scholarly journals Functional improvement in hip pathology is related to improvement in anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing: an intricate link between physical and mental well-being

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Gudmundsson ◽  
Paul A. Nakonezny ◽  
Jason Lin ◽  
Rebisi Owhonda ◽  
Heather Richard ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression are risk factors for poor functional outcomes and worse post-treatment pain that can be treated alongside physical care given to orthopedic patients. While these factors have been shown to be common in patients with hip pathology, there is limited literature that follows these conditions throughout treatment. The purpose of this study was to track psychological factors in patients with various hip pathology to determine if they improved alongside functional measures following treatment. Methods Patients presenting to a specialist hip clinic were prospectively evaluated for outcomes of pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, and hip function. Pre- and post-treatment assessments were undertaken: Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, the Hip Outcome Survey, and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Patient characteristics were recorded. A correlation analysis, using the Spearman partial correlation coefficient (rs), was conducted to evaluate the relationship between change in psychological factors with change in functional outcomes. Results A total of 201 patients (78 male, 123 female) with a mean age of 53.75 ± 18.97 years were included, with diagnoses of hip dysplasia (n = 35), femoroacetabular impingement (n = 35), lateral trochanteric pain syndrome (n = 9), osteoarthrosis (n = 109), and avascular necrosis of the hip (n = 13). Statistical analysis revealed a significant negative relationship between change in function level (as measured by HOOS ADL) and change in pain catastrophizing (rs = − 0.373, p < 0.0001), depression (rs = − 0.363, p < 0.0001), and anxiety (rs = − 0.264, p = 0.0002). Pain catastrophizing, depression, and anxiety improved with function. Spearman correlation coefficients also revealed that pain catastrophizing, HADS anxiety, and HADS depression improved with improvement in other patient-reported functional outcomes. Conclusions Patients with hip pathology often exhibit pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression, but improvements in hip functionality are associated with decreased severity of these psychological comorbidities. Exploring this connection demonstrates the correlation between musculoskeletal impairment and psychosocial outcomes and mental health. Perioperative multidisciplinary assessment may be a beneficial part of comprehensive orthopaedic hip care.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Gudmundsson ◽  
Paul Nakonezny ◽  
Jason Lin ◽  
Rebisi Owhonda ◽  
Heather Richard ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundPain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression represent risk factors that can be treated alongside physical care given to orthopedic patients. While these factors have been shown to be common in patients with hip pathology, there is limited literature that follows these conditions throughout treatment. The purpose of this study was to track psychological factors in patients with various hip pathology to determine if they improved alongside functional measures following treatment.MethodsPatients presenting to a specialist hip clinic were prospectively evaluated for outcomes of pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, and hip function. Pre- and post-treatment assessments were undertaken: Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, the Hip Outcome Survey, and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Patient characteristics were recorded. A correlation analysis, using the Spearman partial correlation coefficient (rs), was conducted to evaluate the relationship between change in psychological factors with change in functional outcomes.ResultsA total of 201 patients (78 male, 123 female) were included, with diagnoses of hip dysplasia (n = 35), femoroacetabular impingement (n = 35), lateral trochanteric pain syndrome (n = 9), osteoarthrosis (n = 109), and avascular necrosis of the hip (n = 13). Statistical analysis revealed a significant negative relationship between change in function level (as measured by HOOS ADL) and change in pain catastrophizing (rs = -0.373, p < 0.0001), depression (rs = -0.363, p < 0.0001), and anxiety (rs = -0.264, p = 0.0002). Pain catastrophizing, depression, and anxiety improved with function. Spearman correlation coefficients also revealed that pain catastrophizing, HADS anxiety, and HADS depression improved with improvement in other patient-reported functional outcomes.ConclusionsPatients with hip pathology often exhibit pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression, but improvements in hip functionality are associated with decreased severity of these psychological comorbidities. Establishing this connection demonstrates the impact that musculoskeletal impairment has on psychosocial outcomes and mental health. Perioperative multidisciplinary assessment may be a beneficial part of comprehensive orthopaedic hip care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1114.2-1114
Author(s):  
M. Letaeva ◽  
M. Koroleva ◽  
J. Averkieva ◽  
O. Malyshenko ◽  
T. Raskina

Objectives:to assess the frequency of occurrence of the anxiety-depressive spectrum in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis.Methods:A survey was conducted of 44 patients aged from 21 to 57 years (average age - 42.3 ± 6.7 years), who were treated at GAUZ KO OKGVV. All patients had a verified diagnosis of RA and AS according to the ACR criteria and received treatment with basic drugs. The control group consisted of 40 people comparable in age and sex, without concomitant pathology of RA and AS.The depression screening card, the subjective well-being scale, and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) were used to assess and detect anxiety-depressive syndrome. The assessment of the condition is carried out over the last 2 weeks, which corresponds to the temporary diagnostic criterion for depression.The Depression Screening Scale is a 35-item self-questionnaire that assesses 7 categories of signs: sleep and appetite disorders, anxiety, emotional instability, cognitive impairment, loss of self, guilt, and suicidal tendencies. A total score of 65 and above indicates a high likelihood of depression.The Subjective Well-Being Scale is a psychodiagnostic screening tool for measuring the emotional component of subjective well-being or emotional comfort.Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Zigmond A.S., Snaith R.P. was developed for the primary detection of depression and anxiety in a general medical practice. The HADS scale consists of 14 statements with 4 possible answers and includes two parts: anxiety and depression. The sum of points of 8 or more is regarded as “subclinically expressed anxiety / depression”, 11 or more points - “clinically expressed anxiety / depression”.Results:According to the results of the depression screening questionnaire, 34 (77.3%) patients with RA and AS showed signs of depression, while in the control group only 6 (15%) patients tested positive for the presence of depressive disorders. According to the data obtained when assessing the scale of well-being in the main group, 26 (59.1%) patients showed signs of emotional discomfort (the indicator was 80% or more), in the control group - in 6 (15%). Using the hospital scale of anxiety and depression HADS, anxiety-depressive syndrome was detected in 36 (81.8%) patients with RA and AS: 16 (44.4%) patients had anxiety, 20 (55.6%) - depression, of them, subclinically expressed anxiety and depression were observed in 10 (27.7%) and 12 (33.3%) people, respectively. Anxiety-depressive syndrome in the control group, according to the HADS questionnaire, was detected only in 8 (20%) patients, of whom 4 (10%) patients had subclinical anxiety and 4 (10%) had signs of depression. No clinically pronounced anxiety and depression were registered in the control group.Conclusion:In most patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, anxiety-depressive disorders have been identified, which can directly affect both the course of the disease itself and the development of various complications. Timely diagnosis of mental disorders and close cooperation of rheumatologists, psychiatrists and psychologists in the selection of adequate therapy can improve the course and prognosis of the disease.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-61
Author(s):  
Vikrant Prabhakar ◽  
Amrit Virk ◽  
Parmal Saini

Background: Depression is commonly reported by university students due to change in environment, academic demands, developing new relations and more financial freedom. If that professional course happens to be medical education, the transition is even more drastic. Studies have also shown that Quality of Life (QOL) is negatively affected by the presence of anxiety and depression. Aim: Present study aims to find the prevalence of anxiety, depression and stress among students who have recently joined medical college. Materials & Method: This cross-sectional study was undertaken at Private medical college in north India. Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) was used for the data collection. MBBS students who have joined the institution in August 2019 were included in the study. Statistical Analysis Used: Data was entered in excel and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) Version 21. Result: We found that almost half of the students who participated in the study had scores above 10 (meaning thereby depressed) on the depression scale, with 23.5% of respondents showing moderate or severe depression. Two-third students experienced anxiety, with 20% students having severe to very severe anxiety. Stress levels amongst the students were also high, with 47% of the students reporting stress. 3.4% students experienced severe or very severe stress. Conclusion: Medical students have high prevalence of stress, anxiety and depression. It is recommended that medical colleges should implement appropriate and timely measures to address students’ well-being and offer comprehensive intervention and preventive programs to help students cope with this transition phase.


2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (7) ◽  
pp. 800-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. N. Hampton ◽  
P. A. Nakonezny ◽  
H. M. Richard ◽  
J. E. Wells

Aims Psychological factors play a critical role in patient presentation, satisfaction, and outcomes. Pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression are important to consider, as they are associated with poorer outcomes and are potentially modifiable. The aim of this study was to assess the level of pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression in patients with a range of hip pathology and to evaluate their relationship with patient-reported psychosocial and functional outcome measures. Patients and Methods Patients presenting to a tertiary-centre specialist hip clinic were prospectively evaluated for outcomes of pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression. Validated assessments were undertaken such as: the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), and the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). Patient characteristics and demographics were also recorded. Multiple linear regression modelling, with adaptive least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) variable selection, was used for analysis. Results A total of 328 patients were identified for inclusion, with diagnoses of hip dysplasia (DDH; n = 50), femoroacetabular impingement (FAI; n = 55), lateral trochanteric pain syndrome (LTP; n = 23), hip osteoarthrosis (OA; n = 184), and avascular necrosis of the hip (AVN; n = 16) with a mean age of 31.0 years (14 to 65), 38.5 years (18 to 64), 63.7 years (20 to 78), 63.5 years (18 to 91), and 39.4 years (18 to 71), respectively. The percentage of patients with abnormal levels of pain catastrophizing, anxiety, or depression was: 22.0%, 16.0%, and 12.0% for DDH, respectively; 9.1%, 10.9%, and 7.3% for FAI, respectively; 13.0%, 4.3%, and 4.3% for LTP, respectively; 21.7%, 11.4%, and 14.1% for OA, respectively; and 25.0%, 43.8%, and 6.3% for AVN, respectively. HADS Anxiety (HADSA) and Hip Disability Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living subscale (HOOS ADL) predicted the PCS total (adjusted R2 = 0.4599). Age, HADS Depression (HADSD), and PCS total predicted HADSA (adjusted R2 = 0.4985). Age, HADSA, patient’s percentage of perceived function, PCS total, and HOOS Quality of Life subscale (HOOS QOL) predicted HADSD (adjusted R2 = 0.5802). Conclusion Patients with hip pathology may exhibit significant pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression. Identifying these factors and understanding the impact of psychosocial function could help improve patient treatment outcomes. Perioperative multidisciplinary assessment may be a beneficial part of comprehensive orthopaedic hip care. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:800–807.


Author(s):  
Anna Idzik ◽  
Anna Leńczuk-Gruba ◽  
Ewa Kobos ◽  
Mariola Pietrzak ◽  
Beata Dziedzic

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many changes in the functioning of people all over the world in a short period of time. According to a WHO report (2020), it is women who are at a particular risk of the negative effects of the pandemic, especially in terms of mental health. Aim of study: The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of anxiety, depression, irritability, and loneliness among adult women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods: The study was conducted on a representative sample of women in Poland (n = 452). The data were collected using the HADS-M scale and the R-UCLA scale. Results: A low level of loneliness was found in 37.3% of the women, moderate in 38.9%, moderately high in 22.3% and very high in 1.3% of women. Self-rating of physical and mental health was significantly positively correlated with anxiety, depression, and irritability in HADS-M, and loneliness in R-UCLA. As the severity of loneliness increased, so did Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores on all subscales (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The study group presented with mental well-being disorders in the form of anxiety and depression. Two in three women experienced loneliness.


2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 394-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hervé Caci ◽  
Franck J. Baylé ◽  
Christelle Dossios ◽  
Philippe Robert ◽  
Patrice Boyer

AbstractObjectiveResearchers tried to explain the overlap between anxiety and depression by suggesting that some items of self-administered questionnaires were badly selected and that both constructs should rather be considered as multidimensional. Thus, we hypothesise that the Spielberger trait anxiety inventory (TAI) includes items related to depression.MethodA non-clinical sample of 193 subjects filled out the TAI and the Hospitalised Anxiety–Depression Scale. Factors were postulated on the basis of item content and submitted to confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).ResultsWe found five factors: a 10-item anxiety factor containing three factors, a four-item unsuccessfulness factor correlated with the HADS anhedonia factor, and a six-item happiness factor.ConclusionThe TAI scale encompasses measures of anxiety, depression and well-being. Consequently, the overlap with other measures of depression may result from item selection. This work awaits replication in independent normal and pathological samples.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Krishna J. Vaghela

The present study has been designed to investigate the difference of psychological well- being, death anxiety, depression between incurable and curable diseases patients. The study was conducted over a sample of eighty patients both incurable diseases patients and curable diseases patients. All participates were administered the psychological well- being scale, death anxiety scale and depression scale. Data was analyzed using t-test. The results reported that exists a statistically significant difference in psychological well-being between incurable and curable diseases patients. As regarding the death anxiety in curable diseases patients was not different significantly from that of patients with incurable diseases. Significant difference is also observed between incurable diseases and curable diseases patients as regarding to their level of depression.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Roy ◽  
Karl Fraser ◽  
Wayne Young ◽  
Janine Cooney ◽  
Warren McNabb ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives The links between food, gastrointestinal (GI) function and comfort, and mental well-being are at the forefront of nutritional research. Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a functional GI disorder and the combination of detailed patient reported outcomes (PROs) combined with omic data could better define these disorders. Methods The Christchurch COMFORT cohort is a case-control study: 337 participants with functional GI disorders (functional constipation FC, functional diarrhoea FD, IBS constipation IBS-C, IBS diarrhoea IBS-D) and asymptomatic controls. Demographics, symptom scores, psychological scores and dietary intake were recorded using the ‘Modified Hunter New England’ (Rome IV diagnostic criteria questionnaires; Medical History Questions; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS). Demographics included Structured Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms (SAGIS); and Diet Diary and Live Symptoms Score (FAST) along with PRO Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Biological samples collected for an untargeted LCMS analysis of plasma and shot-gun metagenome analysis of faecal DNA. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Otago Human Ethics Committee (H16/094). Results Symptom questionnaires were able to cluster 287 subjects into: IBS (42%), functional disorders (18%) and healthy controls (40%). Within IBS, 46% were IBS-D, 23% were IBS-C and 31% were IBS-M. Severity scores were higher for all IBS cases with PROMIS-GI scales. A higher score of health worry was reported in IBS-C than other IBS subtypes. HADS anxiety and depression scales were higher in IBS cases (vs. healthy controls). The FAST diary symptoms correlated with PROMIS GI scales (exception for constipation). Metabolomic analyses detected differential plasma metabolites and pathways (bile acids, lipids, specific amino acids) affected between IBS-C + FC vs IBS-D + FD, healthy vs IBS-D and healthy vs IBS-C. Metagenomics suggests that carbohydrate, methane, and sulfur metabolism may be important in IBS. Conclusions These data will allow us to apply a systems biology approach to identify key pathways and correlate them with the questionnaire data to better understand functional GI disorders. Funding Sources Funded by the NZ National Science Challenge High-Value Nutrition programme.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S502-S503
Author(s):  
Y PARK ◽  
J H Cheon ◽  
Y S Park ◽  
K C Huh ◽  
J E Shin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background As the treatment paradigm of inflammatory bowel disease changes towards patient-centred treatment, it is becoming increasingly important to measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We aimed to identify the changes of emotional health and work- or activity-related outcomes one year after the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) and its predictors in patients enrolled in the moderate-to-severe UC in Korea (MOSAIK) cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02229344). Methods The MOSAIK cohort is the first nationwide, prospective, inception cohort on moderate-to-severe UC in Korea. Between August 2014 and March 2017, consecutive patients from 30 tertiary hospitals were enrolled. PRO data including hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) for emotional health, and work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) questionnaire for work- or activity-related outcomes, were collected within the first 4 weeks of diagnosis via patient surveys. Wilcoxon-signed rank tests and linear mixed-effects regression models were used for paired comparisons between baseline and 1 year and assessing the predictors of HADS and WPAI. Results Of the 368 enrolled patients, 333 eligible patients were analyzed. The mean age at diagnosis was 39 years and 57.7% (192/333) were male. A considerable number of patients had moderate to high (≥11 by HADS) levels of anxiety and depression (16.0% and 20.5%, respectively), and about half of patients had work and activity impairment (45.5% and 45.8%%, respectively) at baseline. After 1 year follow-up, significant reduction of anxiety and depression (mean difference [MD] in HADS score -1.3 for both anxiety and depression, P&lt;0.001), as well as work and activity impairment (MD -24.1% and -22.4%, P&lt;0.001) was noted. Higher disease activity (partial Mayo Score) during a one-year period was a significant predictor of anxiety, depression, work and social activity impairment. Among the symptoms of UC, abdominal pain was a significant predictor of depression and work and activity impairment, and weight loss and diarrhoea were significant predictors of activity impairment. Conclusion Newly diagnosed moderate-to-severe UC patients had considerable anxiety, depression, and work and activity impairment at baseline, but significant improvement was noted after 1 year. Controlling symptoms and disease activity was the most important factor to improve PROs after 1 year.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document