MO985EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF FERRIC CARBOXYMALTOSE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF EARLY POST-RENAL TRANSPLANT ANEMIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Núñez Delgado ◽  
Eulàlia Solà-Porta ◽  
Carlos Arias-Cabrales ◽  
Dolores Redondo-Pachón ◽  
Anna Buxeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Ferric Carboxymaltose ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Risk Of Infection ◽  
500Mg Dose ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Clinical Impairment ◽  
Safety Parameters

Abstract Background and Aims The efficacy and safety of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FeCarb) has been demonstrated both in patients with chronic kidney disease and dialysis, but its effects have not been evaluated in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Method Retrospective study (2016-2018) of KT recipients who received FeCarb during the first 30 days after kidney transplantation (KT). Early efficacy was analyzed by evaluating the first determination of ferrokinetics and hemoglobin levels after administration and late efficacy with the determination >90 days post-administration. Safety parameters were also analyzed. Results Out of 283 KT performed, 77 recipients received one dose of FeCarb (52 received a 500mg dose and 25 a 1000mg dose) after a median of 6 days after the KT (IQR 3.5-9 days). 24 patients required transfusion after administration, 7 of them in the setting of concomitant event and 17 for non-response to FeCarb. Among the non-responders (n=17) there was a higher percentage of women, the initial hemoglobin was lower and they received a higher dose of FeCarb (Table). Responders (n=53) improved early and late ferrokinetic and anemia parameters (Figure). In the multivariate analysis adjusted by gender, controlled infection at the time of FeCarb administration, dose of FeCarb administered, immunosuppression, and previous treatment with erythropoietin, hemoglobin levels below 8 g/dL were associated with increased risk of transfusion after FeCarb administration (HR 11.30 [3.03-42.2]). Tolerability was excellent, with no immediate adverse reactions after FeCarb administration. 17 responders had a controlled infection at the time of FeCarb administration (median days under antibiotic treatment: 3, IQR 1-5). The infection did not worsen the response to FeCarb and no clinical impairment after FeCarb administration was observed. Conclusion: FeCarb administration in early post-transplant anemia is effective in patients with hemoglobin higher than 8g/dl and is not associated with increased risk of infection deterioration.

scholarly journals COVID-19 and Sarcoidosis, Readiness for Vaccination: Challenges and Opportunities

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Manansala ◽  
Amit Chopra ◽  
Robert P. Baughman ◽  
Richard Novak ◽  
Elyse E. Lower ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Inflammatory Disorder ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Risk Of Infection ◽  
Decision Algorithm ◽  
Chronic Inflammatory Disorder ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Immunosuppressive Medications ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities

Sarcoidosis is an immune mediated chronic inflammatory disorder that is best characterized by non-caseating granulomas found in one or more affected organs. The COVID-19 pandemic poses a challenge for clinicians caring for sarcoidosis patients who may be at increased risk of infection compared to the general population. With the recent availability of COVID-19 vaccines, it is expected that clinicians raise questions regarding efficacy and safety in sarcoidosis. However, studies examining safety and efficacy of vaccines in sarcoidosis are lacking. In this review, we examine the current literature regarding vaccination in immunocompromised populations and apply them to sarcoidosis patients. The available literature suggests that vaccines are safe and effective in patients with autoimmune disorders and in those taking immunosuppressive medications. We strongly recommend the administration of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with sarcoidosis. We also present a clinical decision algorithm to provide guidance on vaccination of sarcoidosis patients against COVID-19.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of bortezomib maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-yan Sun ◽  
Jun-ying Li ◽  
Zhang-bo Chu ◽  
Lu Zhang ◽  
Lei Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a B-cell neoplasm with a high incidence of relapse. Bortezomib has been extensively studied for the maintenance treatment of MM. Here, we carried out a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with bortezomib. We searched for clinical trials in PubMed (Medline), Embase (OVID), and the Cochrane Library. Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling a total of 1338 patients were included. Bortezomib maintenance statistically significantly improved both progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.51 to 0.87, P=0.003) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.75 therapy, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.89, P=0.001) more than did non-bortezomib maintenance therapy. Our analysis revealed higher incidence of neutropenia (risks ratios (RR) = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.79), peripheral neuropathy (PN) (RR = 2.23; 95% CI = 1.38 to 3.61, P=0.001), and cardiologic events (RR = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.12 to 3.28, P=0.02) in patients with bortezomib maintenance therapy. Our meta-analysis demonstrates OS and PFS benefits of bortezomib maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed MM. However, the therapy is associated with increased risk of adverse events. Additionally, more RCTs are needed for better understanding and determination of optimal bortezomib maintenance therapy in MM.

ОЦЕНКА ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТИ И БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ 10% ВНУТРИВЕННОГО ИММУНОГЛОБУЛИНА ПРИВИДЖЕН В РЕАЛЬНОЙ КЛИНИЧЕСКОЙ ПРАКТИКЕ

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.G. Khludova ◽  
I.A. Manto ◽  
E.A. Latysheva ◽  
T.V. Latysheva ◽  
M.R. Khaitov
Keyword(s):  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Primary Immunodeficiency ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
High Efficacy ◽  
Antibody Synthesis ◽  
Human Immunoglobulins ◽  
Severe Adverse Reactions ◽  
Common Variable ◽  
Real Clinical Practice

Актуальность. Заместительная терапия иммуноглобулинами человека является ведущим патогенетическим методом лечения первичных иммунодефицитов с нарушением синтеза антител. В настоящее время в России доступно несколько препаратов иммуноглобулинов человека нормальных для внутривенного введения. Цель. Оценить эффективность и безопасность препарата Привиджен (10 раствор иммуноглобулина для внутривенного введения) в реальной клинической практике в течение 12 клинических месяцев. Материалы и методы. 20 взрослых с диагнозом общая вариабельная иммунная недостаточности и Х-сцепленная агаммаглобулинемия получали внутривенный иммуноглобулин Привиджен к интервалом 243 дня в течение 12 мес. Первичными критериями оценки была частота инфекционных осложнений и нежелательных явлений. Результаты. У большинства пациентов в ходе исследования достигнут удовлетворительный претранс-фузионный уровень IgG. Тяжелых нежелательных явлений, связанных с введением препарата, не зарегистрировано. Заключение. В ходе исследования препарат продемонстрировал высокую эффективность и безопасность у пациентов, нуждающихся в ежемесячной заместительной терапииRelevance. Replacement therapy with human immunoglobulins is the leading pathogenetic method of treatment of primary immunodeficiency with impaired antibody synthesis. Currently, several preparations of human immunoglobulins for intravenous administration are available in Russia. Purposes. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Privigen immunoglobulin intravenous 10 liquid in real clinical practice within 12 clinical months. Methods. Twenty adults diagnosed with common variable immunodeficiency or X-linked agammaglobulinemia received intravenous Privigen infusions (0.2-0.4 mg/kg) at 243 intervals over a 12-month period. The primary endpoint was the annual rate of infections and adverse events. Results. Sufficient level of IgG was achieved in most patients during the study. Severe adverse reactions during the treatment were not registered. Conclusions. High efficacy and safety of monthly replacement therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiency with impaired antibody synthesis has been demonstrated.

The Comparative Study of Equisetum pratense, E. sylvaticum, E. telmateia: Accumulation of Silicon, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Screening

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 2519-2523
Author(s):  
Denisa Batir Marin ◽  
Oana Cioanca ◽  
Mihai Apostu ◽  
Cristina Gabriela Tuchilus ◽  
Cornelia Mircea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Activity ◽  
Methanol Extract ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Total Phenolic ◽  
Quantitative Chemical Analysis ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative ◽  
Antioxidant And Antimicrobial Activity ◽  
The Comparative Study

The objective of the current study is represented by the determination of silica and a phytochemical screening of phenolic derivates of some Equisetum species. The antioxidant and antimicrobial activity for Equisetum pratense Ehrh.,, Equisetum sylvaticum L. and Equisetum telmateia Ehrh. (sin. Equisetum maximum Lam.) were also investigated. The concentration of silicon (Si) in plants was determined by the spectrophotometric method using previous treatment with NaOH 50% both for the stem and the nodal branches [1]. Results obtained varied from 95.12 to 162.10 SiO2 mg/g dry plant which represents 4.44% to 7.58% Si/100g dry sample. Two types of total extracts were obtained using different solvents and were subjected to qualitative and quantitative chemical analysis considering total phenolic content [2]. The highest concentration of investigated compounds was found in the methanolic extract, E. sylvaticum, 196.5mg/g dry sample. Antioxidant activity was monitored spectrophotometrically and expressed in terms of IC50 (�g/mL) [3]. Values gathered ranged from 261.7 to 429.5 �g/mL. The highest capacity to neutralized DPPH radicals was found in E. sylvaticum. In vitro antimicrobial activity was determined using difusimetric method [4]. Testing was performed on four microorganisms: three strains of bacteria and one species of fungi. Different effects were noticed against the bacteria, furthermore the methanol extract appeared to be most efficient. All extracts showed significand antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Candida albicans (ATCC 90028) and weak to no activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922).

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with CAD Undergoing Drug-eluting Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (44) ◽  
pp. 5739-5745
Author(s):  
Jieqiong Guan ◽  
Wenjing Song ◽  
Pan He ◽  
Siyu Fan ◽  
Hong Zhi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Drug Eluting

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent. Background: The optimal duration of DAPT to balance the risk of ischemia and bleeding in CAD patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains controversial. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, CNKI and Wanfang Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of comparing different durations of DAPT after DES implantation. Primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and major bleeding, and were pooled by Bayes network meta-analysis. Net adverse clinical and cerebral events were used to estimate the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curves. The subgroup analysis based on clinical status, follow-up and area was conducted using traditional pairwise meta-analysis. Results: A total of nineteen trials (n=51,035) were included, involving six duration strategies. The network metaanalysis showed that T2 (<6-month DAPT followed by aspirin, HR:1.51, 95%CI:1.02-2.22), T3 (standard 6-month DAPT, HR:1.47, 95%CI:1.14-1.91), T4 (standard 12-month DAPT, HR:1.41, 95%CI:1.15-1.75) and T5 (18-24 months DAPT, HR:1.47, 95%CI:1.09-1.97) was associated with significantly increased risk of MACCE compared to T6 (>24-month DAPT). However, no significant difference was found in MACCE risk between T1 (<6-month DAPT followed by P2Y12 monotherapy) and T6. Moreover, T5 was associated with significantly increased risk of bleeding compared to T1(RR:3.94, 95%CI:1.66-10.60), T2(RR:3.65, 95%CI:1.32-9.97), T3(RR:1.93, 95%CI:1.21-3.50) and T4(RR:1.89, 95%CI:1.15-3.30). The cumulative probabilities showed that T6(85.0%), T1(78.3%) and T4(44.5%) were the most efficacious treatment compared to the other durations. In the ACS (<50%) subgroup, T1 was observed to significantly reduce the risk of major bleeding compared to T4, but not in the ACS (≥50%) subgroup. Conclusions: Compared with other durations, short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy showed non-inferiority, with a lower risk of bleeding and not associated with an increased MACCE. In addition, the risk of major bleeding increased significantly, starting with DAPT for 18-month. Compared with the short-term treatment, patients with ACS with the standard 12-month treatment have a better prognosis, including lower bleeding rate and the decreased risk of MACCE. Due to study's limitations, the results should be verified in different risk populations.

scholarly journals 1095. Investigation of Risk Factors Associated with Serious Bacterial, Viral and Invasive Fungal Infections in Hematologic Patients on Ibrutinib

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S576-S577
Author(s):  
Thomas Holowka ◽  
Harry Cheung ◽  
Maricar F Malinis ◽  
Sarah Perreault ◽  
Iris Isufi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Hematologic Malignancy ◽  
Invasive Fungal Infections ◽  
Risk Of Infection ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Serious Infection ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Serious Infections

Abstract Background Ibrutinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat hematologic malignancies that may increase the risk of serious infection including invasive fungal infections (IFI). In a study of 378 patients with hematologic malignancy on ibrutinib, serious infection and IFI occurred in 11% and 4% respectively (Varughese et al. Clin Infect Dis). The primary aims of our study were to determine the incidence of serious infection and associated risk factors in patients on ibrutinib. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with hematologic malignancy prescribed ibrutinib for ≥ 1 week at Yale New Haven Hospital from 2014 to 2019 to identify serious infections defined as those requiring inpatient management. We collected demographic, clinical and oncologic data. Chi-squared tests were used to determine factors associated with an increased risk of infection. Results A total of 254 patients received ibrutinib including 156 with CLL, 89 with NHL and 9 with other leukemias. Among these, 21 underwent HSCT, 9 complicated by GVHD. There were 51 (20%) patients with serious infections including 45 (17.7%) bacterial, 9 (3.5%) viral and 5 (2%) IFI (1 pulmonary cryptococcosis, 4 pulmonary aspergillosis). Anti-mold prophylaxis was prescribed to 7 (2.8%) patients, none of whom developed IFI. Risk factors associated with serious infection included ECOG score ≥ 2 (OR 4.6, p &lt; 0.001), concurrent steroid use (≥ 10 mg prednisone daily for ≥ 2 weeks; OR 3.0, p &lt; 0.001), neutropenia (OR 3.6, p &lt; 0.01), lymphopenia (OR 2.4, p &lt; 0.05) and maximum ibrutinib dose of 560 mg (OR 2, p &lt; 0.05). There was a dose dependent increase in infections based on number of chemotherapy regimens prior to ibrutinib initiation: 14.3% with 0, 19.7% with 1-2 and 28.7% with ≥ 3 prior treatments. Conclusion The incidence of serious infection in hematologic patients on ibrutinib was higher than previously reported (20% versus 11%) but the rate of IFI was lower (2% versus 4%). High ECOG score, leukopenia, steroids, and higher ibrutinib doses were associated with an increased risk for serious infection. Targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis should be considered for patients on ibrutinib with these risk factors. Improving functional status may also reduce the risk of infection in patients on ibrutinib. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals A novel box for aerosol and droplet guarding and evacuation in respiratory infection (BADGER) for COVID-19 and future outbreaks

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hau D. Le ◽  
Gordon A. Novak ◽  
Kevin C. Janek ◽  
Jesse Wang ◽  
Khang N. Huynh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Infection ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Airborne Particles ◽  
Risk Of Infection ◽  
Indirect Contact ◽  
Vacuum Suction ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative ◽  
Additional Layer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Design Construction

AbstractThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected millions and killed more than 1.7 million people worldwide as of December 2020. Healthcare providers are at increased risk of infection when caring for patients with COVID-19. The mechanism of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is beginning to emerge as airborne spread in addition to direct droplet and indirect contact as main routes of transmission. Here, we report on the design, construction, and testing of the BADGER (Box for Aerosol and Droplet Guarding and Evacuation in Respiratory Infection), an affordable, scalable device that contains droplets and aerosol particles, thus minimizing the risk of infection to healthcare providers. A semi-sealed environment is created inside the BADGER, which is placed over the head of the patient and maintains at least 12-air changes per hour using in-wall vacuum suction. Multiple hand-ports enable healthcare providers to perform essential tasks on a patient’s airway and head. Overall, the BADGER has the potential to contain large droplets and small airborne particles as demonstrated by simulated qualitative and quantitative assessments to provide an additional layer of protection for healthcare providers treating COVID-19 and future respiratory contagions.

scholarly journals Risk of infection associated with targeted therapies for solid organ and hematological malignancies

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 204993612198954
Author(s):  
Isabel Ruiz-Camps ◽  
Juan Aguilar-Company
Keyword(s):  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Opportunistic Infections ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Prolonged Treatment ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Risk Of Infection ◽  
Increased Risk

Higher risks of infection are associated with some targeted drugs used to treat solid organ and hematological malignancies, and an individual patient’s risk of infection is strongly influenced by underlying diseases and concomitant or prior treatments. This review focuses on risk levels and specific suggestions for management, analyzing groups of agents associated with a significant effect on the risk of infection. Due to limited clinical experience and ongoing advances in these therapies, recommendations may be revised in the near future. Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are associated with a higher rate of infections, including invasive fungal infection, especially in the first months of treatment and in patients with advanced, pretreated disease. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors are associated with an increased risk of Pneumocystis pneumonia and cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation. Venetoclax is associated with cytopenias, respiratory infections, and fever and neutropenia. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors may predispose patients to opportunistic and fungal infections; need for prophylaxis should be assessed on an individual basis. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have been linked to a higher risk of general and opportunistic infections. Breakpoint cluster region-Abelson (BCR-ABL) inhibitors are associated with neutropenia, especially over the first months of treatment. Anti-CD20 agents may cause defects in the adaptative immune response, hypogammaglobulinemia, neutropenia, and hepatitis B reactivation. Alemtuzumab is associated with profound and long-lasting immunosuppression; screening is recommended for latent infections and prevention strategies against CMV, herpesvirus, and Pneumocystis infections. Checkpoint inhibitors (CIs) may cause immune-related adverse events for which prolonged treatment with corticosteroids is needed: prophylaxis against Pneumocystis is recommended.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document