scholarly journals Influence of prior comorbidities and chronic medications use on the risk of COVID-19 in adults: a population-based cohort study in Tarragona, Spain

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e041577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angel Vila-Córcoles ◽  
Olga Ochoa-Gondar ◽  
Eva M. Satué-Gracia ◽  
Cristina Torrente-Fraga ◽  
Frederic Gomez-Bertomeu ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo investigate possible relationships between pre-existing medical conditions (including common comorbidities and chronic medications) and risk for suffering COVID-19 disease in middle-aged and older adults.DesignPopulation-based retrospective cohort study.SettingTwelve primary care centres (PCCs) in Tarragona (Spain).Participants79 083 people (77 676 community-dwelling and 1407 nursing-home residents), who were all individuals aged >50 years affiliated to the 12 participating PCCs.OutcomesBaseline cohort characteristics (age, sex, vaccinations, comorbidities and chronic medications) were established at study start (1st. March 2020) and primary outcome was time to COVID-19 confirmed by PCR among cohort members throughout the epidemic period (from 1st. March 2020 to 23rd. May 2020). Risk for suffering COVID-19 was evaluated by Cox regression, estimating multivariable HRs adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities and medications use.ResultsDuring the study period, 2324 cohort members were PCR-tested, with 1944 negative and 380 positive results, which means an incidence of 480.5 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases per 100 000 persons-period. Assessing the total study cohort, only age (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03; p=0.002), nursing-home residence (HR 21.83; 95% CI 16.66 to 28.61; p<0.001) and receiving diuretics (HR 1.35; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.76; p=0.026) appeared independently associated with increased risk. Smoking (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.93; p=0.022), ACE inhibitors (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.99; p=0.046) and antihistamine (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.22 to 1.01; p=0.052) were associated with a lower risk. Among community-dwelling individuals, cancer (HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.24; p=0.035), chronic respiratory disease (HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.08 to 3.07; p=0.025) and cardiac disease (HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.19; p=0.021) emerged to be also associated with an increased risk. Receiving ACE inhibitors (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.99; p=0.046) and influenza vaccination (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.91; p=0.012) was associated with decreased risk.ConclusionAge, nursing-home residence and multiple comorbidities appear predisposing for COVID-19. Conversely, receiving ACE inhibitors, antihistamine and influenza vaccination could be protective, which should be closely investigated in further studies specifically focused on these concerns.

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel Teo ◽  
Pei Shi Yeo ◽  
Qi Gao ◽  
Ma Shwe Zin Nyunt ◽  
Jie Jing Foo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Few empirical studies support a bio-psycho-social conceptualization of frailty. In addition to physical frailty (PF), we explored mental (MF) and social (SF) frailty and studied the associations between multidimensional frailty and various adverse health outcomes. Methods Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were conducted using data from a population-based cohort (SLAS-1) of 2387 community-dwelling Singaporean Chinese older adults. Outcomes examined were functional and severe disability, nursing home referral and mortality. PF was defined by shrinking, weakness, slowness, exhaustion and physical inactivity, 1–2 = pre-frail, 3–5 = frail; MF was defined by ≥1 of cognitive impairment, low mood and poor self-reported health; SF was defined by ≥2 of living alone, no education, no confidant, infrequent social contact or help, infrequent social activities, financial difficulty and living in low-end public housing. Results The prevalence of any frailty dimension was 63.0%, dominated by PF (26.2%) and multidimensional frailty (24.2%); 7.0% had all three frailty dimensions. With a few exceptions, frailty dimensions share similar associations with many socio-demographic, lifestyle, health and behavioral factors. Each frailty dimension varied in showing independent associations with functional (Odds Ratios [ORs] = 1.3–1.8) and severe disability prevalence at baseline (ORs = 2.2–7.3), incident functional disability (ORs = 1.1–1.5), nursing home referral (ORs = 1.5–3.4) and mortality (Hazard Ratios = 1.3–1.5) after adjusting for age, gender, medical comorbidity and the two other frailty dimensions. The addition of MF and SF to PF incrementally increased risk estimates by more than 2 folds. Conclusions This study highlights the relevance and utility of PF, MF and SF individually and together. Multidimensional frailty can better inform policies and promote the use of targeted multi-domain interventions tailored to older adults’ frailty statuses.


QJM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
C-H Chen ◽  
C-L Lin ◽  
C-Y Hsu ◽  
C-H Kao

Abstract Background Identifying colorectal cancer associated risks is important for conducting a program for the survey and prevention of colorectal cancer. Aim To investigate the association between use of insulin or metformin with colorectal cancer (CRC) in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Design Population-based cohort study. Methods Through analysis of National Health Insurance (NHI) database between 1998 and 2010 in Taiwan, we identified 66 324 T2DM patients aged ≥ 20 years and selected subjects without diabetes by 1: 1 randomly matching with the study cohort based on age, sex and index date. We followed up the participants until 31 December 2011 or when they withdrew from the NHI program. Results Compared with non-diabetic subjects, the T2DM patients exhibited an increased risk of CRC [adjusted HR (aHR) = 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.39–1.75], after adjustment for age, sex, urbanization level, comorbidities and examinations of colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or stool occult blood test. Among the T2DM patients, insulin usage increased the risk of CRC (aHR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.58–0–2.19) after adjustment for age, sex, urbanization level, comorbidities, metformin usage and examinations; nevertheless, metformin decreased the risk of CRC (aHR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.54–0.77) after adjustment for age, sex, urbanization level, comorbidities, insulin usage and examinations. Compared with the non-insulin cohort, the risk of CRC tended to increase with the incremental dosage of insulin exposure. Conclusion Our population-based cohort study demonstrated an association between T2DM and CRC. Among the T2DM patients, insulin use was associated with an increased risk of CRC and metformin use was associated with a decreased risk of CRC. Inability to obtain information on several potential confounding factors, such as lifestyle and dietary habits, is the major limitation of the study.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4845-4845
Author(s):  
Christian F Christiansen ◽  
Karynsa Cetin ◽  
Merete Lund Mægbæk ◽  
Waleed Ghanima ◽  
Shahram Bahmanyar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: ITP is a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by low platelet counts, resulting in an increased risk for bleeding. Paradoxically, patients with cITP may also have an increased incidence of thrombotic or thromboembolic events, but population-based data on this are limited. We estimated the incidence of these events in a prospective cohort study of incident cITP patients in three Nordic countries. Methods: Based on National Health Registry Systems (NHRSs) and medical records in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, the study cohort included all adults diagnosed with cITP from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2012 (n=1,821). Arterial thrombotic events (myocardial infarction [MI] and stroke) and venous thromboembolic events (pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis) were identified in the NHRSs. Patients were followed from the latest of cITP diagnosis or April 1, 2009, until the earliest date of the first occurrence of the event of interest, death, emigration, or December 31, 2012. Incidence rates (events per 1,000 person-weeks [PW]) were computed for the entire cohort and stratified by gender, age, splenectomy status, and comorbidity burden. Results: Nearly 60% of the cITP cohort was >50 years in age, and 56% were female. Overall, the incidence of arterial thrombotic events was 0.31 per 1,000 PW (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.39) and the incidence of venous thromboembolic events was 0.18 per 1,000 PW (95% CI: 0.13-0.24). For arterial thrombotic events, the risk was higher in males (compared with females), and the risk for both event types increased with increasing age and comorbid burden. Given the small number of patients who underwent splenectomy (n=101), it was difficult to detect any differences in the risk of thrombotic events by splenectomy status, but the incidence of venous thromboembolic events was higher in splenectomized versus non-splenectomized patients (0.27 per 1,000 PW [95% CI: 0.15-0.50] versus 0.16 [95% CI: 0.11-0.23]). Conclusions: Among patients with cITP, the risk of arterial thrombotic events is higher in males than females and increases with increasing age and level of comorbid burden. The risk of venous thromboembolic events is heightened in cITP patients who have undergone splenectomy. Abstract 4845. TableArterial thrombotic eventsVenous thromboembolic eventsN / PWIncidence rate per 1,000 PW (95% CI)N / PWIncidence rate per 1,000 PW (95% CI)Overall (n=1,821)68 / 218,3910.31 (0.25-0.39)39 / 220,8650.18 (0.13-0.24)GenderMale (n=794)39 / 90,5310.43 (0.31-0.59)17 / 92,4080.18 (0.11-0.30)Female (n=1,027)29 / 127,8600.23 (0.16-0.33)22 / 128,4570.17 (0.11-0.26)Age18-50 years (n=751)5 / 96,1190.05 (0.02-0.12)5 / 95,9630.05 (0.02-0.13)51-70 years (n=544)13 / 65,6520.20 (0.11-0.34)13 / 65,5560.20 (0.12-0.34)>70 years (n=526)50 / 56,6210.88 (0.67-1.17)21 / 59,3450.35 (0.23-0.54)Comorbid burdenLow (n=1,243)25 / 154,1810.16 (0.11-0.24)18 / 155,0580.12 (0.07-0.18)Moderate (n=435)29 / 48,3070.60 (0.42-0.86)14 / 49,6940.28 (0.17-0.48)High (n=143)14 / 15,9030.88 (0.52-1.49)7 / 16,1130.43 (0.21-0.91)Splenectomy statusSplenectomized (n=101)10 / 37,1210.27 (0.14-0.50)10 / 36,9570.27 (0.15-0.50)Non-splenectomized (n=1,720)58 / 181,2700.32 (0.25-0.41)29 / 183,9080.16 (0.11-0.23) Disclosures Cetin: Amgen: Employment. Ghanima:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Stryker:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0255492
Author(s):  
Yu-Yen Chen ◽  
Hsin-Hua Chen ◽  
Tzu-Chen Lo ◽  
Pesus Chou

Objective To evaluate whether the risk of subsequent psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis development is increased in patients with uveitis. Methods In Taiwan’s national health insurance research database, we identified 195,125 patients with new-onset uveitis between 2001 and 2013. We randomly selected 390,250 individuals without uveitis who were matched 2:1 to uveitis cases based on age, sex and year of enrolment. The characteristics of the two groups were compared. Using multivariate Cox regression, hazard ratios (HRs) for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis corresponding to uveitis were computed after adjustment for age, sex, insurance cost and comorbidities. In subgroup analyses, separate HRs for mild psoriasis, severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis were calculated. Results The mean age of the study cohort was 50.2 ± 17.2 years. Hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia and obesity were more prevalent in the uveitis group (all p < 0.0001). The hazard of psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis development was significantly greater in the uveitis group than in the non-uveitis group (p < 0.0001); this increased risk persisted after adjustment for confounders [adjusted HR = 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.33–1.48]. Adjusted HRs showed an increasing trend from mild psoriasis (1.35; 95% CI, 1.28–1.44) to severe psoriasis (1.59; 95% CI, 1.30–1.94) and psoriatic arthritis (1.97; 95% CI, 1.60–2.42). Conclusions This nationwide population-based cohort study revealed that patients with uveitis have an increased risk of subsequent psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis development.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
EM. Satué-Gracia ◽  
A. Vila-Córcoles ◽  
C. de Diego-Cabanes ◽  
A. Vila-Rovira ◽  
C. Torrente-Fraga ◽  
...  

SUMMARYObjectiveTo analyse susceptibility/risk of suffering COVID19 among adults with distinct underlying medical conditions.MethodsCohort study (population-based) including 79,083 people ≥50 years-old in Tarragona (Southern Catalonia, Spain). At study start (01/03/2020) baseline cohort characteristics (demographic, previous comorbidities, chronic medications and vaccinations’ history) were recorded. Primary outcome was laboratory-confirmed COVID19 incurred in cohort members throughout 01/03/2020-30/06/2020. Risk of suffering COVID19 was evaluated by Cox regression, estimating multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for age/sex and previous comorbidities.ResultsAcross study period, 536 laboratory-confirmed COVID19 cases were observed (mean incidence: 39.5 cases per 100,000 persons-week). In multivariable-analysis, age/years (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00-1.02; p=0.050), nursing-home (HR: 20.19; 95% CI: 15.98-25.51; p<0.001), neurological disease (HR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.03-1.77; p=0.029), taking diuretics (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.10-1.75; p=0.006), antiplatelet (HR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.05-1.76; p=0.021) and benzodiazepines (HR: 1.24; 95% CI:1.00-1.53; p=0.047) significantly increased risk; while smoking (HR: 0.57; 95%CI: 0.41-0.80; p=0.001), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.61-1.00; p=0.048), angiotensin II receptor blockers (HR: 0.70; 95%CI: 0.51-0.96; p=0.027) and statins (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.58-0.96; p=0.025) were associated with reduced risk. Among non-institutionalised persons, cancer, renal and cardiac disease appeared also related to increased risk, whereas influenza vaccination was associated with reduced risk.ConclusionIn a setting with relatively low incidence of COVID19 across the first wave of pandemic period, age, nursing-home residence and multiple comorbidities appear predisposing for COVID19 among middle-aged/older adults. Conversely, statins, angiotensin-receptor blockers/inhibitors and influenza vaccination were related with decreased risk.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. E849-E856

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain (CP) may increase the risk of cognitive impairment; however, the association between CP and dementia is still unclear. OBJECTIVES: Therefore, we conducted this study to clarify the association between CP and dementia. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Nationwide population based. METHODS: This study recruited 27,792 patients (>= 50 years) with CP from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015, as the study cohort. The comparison cohort consists of patients without CP who were matched 1:1 for age, gender, and index date with the study cohort. A comparison of the risk of dementia between the two cohorts was performed by following up until 2015. RESULTS: The prevalence of CP was 13.4% in the population aged >= 50 years. Patients with CP had a higher risk of dementia than those without CP (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR]: 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-1.26). Compared with the other age subgroups, the 50-64 years age group with CP had the highest risk of dementia (AHR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.14-1.43). The impact of CP on the increased risk of dementia was more prominent in the younger age subgroup and decreased with aging. The increased risk of dementia in patients with CP was persistent, even following up for more than 5 years (AHR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.12-1.26). LIMITATIONS: Using “analgesics use at least 3 months” as the surrogate criteria of CP may underestimate the diagnosis of CP. CONCLUSIONS: CP was associated with a higher risk of dementia, especially in the 50-64 years age group. Early treatment of CP for the prevention of dementia is suggested. KEY WORDS: Chronic pain. cognitive impairment, dementia


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angel Vila-Corcoles ◽  
Eva Satue-Gracia ◽  
Angel Vila-Rovira ◽  
Cinta de Diego-Cabanes ◽  
Maria Jose Forcadell-Peris ◽  
...  

SUMMARYBackgroundDirect and indirect COVID19-related mortality is uncertain. This study investigated COVID19-related and all-cause deaths among middle-aged and older adults during the first wave of COVID19 epidemic period, assessing mortality risks by pre-existing socio-demographic and medical underlying conditions.MethodsPopulation-based cohort study involving 79,083 individuals ≥50 years-old in Tarragona (Southern Catalonia, Spain). Baseline cohort characteristics (age/sex, comorbidities and medications/vaccinations history) were established at study start (01/03/2020) and main outcomes were COVID19-related deaths (occurred in patients diagnosed with the disease) and all-cause deaths occurred among cohort members between 01/03/2020-30/06/2020. Mortality risks were assessed by Cox regression analyses.ResultsCohort members were followed for 1,356,358 persons-weeks, occurring 576 all-cause deaths (124 COVID19-related). All-cause mortality rate was 42.5 deaths per 100,000 persons-week, being 22.8 in healthy/unrelated-COVID19 subjects, 236.4 in COVID19-excluded/PCR-negative subjects, 493.7 in COVID19-compatible/PCR-unperformed subjects and 4009.1 in COVID19-confirmed patients. In multivariable analyses, increasing age, sex male, nursing-home residence, cancer, neurologic, cardiac or liver disease, receiving diuretics, systemic corticosteroids, proton-pump inhibitors and benzodiazepines were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality; conversely, receiving renin-angiotensin inhibitors and statins were associated with reduced risk. Age/years, sex male and nursing-home residence were strong predictors for COVID19-related mortality, but none comorbidity appeared significantly associated with an increased risk.ConclusionApart from direct COVID19-related deaths (which represented almost 22% of all-cause mortality), theoretically COVID19-excluded patients (PCR-negative) suffered considerable greater all-cause mortality than healthy/unrelated-COVID19 subjects, which could explain, in part, the large excess deaths observed across the COVID19 pandemic.


BMC Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Eol Jeong ◽  
Ha-Lim Jeon ◽  
In-Sun Oh ◽  
Woo Jung Kim ◽  
Ju-Young Shin

Abstract Background With antidepressants (ADs) having minimal therapeutic effects during the initial weeks of treatment, benzodiazepines (BZDs) are concomitantly used to alleviate depressive symptoms of insomnia or anxiety. However, with mortality risks associated with this concomitant use yet to be examined, it remains unclear as to whether this concomitant therapy offers any benefits in treating depression. Methods We conducted a population-based cohort study using South Korea’s nationwide healthcare database from 2002 to 2017. Of 2.6 million patients with depression, we identified 612,729 patients with incident depression and newly prescribed ADs or BZDs, by excluding those with a record of diagnosis or prescription within the 2 years prior to their incident diagnosis. We classified our study cohort into two discrete groups depending on the type of AD treatment received within 6 months of incident diagnosis—AD monotherapy and AD plus BZD (AD+BZD) therapy. We matched our study cohort in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores to balance baseline characteristics and obtain comparability among groups. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and patients were followed until the earliest of outcome occurrence or end of the study period. We conducted multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to estimate adjusted hazards ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of mortality associated with AD+BZD therapy versus AD monotherapy. Results The propensity score-matched cohort had 519,780 patients with 259,890 patients in each group, where all baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. Compared to AD monotherapy, AD+BZD therapy was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.06). Conclusions Concomitantly initiating BZDs with ADs was associated with a moderately increased risk of mortality. Clinicians should therefore exercise caution when deciding to co-prescribe BZDs with ADs in treating depression, as associated risks were observed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Angel Vila-Corcoles ◽  
Eva Satue-Gracia ◽  
Angel Vila-Rovira ◽  
Cinta de Diego-Cabanes ◽  
Maria Jose Forcadell-Peris ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Direct and indirect COVID19-related mortality is uncertain. This study investigated all-cause and COVID19-related deaths among middle-aged and older adults during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic period, assessing mortality risks by pre-existing socio-demographic and medical underlying conditions. Methods Population-based cohort study involving 79,083 individuals ≥50 years-old in Tarragona (Southern Catalonia, Spain). Baseline cohort characteristics (age/sex, comorbidities and medications/vaccinations history) were established at study start (01/03/2020) and main outcomes were COVID19-related deaths (those occurred among patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID19) and all-cause deaths occurred among cohort members between 01/03/2020–30/06/2020. Mortality risks were assessed by Cox regression analyses. Results Cohort members were followed for 1,356,358 persons-weeks, occurring 576 all-cause deaths (124 COVID19-related deaths). Of the 124 deceased patients with a laboratory-confirmed COVID19, 112 (90.3%) died by (due to) COVID-19, while 12 (9.7%) died with COVID-19 (but likely due to other concomitant causes). All-cause mortality rate among cohort members across study period was 42.5 deaths per 100,000 persons-week, being 22.8 among healthy/unrelated-COVID19 subjects, 236.4 in COVID19-excluded/PCR-negative subjects, 493.7 in COVID19-compatible/PCR-unperformed subjects and 4009.1 in COVID19-confirmed patients. Increasing age, sex male, nursing-home residence, cancer, neurologic, cardiac or liver disease, receiving diuretics, systemic corticosteroids, proton-pump inhibitors and benzodiazepines were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality; conversely, receiving renin-angiotensin inhibitors and statins were associated with reduced risk. Age/years (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06–1.10), sex male (HR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.24–2.70), nursing-home residence (HR: 12.56; 95% CI: 8.07–19.54) and number of pre-existing comorbidities (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.01–1.29) were significant predictors for COVID19-related mortality, but none specific comorbidity emerged significantly associated with an increased risk in multivariable analysis evaluating it. Conclusion COVID19-related deaths represented more than 20 % of all-cause mortality occurred among middle-aged and older adults during the first wave of the pandemic in the region. A considerable proportion (around 10 %) of these COVID19-related deaths could be attributed to other concomitant causes. Theoretically COVID19-excluded subjects (PCR-negative) suffered ten-times greater all-cause mortality than healthy/unrelated-COVID19 subjects, which points to the existence of considerable number of false negative results in earlier PCR testing and could explain part of the global excess all-cause mortality observed during the pandemic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document