scholarly journals Lysophosphatidic acid provokes fibroblast chemotaxis through combinatorial regulation of myosin II

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreeja B. Asokan ◽  
Heath E. Johnson ◽  
John Sondek ◽  
Maria S. Shutova ◽  
Tatyana M. Svitkina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracellular Signaling ◽  
Myosin Ii ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Combinatorial Regulation ◽  
Local Inhibition ◽  
3D Environments ◽  
And Migration ◽  
Microfluidic Chambers ◽  
G Protein Coupled

SUMMARYLysophophatidic acid (LPA), a biologically active phospholipid that is ubiquitously present in tissues and organs, provokes cellular responses such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation and migration via activation of G-protein coupled receptors. These receptors activate a broad range of intracellular signaling cascades to mediate these responses. Using microfluidic chambers that generate and maintain stable gradients, we observed that chemotaxis of fibroblasts to LPA has higher directional fidelity than chemotaxis provoked by the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) ligand platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). Unlike fast moving amoeboid cells, mesenchymal cells such as fibroblasts do not require PI3K for chemotaxis to a GPCR ligand. In addition, the Arp2/3 complex is not required for fibroblast GPCR-based chemotaxis in either 2D or 3D environments. Our data indicate that combinatorial regulation of myosin II involving global activation by RhoA/ROCK and local inhibition of myosin II at the leading edge by PKC results in highly efficient chemotaxis of fibroblasts to LPA. Based on these observations, we develop a simple mathematical model to explain how dual regulation of myosin II is responsible for enhanced chemotaxis in LPA gradients relative to PDGF. Using pharmacological approaches, we test predictions of this model and modulate the fidelity of LPA and PDGF chemotaxis.

scholarly journals Scribble, Lgl1, and myosin II form a complex in vivo to promote directed cell migration

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (20) ◽  
pp. 2234-2248
Author(s):  
Maha Abedrabbo ◽  
Shoshana Ravid
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Cell Adhesion ◽  
Myosin Ii ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Directed Cell Migration ◽  
Lethal Giant Larvae ◽  
And Migration ◽  
Migrating Cells

Here we show that Scribble (Scrib), Lethal giant larvae 1 (Lgl1), and myosin II form a complex in vivo and colocalize at the cell leading edge of migrating cells, and this colocalization is interdependent. Scrib and Lgl1 are required for proper cell adhesion, polarity, and migration.

scholarly journals Nonpolarized signaling reveals two distinct modes of 3D cell migration

2012 ◽  
Vol 197 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Petrie ◽  
Núria Gavara ◽  
Richard S. Chadwick ◽  
Kenneth M. Yamada
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Intracellular Signaling ◽  
Myosin Ii ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Elastic Behavior ◽  
Collagen Gels ◽  
Primary Fibroblasts ◽  
Context Specific ◽  
3D Cell Migration

We search in this paper for context-specific modes of three-dimensional (3D) cell migration using imaging for phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate (PIP3) and active Rac1 and Cdc42 in primary fibroblasts migrating within different 3D environments. In 3D collagen, PIP3 and active Rac1 and Cdc42 were targeted to the leading edge, consistent with lamellipodia-based migration. In contrast, elongated cells migrating inside dermal explants and the cell-derived matrix (CDM) formed blunt, cylindrical protrusions, termed lobopodia, and Rac1, Cdc42, and PIP3 signaling was nonpolarized. Reducing RhoA, Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK), or myosin II activity switched the cells to lamellipodia-based 3D migration. These modes of 3D migration were regulated by matrix physical properties. Specifically, experimentally modifying the elasticity of the CDM or collagen gels established that nonlinear elasticity supported lamellipodia-based migration, whereas linear elasticity switched cells to lobopodia-based migration. Thus, the relative polarization of intracellular signaling identifies two distinct modes of 3D cell migration governed intrinsically by RhoA, ROCK, and myosin II and extrinsically by the elastic behavior of the 3D extracellular matrix.

scholarly journals Local Myo9b RhoGAP activity regulates cell motility

2020 ◽  
pp. jbc.RA120.013623
Author(s):  
Sandra Angela Hemkemeyer ◽  
Veith Vollmer ◽  
Vera Schwarz ◽  
Birgit Lohmann ◽  
Ulrike Honnert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Cell Motility ◽  
Cell Morphology ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Rho Gtpase ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Cell Extension ◽  
Local Inhibition ◽  
And Migration ◽  
Directional Cell Migration

To migrate, cells assume a polarized morphology, extending forward with a leading edge with their trailing edge retracting back toward the cell body. Both cell extension and retraction critically depend on the organization and dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton, and the small, monomeric GTPases Rac and Rho are important regulators of actin. Activation of Rac induces actin polymerization and cell extension whereas activation of Rho enhances acto-myosin II contractility and cell retraction. To coordinate migration, these processes must be carefully regulated. The myosin Myo9b, a Rho GTPase activating protein (GAP), negatively regulates Rho activity and deletion of Myo9b in leukocytes impairs cell migration through increased Rho activity. However, it is not known whether cell motility is regulated by global or local inhibition of Rho activity by Myo9b. Here, we addressed this question by using Myo9b-deficient macrophage-like cells that expressed different recombinant Myo9b constructs. We found that Myo9b accumulates in lamellipodial extensions generated by Rac-induced actin polymerization as a function of its motor activity. Deletion of Myo9b in HL-60 derived macrophages altered cell morphology and impaired cell migration. Reintroduction of Myo9b or Myo9b motor and GAP mutants revealed that local GAP activity rescues cell morphology and migration. In summary, Rac activation leads to actin polymerization and recruitment of Myo9b, which locally inhibits Rho activity to enhance directional cell migration. In summary, Rac activation leads to actin polymerization and recruitment of Myo9b, which locally inhibits Rho activity to enhance directional cell migration.

scholarly journals β-Arrestin 2 Is a Mediator of GnRH-(1–5) Signaling in Immortalized GnRH Neurons

Endocrinology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (12) ◽  
pp. 4726-4736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darwin O. Larco ◽  
Nina N. Semsarzadeh ◽  
Madelaine Cho-Clark ◽  
Shaila K. Mani ◽  
T. John Wu
Keyword(s):  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Intracellular Signaling ◽  
Second Messengers ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Inositol Triphosphate ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptor ◽  
Signaling Mechanism ◽  
Gnrh Neurons ◽  
G Protein Coupled

We have previously demonstrated that the cleavage product of the full-length GnRH, GnRH-(1–5), is biologically active, binds G protein-coupled receptor 173 (GPR173), and inhibits the migration of cells in the immortalized GnRH-secreting GN11 cell. In this study, we attempted to characterize the GnRH-(1–5) intracellular signaling mechanism. To determine whether the signaling pathway mediating GnRH-(1–5) regulation of migration involves a G protein-dependent mechanism, cells were treated with a generic G protein antagonist in the presence and absence of GnRH-(1–5), and a wound-healing assay was conducted to measure migration. G Protein antagonist 2 treatment abolished the GnRH-(1–5) inhibition of migration, indicating that the mechanism of GnRH-(1–5) is G protein coupled. To identify the potential Gα-subunit recruited by GnRH-(1–5) binding GPR173, we measured the second messengers cAMP and inositol triphosphate levels. GnRH-(1–5) treatment did not alter cAMP levels relative to cells treated with vehicle or forskolin, suggesting that GnRH-(1–5) does not couple to the Gαs or Gαi subunits. Similarly, inositol triphosphate levels remained unchanged with GnRH-(1–5) treatment, indicating a mechanism not mediated by the Gαq/11 subunit. Therefore, we also examined whether GnRH-(1–5) activating GPR173 deviated from the canonical G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway by coupling to β-arrestin 1/2 to regulate migration. Our coimmunoprecipitation studies indicate that GnRH-(1–5) induces the rapid interaction between GPR173 and β-arrestin 2 in GN11 cells. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this association recruits phosphatase and tensin homolog to mediate the downstream action of GnRH-(1–5). These findings suggest that the GnRH-(1–5) mechanism deviates from the canonical G protein-coupled receptor pathway to regulate cell migration in immortalized GnRH neurons.

Glioblastoma invasion and NMDA receptors: A novel prospect

2019 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
DN Nandakumar ◽  
P Ramaswamy ◽  
C Prasad ◽  
D Srinivas ◽  
K Goswami
Keyword(s):  
Glutamate Receptors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Intracellular Signaling ◽  
Transcript Level ◽  
Glioblastoma Cells ◽  
Invasion And Migration ◽  
Matrigel Invasion ◽  
Nmdar Activation ◽  
And Migration

Purpose Glioblastoma cells create glutamate-rich tumor microenvironment, which initiates activation of ion channels and modulates downstream intracellular signaling. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs; a type of glutamate receptors) have a high affinity for glutamate. The role of NMDAR activation on invasion of glioblastoma cells and the crosstalk with α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs) is yet to be explored. Main methods LN18, U251MG, and patient-derived glioblastoma cells were stimulated with NMDA to activate NMDAR glutamate receptors. The role of NMDAR activation on invasion and migration and its crosstalk with AMPAR were evaluated. Invasion and migration of glioblastoma cells were investigated by in vitro trans-well Matrigel invasion and trans-well migration assays, respectively. Expression of NMDARs and AMPARs at transcript level was evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results We determined that NMDA stimulation leads to enhanced invasion in LN18, U251MG, and patient-derived glioblastoma cells, whereas inhibition of NMDAR using MK-801, a non-competitive antagonist of the NMDAR, significantly decreased the invasive capacity. Concordant with these findings, migration was significantly augmented by NMDAR in both cell lines. Furthermore, NMDA stimulation upregulated the expression of GluN2 and GluA1 subunits at the transcript level. Conclusions This study demonstrated the previously unexplored role of NMDAR in invasion of glioblastoma cells. Furthermore, the expression of the GluN2 subunit of NMDAR and the differential overexpression of the GluA1 subunit of AMPAR in both cell lines provide a plausible rationale of crosstalk between these calcium-permeable subunits in the glutamate-rich microenvironment of glioblastoma.

scholarly journals The G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinases (GRKs) in Chemokine Receptor-Mediated Immune Cell Migration: From Molecular Cues to Physiopathology

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Marta Laganà ◽  
Géraldine Schlecht-Louf ◽  
Françoise Bachelerie
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Chemokine Receptor ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Neutrophil Migration ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptor ◽  
Receptor Kinases ◽  
Immune Cell Migration ◽  
And Migration ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Gpcr Desensitization

Although G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) have long been known to regulate G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) desensitization, their more recently characterized functions as scaffolds and signalling adapters underscore that this small family of proteins governs a larger array of physiological functions than originally suspected. This review explores how GRKs contribute to the complex signalling networks involved in the migration of immune cells along chemokine gradients sensed by cell surface GPCRs. We outline emerging evidence indicating that the coordinated docking of several GRKs on an active chemokine receptor determines a specific receptor phosphorylation barcode that will translate into distinct signalling and migration outcomes. The guidance cues for neutrophil migration are emphasized based on several alterations affecting GRKs or GPCRs reported to be involved in pathological conditions.

scholarly journals The Expression of the Cancer-Associated lncRNA Snhg15 Is Modulated by EphrinA5-Induced Signaling

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1332
Author(s):  
Daniel Pensold ◽  
Julia Gehrmann ◽  
Georg Pitschelatow ◽  
Asa Walberg ◽  
Kai Braunsteffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Intracellular Signaling ◽  
Granule Cells ◽  
Cerebellar Granule Cells ◽  
Membrane Receptors ◽  
In Vitro Assays ◽  
Eph Receptor ◽  
Medulloblastoma Cell Line ◽  
And Migration

The Eph receptor tyrosine kinases and their respective ephrin-ligands are an important family of membrane receptors, being involved in developmental processes such as proliferation, migration, and in the formation of brain cancer such as glioma. Intracellular signaling pathways, which are activated by Eph receptor signaling, are well characterized. In contrast, it is unknown so far whether ephrins modulate the expression of lncRNAs, which would enable the transduction of environmental stimuli into our genome through a great gene regulatory spectrum. Applying a combination of functional in vitro assays, RNA sequencing, and qPCR analysis, we found that the proliferation and migration promoting stimulation of mouse cerebellar granule cells (CB) with ephrinA5 diminishes the expression of the cancer-related lncRNA Snhg15. In a human medulloblastoma cell line (DAOY) ephrinA5 stimulation similarly reduced SNHG15 expression. Computational analysis identified triple-helix-mediated DNA-binding sites of Snhg15 in promoters of genes found up-regulated upon ephrinA5 stimulation and known to be involved in tumorigenic processes. Our findings propose a crucial role of Snhg15 downstream of ephrinA5-induced signaling in regulating gene transcription in the nucleus. These findings could be potentially relevant for the regulation of tumorigenic processes in the context of glioma.

Stromal-derived factor 1 and thrombopoietin regulate distinct aspects of human megakaryopoiesis

Blood ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 96 (13) ◽  
pp. 4142-4151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Majka ◽  
Anna Janowska-Wieczorek ◽  
Janina Ratajczak ◽  
M. Anna Kowalska ◽  
Gaston Vilaire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Intracellular Signaling ◽  
Phosphatidyl Inositol ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase ◽  
Proliferative Effect ◽  
Normal Human ◽  
And Migration ◽  
Induced Apoptosis

Abstract The role of the chemokine binding stromal-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) in normal human megakaryopoiesis at the cellular and molecular levels and its comparison with that of thrombopoietin (TPO) have not been determined. In this study it was found that SDF-1, unlike TPO, does not stimulate αIIbβ3+ cell proliferation or differentiation or have an antiapoptotic effect. However, it does induce chemotaxis, trans-Matrigel migration, and secretion of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by these cells, and both SDF-1 and TPO increase the adhesion of αIIbβ3+ cells to fibrinogen and vitronectin. Investigating the intracellular signaling pathways induced by SDF-1 and TPO revealed some overlapping patterns of protein phosphorylation/activation (mitogen-activated protein kinase [MAPK] p42/44, MAPK p38, and AKT [protein kinase B]) and some that were distinct for TPO (eg, JAK-STAT) and for SDF-1 (eg, NF-κB). It was also found that though inhibition of phosphatidyl-inositol 3-kinase (PI-3K) by LY294002 in αIIbβ3+ cells induced apoptosis and inhibited chemotaxis adhesion and the secretion of MMP-9 and VEGF, the inhibition of MAPK p42/44 (by the MEK inhibitor U0126) had no effect on the survival, proliferation, and migration of these cells. Hence, it is suggested that the proliferative effect of TPO is more related to activation of the JAK-STAT pathway (unique to TPO), and the PI-3K–AKT axis is differentially involved in TPO- and SDF-1–dependent signaling. Accordingly, PI-3K is involved in TPO-mediated inhibition of apoptosis, TPO- and SDF-1–regulated adhesion to fibrinogen and vitronectin, and SDF-1–mediated migration. This study expands the understanding of the role of SDF-1 and TPO in normal human megakaryopoiesis and indicates the molecular basis of the observed differences in cellular responses.

G-protein-coupled receptors signalling at the cell nucleus: an emerging paradigmThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled The Nucleus: A Cell Within A Cell.

2006 ◽  
Vol 84 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 287-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernand Gobeil ◽  
Audrey Fortier ◽  
Tang Zhu ◽  
Michela Bossolasco ◽  
Martin Leduc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Cell Nucleus ◽  
Intracellular Signaling ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Nuclear Translocation ◽  
Cell Metabolism ◽  
Hormone Secretion ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
A Cell ◽  
G Protein Coupled

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise a wide family of monomeric heptahelical glycoproteins that recognize a broad array of extracellular mediators including cationic amines, lipids, peptides, proteins, and sensory agents. Thus far, much attention has been given towards the comprehension of intracellular signaling mechanisms activated by cell membrane GPCRs, which convert extracellular hormonal stimuli into acute, non-genomic (e.g., hormone secretion, muscle contraction, and cell metabolism) and delayed, genomic biological responses (e.g., cell division, proliferation, and apoptosis). However, with respect to the latter response, there is compelling evidence for a novel intracrine mode of genomic regulation by GPCRs that implies either the endocytosis and nuclear translocation of peripheral-liganded GPCR and (or) the activation of nuclearly located GPCR by endogenously produced, nonsecreted ligands. A noteworthy example of the last scenario is given by heptahelical receptors that are activated by bioactive lipoids (e.g., PGE2 and PAF), many of which may be formed from bilayer membranes including those of the nucleus. The experimental evidence for the nuclear localization and signalling of GPCRs will be reviewed. We will also discuss possible molecular mechanisms responsible for the atypical compartmentalization of GPCRs at the cell nucleus, along with their role in gene expression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document