scholarly journals Germline genomic patterns are associated with cancer risk, oncogenic pathways, and clinical outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (48) ◽  
pp. eaba4905
Author(s):  
Xue Xu ◽  
Yuan Zhou ◽  
Xiaowen Feng ◽  
Xiong Li ◽  
Mohammad Asad ◽  
...  

There is an ongoing debate on the importance of genetic factors in cancer development, where gene-centered cancer predisposition seems to show that only 5 to 10% of the cancer cases are inheritable. By conducting a systematic analysis of germline genomes of 9712 cancer patients representing 22 common cancer types along with 16,670 noncancer individuals, we identified seven cancer-associated germline genomic patterns (CGGPs), which summarized trinucleotide mutational spectra of germline genomes. A few CGGPs were consistently enriched in the germline genomes of patients whose tumors had smoking signatures or correlated with oncogenesis- and genome instability–related mutations. Furthermore, subgroups defined by the CGGPs were significantly associated with distinct oncogenic pathways, tumor histological subtypes, and prognosis in 13 common cancer types, suggesting that germline genomic patterns enable to inform treatment and clinical outcomes. These results provided evidence that cancer risk and clinical outcomes could be encoded in germline genomes.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaowen Feng ◽  
Xue Xu ◽  
Derek Li ◽  
Qinghua Cui ◽  
Edwin Wang

SummaryGermline genetic polymorphism is prevalent and inheritable. So far mutations of a handful of genes have been associated with cancer risks. For example, women who harbor BRCA1/2 germline mutations have a 70% of cumulative breast cancer risk; individuals with congenital germline APC mutations have nearly 100% of cumulative colon cancer by the age of fifty. At present, gene-centered cancer predisposition knowledge explains only a small fraction of the inheritable cancer cases. Here we conducted a systematic analysis of the germline genomes of cancer patients (n=9,712) representing 22 common cancer types along with non-cancer individuals (n=16,670), and showed that seven germline genomic patterns, or significantly repeatedly occurring sequential mutation profiles, could be associated with both carcinogenesis processes and cancer clinical outcomes. One of the genomic patterns was significantly enriched in the germline genomes of patients who smoked than in those of non-smoker patients of 13 common cancer types, suggesting that the germline genomic pattern was likely to confer an elevated carcinogenesis sensitivity to tobacco smoke. Several patterns were also associated with somatic mutations of key oncogenic genes and somatic-mutational signatures which are associated with higher genome instability in tumors. Furthermore, subgroups defined by the germline genomic patterns were significantly associated with distinct oncogenic pathways, tumor histological subtypes and prognosis in 12 common cancer types, suggesting that germline genomic patterns enable to inform treatment and clinical outcomes. These results demonstrated that genetic cancer risk and clinical outcomes could be encoded in germline genomes in the form of not only mutated genes, but also specific germline genomic patterns, which provided a novel perspective for further investigation.



2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuting Li ◽  
Kaiyin He ◽  
Xiaojuan Peng ◽  
Chenxing Zhang ◽  
Lu Zhong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Several epidemiological studies have assessed the association between the use of antibiotics and cancer risk, but the results were inconsistent. Objective The objective of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to further evaluate possible association between antibiotic exposure and the risk of cancer. Methods We searched PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,and Chinese databases for studies on the association between antibiotic use and cancer without time restrictions. The risk estimates (hazard ratio (HR) or relative risk (RR) or Odds ratio (OR)) with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Results A total of 23 observational studies with 19 case-control and 4 cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. Exposure to antibiotics significantly increased the risk of cancer with an OR of 1.20 (95%CI 1.13-1.27, P=0.000). Subgroup meta-analysis by gender showed that the effect of antibiotic use on cancer risk was greater in male (34%) compared with that in female (19%). On the other hand, the risk of cancer increased with an increasing number of antibiotic prescriptions and the increasing cumulative days of antibiotic exposure. Moreover, of the 7 antibiotic types included, the six classes of antibiotics (penicillin, macrolides, quinolones, sulfonamides, tetracycline, cephalosporins) were associated with the increased risk of cancer. Further, of the 16 separate cancers included, exposure to antibiotics increased the risk of eight common cancer types (liver cancer, colorectal cancer, stomach and small intestine cancer, lymphomas, breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, and renal and bladder). Conclusions Exposure to common antibiotic types may increase the risk of the eight common cancer types in the studies population, especially in male, and the cancer risk increases with increasing antibiotic exposure intensity.



Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 816
Author(s):  
Priya Ramarao-Milne ◽  
Olga Kondrashova ◽  
Sinead Barry ◽  
John D. Hooper ◽  
Jason S. Lee ◽  
...  

Genetic and epigenetic factors contribute to the development of cancer. Epigenetic dysregulation is common in gynaecological cancers and includes altered methylation at CpG islands in gene promoter regions, global demethylation that leads to genome instability and histone modifications. Histones are a major determinant of chromosomal conformation and stability, and unlike DNA methylation, which is generally associated with gene silencing, are amenable to post-translational modifications that induce facultative chromatin regions, or condensed transcriptionally silent regions that decondense resulting in global alteration of gene expression. In comparison, other components, crucial to the manipulation of chromatin dynamics, such as histone modifying enzymes, are not as well-studied. Inhibitors targeting DNA modifying enzymes, particularly histone modifying enzymes represent a potential cancer treatment. Due to the ability of epigenetic therapies to target multiple pathways simultaneously, tumours with complex mutational landscapes affected by multiple driver mutations may be most amenable to this type of inhibitor. Interrogation of the actionable landscape of different gynaecological cancer types has revealed that some patients have biomarkers which indicate potential sensitivity to epigenetic inhibitors. In this review we describe the role of epigenetics in gynaecological cancers and highlight how it may exploited for treatment.





2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10536-10536
Author(s):  
Amin Nassar ◽  
Elio Adib ◽  
Sarah Abou Alaiwi ◽  
Elie Akl ◽  
Talal El Zarif ◽  
...  

10536 Background: Prior studies and clinical trials report associations between self-reported race and clinical outcomes to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). However, comprehensive studies of ancestry-associated differences in clinical outcomes have not been performed. We derived genetic ancestry scores and assessed clinical outcomes in 1341 patients with cancer treated with ICIs. Methods: Patients at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute treated with ICIs only and with relevant cancer types and targeted exome sequencing data (Oncopanel) were included. Relevant cancer types included colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC), esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGC), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and urothelial carcinoma (UC). We developed a bioinformatics pipeline to infer fine-scale genetic ancestry for each patient (n=1341) directly from tumor sequencing data by leveraging off and on-target sequenced reads and external ancestry reference panels. Three ancestry scores were determined (African, East Asian, European). Overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment failure (TTF) were compared by Cox logistic regression between ancestral populations. Hazard ratio (HR) was derived using multivariable analysis, adjusted for single versus combination therapy, prior lines of therapy, and tumor mutational burden (TMB, as percentiles). Results: Median follow-up was 37.8 months (m; interquartile range: 35.7-39.5m). Common cancer types included CRC (n=52), EGC (n=114), HNSCC (n=88), melanoma (n=274), NSCLC (n=571), RCC (n=99), and UC (n=143). A higher East Asian ancestry (EAS) was significantly associated with worse OS ( p=0.03) and TTF ( p=0.002) in patients with RCC, independent of the histologic subtype (Table). There was no significant association between any of the three ancestral populations and clinical outcomes in the other 6 cancer types. Conclusions: We described clinical outcomes to ICIs across three global populations in 7 cancers. As the medical field re-evaluates the use of self-reported race in clinical decision-making, we utilize a novel ancestry pipeline that can be readily applied to tumor-only sequencing panels and better characterize non-white populations. We find no ancestry differences in clinical outcomes except in patients with RCC treated with ICIs which will require future validation. We plan to analyze genomic correlates of response by ancestry in each of the cancer types to better understand these diverge clinical behaviors.[Table: see text]



2012 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 496-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Ciałkowska-Rysz ◽  
Mariusz Kowalczyk ◽  
Leszek Gottwald ◽  
Sylwia Kaźmierczak-Łukaszewicz


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Xia Wei ◽  
Guo-Xiang Tian ◽  
Ju-Kun Song ◽  
Lian-Jie Yang ◽  
Yu-Pei Wang

Epidemiological studies have demonstrated close associations between SET8 rs16917496 T/C polymorphism and cancer risk, but the results of published studies were not consistent. We therefore performed this meta-analysis to explore the associations between rs16917496 T/C polymorphism and cancer risk. Five online databases were searched. Odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to assess the association between rs16917496 T/C polymorphism and cancer risk. In addition, heterogeneity, accumulative, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were conducted to check the statistical power. Overall, 13 publications involving 5878 subjects were identified according to included criteria. No significant cancer risk was observed in genetic model of SET8 rs16917496 T/C polymorphism in Asian populations (C vs. T: OR = 1.04, 95%CI = 0.88–1.23, P = 0.63%; TC vs. TT: OR = 1.17, 95%CI = 0.96–1.24, P = 0.11%; CC vs. TT: OR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.60–1.37, P = 0.63; TC+CC vs. TT: OR = 1.11, 95%CI = 0.90–1.38, P = 0.33; CC vs. TT+TC: OR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.65–1.30, P = 0.63). Furthermore, similar associations were found in the subgroup analysis of race diversity, control design, genotyping methods, and different cancer types. In summary, our meta-analysis indicated that the SET8 rs16917496 T/C polymorphism may not play a critical role in cancer development in Asian populations.



2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhilan Zhang ◽  
Lin Li ◽  
Mengyuan Li ◽  
Xiaosheng Wang

Abstract Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected more than 13 million people and has caused more than 570,000 deaths worldwide as of July 13, 2020. The SARS-CoV-2 human cell receptor ACE2 has recently received extensive attention for its role in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Many studies have also explored the association between ACE2 and cancer. However, a systemic investigation into associations between ACE2 and oncogenic pathways, tumor progression, and clinical outcomes in pan-cancer remains lacking. Methods: Using cancer genomics datasets from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) program, we performed computational analyses of associations between ACE2 expression and antitumor immunity, immunotherapy response, oncogenic pathways, tumor progression phenotypes, and clinical outcomes in 12 cancer cohorts. We also identified co-expression networks of ACE2 in cancer.Results: ACE2 upregulation was associated with increased antitumor immune signatures and PD-L1 expression, and favorable anti-PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 immunotherapy response. ACE2 expression levels inversely correlated with the activity of cell cycle, mismatch repair, TGF-β, Wnt, VEGF, and Notch signaling pathways. Moreover, ACE2 expression levels had significant inverse correlations with tumor proliferation, stemness, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). ACE2 upregulation was associated with favorable survival in pan-cancer and in multiple individual cancer types. Conclusions: ACE2 upregulation was associated with increased antitumor immunity and immunotherapy response, reduced tumor malignancy, and favorable survival in cancer, suggesting that ACE2 is a protective factor for cancer progression. Our data may provide potential clinical implications for treating cancer patients infected with SARS-CoV-2.



2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Buheruk ◽  
O. B. Voloshyna ◽  
L. I. Kovalchuk ◽  
I. V. Balashova ◽  
O. V. Naidionova

The aim of this review is to analyze and summarize the existing evidence regarding the possibilities of using acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to reduce cancer risk. Conclusions. Chronic inflammation facilitates the onset and progress of tumour growth. Anti-cancer properties of acetylsalicylic acid and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are mediated via cyclooxygenase COX-dependent mechanisms, as well as other tumorigenic pathways. Current systematic review addresses potential role of ASA and other NSAIDs in reduction of cancer risk for the following localizations: head and neck, lungs, gastrointestinal tract, breast, ovaries, prostate, and skin. The role of ASA in primary prevention of colorectal cancer in specific populations is presented in 2016 U. S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. Studies indicate heterogeneous protective potential of ASA against different cancer types, depending on studied population, duration of intake and dose. Influence of non-aspirin NSAIDs on cancer morbidity and mortality is more controversial.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document