Precise detection of S phase onset reveals decoupled G1/S transition events

AbstractThe eukaryotic cell division cycle is the process by which cells duplicate their genomes and proliferate. Transitions between sequential cell cycle phases are tightly orchestrated to ensure precise and efficient cell cycle progression. Interrogating molecular events at these transitions is important for understanding normal and pathological cell proliferation and mechanisms that ensure genome stability. A popular fluorescent reporter system known as “FUCCI” has been widely adopted for identifying cell cycle phases. Using time-lapse fluorescence microscopy, we quantitatively analyzed the dynamics of the FUCCI reporters relative to the transitions into and out of S phase. Although the original reporters reflect the E3 ubiquitin ligase activities for which they were designed, SCFSkp2 and APCCdh1, their dynamics are significantly and variably offset from actual S phase boundaries. To precisely mark these transitions, we generated and thoroughly validated a new reporter containing a PCNA-interacting protein degron whose oscillations are directly coupled to the process of DNA replication itself. We combined this reporter with the geminin-based APCCdh1 reporter to create “PIP-FUCCI.” PIP degron reporter dynamics closely correlate with S phase transitions irrespective of reporter expression levels. Using PIP-FUCCI, we made the unexpected observation that the apparent timing of APCCdh1 inactivation frequently varies relative to the onset of S phase. We demonstrate that APCCdh1 inactivation is not a strict pre-requisite for S phase entry, though delayed APCCdh1 inactivation correlates with longer S phase. Our results illustrate the benefits of precise delineation of cell cycle phase boundaries for uncovering the sequences of molecular events at critical cell cycle transitions.

Download Full-text

DNA damage checkpoint dynamics drive cell cycle phase transitions

10.1101/137307 ◽

2017 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Hui Xiao Chao ◽

Cere E. Poovey ◽

Ashley A. Privette ◽

Gavin D. Grant ◽

Hui Yan Chao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Dna Damage ◽

Phase Transitions ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

S Phase ◽

Cell Cycle Phase ◽

Cycle Phase ◽

Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽

Cycle Progression ◽

Dna Damage Checkpoints

ABSTRACTDNA damage checkpoints are cellular mechanisms that protect the integrity of the genome during cell cycle progression. In response to genotoxic stress, these checkpoints halt cell cycle progression until the damage is repaired, allowing cells enough time to recover from damage before resuming normal proliferation. Here, we investigate the temporal dynamics of DNA damage checkpoints in individual proliferating cells by observing cell cycle phase transitions following acute DNA damage. We find that in gap phases (G1 and G2), DNA damage triggers an abrupt halt to cell cycle progression in which the duration of arrest correlates with the severity of damage. However, cells that have already progressed beyond a proposed “commitment point” within a given cell cycle phase readily transition to the next phase, revealing a relaxation of checkpoint stringency during later stages of certain cell cycle phases. In contrast to G1 and G2, cell cycle progression in S phase is significantly less sensitive to DNA damage. Instead of exhibiting a complete halt, we find that increasing DNA damage doses leads to decreased rates of S-phase progression followed by arrest in the subsequent G2. Moreover, these phase-specific differences in DNA damage checkpoint dynamics are associated with corresponding differences in the proportions of irreversibly arrested cells. Thus, the precise timing of DNA damage determines the sensitivity, rate of cell cycle progression, and functional outcomes for damaged cells. These findings should inform our understanding of cell fate decisions after treatment with common cancer therapeutics such as genotoxins or spindle poisons, which often target cells in a specific cell cycle phase.

Download Full-text

Intrinsic S phase checkpoint enforced by an antiproliferative oncosuppressor cytokine

Cancer Gene Therapy ◽

10.1038/s41417-021-00397-3 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Livio Mallucci ◽

Valerie Wells

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

Self Regulation ◽

Cyclin A ◽

S Phase ◽

Cycle Phase ◽

Control Mechanisms ◽

Checkpoint Control ◽

Normal Cells ◽

Orderly Transition

AbstractThe cell cycle is strictly programmed with control mechanisms that dictate order in cell cycle progression to ensure faithful DNA replication, whose deviance may lead to cancer. Checkpoint control at the G1/S, S/G2 and G2/M portals have been defined but no statutory time-programmed control for securing orderly transition through S phase has so far been identified. Here we report that in normal cells DNA synthesis is controlled by a checkpoint sited within the early part of S phase, enforced by the βGBP cytokine an antiproliferative molecule otherwise known for its oncosuppressor properties that normal cells constitutively produce for self-regulation. Suppression of active Ras and active MAPK, block of cyclin A gene expression and suppression of CDK2-cyclin A activity are events which while specific to the control of a cell cycle phase in normal cells are part of the apoptotic network in cancer cells.

Download Full-text

p50 mono-ubiquitination and interaction with BARD1 regulates cell cycle progression and maintains genome stability

Nature Communications ◽

10.1038/s41467-020-18838-2 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Longtao Wu ◽

Clayton D. Crawley ◽

Andrea Garofalo ◽

Jackie W. Nichols ◽

Paige-Ashley Campbell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Genome Stability ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

Human Cancer ◽

S Phase ◽

Post Translational Modification ◽

Chromosomal Breakage ◽

Cycle Progression ◽

Genome Wide ◽

Phase Progression

Abstract p50, the mature product of NFKB1, is constitutively produced from its precursor, p105. Here, we identify BARD1 as a p50-interacting factor. p50 directly associates with the BARD1 BRCT domains via a C-terminal phospho-serine motif. This interaction is induced by ATR and results in mono-ubiquitination of p50 by the BARD1/BRCA1 complex. During the cell cycle, p50 is mono-ubiquitinated in S phase and loss of this post-translational modification increases S phase progression and chromosomal breakage. Genome-wide studies reveal a substantial decrease in p50 chromatin enrichment in S phase and Cycln E is identified as a factor regulated by p50 during the G1 to S transition. Functionally, interaction with BARD1 promotes p50 protein stability and consistent with this, in human cancer specimens, low nuclear BARD1 protein strongly correlates with low nuclear p50. These data indicate that p50 mono-ubiquitination by BARD1/BRCA1 during the cell cycle regulates S phase progression to maintain genome integrity.

Download Full-text

Endothelial cells isolated from caveolin-2 knockout mice display higher proliferation rate and cell cycle progression relative to their wild-type counterparts

AJP Cell Physiology ◽

10.1152/ajpcell.00401.2009 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 298 (3) ◽

pp. C693-C701 ◽

Cited By ~ 18

Author(s):

Leike Xie ◽

Philippe G. Frank ◽

Michael P. Lisanti ◽

Grzegorz Sowa

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Fold Increase ◽

S Phase ◽

Lower Percentage ◽

Wild Type ◽

Cycle Progression ◽

Molecular Events

The goal of this study was to determine whether caveolin-2 (Cav-2) is capable of controlling endothelial cell (EC) proliferation in vitro. To realize this goal, we have directly compared proliferation rates and cell cycle-associated signaling proteins between lung ECs isolated from wild-type (WT) and Cav-2 knockout (KO) mice. Using three independent proliferation assays, we have determined that Cav-2 KO ECs proliferate by ca. 2-fold faster than their WT counterparts. Cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry of propidium iodide-stained cells showed a relatively higher percentage of Cav-2 KO ECs in S and G2/M and lower percentage in Go/G1 phases of cell cycle relative to their WT counterparts. Furthermore, an over 2-fold increase in the percentage of S phase-associated Cav-2 KO relative to WT ECs was independently determined with bromodeoxyuridine incorporation assay. Mechanistically, the increase in proliferation/cell cycle progression of Cav-2 KO ECs correlated well with elevated expression levels of predominantly S phase- and G2/M phase-associated cyclin A and B1, respectively. Further mechanistic analysis of molecular events controlling cell cycle progression revealed increased level of hyperphosphorylated (inactive) form of G1 to S phase transition inhibitor, the retinoblastoma protein in hyperproliferating Cav-2 KO ECs. Conversely, the expression level of the two cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p16INK4 and p27Kip1 was reduced in Cav-2 KO ECs. Finally, increased phosphorylation (activation) of proproliferative extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 was observed in hyperproliferating Cav-2 KO ECs. Overall, our data suggest that Cav-2 negatively regulates lung EC proliferation and cell cycle progression.

Download Full-text

Fungal zygote survival and ploidy maintenance rely on cell cycle-dependent and independent mating blocks

10.1101/2020.07.26.222000 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Aleksandar Vještica ◽

Melvin Bérard ◽

Gaowen Liu ◽

Laura Merlini ◽

Pedro Junior Nkosi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Genome Stability ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

S Phase ◽

Cycle Progression ◽

Mating Behaviors ◽

Cycle Dependent ◽

Necessary And Sufficient ◽

Meiotic Cycle

AbstractTo ensure genome stability, sexually reproducing organisms require that mating brings together exactly two haploid gametes and that meiosis occurs only in diploid zygotes. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, fertilization triggers the Mei3-Pat1-Mei2 signaling cascade, which represses subsequent mating and initiates meiosis. Here, we establish a degron system to specifically degrade proteins post-fusion and demonstrate that mating blocks not only safeguard zygote ploidy but also prevent lysis caused by aberrant fusion attempts. Using long-term imaging and flow-cytometry approaches, we identify previously unrecognized and independent roles for Mei3 and Mei2 in zygotes. We show that Mei3 promotes premeiotic S-phase independently of Mei2 and that cell cycle progression is both necessary and sufficient to reduce zygotic mating behaviors. Mei2 imposes the meiotic program and promotes the meiotic cycle, but also blocks mating behaviors independently of Mei3 and cell cycle progression. Thus, we find that fungi preserve zygote ploidy and survival by at least two mechanisms where the zygotic fate imposed by Mei2 and the cell cycle re-entry triggered by Mei3 synergize to prevent zygotic mating.

Download Full-text

The S-phase-induced lncRNA SUNO1 promotes cell proliferation by controlling YAP1/Hippo signaling pathway

eLife ◽

10.7554/elife.55102 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 ◽

Author(s):

Qinyu Hao ◽

Xinying Zong ◽

Qinyu Sun ◽

Yo-Chuen Lin ◽

You Jin Song ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Cell Proliferation ◽

Rna Polymerase Ii ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

S Phase ◽

Cancer Prognosis ◽

Cycle Phase ◽

Hippo Signaling ◽

Cycle Progression

Cell cycle is a cellular process that is subject to stringent control. In contrast to the wealth of knowledge of proteins controlling the cell cycle, very little is known about the molecular role of lncRNAs (long noncoding RNAs) in cell-cycle progression. By performing genome-wide transcriptome analyses in cell-cycle-synchronized cells, we observed cell-cycle phase-specific induction of >2000 lncRNAs. Further, we demonstrate that an S-phase-upregulated lncRNA, SUNO1, facilitates cell-cycle progression by promoting YAP1-mediated gene expression. SUNO1 facilitates the cell-cycle-specific transcription of WTIP, a positive regulator of YAP1, by promoting the co-activator, DDX5-mediated stabilization of RNA polymerase II on chromatin. Finally, elevated SUNO1 levels are associated with poor cancer prognosis and tumorigenicity, implying its pro-survival role. Thus, we demonstrate the role of a S-phase up-regulated lncRNA in cell-cycle progression via modulating the expression of genes controlling cell proliferation.

Download Full-text

Polyamine dependence of normal cell-cycle progression

Biochemical Society Transactions ◽

10.1042/bst0310366 ◽

2003 ◽

Vol 31 (2) ◽

pp. 366-370 ◽

Cited By ~ 106

Author(s):

S.M. Oredsson

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Enzyme Activities ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

Cyclin A ◽

S Phase ◽

Cycle Phase ◽

Polyamine Biosynthesis ◽

Cycle Progression ◽

Elongation Step ◽

Key Steps

The driving force of the cell cycle is the activities of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). Key steps in the regulation of the cell cycle therefore must impinge upon the activities of the CDKs. CDKs exert their functions when bound to cyclins that are expressed cyclically during the cell cycle. Polyamine biosynthesis varies bicyclically during the cell cycle with peaks in enzyme activities at the G1/S and S/G2 transitions. The enzyme activities are regulated at transcriptional, translational and post-translational levels. When cells are seeded in the presence of drugs that interfere with polyamine biosynthesis, cell cycle progression is affected within one cell cycle after seeding. The cell cycle phase that is most sensitive to polyamine biosynthesis inhibition is the S phase, while effects on the G1 and G2/M phases occur at later time points. The elongation step of DNA replication is negatively affected when polyamine pools are not allowed to increase normally during cell proliferation. Cyclin A is expressed during the S phase and cyclin A/CDK2 is important for a normal rate of DNA elongation. Cyclin A expression is lowered in cells treated with polyamine biosynthesis inhibitors. Thus, polyamines may affect S phase progression by participating in the regulation of cyclin A expression.

Download Full-text

Regulation of DNA Replication Licensing and Re-Replication by Cdt1

International Journal of Molecular Sciences ◽

10.3390/ijms22105195 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (10) ◽

pp. 5195

Author(s):

Hui Zhang

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Dna Damage ◽

Dna Replication ◽

Genome Stability ◽

E3 Ligase ◽

S Phase ◽

Replication Initiation ◽

Nuclear Antigen ◽

Repair Synthesis ◽

Ubiquitin E3 Ligase

In eukaryotic cells, DNA replication licensing is precisely regulated to ensure that the initiation of genomic DNA replication in S phase occurs once and only once for each mitotic cell division. A key regulatory mechanism by which DNA re-replication is suppressed is the S phase-dependent proteolysis of Cdt1, an essential replication protein for licensing DNA replication origins by loading the Mcm2-7 replication helicase for DNA duplication in S phase. Cdt1 degradation is mediated by CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase, which further requires Cdt1 binding to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) through a PIP box domain in Cdt1 during DNA synthesis. Recent studies found that Cdt2, the specific subunit of CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase that targets Cdt1 for degradation, also contains an evolutionarily conserved PIP box-like domain that mediates the interaction with PCNA. These findings suggest that the initiation and elongation of DNA replication or DNA damage-induced repair synthesis provide a novel mechanism by which Cdt1 and CRL4Cdt2 are both recruited onto the trimeric PCNA clamp encircling the replicating DNA strands to promote the interaction between Cdt1 and CRL4Cdt2. The proximity of PCNA-bound Cdt1 to CRL4Cdt2 facilitates the destruction of Cdt1 in response to DNA damage or after DNA replication initiation to prevent DNA re-replication in the cell cycle. CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase may also regulate the degradation of other PIP box-containing proteins, such as CDK inhibitor p21 and histone methylase Set8, to regulate DNA replication licensing, cell cycle progression, DNA repair, and genome stability by directly interacting with PCNA during DNA replication and repair synthesis.

Download Full-text

The Meiosis-Specific Crs1 Cyclin Is Required for Efficient S-Phase Progression and Stable Nuclear Architecture

International Journal of Molecular Sciences ◽

10.3390/ijms22115483 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (11) ◽

pp. 5483

Author(s):

Luisa F. Bustamante-Jaramillo ◽

Celia Ramos ◽

Cristina Martín-Castellanos

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Translational Control ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

Nuclear Architecture ◽

Strand Break ◽

Spindle Pole ◽

S Phase ◽

Cycle Progression ◽

Single Wave ◽

Phase Progression

Cyclins and CDKs (Cyclin Dependent Kinases) are key players in the biology of eukaryotic cells, representing hubs for the orchestration of physiological conditions with cell cycle progression. Furthermore, as in the case of meiosis, cyclins and CDKs have acquired novel functions unrelated to this primal role in driving the division cycle. Meiosis is a specialized developmental program that ensures proper propagation of the genetic information to the next generation by the production of gametes with accurate chromosome content, and meiosis-specific cyclins are widespread in evolution. We have explored the diversification of CDK functions studying the meiosis-specific Crs1 cyclin in fission yeast. In addition to the reported role in DSB (Double Strand Break) formation, this cyclin is required for meiotic S-phase progression, a canonical role, and to maintain the architecture of the meiotic chromosomes. Crs1 localizes at the SPB (Spindle Pole Body) and is required to stabilize the cluster of telomeres at this location (bouquet configuration), as well as for normal SPB motion. In addition, Crs1 exhibits CDK(Cdc2)-dependent kinase activity in a biphasic manner during meiosis, in contrast to a single wave of protein expression, suggesting a post-translational control of its activity. Thus, Crs1 displays multiple functions, acting both in cell cycle progression and in several key meiosis-specific events.

Download Full-text

Spirulina Crude Protein Promotes the Migration and Proliferation in IEC-6 Cells by Activating EGFR/MAPK Signaling Pathway

Marine Drugs ◽

10.3390/md17040205 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 17 (4) ◽

pp. 205

Author(s):

Su-Jin Jeong ◽

Jeong-Wook Choi ◽

Min-Kyeong Lee ◽

Youn-Hee Choi ◽

Taek-Jeong Nam

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Epithelial Cells ◽

Signaling Pathway ◽

Crude Protein ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

Intestinal Epithelial Cells ◽

Mapk Signaling ◽

S Phase ◽

Intestinal Epithelial ◽

Cycle Progression

Spirulina is a type of filamentous blue-green microalgae known to be rich in nutrients and to have pharmacological effects, but the effect of spirulina on the small intestine epithelium is not well understood. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the proliferative effects of spirulina crude protein (SPCP) on a rat intestinal epithelial cells IEC-6 to elucidate the mechanisms underlying its effect. First, the results of wound-healing and cell viability assays demonstrated that SPCP promoted migration and proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Subsequently, when the mechanisms of migration and proliferation promotion by SPCP were confirmed, we found that the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and mitogen-activated protein (MAPK) signaling pathways were activated by phosphorylation. Cell cycle progression from G0/G1 to S phase was also promoted by SPCP through upregulation of the expression levels of cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), which regulate cell cycle progression to the S phase. Meanwhile, the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs), such as p21 and p27, decreased with SPCP. In conclusion, our results indicate that activation of EGFR and its downstream signaling pathway by SPCP treatment regulates cell cycle progression. Therefore, these results contribute to the research on the molecular mechanism for SPCP promoting the migration and proliferation of rat intestinal epithelial cells.

Download Full-text