P070 Tele-consultations from the patient’s perspective: during the pandemic and beyond

Abstract Background/Aims The current COVID-19 pandemic has challenged healthcare systems worldwide stimulating a transformation of NHS services to cope with increased acute demand, while aiming to minimise viral transmission. A significant proportion of rheumatology patients are considered ‘clinically extremely vulnerable’ and are at increased risk of COVID-19. With this in mind, alongside national guidance from the British Society for Rheumatology and the National Institute of Clinical Excellence we adapted our services in response to COVID by mostly suspending face-to-face appointments for follow up patients, instead relying on telephone or virtual consultations with a face-to-face appointment if necessary in order to minimise risk to our patients. We aimed to evaluate our use of telephone consultations during the pandemic and gain understanding of our patients views of telephone consultations longer term. Methods We retrospectively surveyed rheumatology patients under active follow-up at the royal Wolverhampton trust who had a telephone consultation with a rheumatology consultant over a 4-week period (11/5/20- 4/6/20). Patients were invited to participate via a SMS text message containing an embedded web-link to the survey. Results were analysed using SPSS version 26. Results Surveys were sent to 1,213 patients; 306 (25.2%) patients completed the survey. Responders were mostly female; the predominant diagnosis was inflammatory arthritis. Ages included: 1 (0.3%) patient 16-29 years, 46 (15.0%) 30-49, 180 (58.8%) 50-69, and 79 (25.8%) aged >70 years. Regarding their telephone consultation, 86.6% of responders were satisfied with the consultation. During the current pandemic 81.4% of responders were pleased to have a telephone consult rather than face-to-face; 57.2% of responders would be happy for their next routine appointment to be a telephone clinic. A significantly higher proportion of patients <50 years preferred telephone consultations when compared to older patients (Chi2 [DF = 3]= 10.075, P = 0.018) and more younger patients had access to a smartphone than those in the older cohort (Chi2 [DF 3]= 20.919, P = <0.001). Conclusion Overall, the short-term switch to telephone consultation was well received by our cohort. The majority of patients were satisfied with their telephone consultation and most were pleased to have a telephone consult rather than a face-to-face appointment in the current pandemic. Just over half would be happy for their next routine appointment to be a telephone consultation, however, a significantly higher proportion of younger patients prefer telephone consultations compared to older patients and a greater number of younger patients have access to a smartphone compared to older patients. Further planning is required to ensure patients in older and other vulnerable groups are not excluded should telephone clinics become a more permanent fixture. Disclosure N. Cleaton: None. S. Raizada: None.

Download Full-text

Are telephone consultations here to stay in rheumatology?

Rheumatology Advances in Practice ◽

10.1093/rap/rkaa071 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Sabrina R Raizada ◽

Natasha Cleaton ◽

James Bateman ◽

Diarmuid M Mulherin ◽

Nick Barkham

Keyword(s):

Older Patients ◽

Online Survey ◽

Vulnerable Groups ◽

Age Group ◽

Telephone Consultation ◽

Survey Tool ◽

Face To Face ◽

Vulnerable Patients ◽

Number Of Patients

Abstract Objectives During the COVID-19 pandemic, face-to-face rheumatology follow-up appointments were mostly replaced with telephone or virtual consultations in order to protect vulnerable patients. We aimed to investigate the perspectives of rheumatology patients on the use of telephone consultations compared with the traditional face-to-face consultation. Methods We carried out a retrospective survey of all rheumatology follow-up patients at the Royal Wolverhampton Trust who had received a telephone consultation from a rheumatology consultant during a 4-week period via an online survey tool. Results Surveys were distributed to 1213 patients, of whom 336 (27.7%) responded, and 306 (91.1%) patients completed all components of the survey. Overall, an equal number of patients would prefer telephone clinics or face-to-face consultations for their next routine appointment. When divided by age group, the majority who preferred the telephone clinics were <50 years old [χ2 (d.f. = 3) = 10.075, P = 0.018]. Prevalence of a smartphone was higher among younger patients (<50 years old: 46 of 47, 97.9%) than among older patients (≥50 years old: 209 of 259, 80.7%) [χ2 (d.f. = 3) = 20.919, P < 0.001]. More patients reported that they would prefer a telephone call for urgent advice (168, 54.9%). Conclusion Most patients interviewed were happy with their routine face-to-face appointment being switched to a telephone consultation. Of those interviewed, patients >50 years old were less likely than their younger counterparts to want telephone consultations in place of face-to-face appointments. Most patients in our study would prefer a telephone consultation for urgent advice. We must ensure that older patients and those in vulnerable groups who value in-person contact are not excluded. Telephone clinics in some form are here to stay in rheumatology for the foreseeable future.

Download Full-text

829 Is There an Ongoing Role For 'Telephone Triage Clinics' Post COVID-19?

British Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1093/bjs/znab134.092 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

B Holmes ◽

U Mirza ◽

C Manning ◽

R Cooke ◽

R Jugdey

Keyword(s):

Common Theme ◽

Telephone Triage ◽

Telephone Consultation ◽

Face To Face ◽

Clinician Satisfaction ◽

Set Up ◽

Local Protocol ◽

Telephone Questionnaire

Abstract Introduction COVID-19 has placed unprecedented demand on services at ELHT and it has become necessary to have telephone clinics to reduce the number of face-to-face clinics. A ‘telephone triage clinic’ was set up for referrals from A&E. Our project evaluated patient and clinician satisfaction on this. Method We carried out a retrospective telephone questionnaire with patients over a one-week period during the pandemic. We focussed on overall satisfaction of the consultation and quality of communication. Consultants were also surveyed for their opinion on the clinics. Results From 30 patients, 77% said they were ‘very satisfied’ with the overall experience. 80% of patients were ‘very satisfied’ with the overall length of the telephone consultation. 50% of patients felt the clinician was only ‘adequately’ able to assess them over the telephone. The consultants were less satisfied with the overall experience of telephone consultation. A common theme was that they felt ED documentation could be improved to help inform ongoing management. Conclusions Overall, patients were satisfied with the consultations. It has been successful in minimising face to face consultations however some presentations necessitate further evaluation. We need to identify those injuries appropriate for virtual follow up and design a local protocol for these.

Download Full-text

Implementation of podiatry telephone appointments for people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research ◽

10.1186/s13047-020-00441-9 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

Author(s):

J. L. Palmer ◽

H. J. Siddle ◽

A. C. Redmond ◽

B. Alcacer-Pitarch

Keyword(s):

Musculoskeletal Diseases ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Time Frame ◽

Teaching Hospitals ◽

Potential Cost ◽

Foot Health ◽

Telephone Consultation ◽

Face To Face ◽

Initial Intervention

Abstract Background Foot health problems are common in the general population, and particularly so in people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disorders (RMD). Several clinical guidelines state that people with RMDs should have access to foot health services, although service capacity is often limited. The current COVID-19 pandemic has increased the need for alternative ways to provide patient care. The aim of this clinical audit was to review a newly implemented telephone follow-up appointment service conducted within the Rheumatology Podiatry Department in Leeds, UK. Methods Fifty-eight patients attending the Rheumatology Podiatry Department at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust were contacted by telephone approximately 6–8 weeks following initial intervention. During the telephone consultation, all patients were asked pre-defined questions relating to their symptoms, intervention efficacy, the need for further appointments and their preference for the type of consultation. To assess the cost of the telephone consultation the number of attempts needed in order to make successful contact, the duration of the call and the number of telephone follow-up appointments completed in a working day were also recorded. Results Twenty-five patients (43%) were successfully contacted within the 6–8 weeks stipulated time frame and were included in the analysis. Of the 25 contacted, twelve (48%) patients were successfully contacted on the first attempt. Ten (40%) were successfully contacted on the second attempt. The remaining three patients (12%) required 3 or more attempts to make successful contact. Telephone consultations were estimated not to last longer than 10 min, including notes screening and documentation. Eleven patients (44%) reported an improvement in their symptoms, thirteen (52%) reported no change and one patient (4%) reported their symptoms to be worse. Conclusion Telephone follow-up consultations may be a potentially cost-effective alternative to face-to-face appointments when implemented in a Rheumatology Podiatry Department, and provide an alternative way of providing care, especially when capacity for face-to-face contact is limited. The potential cost saving and efficiency benefits of this service are likely to be enhanced when telephone consultations are pre-arranged with patients.

Download Full-text

P071 Survey of rheumatology patient satisfaction with telephone consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic

Rheumatology ◽

10.1093/rheumatology/keab247.069 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Mia Rodziewicz ◽

Terence O'Neill ◽

Audrey Low

Keyword(s):

Patient Satisfaction ◽

Physical Examination ◽

Management Plan ◽

Service Development ◽

Telephone Consultation ◽

Face To Face ◽

Communication Difficulties ◽

Strongly Agree ◽

The Uk

Abstract Background/Aims Rheumatology departments were required to switch rapidly from face-to-face (F2F) to remote consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. We conducted a patient satisfaction survey on the switch to inform future service development. Methods All patients [new (NP), follow-up (FU)] were identified between 1st to 5th June 2020. Patients who attended or did not attend (DNA) a pre-booked F2F consultation or cancelled were excluded. Of the remainder, half the patients was surveyed by phone using a standardised questionnaire and the other half was posted the same questionnaire. Both groups were offered the opportunity to complete the survey online. Patients were surveyed on the organisation and content of the consultation, whether they were offered a subsequent F2F appointment and future consultation preference. Results 233 consultations were scheduled during the study period. After 53 exclusions (34 pre-booked F2F, 16 DNA, 3 cancellations), 180 eligible consultations were surveyed (85 via mailshot, 95 by telephone). 75/180 patients (42%) responded within 1 month of the telephone consultation (20 NP, 47 FU, 8 missing). The organisation of the switch was positively perceived (Table). Patients were highly satisfied with 4 of the 5 consultation domains but were undecided whether a physical assessment would have changed the outcome of the consultation (Table). After the initial phone consultation, 7 of 20 NP and 19 of 47 FU were not offered subsequent F2F appointments at the clinicians’ discretion. Of those not offered subsequent F2F appointments, proportionally more NP (3/7, 43%) would have liked one, compared to FU (5/19, 26%). Reasons included communication difficulties and a desire for a definitive diagnosis. 48/75 (64%) would be happy for future routine FU to be conducted by phone “most of the time" or "always”; citing patient convenience and disease stability. Caveats were if physical examination was required or if more serious issues (as perceived by the patient) needed F2F discussion. Conclusion Patients were generally satisfied with telephone consultations and most were happy to be reviewed again this way. NPs should be offered F2F appointments for first visits to maximise patient satisfaction and time efficiency. P071 Table 1:Median age, yearsFemale; n (%)Follow-up; n (%)All eligible for survey; n = 18056122 (68)133 (74)Sent mailshot; n = 855459 (69)65 (76)Surveyed by phone; n = 955663 (66)68 (72)Responder by mail; n = 166911 (69)13 (82)Responder by phone; n = 525437 (71)34 (65)Responder by e-survey; n = 7495 (71)UnknownOrganisation of the telephone consultation, N = 75Yes, n (%)No, n (%)Missing, n (%)Were you informed beforehand about the phone consultation?63 (84)11 (15)1 (1)Were you called within 1-2 hours of the appointed date and time?66 (88)6 (8)3 (4)Domains of the consultation, N = 75Strongly disagree, n (%)Disagree, n (%)Neutral, n (%)Agree, n (%)Strongly agree, n (%)Missing, n (%)During the call, I felt the clinician understood my problem3 (4)1 (1)1 (1)20 (27)49 (65)1 (1)During the call, I had the opportunity to ask questions regarding my clinical care1 (1)02 (3)16 (21)55 (73)1 (1)A physical examination would have changed the outcome of the consultation16 (21)18 (24)20 (27)11 (15)10 (13)0The clinician answered my questions to my satisfaction2 (3)06 (8)18 (24)49 (65)0At the end of the consultation, the clinician agreed a management plan with me3 (4)2 (3)6 (8)24 (32)39 (52)1 (1)Future consultations, N = 75Never, n (%)Sometimes, n (%)Most of the time, n (%)Always, n (%)Missing, n, (%)In the future, would you be happy for routine FU to be conducted by phone?5 (7)20 (27)16 (21)32 (43)2 (3) Disclosure M. Rodziewicz: None. T. O'Neill: None. A. Low: None.

Download Full-text

Why do frail patients with chronic heart failure die and become hospitalised?

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1149 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

S Sze ◽

P Pellicori ◽

J Zhang ◽

J Weston ◽

A.L Clark

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Cause Of Death ◽

Hospital Admissions ◽

Average Length ◽

Significant Proportion ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Clinical Frailty Scale ◽

Frail Patients ◽

Increased Risk

Abstract Background Frailty is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A better understanding of the causes of hospitalisations and death in frail patients might help to tailor interventional strategies for these at-risk patients. Purpose We studied the cause of death and hospitalisations in ambulatory patients with HF and frailty. Methods We assessed frailty using the clinical frailty scale (CFS) in consecutive HF patients attending a routine follow-up visit. Those with CFS ≥5 were classified as frail. Mortality and hospitalisations were ascertained from medical records (updated systematically using an NHS electronic database), discharge letters, autopsy reports and death certificates. We studied the primary cause of death and hospitalisations within one year of enrolment. Results 467 patients (67% male, median (IQR) age 76 (69–82) years, median (IQR) NT-proBNP 1156 (469–2463) ng/L) were enrolled. 206 (44%) patients were frail. Frail patients were more likely to not receive or receive suboptimal doses of ACEi/ARB and Beta-blockers; while non-frail patients were more likely to be treated with optimal doses. At 1-year follow up, there were 56 deaths and 322 hospitalisations, of which 46 (82%) and 215 (67%) occurred in frail patients. Frailty was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR (95% CI): 4.27 (2.60–7.01)) and combined mortality/ hospitalisation (HR (95% CI): 2.85 (2.14–3.80)), all p<0.001. 57% (n=26) of frail patients died of cardiovascular causes (of which 58% were due to HF progression); although deaths due to non-cardiovascular causes (43%, n=20), especially severe infections, were also common (26%, n=12). (Figure 1) The proportion of frail patients who had non-elective hospital admissions within 1 year was more than double that of non-frail patients (46% (n=96) vs 21% (n=54); p<0.001). Compared to non-frail patients, frail patients had more recurrent (≥2) hospitalisations (28% (n=59) vs 9% (n=24); p<0.001) but median (IQR) average length of hospital stay was not significantly different (frail: 6 (4–11) vs non-frail: 6 (2–12) days, p=0.50). A large proportion of hospitalisations (64%, n=137) in frail patients were due to non-cardiovascular causes (of which 34%, 30% and 20% were due to infections, falls and comorbidities respectively). Of cardiovascular hospitalisations (36%, n=78), the majority were due to decompensated HF (67%, n=46). (Figure 1) Conclusion Frailty is common in patients with HF and is associated with an increased risk of mortality and recurrent hospitalisations. A significant proportion suffered non-cardiovascular deaths and hospitalisations. This implies that interventions targeted at HF alone can only have limited impact on outcomes in frail patients. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Download Full-text

Longitudinal outcomes of patients with pseudodementia: a systematic review

Psychological Medicine ◽

10.1017/s0033291718002829 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 49 (5) ◽

pp. 727-737 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Michael H. Connors ◽

Lena Quinto ◽

Henry Brodaty

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Significant Proportion ◽

Conversion Disorder ◽

Bibliographic Databases ◽

Clinical Value ◽

Trial Methodology ◽

Longitudinal Outcomes ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Wide Range

AbstractDepression and a number of other psychiatric conditions can impair cognition and give the appearance of neurodegenerative disease. Collectively, this group of disorders is known as ‘pseudodementia’ and are important to identify given their potential reversibility with treatment. Despite considerable interest historically, the longitudinal outcomes of patients with pseudodementia remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review of longitudinal studies of pseudodementia. Bibliographic databases were searched using a wide range of search terms. Two reviewers independently assessed papers for inclusion, rated study quality, and extracted data. The search identified 18 studies with follow-up varying from several weeks to 18 years. Overall, 284 patients were studied, including 238 patients with depression, 18 with conversion disorder, 14 with psychosis, and 11 with bipolar disorder. Irrespective of diagnosis, 33% developed irreversible dementia at follow-up, 53% no longer met criteria for dementia, and 15% were lost to follow-up. Considerable variability was identified, with younger age at baseline, but not follow-up duration, associated with better outcomes. ECT and pharmacological interventions were also reported to be beneficial, though findings were limited by the poor quality of the studies. Overall, the findings suggest that pseudodementia may confer an increased risk of irreversible dementia in older patients. The findings also indicate, however, that a significant proportion improve, while many remain burdened with their psychiatric condition, independent of organic dementia. The findings support the clinical value of the construct and the need for its re-examination in light of developments in neuroimaging, genomics, other investigative tools, and trial methodology.

Download Full-text

TP10.2.9The effect of COVID-19 on Breast clinic follow ups – a change in future practice?

British Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1093/bjs/znab362.146 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽

Author(s):

Carol Norman ◽

Lilia Ragad ◽

Anupama Nagarajakumar ◽

Maryam Alam Khan ◽

Michal Uhercik ◽

...

Keyword(s):

University Hospital ◽

Electronic Patient Records ◽

Breast Clinic ◽

Telephone Consultation ◽

Face To Face ◽

Video Telephone ◽

Malignant Breast ◽

The Uk ◽

Future Practice

Abstract Aims Prior to March 2020, at Princess Royal University Hospital (PRUH), Kings College NHS Foundation Trust, almost daily face to face benign/malignant breast clinic follow ups occurred. On March 23rd 2020 the UK went into official COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. The effect on elective follow up practice was swift with cancellation, triaging and replacement of face-to-face by telephonic/virtual consultations. We compared the change of follow up pattern, pre and post COVID-19. Could this effect the future of consultations at PRUH? Methods A comparison of all patients attending PRUH breast unit outpatients in January 2020 (preCOVID-19) for follow up, with those attending in April 2020 (postCOVID-19). Data collection from clinic lists and electronic patient records, with Excel version 16 analysis. Results 343 patient follow up consultations 01/2020. 53 patient follow up consultations 04/2020. Malignant cases: January 65%, April 60% Benign/B3 cases: January 35%, April 20% Summary follow up types. Conclusions Impact of COVID has been widespread in our practice. Our results show a significant reduction in face-to-face appointments, to allow social distancing. Further evaluation of this model will show its sustainability. Patient satisfaction will have to be assessed, with a view to a full move to video/telephone consultation where indicated.

Download Full-text

The Effect of Telemedicine on Patients’ Compliance in Family Medicine Follow-ups in Qatar

Avicenna ◽

10.5339/avi.2022.3 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2022 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Yaman M. AlAhmad ◽

Duaa Mahmoud Haggeer ◽

Abrar Yaser Alsayed ◽

Mahmoud Y. Haik ◽

Leen Maen AbuAfifeh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Family Medicine ◽

Health Care Services ◽

Healthcare Services ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Telephone Consultation ◽

Face To Face ◽

Primary Health Care Centers

Introduction: Telemedicine is the delivery of health care services to patients distantly. During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, telemedicine has become an essential implement in delivering healthcare services worldwide. Accordingly, in March 2020, the Primary Health Care Centers (PHCCs) in Qatar has started telephone consultation follow-up appointments in Family Medicine (FM) clinics instead of conventional consultation. Given the limited data about telephone consultations in Qatar, our aim of this study is to investigate the possible impact of telemedicine on chronic disease patients’ follow-up compliance. Methods: This study compares the compliance of adult patients with chronic diseases following-up within FM clinics in Qatar's PHCC through telephone consultations with a minimum of three telephone consultations ordered between April to November 2020, in comparison to the compliance of the same group of patients to their prior face-to-face follow-up consultations in FM clinics with a minimum of three face-to-face ordered follow up appointments between April to November 2019. A cross-sectional study will be carried out to investigate the effect of telephone consultation in PHCC on patients’ compliance with reference to conventional face-to-face consultation. Patients’ data will be received from Health Information Management in twenty-seven PHCCs in Qatar. Conclusion: Due to the limited studies on the effectiveness of telemedicine on patient compliance in FM follow-ups within Qatar's PHCC, comparing patients’ follow-up compliance with telephone consultations to their prior face-to-face consultations would be helpful in assessing patients’ quality of care delivering within FM clinics. With telecommunication being easily accessible and time-efficient, it is believed, when used correctly, it might improve compliance and adherence to the management prescribed by the physician and follow-up appointments in Qatar's PHCC. In addition, this study will help in providing recommendations that could guide the organization on forming policies to be applied in PHCCs after the resolution of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Download Full-text

Functional Capacity Past Age 40 in Patients With Congenital Ventricular Septal Defects

Journal of the American Heart Association ◽

10.1161/jaha.120.015956 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (19) ◽

Author(s):

Marie Maagaard ◽

Filip Eckerström ◽

Nicolai Boutrup ◽

Vibeke E. Hjortdal

Keyword(s):

Oxygen Uptake ◽

Exercise Capacity ◽

Functional Capacity ◽

Older Patients ◽

Ventricular Septal Defects ◽

Younger Patients ◽

Septal Defects ◽

Lower Oxygen ◽

And Control

Background Ventricular septal defects (VSD), when treated correctly in childhood, are considered to have great prognoses, and the majority of patients are discharged from follow‐up when entering their teens. Young adults were previously found to have poorer functional capacity than healthy peers, but the question remains whether functional capacity degenerates further with age. Methods and Results A group of 30 patients with surgically closed VSDs (51±8 years) with 30 matched, healthy control participants (52±9 years) and a group of 30 patients with small unrepaired VSDs (55±12 years) and 30 matched control participants (55±10 years) underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing using an incremental workload protocol and noninvasive gas measurement. Peak oxygen uptake was lower in participants with closed VSDs than matched controls (24±7 versus 34±9 mL/min per kg, P <0.01) and with unrepaired VSDs than matched controls (26±5 versus 32±8 mL/min per kg, P <0.01). Patients demonstrated lower oxygen uptake from exercise levels at 20% of maximal workload compared with respective control groups ( P <0.01). Peak ventilation was lower in patients with surgically closed VSDs than control participants (1.0±0.3 versus 1.4±0.4 L/min per kg, P <0.01) but similar in patients with unrepaired VSDs and control participants ( P =0.14). Exercise capacity was 29% lower in older patients with surgically closed VSDs than healthy peers, whereas younger patients with surgically closed VSDs previously demonstrated 18% lower capacity compared with peers. Older patients with unrepaired VSDs reached 21% lower exercise capacity, whereas younger patients with unrepaired VSDs previously demonstrated 17% lower oxygen uptake than healthy peers. Conclusions Patients with VSDs demonstrate poorer exercise capacity than healthy peers. The difference between patients and control participants increased with advancing age—and increased most in patients with operated VSDs—compared with previous findings in younger patients. Results warrant continuous follow‐up for these simple defects.

Download Full-text

Results after Laparoscopic Fundoplication: Does Age Matter?

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/000313480607200904 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 72 (9) ◽

pp. 778-784 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Sarah M. Cowgill ◽

Dean Arnaoutakis ◽

Desiree Villadolid ◽

Sam Al-Saadi ◽

Demetri Arnaoutakis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Myocardial Infarction ◽

High Risk ◽

Older Patients ◽

Laparoscopic Fundoplication ◽

Nissen Fundoplication ◽

Younger Patients ◽

Before And After ◽

Laparoscopic Nissen ◽

Age Range

Antireflux fundoplications are undertaken with hesitation in older patients because of presumed higher morbidity and poorer outcomes. This study was undertaken to determine if symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) could be safely abrogated in a high-risk/reward population of older patients. One hundred eight patients more than 70 years of age (range, 70–90 years) underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications undertaken between 1992 and 2005 and were compared with 108 concurrent patients less than 60 years of age (range, 18–59 years) to determine relative outcomes. Before and after fundoplication, patients scored the severity of reflux and dysphagia on a Likert Scale (0 = minor, 10 = severe). Before fundoplication, older patients had lower reflux scores ( P < 0.01), but not lower dysphagia scores or DeMeester scores. One patient (86 years old) died from myocardial infarction; otherwise, complications occurred infrequently, inconsequentially, and regardless of age. At similar durations of follow-up, reflux and dysphagia scores significantly improved ( P < 0.01) for older and younger patients. After fundoplication, older patients had lower dysphagia scores ( P < 0.01) and lower reflux scores ( P < 0.01). At the most recent follow-up, 82 per cent of older patients rated their relief of symptoms as good or excellent. Similarly, 81 per cent of the younger patients reported good or excellent results. Ninety-one per cent of patients 70 years of age or more versus 85 per cent of patients less than 60 years would undergo laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication again, if necessary. With fundoplication, symptoms of GERD improve for older and younger patients, with less symptomatic dysphagia and reflux in older patients after fundoplication. Laparoscopic fundoplication safely ameliorates symptoms of GERD in elderly patients with symptomatic outcomes superior to those seen in younger patients.

Download Full-text