Abstract 12563: Retrospective Analysis of Cardiovascular Events With the Use of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tushar Tarun ◽  
Brian P Bostick ◽  
Deepa Baswaraj ◽  
Nishchayjit Basra ◽  
Meeshal Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Multiple Organ ◽  
Fulminant Myocarditis ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
History Of

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as a promising, novel therapy for multiple malignancies. Immune-related adverse reactions pose a serious concern with use of these agents and reportedly involve multiple organ systems, notably cardiotoxicity. Early identification and management of these adverse events is essential in the prevention of morbidity and mortality. Hypothesis: Immune checkpoint inhibitors cause multiple cardiotoxic effects, and patients with prior cardiac history have a higher likelihood of cardiotoxicity. Methods: 1. A retrospective analysis of 150 patients was performed who had received immunotherapy with either the cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 inhibitors (CTLA4) or with the programmed cell death inhibitors (PD1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors for a period of two years at a Tertiary health Care from 7/1/2016-6/30/2018. 2. Patients' cardiac diagnoses prior to the initiation of therapy were noted and included, including history of heart failure, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and sudden cardiac arrest. 3. Patients’ clinic visits and hospitalizations with admitting and discharge diagnosis, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, troponin T, and NT-proBNP were reviewed. Results: 6% of patients had new onset heart failure (both preserved and reduced), 1.3% had evidence of myocardial infarction, 2% had new atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rate, and 0.6% had fulminant myocarditis. Of patients with new cardiac events, 60% had a history of cardiac disease, which was significantly higher than in patients without (p< 0.05). There were no age or sex differences between the groups with and without cardiotoxicity. Conclusion: Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors have broadened the horizon for treatment of multiple solid and hematological malignancies. Nonetheless, new adverse effects on multiple organ systems, specifically cardiac involvement, occur with these therapies, which are important and potentially detrimental toxicities. Patients with a history of prior cardiovascular disease have higher likelihood to develop cardiotoxicity.

Implementation of a pharmacy consult service for evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitor related adverse events at a large community hospital

2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522097026
Author(s):  
Jeff Kamta ◽  
Bren Magruder ◽  
Lisa Hymel
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Delayed Presentation ◽  
Consult Service ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
History Of ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are novel oncolytic therapies associated with various immune related adverse events (irAEs) affecting multiple organ systems, which may have a delayed presentation. Identification of irAEs and prompt initiation of appropriate treatment represents a challenge to clinicians. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a pharmacy consult service in identification and management of irAEs. Methodology: This was a single center, retrospective study. Patients included were: ≥18 years old, admitted as inpatients, and reported a history of cancer treatment within the last year. A pharmacy consult was developed and implemented for patients who reported a history of ICI therapy within the last year. Education regarding the consult service was provided to select physicians, nurses, and all pharmacists. Primary outcome: percent of admitted patients reporting ICI therapy within the last year, who required pharmacist intervention for an irAE. Secondary outcomes: types of interventions performed, percentage of recommendation acceptance, pharmacist time spent. Results Fifty-one patients received a pharmacy immunotherapy consult. Seventeen patients (33%) met the primary outcome. Thirty-three separate recommendations were made by pharmacists for these 17 patients. The secondary outcomes of interventions made and percentage accepted (n; % accepted): Initiation/adjustment of steroid therapy (20; 40%), placement of a consult for oncology or other specialist (10; 70%), other therapeutic interventions (3; 67%). Average time spent by pharmacist on initial consultations (SD): 29 minutes (15). Conclusion A pharmacy consult service may help to increase identification of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors and initiate timely interventions.

scholarly journals Immune-related Adverse Events Associated with Cancer Immunotherapy: A Review for the Practicing Rheumatologist

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahin Jamal ◽  
Marie Hudson ◽  
Aurore Fifi-Mah ◽  
Carrie Ye
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Multiple Organ ◽  
Delayed Onset ◽  
Inhibitory Pathways ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
After Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer therapy by blocking inhibitory pathways of the immune system to fight cancer cells. Their use is often limited by the development of autoimmune toxicities, which can affect multiple organ systems and are referred to as immune-related adverse events (irAE). Among these are rheumatologic irAE, including inflammatory arthritis, myositis, vasculitis, and others. Rheumatologic irAE seem to be different from irAE in other organs and from traditional autoimmune diseases in that they can occur early or have delayed onset, and can persist chronically, even after cancer therapy is terminated. Because immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly used for many types of cancer, it is important for oncologists and rheumatologists to recognize and manage toxicities early. In this review, we discuss currently approved immune checkpoint inhibitors and their mechanisms of action and systemic toxicities, with a focus on the management and effect on further cancer therapy of rheumatic irAE.

scholarly journals Severe Diarrhea in the Setting of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 704-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean R. Kuo ◽  
Amy D. Davis ◽  
Eduardo A. Rodriguez ◽  
Marcelo F. Vela ◽  
Russell I. Heigh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Therapeutic Agents ◽  
Multiple Organ ◽  
Severe Diarrhea ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
Novel Therapeutic

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) are novel therapeutic agents targeting a variety of cancers by enhanced T cell activation. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) commonly occur with ICPI use and can affect multiple organ systems including the gastrointestinal tract. Due to irAEs, the use of ICPIs is limited in autoimmune diseases. We present a case of microscopic colitis diagnosed after the initiation of nivolumab and a case of ipilimumab colitis and Clostridium difficile in the setting of Crohn’s colitis.

Atezolizumab-induced myositis and myocarditis in a patient with metastatic urothelial carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. e236357
Author(s):  
Mary Sessums ◽  
Siva Yarrarapu ◽  
Pramod K Guru ◽  
Devang K Sanghavi
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Basic Knowledge ◽  
Malignant Neoplasms ◽  
Diverse Range ◽  
History Of ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionised cancer therapy in the past decade. Although they have been indicated to treat a diverse range of malignant neoplasms, they are also associated with various immune-related adverse effects. We report the case of a 74-year-old man with a history of urothelial carcinoma who had atezolizumab-induced myocarditis and myositis resulting in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, despite the discontinuation of atezolizumab and aggressive treatment with corticosteroids. This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for early diagnosis and treatment of immune-related adverse events. Physicians must be aware of the risks associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and have a basic knowledge regarding their management.

scholarly journals Immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a brief review

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Myers
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Proactive Management ◽  
Organ Systems

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (icis) such as inhibitors of ctla-4, PD-1, and PD-L1, given as monotherapy or combination therapy have emerged as effective treatment options for immune-sensitive solid tumours and hematologic malignancies. The benefits of icis can be offset by immune-related adverse events (iraes) that leave all organ systems vulnerable and subsequently increase the risk for morbidity and mortality.Because of fluctuating onset and prolonged duration, the toxicities associated with iraes represent a shift from the understanding of conventional anticancer toxicities. The ctla-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors modulate T-cell response differently, resulting in distinct toxicity patterns, toxicity kinetics, and dose–toxicity relationships. Using individualized patient education, screening, and assessment for the early identification of iraes is key to proactive management and is therefore key to improving outcomes and prolonging therapy.Management of iraes is guided by appropriate grading, which sets the stage for the treatment setting (outpatient vs. inpatient), ici treatment course (delay vs. discontinuation), supportive care, corticosteroid use, organ specialist consultation, and additional immunosuppression. Health care professionals in oncology must work collaboratively with emergency and community colleagues to facilitate an understanding of iraes in an effort to optimize seamless care.

Analysis of metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and the rates of adverse events of colitis and hepatitis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21591-e21591
Author(s):  
Emily Horan ◽  
Melissa Arneil ◽  
Wen Xu ◽  
Victoria Atkinson
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Therapy ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
Oral Steroids ◽  
Intravenous Steroids

e21591 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) are widely used in metastatic melanoma (MM), where it has markedly improved survival outcomes. ICI induced autoimmune adverse reactions (irAE) manifest in all organ systems and are due to over-activation of the immune system. Clinically relevant irAE are colitis and hepatitis as drivers of morbidity and mortality. Methods: Data was collected from a single centre (Princess Alexandra Hospital) from the electronic medical records system and immunotherapy prescribing software. Patient demographics, treatments, complications and outcomes were recorded from 2016-2019. Eligible patients had to have received immunotherapy (pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, or nivolumab) and experienced colitis or hepatitis toxicity. Trial patients were excluded. Results: The cohort of 337 patients who had received immune therapy, 18% (n = 61) had hepatitis or colitis, mean age was 56 years, 64% male. The majority were stage 4d 28% (n = 17). Braf wildtype accounted for 56% (n = 34). The highest rates of irAE occurred on combination ipilimumab and nivolumab 56% (n = 34), 10% nivolumab (n = 6), 3% (n = 2) ipilimumab, and 31% (n = 19) pembrolizumab monotherapy. Colitis affected 61% of patients (n = 37), 30% (n = 18) were grade 3 severity. Hepatitis affected 48% (n = 29), 18% (n = 32) were grade 1. The majority required oral steroids (80%, n = 49), followed by intravenous steroids (51%, n = 31), infliximab (18%, n = 11) and mycophenolate in 5% (n = 3). Hospitalisation occurred in 56% (n = 34), 20% (n = 12) requiring treatment cessation. Progressive disease occurred in 62% (n = 38), and 13% (n = 8) had a complete response. Conclusions: The findings of this analysis mirror current literature with immunotherapies used, rates and severity of irAE. The management of irAE also aligned with current guidelines. Further research is required to investigate patient factors increasing the risk of developing irAE, and ideal treatment regimens. Analysing this large cohort, the incidence of toxicity was 17%, predominantly colitis followed by hepatitis. Patients were severely impacted requiring significant interventions to manage toxicity, hospitalisation and morbidity.

Behcet’s-like syndrome following pembrolizumab: An immune-related adverse event associated with programmed death receptor-1 inhibitor therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 995-999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffi Thomas ◽  
Chay Bae ◽  
Tabanor Joy-Ann ◽  
William Traverse
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Death Receptor ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Right

Introduction The landscape for the treatment of metastatic melanoma has been revolutionized with the introduction immune checkpoint inhibitors. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have now become the standard of care for the treatment of cancers. These immune agents including programmed death receptor-1 inhibitors, programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 inhibitors have shown promising results but have been associated with numerous immune-related complications. Pembrolizumab, a programmed death receptor-1 inhibitor, has been associated with a number of immune-related adverse events affecting multiple organ systems including integument, ocular, endocrine, cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal system. Case report We present a case of an 88-year-old Caucasian male with metastatic melanoma of the face with metastasis to the right fifth cranial nerve and into the right cavernous sinus. He underwent resection of the melanoma and was placed on pembrolizumab at 2 mg/kg every three weeks. Interestingly, 24 months on pembrolizumab therapy, he developed corneal erosions, oral and genital ulcerations. Management and outcome Patient completed his 24 months of pembrolizumab and was started on prednisone and colchicine with improvement in his symptoms. At his follow-up eight months, he had recurrence of an oral ulcer. Discussion Here we present a rare case of an elderly male on pembrolizumab who suffered from corneal erosions, oral and genital ulcers, a syndrome similar to Behcet’s disease. Given that pembrolizumab and other immune checkpoint inhibitors are being utilized in the treatment of cancers, physicians should be aware of the wide range immune-related adverse events including the possible Behcet’s-like syndrome presentation.

scholarly journals Risk factors for cancer-associated thrombosis in patients undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 1200-1206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosuke Ando ◽  
Takahiro Hayashi ◽  
Reiko Sugimoto ◽  
Seira Nishibe ◽  
Kaori Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Anticancer Agents ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
History Of ◽  
Cancer Associated Thrombosis

SummaryPurpose Anticancer agents are known to increase cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) onset. CAT onset rate is reported to be 1.92% in cisplatin-based therapy, 6.1% in paclitaxel plus ramucirumab combination therapy, and 11.9% in bevacizumab monotherapy. Because immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) cause a sudden increase in T cell number, an association between administration of these drugs and increase in CAT incidence is likely. However, the extent to which ICI administration affects CAT incidence remains unclear. Further, risk factors for CAT incidence have not yet been identified. The present study investigated CAT incidence and associated risk factors in patients receiving ICI. Methods Patients administered nivolumab or pembrolizumab at Fujita Health University Hospital from April 2017 to March 2018 were enrolled. We collected retrospective data regarding age, sex, cancer type, BMI, medical history, laboratory data at treatment initiation, medications, and computed tomography (CT) interpretations from electronic medical records. Results We identified 122 eligible participants from 135 patients receiving nivolumab or pembrolizumab. Ten patients (8.2%) developed CAT. A history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or arterial thromboembolism (ATE) was a risk factor for CAT incidence (odds ratio: 6.36, P = 0.039). A history of heart disease may be a risk factor for CAT incidence (odds ratio 6.56, P = 0.052). Significantly higher usage of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy was noted in patients who developed CAT (60%) than in those who did not (13.4%, p < 0.01). Conclusion High (8.2%) CAT incidence during ICI administration suggested that ICI is not associated with a lower blood clot risk than other anticancer agents investigated in previous studies. For patients with VTE, ATE, or heart disease history, it is crucial to consider the possibility of CAT even with antiplatelet therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document