Generating Confidence in Inspection Results
Crucial decisions, based upon NDE results, are made regarding the operation of safety critical components. Materials investigations identify degradation mechanisms, and defect assessments determine what defects are tolerable, but NDE is generally the only method of determining whether unacceptable defects actually exist in a component. Consequently, it is vital that we have confidence in the NDE results. This paper describes the measures that are taken to ensure confidence in the NDE being applied and the interactions that are needed with other structural integrity disciplines. In particular, we describe the role of Inspection Qualification as a formal process that has been adopted to address the uncertainties in NDE performance identified through round robin trials. Although the examples used are from the nuclear industry they pertain to any industry sector where NDE plays an important role in assessing structural integrity. Increasing interest in applying risk-informed inspection scopes, plant life extension and the world-wide nuclear new build programme are imposing new requirements on NDE of safety-critical components. We describe how the NDE community is responding to these challenges in providing quantitative inspection information (probability of detection) and maintaining a high level of confidence in the results. The paper aims to inform other structural integrity disciplines and plant operators of the impact their decisions may have on the NDE. For example, the pessimisms and safety margins applied to determine acceptance standards often impose extremely onerous requirements on the NDE resulting in long development times and high cost. In addition we discuss how the NDE can impact on the decisions regarding safe and reliable operation of plant.