scholarly journals 208. Comparison of Bloodstream Infections in Hospitalized Patients Before and During the COVID-19 Surge in a Community Hospital in the South Bronx: An Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S212-S213
Author(s):  
Afsheen Afzal ◽  
Edgar Gomez ◽  
Victor Perez Guttierrez ◽  
Aye Myat Mon ◽  
Carolina Moreira Sarmiento ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Positive Culture ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Blood Stream ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Rectal Tube ◽  
The South ◽  
South Bronx

Abstract Background There is a paucity of data of bloodstream infections (BSI) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of our study was to compare the incidence and characteristics of blood stream infections (BSI) in hospitalized patients before and during the surge of COVID-19 pandemic in a community hospital in South Bronx. Methods This is a retrospective observational comparative study of adult hospitalized patients with BSI admitted before (Jan 1-Feb 28, 2020) and during COVID-19 surge (Mar 1- May 1,2020). The incidence of BSI, patient demographics, clinical and microbiological characteristics of infections including treatment and outcomes were compared. Results Of the 155 patients with BSI, 64 were before COVID and 91 were during the COVID surge (Table 1). Incidence of BSI was 5.84 before COVID and 6.57 during surge (p = 0.004). Majority of patients during COVID period had ARDS (39.6%), required mechanical ventilation (57%), inotropic support (46.2%), therapeutic anticoagulation (24.2%), proning (22%), rectal tube (28.6%), Tocilizumab (9.9%), and steroids (30.8%) in comparison to pre-COVID (Table 2). Days of antibiotic therapy prior to BSI was 5 days before COVID and 7 during COVID. Mortality was higher among patients with BSI admitted during COVID surge (41.8% vs. 14.1% p < 0.0001). Of 185 BSI events, 71 were Pre-COVID and 114 during surge. Primary BSI were predominant (72%) before COVID contrary to secondary BSI (46%) (CLABSI) during COVID. Time from admission to positive culture was 2.5 days during COVID compared to 0.9 pre-COVID. Majority of BSI during COVID period were monomicrobial (93%) and hospital acquired (50%) (p=0.001). Enterococcus (20.2%), E.coli (13.2%), and MSSA (12.3%) were predominant microbes causing BSI during COVID vs. MRSA (15.5%), Streptococci (15.5%), and S. pneumoniae (14.1%) before COVID (Figure 1). In multivariate logistic regression, Enterococcal coinfection was associated with COVID positivity (OR 2.685, p = 0.038), mechanical ventilation (OR 8.739, p = 0.002), and presence of COPD/Asthma (OR 2.823, p = 0.035). Comparison of Microorganisms Isolated in the BSI X-axis represents the total number of BSI events whereas the number at the end of each bar represents the percentage Conclusion Higher incidence of secondary BSI (CLABSI) due to Enterococcus spp. was observed during the surge of COVID-19 infection in the South Bronx. Breakdown of infection control measures during the COVID-19 pandemic could have been contributory. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 201. Comparison of Bloodstream Infections Between Hospitalized Patients with and without COVID-19 Infection During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Community Hospital in South Bronx: An Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S208-S209
Author(s):  
Afsheen Afzal ◽  
Edgar Gomez ◽  
Victor Perez Guttierrez ◽  
Aye Myat Mon ◽  
Carolina Moreira Sarmiento ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Positive Culture ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Rectal Tube ◽  
Candida Spp ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Abstract Background Comparative data on bloodstream infections (BSI) in hospitalized patients with and without SARS-CoV2 positive test is lacking. Methods A retrospective observational study comparing (BSI) with and without COVID-19 infection was performed was performed from Jan1- May 1, 2020. Patient demographics, clinical microbiological characteristics of infections, therapeutic interventions and outcomes was compared between the two groups. Results Of 155 patients with BSI, 104 were SARS-CoV2 PCR negative (N) while 51 were positive (Table 1). Majority of SARS-CoV2 positives (P) had ARDS (58.8%), required mechanical ventilation (73%), inotropic support (55%), therapeutic anticoagulation (28%), proning (35%), Rectal tube (43%), Tocilizumab (18%), and steroids (43%) (Table 2). BSI was higher in N with HIV (16.3% vs 3.9% p=0.027). Duration of antibiotic therapy (DOT) prior to BSI was significantly longer in P (15 days vs. 5 days, p < 0.0001) (table 2). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher among P with BSI (49% vs. 21% p < 0.0001). 185 BSI events were observed during the study period with 117 in N patients and 68 in P. Primary BSI was predominant (76%) in N while secondary BSI (65%) was common in P of which 50% were CLABSI. Median time from admission to positive culture was 0.86 days in N compared to 12.4 in P (p = 0.001). Majority of BSI in P were monomicrobial (88%) and hospital acquired (71%) when compared to N (p< 0.001). Enterococcus spp (28%), Candida spp(12%), MRSA (10%) and E.coli (10%) were predominant microbes in P compared to Streptococcus grp (16%), MSSA (14%), MRSA (13%) and E.coli (12%) in N (figure 1). Mortality from BSI was associated with COVID-19 infection (OR 2.403, p = 0.038), DM (OR 2.335, p = 0.032), Charlson comorbidity index >3 (OR 1.236, p = 0.004), and mechanical ventilation (OR 11.398, p < 0.001) on multivariate analysis. Comparison of Microorganisms isolated in the BSI X-axis represents the number of BSI events whereas the number at the end of each bar represents the percentage Conclusion Increased events of hospital acquired, secondary BSI (CLABSI) due to Enterococcus was observed in adult P compared to N. These patients were critically ill, developed BSI in the second week of hospitalization, had longer DOT prior to positive cultures and worse outcomes. Breakdown of infection control measures and inappropriate antimicrobial use during the surge could be contributory. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Bloodstream infections in hospitalized patients before and during the COVID-19 surge in a community hospital in the South Bronx

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afsheen Afzal ◽  
Victor Perez Gutierrez ◽  
Edgar Gomez ◽  
Aye Myat Mon ◽  
Carolina Moreira Sarmiento ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Community Hospital ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
The South ◽  
South Bronx

scholarly journals Three-year study of health care-associated infections in a Turkish pediatric ward

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1415-1420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Canan Kuzdan ◽  
Ahmet Soysal ◽  
Gulcan Çulha ◽  
Gulsen Altinkanat ◽  
Guner Soyletir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Blood Stream ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Pediatric Ward ◽  
Control Programmes ◽  
Resistance Patterns ◽  
Health Care Associated Infections ◽  
Tract Infections

Introduction: Health care-associated infections (HCAIs) can cause an increase in morbidity, mortality and costs, especially in developing countries. As information on the epidemiology of HCAIs in pediatric patientsinTurkey is limited, we decided to study the annual incidence and antibiotic resistance patterns in our pediatric ward at Marmara University Hospital. Methodology: All hospitalized patients in the pediatric ward were assessed with regard to HCAIs betweenJanuary 1, 2008 and December 31, 2010. Data was prospectively collected according to standard protocols of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NosoLINE). Results: A total of 16.5% of all hospitalized patients developed HCAIs in the three years studied. The most frequent HCAIs were urinary tract infections (UTI) (29.3%), bloodstream infections (27%) and pneumonias (21%). While the most frequent agent isolatedfrom UTI was Escherichia coli (26%), the most common agent in blood stream infections was Staphylococcus epidermidis (30.4%). Vancomycin resistance was found in 73.3% of all Enterococcus faecium strains. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase was detected in 58.3% of Klebsiella pneumoniae and E. coli isolates. Conclusions: Continual HCAI surveillance is important to determineits rate. Knowledge of the HCAI incidence can influence people’s use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and encourage antibiotic rotation. Moreover, the knowledge of HCAI incidence may support the infection control programmes, including education and isolation methods which ultimately may help to reducethe rate of the HCAIs.

scholarly journals Impact of Residential Neighborhood and Race/Ethnicity on Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in the Bronx

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwayvania Miller ◽  
Amara Sarwal ◽  
Bo Yu ◽  
Edgar Gomez ◽  
Victor Perez-Gutierrez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
The South ◽  
South Bronx ◽  
Disadvantaged Area ◽  
Residential Neighborhood ◽  
Major Disaster ◽  
Comorbidity Burden ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
The Impact

AbstractThe socially vulnerable have been most affected due to the COVID-19 pandemic, similar to the aftermath of any major disaster. Racial and social minorities are experiencing a disproportionate burden of morbidity and mortality.The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of residential location/community and race/ethnicity on outcomes of COVID-19 infection among hospitalized patients within the Bronx. This was a single center retrospective observational cohort study that included SARS-CoV2 positive adult residents of the Bronx (stratified as residents of South Bronx vs Rest of Bronx) hospitalized between March-May 2020. Data extracted from hospital electronic medical records included residential addresses, race, comorbidities, and insurance details. Comorbidity burden other clinical and laboratory details were also assessed to determine their correlation to COVID-19 severity of illness and outcomes of mortality and length of stay.As expected, the COVID-19 pandemic differentially affected outcomes in those in the more socially disadvantaged area of the South Bronx versus the rest of the Bronx borough. Residents of the South Bronx had a significantly higher comorbidity burden and had public insurance to access medical care in comparison to the remainder of the Bronx. Interestingly, for the patient population studied there was no observed difference in 30-day mortality by race/ethnicity among those infected with COVID- 19 in spite of the increased disease burden observed.This adds an interesting perspective to the current literature, and highlights the need to address the social/economic factors contributing to health access disparity to reduce the adverse impact of COVID-19 in these communities.

scholarly journals Evaluation of a new Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility system for Gram-negative and Gram-positive bloodstream infections: Speed and accuracy of Alfred 60 AST

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanesa Anton-Vazquez ◽  
Adjepong Samuel ◽  
Suarez Cristina ◽  
Planche Timothy
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Antibiotic Sensitivity ◽  
Positive Culture ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Blood Stream ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Culture Bottle ◽  
Gram Negative

Abstract Background Blood stream infections (BSIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The time from taking blood cultures to obtain results of antibiotic sensitivity can be up to five days which impacts patient care. The Alfred 60 AST™ can reduce laboratory time from positive culture bottle to susceptibility results from 16-25 hours to 5-6 hours, transforming patient care. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a rapid antimicrobial susceptibility system, the Alfred 60 AST™, in clinical isolates from patients with BSIs and confirm time to results. Methods 301 Gram-negative and 86 Gram-positive isolates were analysed directly from positive blood culture bottles following Gram staining. Antimicrobial susceptibility results and time-to-results obtained by rapid Alfred 60 AST system and BD Phoenix were compared . Results A total of 2,196 antimicrobial susceptibility test results (AST) were performed: 1,863 Gram-negative and 333 Gram-positive. AST categorical agreement (CA) for Alfred 60 AST™ was 95% (1772/1863) for Gram-negative and 89% (295/333) for Gram-positive isolates. Gram-negative CA: ampicillin 96% (290/301); ciprofloxacin 95% (283/297); ceftriaxone 96% (75/78); meropenem 97% (288/297); piperacillin-tazobactam 95% (280/295); gentamicin 94% (279/297) and amikacin 93% (277/298). The median time to susceptibility results from blood culture flagging positive was 6.3 h vs 20 h (p<0.01) for Alfred system vs BD Phoenix™. Conclusion Alfred 60 AST system greatly reduced time to antimicrobial susceptibility results in Gram-negative and Gram-positive BSIs with good performance and cost, particularly for Gram-negative bacteraemia.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci

2022 ◽  
Vol 66 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 12-16
Author(s):  
N. E. Barantsevich ◽  
S. V. Volkova ◽  
A. Yu. Zaritsky ◽  
E. P. Barantsevich
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Blood Stream ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vancomycin Resistance ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Linezolid Resistance ◽  
Enterococcus Spp ◽  
Major Medical Center

Background. Enterococcus spp. are opportunistic agents of community-acquired and in-hospital infections, which have been considered a threat to public health due to their antimicrobial resistance, primarily to glycopeptides, in recent years.The aim of the study is to determine the prevalence of various Enterococcus species causing infections in hospitalized patients and their antimicrobial resistance.Methods included identification by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in accordance with the EUCAST or, in their absence, CLSI guidelines.Results. Antimicrobial resistance in 1562 consecutive Enterococcus strains isolated from hospitalized patients was determined in a major medical center admitting patients from various regions of the Russian Federation in 2019. The predominance of E.faecalis and E.faecium (99.5%) was revealed; the frequency of isolation of the former was 56% higher than that of the latter. E.avium, E.casseliflavus, E.gallinarum, E.durans were isolated from 0.5% of biological samples. The highest level of resistance of enterococci was observed to erythromycin (84.8%), tetracycline (75.0%), and rifampicin (68.2%). Multidrug, as well as vancomycin resistance, prevailed in E.faecium. All E.faecium strains isolated from blood were multidrug resistant. Resistance to vancomycin in enterococci, causing bloodstream infections, was observed solely in 19.5% of E.faecium; all vancomycin-resistant isolates were also resistant to teicoplanin. Linezolid resistance was detected in 2 community-acquired strains of E.faecalis (0.1%). Rare enterococci have shown diverse patterns of antimicrobial resistance.Conclusions. E.faecalis and E.faecium prevailed among Enterococcus spp. causing infections in hospitalized patients. Multidrug resistance and vancomycin resistance were observed predominantly in E.faecium, especially in strains causing blood-stream infections. Further monitoring of the spread and antimicrobial resistance of various Enterococcus spp. in hospital and community-acquired infections is needed.

scholarly journals Evaluation of a new Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility system for Gram-negative and Gram-positive bloodstream infections: speed and accuracy of Alfred 60AST

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanesa Anton-Vazquez ◽  
Samuel Adjepong ◽  
Cristina Suarez ◽  
Timothy Planche
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Antibiotic Sensitivity ◽  
Positive Culture ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Blood Stream ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Culture Bottle ◽  
Gram Negative

Abstract Background Blood stream infections (BSIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The time from taking blood cultures to obtain results of antibiotic sensitivity can be up to five days which impacts patient care. The Alfred 60 AST™ can reduce laboratory time from positive culture bottle to susceptibility results from 16 to 25 h to 5–6 h, transforming patient care. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a rapid antimicrobial susceptibility system, the Alfred 60 AST™, in clinical isolates from patients with BSIs and confirm time to results. 301 Gram-negative and 86 Gram-positive isolates were analysed directly from positive blood culture bottles following Gram staining. Antimicrobial susceptibility results and time-to-results obtained by rapid Alfred 60 AST system and BD Phoenix were compared . Results A total of 2196 antimicrobial susceptibility test results (AST) were performed: 1863 Gram-negative and 333 Gram-positive. AST categorical agreement (CA) for Alfred 60 AST™ was 95% (1772/1863) for Gram-negative and 89% (295/333) for Gram-positive isolates. Gram-negative CA: ampicillin 96% (290/301); ciprofloxacin 95% (283/297); ceftriaxone 96% (75/78); meropenem 97% (288/297); piperacillin-tazobactam 95% (280/295); gentamicin 94% (279/297) and amikacin 93% (277/298). The median time to susceptibility results from blood culture flagging positive was 6.3 h vs 20 h (p < 0.01) for Alfred system vs BD Phoenix™. Conclusion Alfred 60 AST system greatly reduced time to antimicrobial susceptibility results in Gram-negative and Gram-positive BSIs with good performance and cost, particularly for Gram-negative bacteraemia.

scholarly journals Healthcare-Associated Laboratory-Confirmed Bloodstream Infections—Species Diversity and Resistance Mechanisms, a Four-Year Retrospective Laboratory-Based Study in the South of Poland

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 2785
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Chmielarczyk ◽  
Monika Pomorska-Wesołowska ◽  
Dorota Romaniszyn ◽  
Jadwiga Wójkowska-Mach
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Diagnostic Techniques ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
The South ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Aminoglycoside Resistance ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Maldi Tof ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant

Introduction: Regardless of the country, advancements in medical care and infection prevention and control of bloodstream infections (BSIs) are an enormous burden of modern medicine. Objectives: The aim of our study was to describe the epidemiology and drug-resistance of laboratory-confirmed BSI (LC-BSIs) among adult patients of 16 hospitals in the south of Poland. Patients and methods: Data on 4218 LC-BSIs were collected between 2016–2019. The identification of the strains was performed using MALDI-TOF. Resistance mechanisms were investigated according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, EUCAST recommendations. Results: Blood cultures were collected from 8899 patients, and LC-BSIs were confirmed in 47.4%. The prevalence of Gram-positive bacteria was 70.9%, Gram-negative 27.8% and yeast 1.4%. The most frequently isolated genus was Staphylococcus (50% of all LC-BSIs), with a domination of coagulase-negative staphylococci, while Escherichia coli (13.7%) was the most frequent Gram-negative bacterium. Over 4 years, 108 (2.6%) bacteria were isolated only once, including species from the human microbiota as well as environmental and zoonotic microorganisms. The highest methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence was in intensive care units (ICUs) (55.6%) but S. aureus with resistance to macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins B (MLSB) in surgery was 66.7%. The highest prevalence of E. faecalis with a high-level aminoglycoside resistance (HLAR) mechanism was in ICUs, (84.6%), while E. faecium-HLAR in surgery was 83.3%. All cocci were fully glycopeptide-sensitive. Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli were detected only in non-fermentative bacilli group, with prevalence 70% and more. Conclusions: The BSI microbiology in Polish hospitals was similar to those reported in other studies, but the prevalence of MRSA and enterococci-HLAR was higher than expected, as was the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant non-fermentative bacilli. Modern diagnostic techniques, such as MALDI-TOF, guarantee reliable diagnosis.

scholarly journals Empiric use of anticoagulation in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a propensity score-matched study of risks and benefits

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Yu ◽  
Victor Perez Gutierrez ◽  
Alex Carlos ◽  
Gregory Hoge ◽  
Anjana Pillai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Risk Estimation ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 demonstrate a higher risk of developing thromboembolism. Anticoagulation (AC) has been proposed for high-risk patients, even without confirmed thromboembolism. However, benefits and risks of AC are not well assessed due to insufficient clinical data. We performed a retrospective analysis of outcomes from AC in a large population of COVID-19 patients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 1189 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between March 5 and May 15, 2020, with primary outcomes of mortality, invasive mechanical ventilation, and major bleeding. Patients who received therapeutic AC for known indications were excluded. Propensity score matching of baseline characteristics and admission parameters was performed to minimize bias between cohorts. Results The analysis cohort included 973 patients. Forty-four patients who received therapeutic AC for confirmed thromboembolic events and atrial fibrillation were excluded. After propensity score matching, 133 patients received empiric therapeutic AC while 215 received low dose prophylactic AC. Overall, there was no difference in the rate of invasive mechanical ventilation (73.7% versus 65.6%, p = 0.133) or mortality (60.2% versus 60.9%, p = 0.885). However, among patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, empiric therapeutic AC was an independent predictor of lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.476, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.345–0.657, p < 0.001) with longer median survival (14 days vs 8 days, p < 0.001), but these associations were not observed in the overall cohort (p = 0.063). Additionally, no significant difference in mortality was found between patients receiving empiric therapeutic AC versus prophylactic AC in various subgroups with different D-dimer level cutoffs. Patients who received therapeutic AC showed a higher incidence of major bleeding (13.8% vs 3.9%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with a HAS-BLED score of ≥2 had a higher risk of mortality (HR 1.482, 95% CI 1.110–1.980, p = 0.008), while those with a score of ≥3 had a higher risk of major bleeding (Odds ratio: 1.883, CI: 1.114–3.729, p = 0.016). Conclusion Empiric use of therapeutic AC conferred survival benefit to patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, but did not show benefit in non-critically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Careful bleeding risk estimation should be pursued before considering escalation of AC intensity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document