cancer and 276 with rectal cancer were enrolled. Four ineligible patients were excluded; data from the remaining 332 patients with colon cancer and 274 with rectal cancer were analyzed. The patients’ characteristics were similar in the groups. Analysis of the results of follow-up until March 2006, at least 5 years after surgery in all patients (median follow-up period, 6.2 years), showed no significant difference in RFS or OS in colon cancer. In rectal cancer, however, RFS and OS were significantly better in the UFT group than in the control group. The only grade 4 toxicity was diarrhea, occurring in 1 patient with colon cancer and 1 patient with rectal cancer. Conclusions: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT is well tolerated and improved RFS and OS in patients with stage III rectal cancer. In colon cancer, the expected benefits were not obtained (hazard ratio = 0.67). [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Impact of diabetes on site-specific oncologic outcome in stage I-III colorectal cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14114-e14114
Author(s):  
Justin Y Jeon ◽  
Deok Hyun Jeong ◽  
Min Keun Park ◽  
Jennifer A. Ligibel ◽  
Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
Survival Outcome ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
All Cause Mortality

e14114 Background: Background: Conflicting results have been reported whether pre diagnosis diabetes mellitus (DM) influence survival of colorectal cancer patients or not. Therefore, we determine the influence of DM on long-term outcomes of stage 1-3 patients with resected colon and rectal cancer. Methods: This prospective study include a total of 4,131 participants who were treated for cancer between 1995 and 2005 in South Korea in a single hospital (Non DM: 3,614 patients, DM: 517 patients) with average follow up period of 12 years. We analyzed differences in all cause mortality, disease free survival (DFS), recurrence free survival (RFS) and colorectal cancer-specific mortality between colorectal patients with DM and those without DM. Results: After adjustment for potential confounders, pre-diagnosis DM significantly associated with increased all cause mortality (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.11-1.92), and recurrence free survival reduced DFS (HR: 1.45, 95%CI: 1.15-1.84) and RFS (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.98-1.76) in colon cancer patients but not in rectal cancer patients. In colon cancer patients, DM negatively affects the survival outcome of proximal colon cancer (HR: 2.08, 95%CI: 1.38-3.13), but not of distal cancer (HR:1.34, 95% CI: 0.92-1.96). Conclusions: To our knowledge, the current study first reported the effects of pre-diagnosis DM on survival outcome of colorectal cancer are site specific (proximal colon, distal colon and rectum). The current study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (KRF) (No. 2011-0004892) and the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (1120230). [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Healthy lifestyle, endoscopic screening, and colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in the United States: A nationwide cohort study

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. e1003522
Author(s):  
Kai Wang ◽  
Wenjie Ma ◽  
Kana Wu ◽  
Shuji Ogino ◽  
Andrew T. Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Healthy Lifestyle ◽  
The United States ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
Health Study ◽  
Endoscopic Screening ◽  
Incidence And Mortality

Background Healthy lifestyle and screening represent 2 major approaches to colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. It remains unknown whether the CRC-preventive benefit of healthy lifestyle differs by endoscopic screening status, and how the combination of healthy lifestyle with endoscopic screening can improve CRC prevention. Methods and findings We assessed lifestyle and endoscopic screening biennially among 75,873 women (Nurses’ Health Study, 1988 to 2014) and 42,875 men (Health Professionals Follow-up Study, 1988 to 2014). We defined a healthy lifestyle score based on body mass index, smoking, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and diet. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and population-attributable risks (PARs) for CRC incidence and mortality in relation to healthy lifestyle score according to endoscopic screening. Participants’ mean age (standard deviation) at baseline was 54 (8) years. During a median of 26 years (2,827,088 person-years) follow-up, we documented 2,836 incident CRC cases and 1,013 CRC deaths. We found a similar association between healthy lifestyle score and lower CRC incidence among individuals with and without endoscopic screening, with the multivariable HR per one-unit increment of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.90) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.88), respectively (P-interaction = 0.99). The fraction of CRC cases that might be prevented (PAR) by endoscopic screening alone was 32% (95% CI, 31% to 33%) and increased to 61% (95% CI, 42% to 75%) when combined with healthy lifestyle (score = 5). The corresponding PAR (95% CI) increased from 15% (13% to 16%) to 51% (17% to 74%) for proximal colon cancer and from 47% (45% to 50%) to 75% (61% to 84%) for distal CRC. Results were similar for CRC mortality. A limitation of our study is that our study participants are all health professionals and predominantly whites, which may not be representative of the general population. Conclusions Our study suggests that healthy lifestyle is associated with lower CRC incidence and mortality independent of endoscopic screening. An integration of healthy lifestyle with endoscopic screening may substantially enhance prevention for CRC, particularly for proximal colon cancer, compared to endoscopic screening alone.

scholarly journals Yogurt consumption and colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. 1566-1575
Author(s):  
Karin B Michels ◽  
Walter C Willett ◽  
Rita Vaidya ◽  
Xuehong Zhang ◽  
Edward Giovannucci
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
Health Study ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Incidence ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Mortality

ABSTRACT Background Yogurt is a commonly consumed fermented food. Regular yogurt consumption may contribute to a favorable gut microbiome and gut health, but few epidemiologic studies have considered the relation between regular yogurt consumption and the incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer. Objectives We used data from 2 large, prospective cohort studies, the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, to examine the role of yogurt consumption on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Methods During 32 years of follow-up in 83,054 women (mean age at baseline, 45.7 years) and 26 years of follow-up in 43,269 men (mean age at baseline, 52.3 years), we documented a total of 2666 newly diagnosed cases of colorectal cancer in these cohorts. We modeled yogurt consumption at baseline and cumulatively updated it throughout follow-up. Results: Baseline yogurt consumption was associated with a reduced risk of colon cancer in age-adjusted analyses (P for trend &lt; 0.001). Associations remained statistically significant after adjusting for potential confounders, including calcium and fiber intake (P for trend = 0.03), and were restricted to proximal colon cancer. The consumption of 1 + servings per week of yogurt at baseline, compared to no yogurt consumption, was associated with a multivariable HR of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70–0.99; P trend = 0.04) for the proximal colon cancer incidence. Latency analyses suggested that the most important window of opportunity for regular yogurt consumption to prevent colorectal cancer was 16–20 years in the past. When yogurt consumption was cumulatively updated, associations attenuated and were no longer significant. No statistically significant inverse trend was observed between yogurt consumption and the colorectal cancer mortality. Conclusions In these large cohorts, the frequency of yogurt consumption was associated with a reduced risk of proximal colon cancer with a long latency period. No significant inverse trend was observed for colorectal cancer mortality.

scholarly journals Nitrogen-nitrate exposure from drinking water and colorectal cancer risk for rural women in Wisconsin, USA

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 399-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane A. McElroy ◽  
Amy Trentham-Dietz ◽  
Ronald E. Gangnon ◽  
John M. Hampton ◽  
Andrew J. Bersch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Drinking Water ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Rural Women ◽  
Nitrate Nitrogen ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
Nitrate Contamination ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Risk

One unintentional result of widespread adoption of nitrogen application to croplands over the past 50 years has been nitrate contamination of drinking water with few studies evaluating the risk of colorectal cancer. In our population-based case-control study of 475 women age 20–74 years with colorectal cancer and 1447 community controls living in rural Wisconsin, drinking water nitrate exposure were interpolated to subjects residences based on measurements which had been taken as part of a separate water quality survey in 1994. Individual level risk factor data was gathered in 1990–1992 and 1999–2001. Logistic regression models estimated the risk of colorectal cancer for the study period, separately and pooled. In the pooled analyses, an overall colorectal cancer risk was not observed for exposure to nitrate-nitrogen in the highest category (≥10 ppm) compared to the lowest category (&lt;0.5 ppm). However, a 2.9 fold increase risk was observed for proximal colon cancer cases in the highest compared to the lowest category. Statistically significant increased distal colon or rectal cancer risk was not observed. These results suggest that if an association exists with nitrate-nitrogen exposure from residential drinking water consumption, it may be limited to proximal colon cancer.

scholarly journals lncRNA-PCAT1 rs2632159 polymorphism could be a biomarker for colorectal cancer susceptibility

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-li Yang ◽  
Zhe Huang ◽  
Li-na Wu ◽  
Rong Wu ◽  
Han-xi Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Bioinformatic Analysis ◽  
Recessive Model ◽  
Eqtl Analysis ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Colon Cancer Risk

AbstractBackground: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in lncRNAs could be biomarkers for susceptibility to colorectal cancer (CRC), but the association of PCAT1 polymorphisms and CRC susceptibility is yet to be studied. Methods: Five tagSNPs covering the PCAT1 gene were detected through Kompetitive Allele-Specific PCR among 436 CRC patients and 510 controls. An expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) bioinformatic analysis was then performed. Results: In the present study, PCAT1 rs2632159 polymorphism increased CRC risk by 1.37-fold and 2.19-fold in the dominant and recessive models, respectively (P=0.040 and 0.041). When the CRC cases were divided into colon cancer and rectal cancer, we found that this polymorphism affected colon cancer risk under the dominant model (P=0.022, OR = 1.51) and affected rectal cancer susceptibility under the recessive model (P=0.009, OR = 3.03). A more pronounced effect was observed in the male subgroup in that PCAT1 rs2632159 SNP increased rectal cancer risk by 3.97-fold (P=0.017). When PCAT1 rs2632159 was present, epistatic effects were observed with rs1902432 and rs785005 (P=0.011 and 0.008, respectively). eQTL analysis showed that rs2632159 could influence binding with the transcription factors EBF, LUN-1, and TCF12. Conclusion:PCAT1 rs2632159 SNP could be a biomarker for CRC risk. And the rs1902432 SNP might only have potential to be a biomarker for colon cancer risk.

scholarly journals Long-term incidence of colorectal cancer after bariatric surgery or usual care in the Swedish Obese Subjects study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0248550
Author(s):  
Magdalena Taube ◽  
Markku Peltonen ◽  
Kajsa Sjöholm ◽  
Richard Palmqvist ◽  
Johanna C. Andersson-Assarsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Risk ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Surgery Group ◽  
Obese Subjects

Bariatric surgery in patients with obesity is generally considered to reduce cancer risk in patients with obesity. However, for colorectal cancer some studies report an increased risk with bariatric surgery, whereas others report a decreased risk. These conflicting results demonstrate the need of more long-term studies analyzing the effect of bariatric surgery on colorectal cancer risk. Therefore, data from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01479452, was used to examine the impact of bariatric surgery on long-term incidence of colorectal cancer. The SOS study includes 2007 patients who underwent bariatric surgery and 2040 contemporaneously matched controls who received conventional obesity treatment. Patients in the surgery group underwent gastric bypass (n = 266), banding (n = 376) or vertical banded gastroplasty (n = 1365). Information on colorectal cancer events was obtained from the Swedish National Cancer Registry. Median follow-up was 22.2 years (inter-quartile range 18.3–25.2). During follow up there were 58 colorectal cancer events in the surgery group and 67 colorectal cancer events in the matched control group with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.79 (95% CI:0.55–1.12; p = 0.183). After adjusting for age, body mass index, alcohol intake, smoking status, and diabetes, the adjusted HR was 0.89 (95% CI:0.62–1.29; p = 0.551). When analyzing rectal cancer events separately- 19 events in the surgery group and 31 events in the control group-a decreased risk of rectal cancer with surgery was observed (HR = 0.56; 95% CI:0.32–0.99; p = 0.045, adjusted HR = 0.61 (95% CI:0.34–1.10; p = 0.099), while the risk of colon cancer was unchanged. To conclude- in this long-term, prospective study, bariatric surgery was not associated with altered colorectal cancer risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document