scholarly journals Bibliometric analysis of Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine from 2008 to 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Taha Hussein Musa ◽  
Abdelaziz Adam Idriss Arbab ◽  
Hassan Hussein Musa
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Core Collection ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
R Package ◽  
Tropical Medicine ◽  
H Index ◽  
Asian Pacific ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
The Web

The purpose of the study is to assess the scientific research productions in Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine (APJTM) from its first issue up to Dec 2019. We used the Web of Science Core Collection (SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI) to extract the relevant documents. Additionally, the data analysis using ORIGIN PRO 2018, HistCite, bibliometrix R-package, and VOSviewer. Var1.6.6. A total of 2,137 publications of APJTM. A total of 2,136 documents were retrieved, with received 13956 citations, with an average mean 6.63 citations per article, an h-index of 38. The most frequently occurring keywords in this analysis were Malaria, dengue, apoptosis, antioxidant, rate, invasion and anopheles stephesi and inflammation. The study provided the comprehensive and general overview for APJTM journal over its history from the first issue up-to-date. Moreover, the findings provide an insight into the frequency of citations for top-cited articles published in APJTM as well as the quality of the works, journals, trends of publications steering in APJTM.

The presence of Polish, Hungarian and Slovak Publications in the Field of Education in the Web of Science Database. A Bibliometric Comparative Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-35
Author(s):  
Sławomir Rębisz
Keyword(s):  
Core Collection ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Citation Impact ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Scholarly Journals ◽  
Thomson Reuters ◽  
Scientific Institutions ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
The Web

AbstractThe author of this article aims at comparing the publication activity of scholars from Poland, Slovakia and Hungary in education in the period of 1994-2014. Based on the comparative analyses, the author sought to determine: (1) trends in the scholarly performance in the analysed field of study (increase/decrease), (2) leading scientific institutions with the largest number of publications in the field of education, (3) scale of internationalization (international co-authorship). Furthermore (4) the author discusses the participation of scientists from the countries under analysis in the European (EU) and worldwide circulation of scholarly papers in the field of education. To perform the analyses, first the representative source had to be chosen. Considering that what is valued in science, also in Europe, is the prestige of a journal in which a paper is published while the overall science hierarchy is primarily based on the global grading of scholarly journals, we have chosen to use the data from the Thomson/Reuters database (Web of ScienceTM Core Collection) containing an index of selected papers with the so-called impact factor (IF), a well-known global indication of citation impact. Several publications in the journals with high IF is a confirmation of the high quality of scientific research while it also determines the level of internationalization of science. This study was conducted over twenty years (1994-2014) to make sure it was representative of the publishing activity and international output of scholars from the countries under analysis.

scholarly journals On Lists, Indexes, and Quality: Is there a Connection?

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3/2020) ◽  
pp. 193-207
Author(s):  
Zoran JANJETOVIĆ
Keyword(s):  
Academic Achievement ◽  
Core Collection ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Ministry Of Education ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Education Science ◽  
The Web

Starting from the argument-based critique of one of the papers indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection, the article examines if there is a connection between quality of works, journals in which they are published, lists in which these journals feature and indices that list these articles, advertising authors who often do not deserve it. The paper deals with the untoward consequences of such a short-sighted practice and argues in favor of a constant revision of the lists and indices supported by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia, thus increasing the relevance of the lists and indexes applied as yardsticks of academic achievement.

scholarly journals LEV GOLDFARB. BIOGRAPHICAL OVERVIEW

2020 ◽  
pp. 58-60
Keyword(s):  
Nervous System ◽  
Neurodegenerative Diseases ◽  
Core Collection ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Prion Diseases ◽  
H Index ◽  
The Web

LEV GOLDFARB, PhD, MD, Professor, National Institute of Health (USA). He has 168 publications of scientific articles in the journals of the Web of Science Core collection. His articles were quoted 10348 times, h-index 55. Research interests: neurology, genetics, neurodegenerative diseases, hereditary, infectious and prion diseases of the nervous system.

scholarly journals Bibliometric Analysis of Microtia-Related Publications From 2006 to 2020

2021 ◽  
pp. 014556132110376
Author(s):  
Wei Wang ◽  
Xinxin Dong ◽  
Jianwen Qu ◽  
Yangyang Lin ◽  
Lei Liu
Keyword(s):  
Core Collection ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
The United States ◽  
Research Trends ◽  
External Ear ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Occurrence Matrix ◽  
Author Citations ◽  
Over Time

Objective: Microtia is a congenital auricular malformation with a hypoplastic external ear that ranges in severity from a slightly smaller auricle to complete the absence of the auricle. The present study was conducted to identify and analyze the characteristics of microtia-related articles published from 2006 to 2020 by using bibliometric analyses. Method: Microtia-related studies published from 2006 to 2020 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Keywords, first author, citations, date of publication, and publication journal were extracted and quantitatively analyzed using Bibliographic Item Co-Occurrence Matrix Builder software and the Bibliometric ( https://bibliometric.com/app ). VOSviewer was used to visualize research and form a network map on keywords and citations. Results: A total of 1031 articles from 2006 to 2020 were included. The number of articles showed an overall trend of growth over time. The United States and China are the top 2 countries in terms of the number of microtia-related articles. From the analysis of keyword clustering, keywords could be mainly divided into 4 clusters in the field of microtia research: surgery, tissue engineering, epidemiology, and rehabilitation including hearing-related treatments, evaluation of effects, and quality of life after surgery. The top 10 most frequently cited papers from 2006 to 2020 were also extracted and analyzed. Conclusion: A bibliometric research of microtia-related articles from 2006 to 2020 was conducted. This study may be helpful to understand the current research status of microtia and find the research trends in this field, thus proposing future directions for microtia research.

scholarly journals Resources and Capabilities from Their Very Outset: a Bibliometric Comparison Between Scopus and the Web of Science

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Mileidy Alvarez-Melgarejo ◽  
Martha L. Torres-Barreto
Keyword(s):  
Web Of Science ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Bibliometric Method ◽  
Search Results ◽  
Resources And Capabilities ◽  
New Research ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
The Web

The bibliometric method has proven to be a powerful tool for the analysis of scientific publications, in such a way that allows rating the quality of the knowledge generating process, as well as its impact on firm´s environment. This article presents a comparison between two powerful bibliographic databases in terms of their coverage and the usefulness of their content. The comparison starts with a subject associated to the relationship between resources and capabilities. The outcomes show that the search results differ between both databases. The Web Of Science (WOS), has a greater coverage than SCOPUS has.  It also has a greater impact in terms of most cited authors and publications. The search results in the WOS yield articles from 2001, while Scopus yields articles from 1976, however, some of the latter are inconsistent with the topic being searched. The analysis points to a lack of studies regarding resources as foundations of firm´s capabilities; as a result, new research on this field is suggested.

scholarly journals A global bibliometric analysis of research on microplastics from 2004 to 2020

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Li ◽  
Binshuo Liu ◽  
Lei Wu ◽  
Shuang Zhong ◽  
Chunqing Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Core Collection ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Environmental Problem ◽  
Research Trends ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Bibliographic Records ◽  
Significant Interest ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Web

Abstract Microplastics (MPs) pollution has garnered significant interest as a serious environmental problem. To date, a large amount of research has been published on this topic. We analyzed the related studies to assess the global developments of MPs regarding the evolution, research trends, and hotspots by bibliometric. A total of 2,872 bibliographic records were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection, and CiteSpace 5.4 was used for bibliometrics. The results visually displayed the contributing countries, institutions, authors, keywords, and potential research directions in the MPs fields. The scientific developments in this field began in 2004 and have accelerated considerably since 2012. China and the USA are the leading countries in MPs research. The research on MPs is multidisciplinary and involves Ecology, Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Environmental Science, and Oceanography. Among these, Oceanography was the most connected with MPs and was the most well-developed. Overall, we mapped the development of MPs research and attempted a comprehensive discussion and understanding of scientific advances, as well as the progress made.

scholarly journals Scientometric analysis activity in the publication «life sciences» in the world and in Ukraine

2019 ◽  
pp. 23-33
Author(s):  
V.M. Yevtushenko
Keyword(s):  
Core Collection ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Journal Citation Report ◽  
Life Sciences ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Research Areas ◽  
The World ◽  
Scientific Papers ◽  
Scientific Fields ◽  
The Web

The article is devoted to the study of the state and trends of the publishing activity of Ukrainian scientists and leading countries in the field of life sciences («Life sciences»). The Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC), Journal Citation Report (JSR) and InCites, as well as classifications of scientific fields designed to structure the publication flow of scientific papers and journals in these information resources, are used for the research base – Web of Science Categories and Research Areas. The article presents the results of the author’s research on the publication indices of scientists of Ukraine and the leading countries of the world for the period 2008-2018 in the field of “Life Sciences” according to the international science-computer database of Web of Science. Conclusions about the growth of indicators of publication activity of scientific works in the field of “Life Sciences” are made. The tendency of a significant increase in their number in Ukraine has been revealed, but domestic studies do not represent all the areas of «Life Sciences» most popular in foreign scientists

scholarly journals Наукометричний аналіз публікаційної активності науковців ДУ «Інститут ендокринології та обміну речовин ім. В.П. Комісаренка НАМН України» за даними наукометричної бази даних Web of Science

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-75
Author(s):  
M.D. Tronko ◽  
I.P. Pasteur
Keyword(s):  
Core Collection ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
H Index

Мета — наукометричний аналіз публікаційної активності науковців ДУ «Інститут ендокринології та обміну речовин ім. В.П. Комісаренка НАМН України» (далі — Інститут) за даними наукометричної бази даних Web of Science. Матеріал і методи. Метод дослідження — наукометричний аналіз наукових публікацій за даними наукометричної бази даних Web of Science. Об’єктом дослідження були всі публікації науковців Інституту за даними Web of Science Core Collection, а предметом дослідження — кількість публікацій, індекс Хірша (h-index), кількість бібліографічних посилань на публікації та кількість статей із бібліографічними посиланнями на публікації (загальна кількість і кількість без самоцитування). Результати. Станом на 01.11.2019 року в штаті Інституту налічувалося 79 науковців, із них 18 із науковим ступенем доктора наук, 41 — кандидата наук і 20 без наукового ступеня. Усі доктори наук були в базі даних Web of Science Core Collection, і середнє значення індексу Хірша для їх групи становило приблизно 6,2 пункту. Серед кандидатів наук у базі даних був 31 науковець (75,6% від загальної кількості із цим ступенем), а середнє значення індексу Хірша для їх групи становило майже 1,4 пункту (у 16 кандидатів наук цей індекс становив 0). У базі даних були також 8 науковців без наукового ступеня (40,0% від загальної кількості без ступеня), проте середнє значення індексу Хірша для їх групи перевищувало 2,2 пункту (у 4 науковців цей індекс становив 0). У цілому по Інституту 57 науковців (72,2% від загальної кількості) були в базі даних Web of Science Core Collection і мали індекс Хірша, середнє значення якого дещо перевищувало 3,0 пункти. За всіма показниками беззаперечними лідерами є науковці М.Д. Тронько та Т.І. Богданова, індекс Хірша яких становить відповідно 32 і 31 пункти. Висновок. У науковців Інституту є достатній потенціал для суттєвого поліпшення власних наукометричних показників за даними наукометричної бази Web of Science Core Collection.

scholarly journals Bibliometric analysis of Russian publications’ quality in physical area, included to the Web of Science Core Collection Data Base

Bibliosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 49-60
Author(s):  
A. V. Glushanovskiy
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Core Collection ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Research Level ◽  
Collection Data ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
The Web

The article analyzes the changes in the bibliometric characteristics of the array of Russian publications reflected in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC database) in the field of physics in 2018, compared to the same characteristics in 2010. The main parameter to assess the quality (research level) of arrays with bibliometric point of view was “Comprehensive index of quality” (CIQ) for the array of publications, calculated on the basis of one of the parameters in “Method for calculating the qualitative indicator of the state task “the Comprehensive performance score publication”...”, used by the Ministry of science and higher education of the Russian Federation. It was found that with an almost twofold increase in the volume of the array, there was a slight decrease in its quality in terms of CIQ in 2018 in comparison with 2010. The author also compared the characteristics of the array of Russian publications in 2018 with similar ones of the arrays on physical publications in Germany, India and Great Britain, located close to Russia in the ranking by the number of publications included in the WoS array (in this ranking, Russia was on the fourth place in 2018). In the ranking based on the CIQ indicator, the arrays of these countries are significantly ahead of the Russian one, and our country is only on the sixth place. The main reasons for this lag in the Russian publications array are identified. They are: a lower percentage of Russian publications in high-quartile journals and a greater number of publications from conference proceedings. The conclusion is made about the applicability of bibliometric analysis to identify trends in publishing activities in the scientific field.

scholarly journals A Scientometric Review on Rockburst in Hard Rock: Two Decades of Review from 2000 to 2019

Geofluids ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weizhang Liang ◽  
Bing Dai ◽  
Guoyan Zhao ◽  
Hao Wu
Keyword(s):  
Core Collection ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Hard Rock ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Knowledge Map ◽  
Evolutionary Trends ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Knowledge Domains ◽  
Deep Underground ◽  
The Web

Considerable advances have been made from diverse perspectives in rockburst research to guarantee the safety of deep underground activities. However, to date, few reviews have been made to systematically analyze the overall research status of rockburst. This study is aimed at providing a scientometric review on rockburst research in hard rock from 2000 to 2019. First, a total of 430 papers were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Then, the CiteSpace software was adopted to conduct a scientometric analysis from five main aspects. Finally, the existing knowledge domains and future directions were discussed. Based on the results of this study, main countries, institutions, authors, and journals of rockburst research were revealed, and some important papers, hot topics, and evolutionary trends were found out. This review contributes to the integrated knowledge map of rockburst research in hard rock and provides researchers a valuable and in-depth understanding in this domain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document