scholarly journals OC 8568 A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ORAL IRON FOR TREATMENT OF POST-MALARIA ANAEMIA IN MALAWIAN CHILDREN COMPARING IMMEDIATE VERSUS DELAYED ADMINISTRATION

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A14.2-A14
Author(s):  
Kamija Phiri ◽  
Herbert Longwe ◽  
Sarah White ◽  
Michael Esan ◽  
Feiko Ter Kuile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Iron Supplementation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Iron Administration ◽  
Double Blind Clinical Trial ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Randomised Controlled

BackgroundAlthough universal provision of iron supplements to children is recommended by the WHO, it is not yet clear whether the administration of the supplements poses a risk in children in malaria-endemic areas. We investigate the effects of iron supplementation in children with post-malaria anaemia and haematological response with immediate and delayed (2’weeks) iron administration.MethodsA randomised double-blind clinical trial was conducted in Zomba and Blantyre between 2009 and 2013. All children aged 4 to 36 months with uncomplicated malaria and with iron deficiency were enrolled into the study. Malaria treatment was administered to all the children and they were randomly assigned to 3 groups as follows: immediate iron administration, delayed iron administration, or placebo. The children were followed up for 10 weeks, with their haematological recovery indices and adverse effects being monitored at 2, 4, 8 and 10 weeks. The primary outcome of the study was the proportion of children without anaemia (defined as Hb >10.9 g/dl) at the end of the iron supplementation period.ResultsA total of 538 participants were randomised to immediate iron administration (n=183), delayed iron administration (n=183), or placebo (n=172). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of being non-anaemic at the end of the follow-up period (10 weeks post-malaria infection) was 1.51 (95% CI 1.17–1.94, p<0.001) among immediate group versus the placebo group. There was no significant difference between delayed and placebo group (IRR 1.18, 95% CI 0.91–1.55). Secondary analysis of risk of malaria and bacterial infection and iron markers at the end of the intervention period is underway and shall be presented at the conference.ConclusionThe results so far support the administration of iron immediately after completing antimalarial treatment in anaemic children, however safety results will be needed to be reviewed before conclusive recommendations.

scholarly journals Effects of Fermented Milk Containing Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Strain Shirota on Constipation in Patients with Depression: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 2238
Author(s):  
Xiaomei Zhang ◽  
Shanbin Chen ◽  
Ming Zhang ◽  
Fazheng Ren ◽  
Yimei Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Fermented Milk ◽  
Daily Consumption ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Factor Α

Probiotics have been shown to benefit patients with constipation and depression, but whether they specifically alleviate constipation in patients with depression remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei strain Shirota (LcS), formerly Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota, on constipation in patients with depression with specific etiology and gut microbiota and on depressive regimens. Eighty-two patients with constipation were recruited. The subjects consumed 100 mL of a LcS beverage (108 CFU/mL) or placebo every day for 9 weeks. After ingesting beverages for this period, we observed no significant differences in the total patient constipation-symptom (PAC-SYM) scores in the LcS group when compared with the placebo group. However, symptoms/scores in item 7 (rectal tearing or bleeding after a bowel movement) and items 8–12 (stool symptom subscale) were more alleviated in the LcS group than in the placebo group. The Beck Depression Index (BDI) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) scores were all significantly decreased, and the degree of depression was significantly improved in both the placebo and LcS groups (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the groups. The LcS intervention increased the beneficial Adlercreutzia, Megasphaera and Veillonella levels and decreased the bacterial levels related to mental illness, such as Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, Sutterella and Oscillibacter. Additionally, the interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) levels were significantly decreased in both the placebo and LcS groups (p < 0.05). In particular, the IL-6 levels were significantly lower in the LcS group than the placebo group after the ingestion period (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the daily consumption of LcS for 9 weeks appeared to relieve constipation and improve the potentially depressive symptoms in patients with depression and significantly decrease the IL-6 levels. In addition, the LcS supplementation also appeared to regulate the intestinal microbiota related to mental illness.

scholarly journals Randomised Double-Blind Trial of Combination Antibiotic Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Smith ◽  
Caroline Doré ◽  
Peter Charles ◽  
Alena Vallance ◽  
Tara Potier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Active Treatment ◽  
Active Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Good Evidence ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Acr20 Response ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective. A combination of intravenous clindamycin and oral tetracycline has been used for many years as a treatment for active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), despite the absence of good evidence for its efficacy. A single-blind pilot study of this therapy suggested that a double-blind placebo-controlled trial was warranted.Methods. Patients with active RA were randomised in a 2 : 1 ratio to receive active treatment or placebo for 25 weeks. The active treatment consisted of intravenous clindamycin in a reducing regime, and oral tetracycline twice daily three times a week. 50 patients were to be recruited. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients achieving an ACR20 response.Results. An interim statistical analysis was performed after 20 patients had completed the study. Two patients in the active group achieved an ACR20 response, with none in the placebo group (NS). There was a better ESR20 response in the placebo group (P=.02). There were no other significant differences between the groups. The results indicated that it was unlikely that a significant difference in ACR20 response would emerge if the remaining 30 patients were recruited. The trial was therefore halted.Conclusion. This antibiotic regime is unlikely to be a valuable therapy for active rheumatoid arthritis.

scholarly journals Neurological Development and Iron Supplementation in Healthy Late-Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Luciano ◽  
Domenico Marco Romeo ◽  
Giuseppina Mancini ◽  
Serena Sivo ◽  
Carolina Dolci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Iron Supplementation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Preterm Neonates ◽  
Neurological Development ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Mean

Abstract ObjectiveLate-preterm infants (LPT) are at increased risk for long-term neurodevelopmental sequelaeand iron deficiency. Aim of the study is to assess the positive effect of iron supplementation on neurological development in healthy LPT.DesignWe designed a perspective, randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial. The newborns were randomized in two groups: thirty-three patients received martial prophylaxis, thirty-three placebo. Every patient was assessed using the Griffith Mental Development Scales (GMDS)-II edition at 12 months of post-conceptional age.SettingThe study was performed at the Neonatology Unit of Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS.PatientsSixty-six healthy LPT infants born between 340⁄7 and 366⁄7 weeks of Gestational Age were enrolled in the study.InterventionsOne group received martial prophylaxis from the third week of life to six months of post-conceptional age (2 mg/kg/day of iron pidolate), the other received placebo.Main outcome measuresFifty-two of the enrolled infants were assessed using the GMDS at 12-month of post-conceptional age. Statistical analysis of the mean scores of the Griffith subscales was performed.ResultsThere was a difference in the mean Developmental Quotient (DQ) (p<0.01) between the two groups: Iron Group mean DQ 121.45+10.53 vs Placebo Group mean DQ 113.25+9.70. Moreover, mean scores of the Griffith subscales A, B and D showed significant differences between the two Groups (scale A p<0.05, scale B p<0.02, scale D p<0.01 respectively).ConclusionsOur data show that newborns who received iron supplementation during the first six months of life achieved significantly better neurological outcomes at GMDS than Placebo group.

scholarly journals Ligilactobacillus salivarius PS2 Supplementation during Pregnancy and Lactation Prevents Mastitis: A Randomised Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1933
Author(s):  
Esther Jiménez ◽  
Susana Manzano ◽  
Dietmar Schlembach ◽  
Krzysztof Arciszewski ◽  
Rocio Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Post Partum ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Late Pregnancy ◽  
Probiotic Strain ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Pregnancy And Lactation ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Mastitis is considered one of the main reasons for unwanted breastfeeding cessation. This study aimed to investigate the preventive effect of the probiotic strain Ligilactobacillus salivarius PS2 on the occurrence of mastitis in lactating women. In this multicountry, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 328 women were assigned to the probiotic or the placebo group. The intervention started from the 35th week of pregnancy until week 12 post-partum. The primary outcome was the incidence (hazard) rate of mastitis, defined as the presence of at least two of the following symptoms: breast pain, breast erythema, breast engorgement not relieved by breastfeeding, and temperature > 38 °C. The probability of being free of mastitis during the study was higher in the probiotic than in the placebo group (p = 0.022, Kaplan–Meier log rank test) with 9 mastitis cases (6%) vs. 20 mastitis cases (14%), respectively. The hazard ratio of the incidence of mastitis between both study groups was 0.41 (0.190–0.915; p = 0.029), indicating that women in the probiotic group were 58% less likely to experience mastitis. In conclusion, supplementation of L. salivarius PS2 during late pregnancy and early lactation was safe and effective in preventing mastitis, which is one of the main barriers for continuing breastfeeding.

scholarly journals Naoxuekang, Xinnaoshutong and Xuesaitong capsules for treating stroke: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. e015983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huiling Chen ◽  
Hongbo Cao ◽  
Xu Guo ◽  
Meidan Zhao ◽  
Qing Xia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Facial Paralysis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Initial Treatment Period ◽  
Double Blind Clinical Trial ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Index Value ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionAfter stroke, hemiplegia, dysphasia and facial paralysis can manifest during the convalescent period. Currently, no Chinese patent medicine (CPM) is previously reported to cure each of these symptoms primarily, and thus, there are no relevant instructions for the use of CPM. This study presents a new approach based on comparative effectiveness research to distinguish the curative effects of three CPMs that are often used in stroke convalescence to determine the ideal medicine for the treatment of each symptom.Methods and analysisIn this multicentre and double-blind clinical trial, stratified randomisation is used to group the patients according to their primary symptoms (hemiplegia, dysphasia and facial paralysis). Three strata will be enrolled, with 80 eligible participants included in each stratum. Each stratum will be randomly and equally divided into four groups, and each group will receive one of the following treatments: Naoxuekang, Xinnaoshutong (XNST), Xuesaitong (XST) or placebo. This study will include two stages: the initial treatment period (30 days) and a follow-up period (180 days). Three replicates for each data point will be completed during this trial. The first visit will occur on day 0 after enrolment, the second visit on day 30±2 and the third visit on day 210±5. The Delphi technique is adopted to achieve index weighting, which ensures that the evaluation outcome is patient oriented. The weighted index value will be computed as the final measurement index of the outcome.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (registration number TJUTCM-EC20160007). The results will be offered for publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberThis trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-IOR-17010397). The date of registration was 11 January 2017.

scholarly journals A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial to investigate the effect of Tai Chi on the instrumented timed up and go test in people with mild to moderate dementia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Williams ◽  
Samuel Nyman
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Tai Chi ◽  
Training Stimulus ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Timed Up And Go ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Background Previous research has identified that Tai Chi is effective for reducing risk of falls and improving timed up and go scores. However, our previous research identified no-significant difference in time to complete the timed up and go test following a Tai Chi intervention in people with dementia. Aim To conduct a secondary analysis to extend our understanding of the effect of Tai Chi on the instrumented Timed Up and Go test. Methods This is a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial set in the community. People with dementia, recruited from NHS databases, memory clinics, local charities and self-referral across the south of England, received either 20 weeks of Tai Chi plus normal care or normal care. Outcomes were assessed using the instrumented Timed Up and Go test, completed at baseline and after 6 months. Results From 83 people with dementia volunteering for the study, 67 complete datasets were available for analysis. Within-group pairwise comparison across time revealed no-significant gains for any of the instrumented Timed Up and Go variables, and no-significant difference for between-group pairwise comparisons. Discussion This suggests that Tai Chi had no effect on the instrumented Timed Up and Go in people with dementia. This lack of effect may be due to the lack of specificity of the training stimulus to the outcome measure. Conclusion Tai Chi had no effect on any instrumented Timed Up and Go variables, suggesting Tai Chi may not be best placed to enhance the sub-elements of the instrumented Timed Up and Go to reduce fall risk among community-dwelling people with dementia. Clinical trial registration number: NCT02864056.

Apixaban Reduces Hospitalization In Patients With Venous Thromboembolism: An Analysis Of The AMPLIFY-EXT Trial

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3638-3638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianchen Liu ◽  
John Thompson ◽  
Hemant Phatak ◽  
Jack Mardekian ◽  
Anthony R. Porcari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with a considerable risk for morbidity and recurrence and related hospitalizations. In the Apixaban after the Initial Management of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis with First-Line Therapy-Extended Treatment (AMPLIFY-EXT) trial, a double-blind placebo-controlled trial with 12 months of treatment, two doses of apixaban (2.5 mg and 5 mg, twice daily) versus placebo significantly reduced symptomatic recurrent VTE or all-cause death without increasing the rate of major bleeding among 2,482 VTE patients who had completed 6-12 months of anticoagulation therapy. In this study, the effects of apixaban therapy versus placebo on medical hospitalization during AMPLIFY-EXT trial were evaluated. Methods A total of 2,477 patients who received study drugs were included in the analysis. All-cause hospitalizations during the trial were captured by dedicated case report forms. Outcomes of interest were; rate of hospitalizations and time from randomization to the first hospitalization. Patients were censored at either death, loss to follow-up, or end of study, whichever came first. Effects of treatment with apixaban versus placebo on the rates of hospitalization were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results During a mean follow-up of 12.3 months, 138 patients were hospitalized at least once, 62 (7.5%/year) in the placebo group (n=826), 42 (4.8%/year) in the apixaban 2.5 mg group (n=840), and 34 (4.0%/year) in the apixaban 5 mg group (n=811). Compared with placebo, apixaban 2.5 mg [hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44–0.96; p=0.030] and 5 mg (HR 0.54, 95%CI 0.36–0.83, p=0.004) were both associated with significant reduction in hospitalization. There was no significant difference in hospitalizations between the 2 doses of apixaban (5 mg vs. 2.5 mg: HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.53–1.32, p=0 .445). The mean time to first hospitalization was 153.7 days in the placebo group, 196.9 days in the apixaban 2.5 mg group, and 202.4 days in the apixaban 5 mg group (Figure). Conclusions Extended anticoagulation with apixaban at either a dose of 5 mg or 2.5 mg significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization, possibly due to the reduction in VTE recurrence. Disclosures: Liu: Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Thompson:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Phatak:BMS: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mardekian:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Porcari:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Johnson:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Raloxifene and body composition and muscle strength in postmenopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

2010 ◽  
Vol 162 (2) ◽  
pp. 371-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Didy E Jacobsen ◽  
Monique M Samson ◽  
Marielle H Emmelot-Vonk ◽  
Harald J J Verhaar
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
The Body ◽  
Fat Free Mass ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo

ObjectiveTo compare the effects of raloxifene and placebo on body composition and muscle strength.DesignRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 198 healthy women aged 70 years or older conducted between July 2003 and January 2008 at the University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.MethodsParticipants were randomly assigned to receive raloxifene 60 mg or placebo daily for 12 months. Measurements were taken at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months, and change from baseline was calculated. Main outcome measures were body composition (bioelectrical impedance analysis), muscle strength, and muscle power (maximum voluntary isometric knee extension strength, explosive leg extensor power, and handgrip strength).ResultsAt 12 months, the body composition of women taking raloxifene was significantly different from that of women taking placebo: fat-free mass (FFM) had increased by a mean of 0.83 (2.4) kg in the raloxifene group versus 0.03 (1.5) kg in the placebo group (P=0.05), and total body water had increased by a mean of 0.6 (1.8) litres in the raloxifene group versus a decrease of 0.06 (1.1) litres in the placebo group (P=0.02). Muscle strength and power were not significantly different.ConclusionRaloxifene significantly changed body composition (increased FFM; increased water content) compared with placebo in postmenopausal women.

scholarly journals The addition of omeprazole to ondansetron for treating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in pediatric cancer patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Perjuangan Dapot Hamonangan Simbolon ◽  
Selvi Nafianti ◽  
Pertin Sianturi ◽  
Bidasari Lubis ◽  
Aznan Lelo
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pediatric Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pediatric Cancer Patients

Background Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting are some of the most disturbing side effects in pediatric cancer patients. The standard recommendation is the use of 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonist, such as ondansetron, to treat these symptoms. Despite this treatment, more than 50% of patients still experience nausea and vomiting.Objective To evaluate the effect of the addition of omeprazole to ondansetron in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.Methods A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was conducted at Haji Adam Malik Hospital, Medan, North Sumatera, from March to May 2016. Subjects were children aged 1 to 18 years, diagnosed with cancer, and who received intravenous chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive either a single dose of ondansetron (0.5 mg/kg) plus placebo or ondansetron (0.5 mg/kg) plus omeprazole (0.5 mg/kg). The severity of nausea and vomiting were measured using the Rhodes index of nausea, vomiting, and retching during the 24 hours after initiation of emetogenic chemotherapy. The primary outcome of efficacy was the proportion of patients who achieved complete response (lack of nausea/vomiting). Statistical analysis was performed by Chi-square and Fischer’s exact tests.Results Seventy eligible pediatric patients were randomized into two groups: 32 subjects in the ondansetron + placebo group and 38 others in the ondansetron + omeprazole group. The therapy failed in 50% (16/32) of the ondansetron + placebo group and 18.4% (7/38) of the ondansetron + omeprazole group. There was a significant difference in the clinical response between groups (P=0.01).Conclusion The addition of omeprazole to ondansetron for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is more effective than administration of ondansetron alone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document