Age at Diagnosis, Extent of Disease and Breast Cancer Survival: A Population-Based Study in Florence, Italy

2000 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Barchielli ◽  
Daniela Balzi

Background The effect of age at diagnosis on the prognosis of breast cancer is still controversial. The study described the variation by age at diagnosis of some clinical-pathologic features and evaluated the relationship between age and survival, taking into account the effect of extent of disease. Materials The study comprised a large population-based series of 1,182 invasive breast cancers, incident in the period 1985–1986 in the province of Florence. Results The proportion of cases without nodal involvement progressively lowered from 59% in the age group ≤39 years to 22% in the age group ≥80 years. The extent of disease was unknown in 14% of cases aged 70–79 years and in 43% of those aged ≥80 years (other age groups: 3%–5%). A lower rate of surgical treatment and axillary surgery were the main reasons for inadequate staging in the elderly. Ten-year observed survival progressively decreased from 71% for age ≤39 years to 12% for age ≥80 years. Ten-year relative survival showed less evident differences, dropping from 72% for age ≤39 years to 57% for age ≥80 years. In the relative survival analysis, the differences in relative risks of death among age groups were not significant, either in the univariate or multivariate analysis. Nevertheless, the model with adjustment for extension of disease showed a flattening of the estimated relative risks in age groups over 59 years. Conclusions Age at diagnosis was not significantly related to 10-year breast cancer relative survival, suggesting that the worse prognosis in the elderly was largely related to the risk of death from other causes, rather than to a different malignant potential of the tumor. The worse distribution by extent of disease in older women indirectly suggested that diagnostic delays also influenced the different prognosis observed among age groups.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3773-3773
Author(s):  
Adam Mendizabal ◽  
Paul H Levine

Abstract Abstract 3773 Background: Age at diagnosis of CML varies by race in the United States with median occurring around ages 54 and 63 among Black and White patients, respectively. The treatment paradigm shifted when Imatinib was approved in 2001 for treatment of CML. More recently, second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have also been used for treatment of CML. Differences in outcomes by race have been previously reported prior to the TKI treatment period. We aimed to assess whether the earlier age at diagnosis resulted in differential trends in age-adjusted incidence rates and survival outcomes by race in the post-Imatinib treatment period. Methods: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 Registries were extracted for diagnoses between 2002 and 2009 based on the assumption that cases diagnosed after 2002 would be treated with TKI's. CML was defined according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology 3rd edition code 9863 (CML-NOS) and 9875 (CML-Philadelphia Chromosome Positive). Cases diagnosed by autopsy or death certificate only were excluded. Incidence rates are expressed per 100,000 person-years and age-adjusted to the 2000 US Standard Population. Black/White incidence rate ratios (IRRBW) are shown with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Kaplan-Meier estimates of CML-specific survival (CPS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated at 5-years post-diagnosis with the event being time to CML-specific death or any death, respectively. Stratified Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to assess the impact of age and race on the risk of death expressed as a hazard ratio (HR). Results: Since 2002, 6,632 patients diagnosed with CML were reported to the SEER 18 registries including 5,829 White patients (87.9%) and 803 Black patients (12.1%) with 57% being male. The age-adjusted incidence rate for Blacks was 1.18 (95% CI, 1.10–1.27) per 100,000 and 1.12 (95% CI, 1.09–1.27) per 100,000 for Whites. The corresponding IRRBW was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.98– 1.14). When considering 20-year age-groups, Blacks had higher incidence rates in the 20–39 and 40–59 age groups; IRRBW of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.06–1.49; p=0.0073) and 1.23 (95% CI, 1.09–1.39; p=0.0007), respectively. No statistically significant differences in IRRBW were seen within the 0–19, 60–79 and 80+ age-groupings although Whites have higher non-significant incidence rates in the latter 2 age-groups. Differences in IRRBW prompted an assessment of survival to determine if the excess incidence observed in the younger age groups corresponded with a worse survival. CPS at 5-years was 85.5% (95% CI, 84.3–86.6). In univariate analysis, age was an important predictor of outcome (p<0.0001) with patients diagnosed after age 80 having the worse outcomes (OS: 58.3%), followed by patients diagnosed between 60 and 79 years (OS 84.7%), 0–19 years (OS: 87.1%), 40–59 years (OS: 90.2%), and 20–39 years (OS: 92.6%). When considering all age-groups, race was not a significant predictor of death (HR 0.91; 95% CI, 0.72–1.15). However, in a stratified analysis with 20-year age groups, Blacks had an increased risk of death as compared to Whites (Figure 1) in the 20–39 age group (HR: 2.94; 95% CI, 1.72–5.26; p<0.0001) and the 40–59 age group (HR: 1.67; 95% CI, 1.22–2.27; p=0.0069) while no differences were seen within the 0–19, 60–79 and 80+ age groups. Conclusions from OS models were similar to that of the CPS models. Conclusions: Through this analysis of population-based cancer registry data collected in the US between 2002 and 2009, we show that Blacks have a younger age at diagnosis with higher incidence rates observed in the 20–39 and 40–59 age-groups as compared to Whites. Both CPS and OS outcomes differed by race and age. Similar to the differences observed with the incidence rates, survival was worse in Blacks diagnosed within the 20–39 and 40–59 age-groups as compared to Whites. Although outcomes have globally improved in patients with CML since the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the persistence of incidence heterogeneity and poorer survival among Blacks warrants further attention. Access to care may be a possible reason for the differences observed but further studies are warranted to rule out biological differences which may be causing an earlier age at onset and poorer survival. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18597-18597
Author(s):  
Y. Rottenberg ◽  
T. Peretz

18597 Background: In industrial countries, the cancer burden of the elderly is high and is increased. One reason is longer life expectancy. Increasing age standardized rates of cancer in this age group compared to younger groups may also explain this phenomenon. Methods: Two age groups were examined, above and below 65 years. Each age group was further divided into men and women. The age standardized rates for all cancers combined among the Jewish population in Israel were identified through the Israel Cancer Registry during the years 1973–2002. In addition, lung and colorectal cancers according to sexes, prostate cancer in men and breast cancer in women were examined. Results: Between the first 5 years of the study (1973–1977) and the last 5 years (1998–2002) the age standardized rates for all cancers combined were raised by about one third in the two age groups. In males, the overall change was higher in the older group (42% in men aged 65 years and older compared to 31% in men younger than 65). However, the rise in the younger group was more prominent in females (42% in women younger than 65 years compared to 33 % in women aged 65 and older). The most outstanding increase was in prostate cancer in men, but mainly in the younger group (176% in the older group and 368% in the younger group) followed by breast cancer in women, more prominent in the older group (64% in the older group and 50% in the younger group). In both sexes, more noticeable increases were noted in the older groups in colorectal cancer and in lung cancer. Between the years 1993–1997 and 1998–2002 shifts towards stabilization and even a decrease was noted in some of the cancers that were examined. In men aged 65 years and older rates for all cancers combined were decreased by 2.5%, among the specific tumors and a decrease was noted in lung cancer (6.7%) and prostate cancer (5.8%). The rates for all cancers combined among the older women were slightly decreasing (2.0%). No decrease was noted in the specific tumors in this group. Among the younger groups in both sexes, no decrease (defined >0.5%) was noted. Conclusions: These data argue against the hypothesis that the overall change in the cancer burden in the aged could be also explained by differences changes in the risk of developing cancer between these two age groups. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1885-1885
Author(s):  
J. Reutfors ◽  
L. Brandt ◽  
K. Sparring Björkstén ◽  
A. Ekbom ◽  
U. Ösby

IntroductionSuicide risk is increased in patients with a history of psychiatric hospitalization.AimTo explore how suicide risk varies by age during psychiatric hospitalization and in the year post-discharge.MethodsThis is a population-based case-control study of all suicides (n = 20,675; 70% male) in Sweden aged ≥18 years during 1991–2003. Each suicide was individually matched to 10 population controls by age, sex, and county of residence. Discharge diagnoses of a mental disorder (except dementia and other organic disorders) in the year prior to suicide were identified by register linkage. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated by conditional logistic regression to estimate the relative risk of suicide in those with psychiatric diagnoses compared to the general population. ORs were estimated by age group (18–34 years, 35–49 years, 50–64 years, and ≥ 65 years) and timing of the suicide in relation to discharge.ResultsDuring hospitalization, the youngest age group had the greatest suicide risk elevation [OR 64 (95% CI 44-92)]. In the first month post-discharge, the oldest age group had the highest suicide risk elevation [OR 162 (95% 66–399) in the first week and OR 127 (95% 67–242) in the second to fourth weeks]. In the remaining eleven months, suicide risk elevation was lower and relatively similar in different age groups.ConclusionsDuring the year following psychiatric hospitalization, an especially high attention should be paid to the suicide risk of the elderly patients in the first month post-discharge.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (18) ◽  
pp. 2514-2520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magnus Björkholm ◽  
Lotta Ohm ◽  
Sandra Eloranta ◽  
Åsa Derolf ◽  
Malin Hultcrantz ◽  
...  

Purpose Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) management changed dramatically with the development of imatinib mesylate (IM), the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the BCR-ABL1 oncoprotein. In Sweden, the drug was approved in November 2001. We report relative survival (RS) of patients with CML diagnosed during a 36-year period. Patients and Methods Using data from the population-based Swedish Cancer Registry and population life tables, we estimated RS for all patients diagnosed with CML from 1973 to 2008 (n = 3,173; 1,796 males and 1,377 females; median age, 62 years). Patients were categorized into five age groups and five calendar periods, the last being 2001 to 2008. Information on use of upfront IM was collected from the Swedish CML registry. Results Relative survival improved with each calendar period, with the greatest improvement between 1994-2000 and 2001-2008. Five-year cumulative relative survival ratios (95% Cls) were 0.21 (0.17 to 0.24) for patients diagnosed 1973-1979, 0.54 (0.50 to 0.58) for 1994-2000, and 0.80 (0.75 to 0.83) for 2001-2008. This improvement was confined to patients younger than 79 years of age. Five-year RSRs for patients diagnosed from 2001 to 2008 were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85 to 0.94) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.47) for patients younger than 50 and older than 79 years, respectively. Men had inferior outcome. Upfront overall use of IM increased from 40% (2002) to 84% (2006). Only 18% of patients older than 80 years of age received IM as first-line therapy. Conclusion This large population-based study shows a major improvement in outcome of patients with CML up to 79 years of age diagnosed from 2001 to 2008, mainly caused by an increasing use of IM. The elderly still have poorer outcome, partly because of a limited use of IM.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (33) ◽  
pp. 4381-4386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Miao ◽  
Helena M. Verkooijen ◽  
Kee-Seng Chia ◽  
Christine Bouchardy ◽  
Eero Pukkala ◽  
...  

Purpose Male breast cancer is a rare disease with an incidence rate less than 1% of that of female breast cancer. Given its low incidence, few studies have assessed risk and prognosis. Methods This population-based study, including 459,846 women and 2,665 men diagnosed with breast cancer in Denmark, Finland, Geneva, Norway, Singapore, and Sweden over the last 40 years, compares trends in incidence, relative survival, and relative excess mortality between the sexes. Results World standardized incidence rates of breast cancer were 66.7 per 105 person-years in women and 0.40 per 105 person-years in men. Women were diagnosed at a younger median age (61.7 years) than men (69.6 years). Male patients had a poorer 5-year relative survival ratio than women (0.72 [95% CI, 0.70 to 0.75] v 0.78 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.78], respectively), corresponding to a relative excess risk (RER) of 1.27 (95% CI, 1.13 to 1.42). However, after adjustment for age and year of diagnosis, stage, and treatment, male patients had a significantly better relative survival from breast cancer than female patients (RER, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97). Conclusion Male patients with breast cancer have later onset of disease and more advanced disease than female patients. Male patients with breast cancer have lower risk of death from breast cancer than comparable female patients.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 113 (16) ◽  
pp. 3666-3672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Åsa Rangert Derolf ◽  
Sigurdur Yngvi Kristinsson ◽  
Therese M.-L. Andersson ◽  
Ola Landgren ◽  
Paul W. Dickman ◽  
...  

AbstractWe evaluated survival patterns for all registered acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients diagnosed in Sweden in 1973 to 2005 (N = 9729; median age, 69 years). Patients were categorized into 6 age groups and 4 calendar periods (1973-1980, 1981-1988, 1989-1996, and 1997-2005). Relative survival ratios were computed as measures of patient survival. One-year survival improved over time in all age groups, whereas 5- and 10-year survival improved in all age groups, except for patients 80+ years. The 5-year relative survival ratios in the last calendar period were 0.65, 0.58, 0.36, 0.15, 0.05, and 0.01 for the age groups 0 to 18, 19 to 40, 41 to 60, 61 to 70, 71 to 80, and 80+ years, respectively. Intensified chemotherapy, a continuous improvement in supportive care, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation are probably the most important factors contributing to this finding. In contrast, there was no improvement in survival in AML patients with a prior diagnosis of a myelodysplastic syndrome during 1993 to 2005 (n = 219). In conclusion, AML survival has improved during the last decades. However, the majority of AML patients die of their disease and age remains an important predictor of prognosis. New effective agents with a more favorable toxicity profile are needed to improve survival, particularly in the elderly.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (15) ◽  
pp. 1993-1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigurdur Yngvi Kristinsson ◽  
Ola Landgren ◽  
Paul W. Dickman ◽  
Åsa Rangert Derolf ◽  
Magnus Björkholm

Purpose To define patterns of survival among all multiple myeloma (MM) patients diagnosed in Sweden during a 30-year period. Patients and Methods A total of 14,381 MM patients (7,643 males; 6,738 females) were diagnosed in Sweden from 1973 to 2003 (median age, 69.9 years; range 19 to 101 years). Patients were categorized into six age categories and four calendar periods (1973 to 1979, 1980 to 1986, 1987 to 1993, and 1994 to 2003). We computed relative survival ratios (RSRs) as measures of patient survival. Results One-year survival improved (P < .001) over time in all age groups and RSRs were 0.73, 0.78, 0.80, and 0.82 for the four calendar periods; however, improvement in 5-year (P < .001) and 10-year (P < .001) RSR was restricted to patients younger than 70 years and younger than 60 years, respectively. For the first time, in analyses restricted to MM patients diagnosed at age younger than 60 years, we found a 29% (P < .001) reduced 10-year mortality in the last calendar period (1994 to 2003) compared with the preceding calendar period (1987 to 1993). Females with MM had a 3% (P = .024) lower excess mortality than males. Conclusion One-year MM survival has increased for all age groups during the last decades; 5-year and 10-year MM survival has increased in younger patients (younger than 60 to 70 years). High-dose melphalan with subsequent autologous stem-cell transplantation, thalidomide, and a continuous improvement in supportive care measures are probably the most important factors contributing to this finding. New effective agents with a more favorable toxicity profile are needed to improve survival further, particularly in the elderly.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H J Ahn ◽  
S R Lee ◽  
E K Choi ◽  
K D Han ◽  
S I Kwon ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) and ischemic stroke (IS) are two significant cardiovascular diseases that confer an enormous healthcare burden. A limited study comprehensively evaluated the association between full ranges of body mass index (BMI), including underweight, and AF or IS risks, especially in the different age subgroups. Purpose We investigated the association between BMI and AF and IS incidence according to the Korean population's age groups. Methods This was a nationwide population-based cohort study using data from the Korea National Health Insurance Service, including 9 194 477 healthy adults who underwent a medical examination in 2009. We stratified the study population into three age subgroups: age 20–39 (young, 33.1%), age 40–64 (middle-aged, 56.3%), and age over 65 years (elderly, 10.6%). In each age group, the individuals were categorized based on BMI (kg/m2) into underweight (&lt;18.5), normal (18.5 to &lt;23), overweight (23 to &lt;25), obese I (25 to &lt;30), and obese II (≥30). The first occurrences of AF and IS were followed up until December 31, 2018. According to BMI in each age group, the risks of AF and IS were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression with 95% confidence intervals (CI) by adjusting age, sex, lifestyle behaviors, and comorbidities. Results Overall, both underweight and higher BMI were associated with an increased risk of AF and stroke across all age groups. The increased risk of AF for patients with obese II was slightly accentuated compared to patients with normal BMI in the young population than elderly population (hazard ratio [HR] 1.78, 95% CI 1.63–1.94 for age 20–39 years; HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.48–1.61 for age ≥65 years, respectively). For underweight individuals, however, the increased risk of AF became more prominent in the elderly: HR and 95% CI was 1.12 (1.07–1.17) in the age over 65 years old, and 1.05 (0.94–1.16) in the age 20–39. Regarding IS, the young group presented a considerable increment in the magnitude of HRs in both underweight and higher BMI groups. However, the association between the BMI and stroke risk became attenuated in the elderly: HRs and 95% CI in underweight and obese II individuals were 1.10 (0.93–1.30) and 2.223 (1.99–2.49) in the age 20–39 group, whereas 0.97 (0.93–1.01) and 1.03 (0.98–1.08) in the age over 65 years old. Conclusions Underweight as well as obesity was associated with increased risks of AF and IS in the general population. In both AF and IS, the gradient of risks according to BMI was apparent at young ages; thus, maintaining normal body weight should be warranted in early life. An interplay of several factors other than BMI may contribute to ischemic stroke in the old ages, requiring integrated risk management in older patients. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4380-4380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Øystein Langseth ◽  
Tor Åge Myklebust ◽  
Tom Børge Johannesen ◽  
Øyvind Hjertner ◽  
Anders Waage

Background: Several population-based studies on multiple myeloma (MM) have shown an improvement in relative survival (RS) for patients aged 65 years or younger at the time of diagnosis. In patients aged 75 years or older, the improvement in long-term RS is absent in most reports or much less pronounced. To our knowledge, only 2 studies based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database have demonstrated a significant increase in RS for this age-group. (Pulte et al. 2011, Costa et al. 2017) We performed a population-based study on Norwegian MM-patients to provide up-to-date estimates on changes in relative survival during the past 3 decades. Methods: The Cancer Registry of Norway (CRN) was established in 1951 and provides high-quality nationwide cancer statistics. For MM, the reported completeness of case-ascertainment is above 95%. Incidence data and all reported cases of MM diagnosed between January 1, 1982 and December 31, 2017 were retrieved from the CRN (n=10 961). Nationwide drug consumption statistics for drugs used in myeloma treatment were retrieved from the Norwegian Drug Wholesales Statistics and the Norwegian Prescriptions Database, Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Follow-up ended December 31, 2017. The time of MM-diagnosis was divided into 7 categories: 1982-1987, 1988-1992 (melphalan-prednisone), 1993-1997(early high-dose melphalan with autologous stem-cell transplant (HDM-ASCT)), 1998-2002 (introduction of thalidomide), 2003-2007 (early thalidomide upfront, introduction of bortezomib), 2008-2012 (thalidomide and bortezomib upfront, introduction of lenalidomide), 2013-2017 (lenalidomide upfront, early pomalidomide, daratumumab, panobinostat and carfilzomib). Age at diagnosis was divided into 3 categories; <65 years, 65-79 years and 80 years or older. We estimated relative survival ratios (RSR) with 95% confidence intervals 5 and 10 years after the time of diagnosis by the Ederer-II method. The analysis was stratified by age-group and calendar period of diagnosis. Cohort analysis was applied to calendar periods with complete follow-up, and period analysis was applied where complete-follow up was not available (2013-2017 and 10-year estimates for 2008-2012). Non-overlapping confidence intervals were considered statistically significant. Results: The age-standardized incidence rate was stable until approximately year 2000, followed by an increasing tendency reaching 8.4 cases per 100 000 persons in 2017. Figure 1. Patients diagnosed before the age of 65 had a steady increase in both 5 and 10-year RSR across all calendar periods. For patients aged 65-79 years, the 5- and 10-year RSR's were stable at approximately 0.3 and 0.1, respectively, until the calendar period 1998-2002. In the following years, an improvement in both 5- and 10-year RSR was observed. The 5-year RSR improved significantly from 0.31 (95% CI; 0.27-0.35) in the first calendar period to 0.43 (95% CI;0.39- 0.47) during 2008-2012. The predicted 5-year RSR for 2013-2017 was 0.48 (95% CI; 0.44-0.52). There were also signs of improved 10-year RSR, predicted to 0.23 (95% CI; 0.18-0.27) during 2013-2017 compared to 0.11 (95% CI; 0.08-0.14) during 1982-1987. The 5-year RSR for patients aged 80+ years was 0.11 (95% CI; 0.01-0.17) during 1982-1987 and the 10-year RSR was 0.03 (95% CI; 0.01-0.11). In the following 4 calendar periods the RSR-estimates fluctuated before a rising tendency during the last 2 periods. The 5-year RSR improved significantly to 0.26 (95% CI; 0.20-0.32) during 2008-2012 and further rising to a predicted value of 0.32 (95% CI; 0.25-0.38) during 2013-2017. Figure 2. Additionally, complete annual prescription statistics for the oral agents thalidomide, lenalidomide and pomalidomide were obtained. Conclusions: We provide real-world observations on changes in RS in a population-based cohort of 10 961 MM-patients. We demonstrate an improvement in 5-year relative survival across all age-groups, including patients aged 80 years or older. For patients <65 years, there was a steady increase in RS since 1982 and we see no obvious impact of the implementation of HDM-ASCT. For the other age-groups, the improvement in RS coincides with the introduction of new drugs. The increase in incidence since 2000 may be due to increased testing for M-protein. We can point to the introduction of new drugs and increased incidence of indolent cases as possible reasons for increasing RS. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 441-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco La Rosa ◽  
Vincenzo Michele Patavino ◽  
Anna Cristina Epifani ◽  
Anna Maria Petrinelli ◽  
Liliana Minelli ◽  
...  

We analyzed the 10-year survival of 1,512 women with breast cancer in relation to age at diagnosis. The incident cases were from an ad hoc investigation in Umbria, a region of central Italy, for the period 1978-1982. The follow-up was carried out by an automatic link with the RENCAM (Nominative register of causes of death) and verified at the Registrar's Offices of the various towns of the region. Observed survival at 1 year was 0.89, at 3 years 0.75, at 5 years 0.64 and at 10 years 0.47. Median survival was 9.0 years. Relative survival at 1, 3, 5, 10 years was respectively 0.91, 0.79, 0.71 and 0.59. Women <35 years of age had a better prognosis both at 5 (0.83) and 10 years (0.69) from diagnosis. Thereafter, survival decreased with increasing age. The exception to this trend was women in the 45-49 and 60-64 year age ranges, for which survival was greater than the previous age range classes by 6% and 13%, respectively, at 5 years from diagnosis and 6% and 14% at 10 years. Comparison of data from Umbria and Italian and European Registries shows that the prognosis for Umbrian women with breast cancer is quite good.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document