scholarly journals Death, hospitalization, emergency department visits and out-patient visits in patients with heart failure in contemporary practice: results from the prospective Europeam 9069-patient ARIADNE registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L.H Lund ◽  
U Zeymer ◽  
A.L Clark ◽  
V Barrios ◽  
T Damy ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In Europe, heart failure (HF) is managed in variable settings and frequently in office-based practice. In HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) there is now extensive evidence based therapy, but implementation is inconsistent, variable and overall inadequate. The Assessment of Real lIfe cAre –Describing EuropeaN hEart failure management (ARIADNE) registry aimed to assess in detail how outpatients with HFrEF are managed in Europe in contemporary practice. Methods ARIADNE was a prospective non-interventional registry of patients with HFrEF (NYHA class II-IV) treated by office-based cardiologists or selected primary care physicians (recognized as HF specialists) in a real world setting. Patients were enrolled in 687 centres in 17 European countries, and studied at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Key pre-specified outcomes were deaths, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and office visits, and their primary reasons. Results Over 20 months, we enrolled 9069 patients; median age 69 (19–96) years, 24% women, with 30% older than 75 years, 61% NYHA class II, with a median EF 35% (30–40%). Over a median follow-up of 353 (1–631) days, 382 patients (4.3%) died, with 171 cardiovascular deaths (1.9%). The rates of total hospitalizations overall, for HF, and for non-HF cardiovascular reasons were 19.3, 8.1, and 4.8 per 100 patient years, respectively; and rates of emergency department visits overall, for HF reasons, and for non-HF CV reason were 7.7, 1.6, and 1.8, respectively. The number of HF office visits were on average 1.0 per patient. Conclusions In this large multinational HFrEF registry with detailed data on cause-specific outcomes and health care utilization, incidence of death was low and outpatient HF visits were few, but incidence of HF and CV hospitalization and emergency department visits was high. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis AG, Switzerland

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Maggioni ◽  
V Barrios ◽  
A.L Clark ◽  
T Damy ◽  
J Drozdz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recently, the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) was introduced as a novel therapeutic option into European guidelines for the management of heart failure (HF). The Assessment of Real lIfe cAre –Describing EuropeaN hEart failure management (ARIADNE) registry provides real world information about its use and efficacy in real life in outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in Europe. Methods ARIADNE was a prospective registry of patients with HFrEF (NYHA II-IV, reduced EF) treated by office-based cardiologists or selected primary care physicians (recognized as HF specialists) in a real world setting. 9069 HFrEF patients were enrolled from 674 investigators in 17 European countries, and followed over 12 months. Out of 8787 patients fulfilling criteria for analysis, 52.5% of the patients received S/V treatment at baseline, whereas 47.5% continued on their previous individualized heart failure medication. Results of S/V patients are reported here. Results The mean age of patients prescribed S/V was 67.3 years, mainly NYHA class II or III (49.7% and 48.2%, respectively), and mean LVEF of 32.7%. Common documented comorbidities were arterial hypertension (63.7%), coronary heart disease (62.4%), dyslipidemia (50.3%), diabetes (32.5%), and chronic kidney disease (24.1%). Of the 4143 patients in the S/V group, 89.9% received S/V at baseline, 74.8% received S/V in combination with a β-blocker; 47.8% with a β-blocker and MRA. Within 6 months of the observational period, 693 (17.4%) of the S/V patients were hospitalized, of which 46.8% and 28.7%, had HF related and non-HF cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations. Emergency room visits without hospitalization were documented for 3.4% of S/V patients in the same time period; stroke and myocardial infarction occurred in 22 (0.5%) and 24 (0.6%) of the S/V patients, respectively. Cardiac catheterization or coronary angiography procedures were applied to 1.7% and 2.8% of the S/V patients. Total mortality was 4.3% (S/V 3.8%; non-S/V 5.0%), cardiovascular mortality 1.9% (S/V 1.8%; non-S/V 2.2%), during the 12 month observational period. The proportion of S/V patients in NYHA class III or IV decreased in the course of the study from 44.6% to 24.0%. After 12 months of follow up, 46.3% of patients with NYHA class III had a reported improvement to NYHA class II. Consistently, mean LVEF increased to 37.9%. The percentage of S/V patients with LVEF <22.5% decreased from 11.5% to 5.8%. KCCQ overall summary score increased by 1.9 points. An improvement of ≥5 points, denoting a clinically meaningful increase, was reported for 36.2% of S/V patients. Conclusions Data from the ARIADNE prospective registry portray a diverse, multinational study cohort receiving sacubitril/valsartan under real-world conditions. Throughout the study, symptoms and quality of life improved with the use of S/V. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis AG, Switzerland


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Lahoz ◽  
S Corda ◽  
C Proudfoot ◽  
A.F Fonseca ◽  
S Cotton ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and purpose The majority of patients with heart failure (HF) have difficulties in independently carrying out activities of daily living and hence, require support from caregivers (CGs). This study assessed the quality of life (QoL) of CGs of HF patients with sub-normal LVEF (≤60%). Methods A cross-sectional survey of HF patients and their CGs was conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. Cardiologists and primary care physicians completed patient record forms (PRF) between June and November 2019. Caregivers of the same patients were invited to complete a caregiver self-completion survey, which included the Family Caregiver QoL Scale (FAMQOL) and EQ-5D. Patient demographics were derived from PRFs. Results 361 CGs (73.1% female, mean age: 58.8 yrs) and HF patients (39.9% female, mean age: 71.2 yrs) were included. 58.2% of the CGs were spouses, 23.4% a child of the patient. On average, CGs devoted 20 hrs/week in the care of HF patients; this CG time increased from 12 to 26 hrs/week with NYHA class I to III/IV of the HF patient. Further, anxiety/stress was experienced overall by 29/31% of CGs which increased from 27/17% for NYHA I to 40/41% for NYHA III/IV of the HF patient (Table 1). Conclusions Caregivers of patients with HF and LVEF ≤60% spend a significant amount of time to provide daily support to HF patients. Patients with progressive disease were older, more polymorbid and had a higher disease duration. These factors likely contributed towards increased caregiver burden of HF patients with increased NYHA class. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis Pharma AG


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
U Zeymer ◽  
L.H Lund ◽  
V Barrios ◽  
C Fonseca ◽  
A.L Clark ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recently, the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan was introduced as novel therapeutic option into European guidelines for the management of heart failure. The ARIADNE registry provides information about its safety and tolerability profile in real life in outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in Europe. Methods ARIADNE was a prospective registry of patients with HFrEF treated by office-based cardiologists or selected primary care physicians (recognized as HF specialists) in a real world setting. In total, 9069 HFrEF patients in 687 centres from 17 European countries were included and prospectively followed over 12 months. Here we report the safety information from 4614 patients that received sacubitril/valsartan at baseline. Results The mean age of patients was 67.3 years at baseline. The majority of enrolled patients were in NYHA class II or III (49.7% and 48.2%, respectively). Mean LVEF was 32.7% in the S/V group. Patients with S/V had arterial hypertension (62.5%), coronary heart disease (61.0%), dyslipidemia (50.6%), atrial fibrillation (41.0%), diabetes (34.3%), and chronic kidney disease (26.0%). Co-medications were beta-blockers (83.4%), MRAs (60.1%), loop diuretics (65.2%), and digitalis (7.5%). S/V was discontinued due to an adverse event (AE) during the 12 months in 191 (4.1%) patients, of these in 180 (3.6%) due to AEs and 28 (0.6%) due to SAEs. The most frequent AE was hypotension, which was reported in 391 (7.9%) of patients, of these 74 (18.9%) discontinued S/V. Hypokalaemia was observed in 1.7% and an impairment of renal function in 1.0% of S/V patients, respectively. Total mortality was 3.8%, cardiovascular mortality 1.8% in the S/V group. Conclusions This is the first large prospective study on the use of S/V in patients with HFrEF in Europe. S/V was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable with that observed in clinical trials for S/V patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis Pharma AG


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Calero ◽  
E Hidalgo ◽  
R Marin ◽  
L Rosenfeld ◽  
I Fernandez ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Self-care is a crucial factor in the education of patients with heart failure (HF) and directly impacts in the progression of the disease. However, little is published about its major clinical implications as admission or mortality in patients with HF. Aims and methods The aim of the study was to analyze time to admission due to acute heart failure and mortality associated with poor self-care in patients with chronic HF. We prospectively recruited consecutive patients with stable chronic HF referred to a nurse-led HF programme. Selfcare was evaluated at baseline with the 9 item European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale. Scores were standardized and reversed from 0 (worst selfcare) to 100 (better self care). For the purpose of this study we analyzed the associations of worse self-care (defined as scores below the lower tertile of the scale) with demographic, disease-related (clinical) and psychosocial factors in all patients at baseline. Results We included 1123 patients, mean age 72±11, 639 (60%) were male, mean LVEF 45±17 and 454 (40,4%) were in NYHA class III or IV. Mean score of the 9-item ESCBE was 69±28. Score below 55 (lower tertile) defined impaired selfcare behaviour. Those patients with worse self-care had more ischaemic heart disease, more COPD, and they achieved less distance in the 6 minute walking test. Regarding psychosocial items patients in lower tertile of self-care needed a caregiver more frequently, they present more cognitive impairment, depressive symptoms and worse score in terms of health self-perception. Multivariate Cox Models showed that a score below 55 points in 9-item ESCBE was independently associated with higher readmission due to acute heart failure [HR 1.26 (1.02–1.57), p value=0.034] and with mortality [HR 1.24 CI95% (1.02–1.50), p value=0.028] Conclusion Poor self-care measured with the modified 9-item ESCBE was associated with higher risk of admission due to acute decompensation and higher risk of mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. These results highlight the importance of assessing self-care and provide measures to improve them. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Hospital Univesitario de Bellvitge


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Rapezzi ◽  
A.V Kristen ◽  
B Gundapaneni ◽  
M.B Sultan ◽  
M Hanna

Abstract Background In the Tafamidis in Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial (ATTR-ACT), tafamidis was shown to be an effective treatment for patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Further assessment of the efficacy of tafamidis in patients with more advanced ATTR-CM would aid treatment decisions. Purpose To characterize the benefits of tafamidis in patients with advanced ATTR-CM. Methods In ATTR-ACT, ATTR-CM patients were randomized to tafamidis (n=264) or placebo (n=177) for 30 months. Efficacy outcomes included all-cause mortality and frequency of cardiovascular (CV)-related hospitalisations. Key secondary endpoints were change from baseline to Month 30 in 6MWT distance and KCCQ-OS score. Efficacy assessments in NYHA Class III patients at baseline (n=141) were a pre-specified analysis. In a post-hoc analysis, mortality and CV-related hospitalizations were assessed in all patients grouped into quartiles of increasing disease severity based on 6MWT distance at baseline. Longer-term all-cause mortality (as of 1 Aug 2019) was assessed in NYHA Class III patients utilizing data from ATTR-ACT patients who enrolled in a long-term, extension study (LTE) and continued treatment with higher dose tafamidis (n=55; median treatment duration 51.6 months); or, if previously treated with placebo, started tafamidis treatment (placebo/tafamidis; n=63 [50.1 months]). Results In advanced ATTR-CM patients (NYHA Class III), tafamidis reduced the risk of death (HR [95% CI] 0.837, [0.541, 1.295], P=0.4253), and the decline in 6MWT distance (LS mean [SE], 31.6 (22.1) m; P=0.1526) and KCCQ-OS score (LS mean [SE], 13.1 (5.0); P=0.0090), vs placebo. Paradoxically, there was a higher frequency of CV-related hospitalizations with tafamidis (RR [95% CI] vs placebo, 1.411 [1.048, 1.900]). In all patients by 6MWT quartile, CV-related hospitalizations/year with tafamidis and placebo increased with disease severity, with the exception that placebo-treated patients in the highest severity quartile had fewer CV-related hospitalisations (0.73) than those in the third quartile (0.92). Mortality with tafamidis and placebo increased, and was greater with placebo, in every quartile (Figure). Survival (NYHA Class III patients in ATTR-ACT and LTE) was improved with high dose tafamidis with longer term follow-up (HR vs placebo/tafamidis [95% CI], 0.6569 [0.4175, 1.0336]; P=0.0692). Conclusions These analyses, including longer-term follow-up, demonstrate that patients with advanced ATTR-CM benefit from tafamidis. The decrease in CV-related hospitalisations in more severe patients treated with placebo suggests that the comparatively greater hospitalisation frequency in NYHA Class III patients treated with tafamidis is a consequence of their lower mortality rate. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): This study was sponsored by Pfizer


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Manzo-Silberman ◽  
T Chouihed ◽  
L Fraticelli ◽  
A Peiretti ◽  
C Claustre ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrythmia, especially in older adults. AF represents 1% of emergency department (ED) visits a third of which are de novo or recurrent. While the diagnosis is given quickly by reading the electrocardiogram (ECG), its management both remains complex. European guidelines have been published in 2016. Purpose Our study aimed to investigate guidelines implementation in French ED. Methods Prospective national multicenter study (clinical trials NCT 03836339) and core interpretation of ECG. Consecutive patients admitted in 32 French ED for AF confirmed by ECG were prospectively included. Clinical characteristics at admission were recorded by the physician. The 3-months telephone follow-up was ensured by one operator. Results From 1/10/2018 to 30/11/2018, 1369 patients with AF were included, of whom 295 (21.55%) had a de novo AF. Patients were 80 [65; 87] years old, 51.17% of men, 71.53% self-ruling, 91.53% living at home, 65.42% transported by firemen or by ambulances and 4,07% by a mobile intensive care unit. Twenty-six (8.84%) patients had a history of stroke or transient ischemic stroke and none of them on anticoagulants. CHA2DS2-VASC score was performed in 66.78% of patients and was 0 in 14 (7.11%) patients. HAS-BLED score = 2 [1; 3]. At admission 50.17% of patients received anticoagulants, of whom 49.32% a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant, 0.68% Vitamin K antagonists, 50.68% UFH or LMWH. Beta-blockers were administered in 102 (24.01%) patients and amiodarone in 38 (12.89%). Cardiac echography has been performed in 20.34% of patients. Atrial fibrillation was the primary diagnosis in 42.71% of patients. It has been associated to a pneumopathy in 25.17% of patients, a pulmonary embolism in 4.76% and acute alcoholism in 1.36% of them. Precipitating factor was often undetermined. The discharge to the home concerned 18.64% of patients, 26.78% of patients were hospitalized in ED hospitalization unit, 23.05% in cardiology or intensive care unit. At 3 months, 49% of patients were on anticoagulants, of whom 90% on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, 95% of them didn't report any bleeding event and 41.77% of them were able to have a cardiology consultation within three months. Three-months mortality was about 22.09%, and rehospitalization rate about 22.89%. Conclusion It seems to be a reticence to initiate anticoagulation of patients admitted to ED with a de novo AF. It could be explained by both the advanced age of the patients and the lack of an organized access to a systematic cardiology consultation at discharge. Patients with chronic AF are subject to high mortality at 3 months and a significant risk of readmission. The application of the guidelines could be optimized by a better training program and the implementation of a dedicated pathway of care. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Bayer


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Jimenez ◽  
M Cainzos-Achirica ◽  
D Monterde ◽  
L Garcia-Eroles ◽  
C Enjuanes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Prevalence of congestive heart failure (CHF) and predisposing conditions has described previously. Most of these studies evaluated centre-European or north-American populations. However, the prevalence and evolutionary changes of Heart Failure stages A, B and C has not been fully elucidated in Mediterranean cohorts. Purpose To estimate the prevalence of CHF (HF Stage C) and four additional key chronic cardiovascular, metabolic and renal conditions predisposing to the development of CHF (HF Stages A and B) at a population level in a south-European healthcare area. We analysed the evolutionary changes in the prevalence in these five conditions. Methods In a healthcare area of 1,3Millions inhabitants, we extracted health related information of all individuals ≥55 years old. We analysed data of 375,233 individuals included in the population-based healthcare database of a public Institute of Health between 2015 and 2017. The conditions of interest were CHF, chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes mellitus (DM), ischemic heart disease (IHD) and hypertension (HTN). Results The prevalence of chronic conditions was high, particularly of HTN (48.2–48.9%) and DM individuals (14.6–14.8%). The other conditions were less frequent, with prevalence around 2–4% for IHD, 5–9% for CKD and 2–4% for CHF (Table). However, the less frequent conditions had a striking upward trend with over 1,500 new prevalent cases per year between 2015 and 2017 for CHF (45% relative increase), more than 2,500 new prevalent cases for IHD (67% relative increase) and more than 4,000 new prevalent cases per year for CKD (44% relative increase). Conclusion In this south European cohort, there were a high prevalence of HTN and DM as risk factors and a significant trend of increasing prevalence in high cost chronic conditions such as CHF, IHD and CKD. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): The present study was funded by an unrestricted research grant from Vifor Pharma.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
U Zeymer ◽  
L.H Lund ◽  
V Barrios ◽  
C Fonseca ◽  
A.L Clark ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) is a major medical and economic burden that is often managed in office based practices. Recently, the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) was introduced as novel therapeutic option into European guidelines for the management of HF. The ARIADNE registry aims to provide information on how outpatients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are managed in Europe, in light of this novel treatment option. Methods ARIADNE was a prospective registry of patients with HFrEF treated by office-based cardiologists (OBC) or selected primary care physicians (recognized as HF specialists; PCP) in a real world setting. HFrEF patients were included prospectively, independently of whether treatment had been changed recently or not. 9069 patients were recruited from 687 centres in 17 European countries. Results The mean age of all patients was 68.1 years (S/V: 67.3 years, Non-S/V: 68.9 years). The majority of patients were in NYHA class II (61.3%), or NYHA class III (37.1%) overall, while more patients in the S/V group showed NYHA class III (S/V: 42.8%, Non-S/V: 30.9%). Mean LVEF was slightly lower in the S/V group than in the Non-S/V group (S/V: 32.7%, Non-S/V: 35.4%, overall 34.0%). The most frequently observed signs of HF were dyspnoea upon effort, followed by fatigue, palpitations on exertion at baseline. More patients tend to have more severe symptoms in the S/V groups (e.g. for dyspnoea on effort, Non-S/V: moderate 40.8%, severe 8.6%; S/V: moderate 46.4%, severe 14.1%). 44.0% of patients from the S/V group and 39.3% of non-S/V patients reported at least one hospitalization within 12 months prior to baseline, of which 73.3% in S/V and 69.9% in non-S/V patients were due to HF., At baseline, 44.7% of the patients used a CV device, of which most were implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD: Non-S/V 54.2%, S/V: 52.8%), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-ICD:Non-S/V 21.9%, S/V: 27.0%), and pacemaker (Non-S/V: 13.4%, S/V: 10.5%). The mean KCCQ overall summary score was 62.6 in the S/V group and 69.5 in the Non-S/V group at baseline. 83.9% of patients were treated with ARB or ACEi in Non-S/V group, (ACEi 57.3%, ARB 26.9%). The most frequently taken drug combinations in either group were ACEi/ ARB or S/V with β -blockers (Non-S/V 69.3%, S/V 67.3%). 40.2% in the Non-S/V group and 42.9% in S/V groups used a combination of ACEi/ARB or S/V, β-blocker and MRA. Conclusions The ARIADNE prospective registry provides insights and reflects variations in HF treatment practices in outpatients in Europe and the way S/V was introduced by OBCs and specialized PCPs in a real-world setting. In the observed population, S/V is more often prescribed to slightly younger patients with slightly lower LVEF, there was a greater observed percentage of S/V patients NYHA class III, with lower quality of life measurements and with more severe symptoms and recent hospitalizations for heart failure. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis Pharma AG


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Bouwens ◽  
A Schuurman ◽  
K.M Akkerhuis ◽  
S.J Baart ◽  
K Caliskan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Activation of the inflammatory response in heart failure (HF) may initially serve as a compensatory mechanism. However, on the longer term, this physiological phenomenon can become disadvantageous. Temporal patterns of inflammatory proteins other than CRP have not yet been investigated in patients with stable HF. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the association of 17 serially measured cytokines and cytokine receptors with clinical outcome in patients with stable heart failure. Methods In 263 patients, 1984 serial, tri-monthly blood samples were collected during a median follow-up of 2.2 (IQR: 1.4–2.5) years. The primary endpoint (PE) composed of cardiovascular mortality, HF-hospitalization, heart transplantation, and LVAD. We selected baseline blood samples in all patients, as well as the two samples closest to the primary endpoint, and the last sample available in event-free patients. Thus, in 567 samples we measured 17 cytokines and cytokine receptors using the Olink Proteomics Cardiovascular III multiplex assay. Associations between biomarkers and PE were investigated by joint modelling. Results Median age was 68 (IQR: 59–76) years, with 72% men, 74% NYHA class I-II and a median ejection fraction of 30% (23–38%). 70 patients reached a PE. After adjustment for clinical characteristics (age, sex, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, NYHA class at baseline, diuretics and systolic blood pressure), 7 biomarkers were associated with the PE (Figure). Interleukin-1 receptor type 1 (IL1RT1) showed the strongest association: HR 2.65 [95% CI: 1.78–4.21]) per standard deviation change in level (NPX) at any point in time during follow-up, followed by Tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNF-R1): 2.25 [1.66–3.08], and C-X-C motif chemokine 16 (CXCL16): 2.18 [1.59–3.04]. After adjustment for baseline N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide, high-sensitive troponin T and C-reactive protein however, only IL1RT1 and TNF-R1 remained significantly associated with the PE. Conclusion Repeatedly measured levels of several cytokines and cytokine receptors are independently associated with clinical outcome in stable HF patients. These results suggest that repeated measurements of these biomarkers, in addition to established cardiac biomarkers, may contribute to personalized risk assessment and herewith better identify high-risk patients. Figure 1. Associations between levels of cytokines and cytokine receptors and the primary endpoint. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Other. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by the Jaap Schouten Foundation and the Noordwest Academie.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Selvaraj ◽  
B.L Claggett ◽  
D.V Veldhuisen ◽  
I.S Anand ◽  
B Pieske ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Serum uric acid (SUA) is a biomarker of several pathobiologies relevant to the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), though by itself may also worsen outcomes. In HF with reduced EF, SUA is independently associated with adverse outcomes and sacubitril/valsartan reduces SUA compared to enalapril. These effects in HFpEF have not been delineated. Purpose To determine the prognostic value of SUA, relationship of change in SUA to quality of life and outcomes, and influence of sacubitril/valsartan on SUA in HFpEF. Methods We analyzed 4,795 participants from the Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ARB Global Outcomes in HF with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PARAGON-HF) trial. We related baseline hyperuricemia to the primary outcome (CV death and total HF hospitalization), its components, myocardial infarction or stroke, and a renal composite outcome. At the 4-month visit, the relationship between SUA change and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (KCCQ-OSS) and several biomarkers including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were also assessed. We simultaneously adjusted for baseline and time-updated SUA to determine whether lowering SUA was associated with clinical benefit. Results Average age was 73±8 years and 52% were women. After multivariable adjustment, hyperuricemia was associated with increased risk for most outcomes (primary outcome HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.37, 1.90, Fig 1A). The treatment effect of sacubitril/valsartan for the primary outcome was not modified by baseline SUA (interaction p=0.11). Sacubitril/valsartan reduced SUA −0.38 mg/dL (95% CI: −0.45, −0.31) compared with valsartan (Fig 1B), with greater effect in those with baseline hyperuricemia (−0.50 mg/dL) (interaction p=0.013). Change in SUA was independently and inversely associated with change in KCCQ-OSS (p=0.019) and eGFR (p<0.001), but not NT-proBNP (p=0.52). Time-updated SUA was a stronger predictor of adverse outcomes over baseline SUA. Conclusions SUA independently predicts adverse outcomes in HFpEF. Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduces SUA compared to valsartan, an effect that was stronger in those with higher baseline SUA, and reducing SUA was associated with improved outcomes. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document