scholarly journals The impact of certain underlying comorbidities on the risk of developing hospitalised pneumonia in England

Pneumonia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Campling ◽  
D. Jones ◽  
J. D. Chalmers ◽  
Q. Jiang ◽  
A. Vyse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Chronic Respiratory Disease ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Comorbid Condition ◽  
Odds Ratios ◽  
Comparator Group ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background UK specific data on the risk of developing hospitalised CAP for patients with underlying comorbidities is lacking. This study compared the likelihood of hospitalised all-cause community acquired pneumonia (CAP) in patients with certain high-risk comorbidities and a comparator group with no known risk factors for pneumococcal disease. Methods This retrospective cohort study interrogated data in the Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) dataset between financial years 2012/13 and 2016/17. In total 3,078,623 patients in England (aged ≥18 years) were linked to their hospitalisation records. This included 2,950,910 individuals with defined risk groups and a comparator group of 127,713 people who had undergone tooth extraction with none of the risk group diagnoses. Risk groups studied were chronic respiratory disease (CRD), chronic heart disease (CHD), chronic liver disease (CLD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes (DM) and post bone marrow transplant (BMT). The patients were tracked forward from year 0 (2012/13) to Year 3 (2016/17) and all diagnoses of hospitalised CAP were recorded. A Logistic regression model compared odds of developing hospitalised CAP for patients in risk groups compared to healthy controls. The model was simultaneously adjusted for age, sex, strategic heath authority (SHA), index of multiple deprivation (IMD), ethnicity, and comorbidity. To account for differing comorbidity profiles between populations the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was applied. The model estimated odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals of developing hospitalised CAP for each specified clinical risk group. Results Patients within all the risk groups studied were more likely to develop hospitalised CAP than patients in the comparator group. The odds ratios varied between underlying conditions ranging from 1.18 (95% CI 1.13, 1.23) for those with DM to 5.48 (95% CI 5.28, 5.70) for those with CRD. Conclusions Individuals with any of 6 pre-defined underlying comorbidities are at significantly increased risk of developing hospitalised CAP compared to those with no underlying comorbid condition. Since the likelihood varies by risk group it should be possible to target patients with each of these underlying comorbidities with the most appropriate preventative measures, including immunisations.

Ambulant erworbene Pneumonie: Komorbiditäten als Risikofaktoren erkennen

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-27
Author(s):  
Stefan Krüger
Keyword(s):  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Chronic Respiratory Disease ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Comorbid Condition ◽  
Odds Ratios ◽  
Chronic Heart Disease ◽  
Comparator Group ◽  
Increased Risk

Background: UK specific data on the risk of developing hospitalised CAP for patients with underlying comorbidities is lacking. This study compared the likelihood of hospitalised all-cause community acquired pneumonia (CAP) in patients with certain high-risk comorbidities and a comparator group with no known risk factors for pneumococcal disease. Methods: This retrospective cohort study interrogated data in the Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) dataset between financial years 2012/13 and 2016/17. In total 3,078,623 patients in England (aged ≥18 years) were linked to their hospitalisation records. This included 2,950,910 individuals with defined risk groups and a comparator group of 127,713 people who had undergone tooth extraction with none of the risk group diagnoses. Risk groups studied were chronic respiratory disease (CRD), chronic heart disease (CHD), chronic liver disease (CLD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes (DM) and post bone marrow transplant (BMT). The patients were tracked forward from year 0 (2012/13) to Year 3 (2016/17) and all diagnoses of hospitalised CAP were recorded. A Logistic regression model compared odds of developing hospitalised CAP for patients in risk groups compared to healthy controls. The model was simultaneously adjusted for age, sex, strategic heath authority (SHA), index of multiple deprivation (IMD), ethnicity, and comorbidity. To account for differing comorbidity profiles between populations the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was applied. The model estimated odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals of developing hospitalised CAP for each specified clinical risk group.Results: Patients within all the risk groups studied were more likely to develop hospitalised CAP than patients in the comparator group. The odds ratios varied between underlying conditions ranging from 1.18 (95% CI 1.13, 1.23) for those with DM to 5.48 (95% CI 5.28, 5.70) for those with CRD. Conclusions: Individuals with any of 6 pre-defined underlying comorbidities are at significantly increased risk of developing hospitalised CAP compared to those with no underlying comorbid condition. Since the likelihood varies by risk group it should be possible to target patients with each of these underlying comorbidities with the most appropriate preventative measures, including immunisations.

scholarly journals The Impact of Concurrent MYC BCL2 Protein Expression on the Risk of Secondary Central Nervous System Relapse in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 495-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry J. Savage ◽  
Laurie H. Sehn ◽  
Diego Villa ◽  
Roopesh R. Kansara ◽  
Anja Mottok ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Expression ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Cumulative Risk ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Bcl2 Protein ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction: Recent studies have established that concurrent MYC and BCL2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) identifies a subgroup of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with a poor outcome. Classic dual translocation MYC/ BCL2, so called ‘double hit' disease, is associated with a high risk of central nervous system (CNS) relapse; however the impact of concurrent MYC and BCL2 protein expression on the risk of CNS relapse remains unknown. Further, robust biological markers that accurately predict the risk of CNS relapse in DLBCL would also be of value in clinical practice. Methods: Cases of pre-treatment formalin fixed paraffin embedded DLBCL in two tissue microarrays were independently scored by two expert hematopathologist (GWS and KLT or PF and AM) for expression of MYC (Epitomics Y69), BCL2 (Dako 124), CD10, BCL6 and MUM1 by IHC. MYC and BCL2 positivity were defined as ≥ 40% and ≥ 50% cells with staining, respectively, in accordance with previously established cutoffs (Johnson, JCO 2012; 30). Cases with discordant scores were reviewed by a third hematopathologist (RDG) to reach a consensus. Cell of origin (COO) was assigned according to the Hans IHC algorithm (Hans, Blood 103: 2004) as well as by the recently described gene expression profiling Lymph2Cx 20 gene assay based on NanoString technology (Scott, Blood 2014; 123) in the subset of patients with ≥ 40% tumor content. Patients treated with at least one cycle of R-CHOP chemotherapy with curative intent were included and those with established CNS disease at diagnosis were excluded. Results: 447 patients were identified with the following baseline clinical characteristics: Median age 65 y (16-92y); males n=280, 63%; performance status ≥ 2, n= 147, 33%; stage 3 or 4 disease n=242, 54%; elevated LDH n=219, 47%; EN > 1 n= 80, 17%. With a median follow-up of 6.75 years for living patients, the 3 year time to progression, progression-free and overall survival for all patients were 68%, 66%, and 73%, respectively. In total, 131 (29%) were MYC+BCL2+ and 316 (71%) were non-MYC+BCL2+. By COO assignment using the Hans algorithm (n=444), 192 were non-GCB (43%) and 252 were GCB (57%) and by the Lymph2Cx (n=308); 103 were ABC (33%), 172 were GCB (56%) and 33 (11%) were unclassifiable. The 2 year cumulative risk of CNS relapse for the whole cohort was 4.3%. The cumulative risk of CNS relapse was higher in cases that were MYC+BCL2+ (2 year risk 9.4% vs 2.4%, P=0.001) with similar results obtained if classic MYC+BCL2+ double hit cases are excluded. There were no cases of CNS relapse in cases MYC+ alone by IHC. By COO, patients with a non-GCB phenotype by the Hans algorithm had an increased risk of CNS relapse (2 year risk 6.9% vs 2.6%, P=0.03) and similarly, cases assigned as ABC DLBCL by the Lymph2Cx assay also identified a group with a higher risk of CNS relapse compared to GCB cases (9.5% vs 2.5%, P=0.03) (Figure 1). In Cox regression multivariate analysis including the COO (Hans), IPI group (0/1 vs 2/3 vs 4/5) and MYC/BCL2 IHC, only the IPI (HR 2.18, P=0.02) and MYC+BCL2+ IHC (HR=3.76, P=0.007) were associated with an increased risk of CNS relapse. Similar results were obtained using the Lymph2Cx COO designation. Within the IPI risk groups, MYC+BCL2+ status further stratified patients in the intermediate risk group (IPI 2 or 3, n=206) into a higher risk group (2 year CNS relapse 12.6%) and a low risk group (2 year CNS relapse 2.9%) (P=0.01). A similar trend was observed in the high IPI risk group (IPI 4 or 5, n=86, 2 year CNS relapse MYC+BCL2+ 17.2% vs 4.7%, P=.0.18) but it was not useful in the low IPI risk group (IP1 0 or 1 (n=155), 2 year CNS relapse 4% vs 1%, P=0.39) where the overall risk was low. Within the COO subgroups, MYC+BCL2+ status also defined a group at high cumulative risk of CNS relapse within the non-GCB subtype (12.9% vs 3%, P=0.001) and by the Lymph2Cx defined ABC subtype (16.9% vs 2.2%, P= 0.03) and a trend was observed for GCB defined by Lymph2Cx (6.6% vs 1.5%. P=.08) but not by Hans criteria (P=0.40). Conclusion: Concurrent expression of MYC and BCL2 protein in DLBCL defines a group of patients at high risk of CNS relapse, independent of the IPI and COO. MYC+BCL2+ status may help to further risk stratify patients in the intermediate and high IPI risk groups and within the ABC subtype to identify patients who should undergo additional diagnostic testing and in whom to explore the effectiveness of prophylactic CNS strategies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Savage: F Hoffmann-La Roche: Other. Sehn:Roche: Research Funding. Connors:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Gascoyne:Hoffman La-Roche: Research Funding.

The impact of acute and chronic exercise on thrombosis in cardiovascular disease

2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (03) ◽  
pp. 452-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxanne Pelletier ◽  
Kim L. Lavoie ◽  
Simon L. Bacon
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Aerobic Exercise ◽  
Acute Exercise ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Cardiovascular Fitness ◽  
Chronic Exercise ◽  
Warm Up ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Intensity Of Exercise ◽  
The Impact

SummaryThere is now a large and impressive literature showing that people who engage in chronic aerobic exercise or who have better cardiovascular fitness levels, tend to live longer and have lower levels of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, there is a paradox, as acute aerobic exercise has been associated with an increased risk of CVD events. There are now a number of review articles suggesting that the differential benefits of chronic, relative to acute, exercise might be due to thrombotic changes, though the majority of this data is derived from healthy individuals. However, acute exercise is of greater concern and chronic exercise of greater benefit to patient populations. In addition, these higher risk groups tend to present with more complex profiles, e.g. they may be taking medications that influence thrombotic pathways. As such, the current review has focused on newer information relating to exercise, physical activity and thrombosis in patient populations, and highlights some of the growing area’s in the field. For example, the impact of warm-up exercise, the interaction of medications, and issues surrounding the optimal volume and intensity of exercise.

Impact of Targeted Immunotherapies and Novel Cytogenetic and Clinical Risk Groups on Outcome after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (AlloHCT) for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): The Mayo Clinic Cohort

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2588-2588
Author(s):  
Zaid Abdel Rahman ◽  
Michael G. Heckman ◽  
Kevin C. Miller ◽  
Patricia Greipp ◽  
Matthew R Spiegel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact

Introduction Novel high-risk groups have been identified in adult ALL, including secondary (sALL) and Philadelphia-like ALL (Ph-like, based on CRLF2, IgH, ABL2, JAK2 and other tyrosine kinase translocations), and those with minimal residual disease >0.1% (MRD+) after induction therapy. Novel targeted therapies are now routinely incorporated into 1st line regimens, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BCR-ABL1-pos), rituximab (CD20+) and blinatumomab (Blina) for MRD+. The impact of these novel high risk groups and therapies after alloHCT is unknown; therefore, we evaluated their impact on overall survival (OS), relapse rate (REL), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and acute and chronic GVHD. Methods We evaluated pts receiving 1st Allo-HCT for ALL at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Phoenix, and Jacksonville) from 2008-2018 for outcomes of interest, specifically the impact of novel therapies and risk groups. Associations of patient factors with outcomes were examined using univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazards regression models, where the cause-specific hazard of the given outcome was modeled to account for the competing risk of death. Results We identified 261 consecutive AlloHCT recipients during the study period. Median age at transplant was 48 years (18-72) and 147 (56.3%) were male. The median comorbidity (HCT-CI) score was 2 (0-8). 213 pts (81.6%) had B-lineage ALL, of which 85 (32.6%) were BCR-ABL-pos, 17 (6.5%) Ph-like (identified by FISH), 16 (6.1%) hypoploidy/near triploidy (Hy/Tri), and 67 (25.7%) pre-B ALL NOS. The remaining 48 (18.4%) had T-ALL. 30 pts (11.5%) had sALL (i.e. prior chemo/radiotherapy for another malignancy). HyperCVAD was the most common 1st line regimen (68.2%). 243 (93.1%) pts achieved Complete Remission (CR1) after induction therapy, and 203 (77.8%) were in CR1 at the time of alloHCT. Blina was administered for MRD+ in 14 pts (5.4%), and for relapsed/refractory ALL (R/R) in 13 (27% of R/R pts), 7 of whom received Blina as initial therapy for R/R. Donors were matched unrelated in 149 (57.1%), matched related in 98 (37.5%), and haploidentical in 14 (5.4%). Peripheral blood (PB) grafts were used in 233 (89.3%). 103 (54.5%) were donor:recipient (D:R) sex-matched, and 86 D:R mismatched [47 (24.9%) M:F; and 39 (20.6%) F:M]. Myeloablative conditioning was used for the majority (78.5%) mostly with Cy/TBI (60.5%). Standard GVHD prophylaxis regimens were used. Outcomes Median follow-up after transplant was 22.4 months (0.5-135), and 51 (19.5%) had REL. The 1, 2 and 5-year survival rates were 71.9%, 64.9%, and 54.1%, respectively (Figure 1). Acute GVHD developed in 144 (55.2%) and chronic GVHD in 100 (38.3%). Ph-like ALL, Blina for MRD+, Blina for R/R, sALL and CD20-pos had no independent impact on OS. In contrast, age>60, Hy/Tri, and >CR1 at alloHCT were associated with worse OS in UVA, however, in MVA only pre-B ALL NOS was associated with better OS. Female:male D:R status was associated with inferior OS. Blina for R/R disease was associated with increased risk of REL in UVA [HR 5.26 95% CI (1.33, 20.00), p=0.017], whereas other novel high risk groups had no impact on REL. In contrast, T-ALL, Hy/Tri and >CR1 at AlloHCT were associated with increased REL in UVA, but only T-ALL and Hy/Tri continued to predict for increased REL in MVA. Secondary ALL was associated with increased NRM in UVA [HR 1.96 95% CI (1.07, 3.57), p=0.028], whereas other novel high risk groups had no impact on NRM. In contrast, age>60, >CR1 at AlloHCT and D:R sex mismatch were associated with higher NRM in UVA, but only sex mismatch and >CR1 at AlloHCT were associated with higher NRM in MVA. TBI use was associated with higher risk of acute GvHD (p=0.008) and ATG use with lower risk chronic GVHD (p<0.001). Similarly non-PB grafts were associated with a lower risk of chronic GVHD (p=0.005). Results for OS, REL, NRM, acute and chronic GVHD analysis are shown in Table 1. Conclusion Novel high risk groups (CD20+, Ph-like and sALL) do not appear to adversely impact OS after alloHCT, although sALL was associated with increased risk of NRM. Interestingly, pre-B-ALL NOS appear to be associated with favorable OS. Novel targeted therapies also do not independently predict outcome, with the exception of Blina for R/R ALL which may be associated with REL after subsequent alloHCT (a subgroup for whom novel maintenance strategies should be explored). Our analysis highlights the importance of allo-HCT for novel high risk ALL subgroups. Disclosures Patnaik: Stem Line Pharmaceuticals.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kharfan-Dabaja:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Foran:Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding.

A Prognostic Model for Predicting the Impact of Comorbidities on Survival of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2453-2453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo G. Della Porta ◽  
Luca Malcovati ◽  
Erica Travaglino ◽  
Cristiana Pascutto ◽  
Margherita Maffioli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Iron Overload ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Secondary Iron Overload ◽  
Transfusion Dependency ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) occur mainly in older persons, and these patients are likely to have comorbidities. We studied the impact of comorbidities on non-leukemic death (NLD) and overall survival (OS) in MDS patients with the aim of developing a specific prognostic index. Eight hundred forty consecutive patients receiving a diagnosis of MDS at Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy, between 1992 and 2006 were retrospectively evaluated. One or more comorbidities were present in 455/840 (54%) patients: the older the age, the higher their prevalence (P&lt;0.001). Cardiac disease was observed in 25% of patients, liver disease in 16%, diabetes in 11%, prior solid tumor in 10%, nephropathy and pulmonary disease in 4%. Non-leukemic causes of death included cardiac failure (63%), infection (24%) and hemorrhage (7%). In a Cox analysis with age, sex, WHO category, cytogenetics and transfusion-dependency as time-dependent covariates, the presence of one or more comorbidities significantly affected both the risk of NLD (HR=1.91, P=0.001) and OS (HR=1.51, P=0.01), while it did not influence the risk of leukemic progression. The negative effect of comorbidities on OS was more evident in patients without excess of blasts (HR=1.8 P=0.007), while it retained a borderline significance in patients with more advanced disease (P=0.05). By including comorbidities as distinct entities in multivariable analysis, cardiac failure, liver or pulmonary disease, and solid tumors were found to independently affect the risk of NLD (HR=3.7, HR=2.08, HR=2.07 HR=2.23, respectively; P values from &lt;0.001 to 0.033). Based on results of uni- and multivariable analysis, we developed a prognostic model for predicting the effect of comorbidities on NLD and OS. For each comorbidity, risk scores were estimated from the coefficients of the Cox regression. This MDS-specific comorbidity index (MDS-CI) allowed us to identify 3 groups of patients with different probability of NLD and OS (HR 2.78, P&lt;0.001; HR 1.67 P=0.001), and provided a better stratification than the available non MDS-specific indices. Focusing on WPSS categories [J Clin Oncol2007; 25:3503–10], MDS-CI significantly stratified survival of patients with very-low, low and intermediate risk groups (P&lt;0.001), while it had no effect in high and very-high risk groups. We then investigated the relationship between transfusion-dependency, secondary iron overload and comorbidities. Heart failure (28% vs. 18% P=0.001) and cardiac death (69% vs 55% P=0.03) were significantly more frequent in transfusion-dependent patients. In a Cox analysis with time-dependent covariates, transfusion-dependent patients showed an increased risk of NLD (HR=2.12 P=&lt;0.001), heart failure (HR 1.34 P=0.03), and cardiac death (HR 2.99 P=0.01). The development of secondary iron overload significantly affected the risk of NLD and OS (HR=1.25 and 1.16 respectively, P&lt;0.001), and this effect was maintained after adjusting for transfusion burden. Iron overload specifically increased the risk of developing heart failure (HR=1.17, P&lt;0.001). In summary, the presence of non-hematological comorbidities significantly worsens the survival of MDS patients. Transfusion-dependency and secondary iron overload are associated with an increased risk of cardiac complications and cardiac death. The MDS-CI might be a useful tool for clinical decision making in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Revalidation of the Flipi Score in the Era of Immunotherapy.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4437-4437
Author(s):  
German Stemmelin ◽  
Carlos Doti ◽  
Claudia Shanley ◽  
Jose Ceresetto ◽  
Oscar Rabinovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The One ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The FLIPI prognosis score for follicular lymphoma (FL) was developed based on cases diagnosed between 1985 and 1992, and treated with different schemes that did not include rituximab (R). In the present study, we report the evolution of all FL treated in a single institution through the last decade and analize whether FLIPI mantains its effectiveness to identify different risk groups within patients treated with the new therapeutic alternatives available. Material and Methods: We identified sixty two patients with diagnosis of grade I-II-IIIa FL. Patients characteristics: median age 57.5 yr (r, 30–80); 36 males; 63% stages III–IV, and 37% with bone marrow infiltration at the time of diagnosis. Thirty eight percent had a low risk by FLIPI, 34% had an intermediate risk and 27.4% had a high risk. In 19 pts (30.6%) the initial decision was “watch and wait” but 82% received a form of treatment at some point. R was used in 36 pts (58%) with some of the following regimes: chemotherapy (chemo) + R and/or R as consolidation therapy and/or R as monotherapy and/or R as maintenance therapy. Of all prescribed treatments (excluding R as monotherapy and/or maintenance treatment), 52.8% were chemo alone, 20.2% chemo + R, 21.3% radiotherapy and 5.6% received a bone marrow transplant. Results: we considered the analysis of overall survival (OS) the most appropiate approach, since most treatments were seeking the control of the FL, and not the complete remission or cure. The follow up median time was 53.2 months ± 34.8 1SD. The 5-yr OS for the 62 pts was 81.8% ± 11.3 CI 95%. The 5-yr OS for those with a low, intermediate and high risk FLIPI was 100% −5, 84.2% ± 21 and 52% ±26.2, respectively. The difference in 5-yr OS was statistically significant between low and high risk, intermediate and high risk, but failed to prove a significant difference between low and intermediate risk. Among the different risk factors tested in a univariate analysis only age ≥ < 60 yr old demonstrated a significant difference, 60.7% vs 90%, respectively. Conclusions: The 5-yr OS in our series is higher than the one described in the original FLIPI study (Blood2004; 104:1258–65) which was 81.8% vs 71% for the whole group; 90% vs 78.1% for pts <60 yr old; 60.7% vs 57.7% for ≥ 60 yr old; 100% vs 90.6% for low FLIPI and 84.2% vs 77.6% for intermediate FLIPI. The only group that failed to prove an improvement was the high risk FLIPI with 52% vs 52.5%. The impact of novel therapies was more evident in patients with a low or intermediate FLIPI and was even more evident in patients younger than 60 yr old. According to our results, FLIPI maintains its effectiveness in differentiating two risk groups, i.e., low-intermediate vs high. We believe that the OS curves will probably continue to improve as the treatments that are considered today as the most effective ones, were just included in our series in the last three years.

Impact of Cytogenetics Risk on Outcome after Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC) Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-SCT) from An HLA Identical Sibling for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in First Complete Remission (CR1)

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 345-345
Author(s):  
Mohamad Mohty ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Noel-Jean Milpied ◽  
Jan J. Cornelissen ◽  
Didier Blaise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Early Death ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Intermediate Group ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
The Poor ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Allo-SCT is a well established therapy for adult patients with AML. In the setting of standard myeloablative allo-SCT, the fear of early death as a result of the procedure led to the restriction of allo-SCT in CR1 to patients who presented with high risk AML features, especially taking into account the impact of cytogenetics risk on outcome determining standard (good)-, intermediate-, and poor-risk populations. In the last decade, RIC allo-SCT has emerged as an attractive modality to decrease toxicity and widen the spectrum of AML patients who are candidate to allo-SCT. However, the issue of possible higher relapse rates after RIC allo-SCT, and continuous improvements in non-allo-SCT strategies, raise concern about the utility of this approach in AML patients in CR1 (e.g. in comparison to intensive chemotherapy and new drugs). Of note, no large studies have yet assessed the impact of cytogenetics risk on outcome in the context of RIC allo-SCT. This report describes the results of 378 AML patients (185 males) transplanted in CR1 using a RIC regimen and reported to the EBMT registry between 2000 and 2007, and for whom detailed cytogenetics data were available. All patients received RIC allo-SCT from an HLA identical sibling. RIC was defined as Busulfan conditioning regimens containing &lt; 8mg/kg total dose, or TBI &lt;6 Gy: The median age at time of allo-SCT was 55 (range, 18–74) y. The median intervals from AML diagnosis to CR1 and from CR1 to RIC allo- SCT were 45 and 155 days respectively. In this series, 21 patients (6%) belonged to the good cytogenetics risk group, while 304 patients (80%) and 53 patients (14%) belonged to the intermediate and poor cytogenetics risk groups respectively. Age, year of transplant, WBC at diagnosis, gender, CMV serostatus, stem cell source, and RIC regimen type were comparable between all three groups. The M5-6-7 FAB subgroup was significantly higher in the poor risk group (30% vs. 20% in the intermediate group). With a median follow-up of 24 (range, 1–93) months, the KM estimates of 2 years leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 64+/−4, 57+/-3 and 38+/−7% in the good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk subgroups respectively (P=0.003). In multivariate analysis, cytogenetics was not significantly associated with non-relapse mortality. However, relapse incidence was significantly influenced by the cytogenetics risk groups (P=0.0001) and a higher WBC at diagnosis (P=0.001). Finally, LFS was significantly influenced by the cytogenetics risk groups (P=0.004), a higher WBC at diagnosis (P=0.006), and year of transplant (P=0.04). Despite its retrospective nature, results from this large study strongly suggest that RIC allo-SCT from an HLA-matched sibling donor is a valid option for AML patients in CR1 not eligible for standard allo-SCT. As it has been shown in the setting of myeloablative conditioning allo-SCT, patients from the poor cytogenetics risk group had increased relapse incidence and decreased LFS rate after RIC allo-SCT. Therefore, prospective strategies such as use of new drugs, intensification of conditioning regimen, post HST immunotherapy should be investigate to improve current results in this group.

The Glasgow whipple risk score to predict pancreas-specific complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 394-394
Author(s):  
Lavanniya Kumar Palani Velu ◽  
Vishnuvardhan Chandrabalan ◽  
Ross Carter ◽  
Colin McKay ◽  
Donald McMillan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Serum Amylase ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Prolonged Stay ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Serum Crp

394 Background: Pancreas-specific complications (PSC), comprising postoperative pancreatic fistula, post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage, and intra-abdominal collections, are drivers of morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Intra-operatively derived pancreatic gland texture is a major determinant of postoperative PSC. We have previously demonstrated that a postoperative day 0 (PoD0) serum amylase ≥ 130 IU/L is an objective surrogate of pancreatic texture, and is associated with PSC. We sought to refine the PSC risk prediction model by including serial measurements of serum C-reactive protein (CRP). Methods: 230 consecutive patients undergoing PD between 2008 and 2014 were included in the study. Routine serum investigations, including amylase and CRP were performed from the pre-operative day. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify a threshold value of serum CRP associated with clinically significant PSC. Results: 95 (41.3%) patients experienced a clinically significant PSC. ROC analysis identified post-operative day 2 (PoD2) serum CRP of 180 mg/L as the optimal threshold (P=0.005) associated with clinically significant PSC, a prolonged stay in critical care (P =0.032), and a relaparotomy (P = 0.045). Patients with a PoD0 serum amylase ≥ 130 IU/L who then developed a PoD2 serum CRP ≥ 180 mg/L had a higher incidence of postoperative complications. Patients were categorised into high, intermediate and low risk groups based on PoD0 serum amylase and PoD2 serum CRP. Patients in the high risk group (PoD0 serum amylase ≥ 130 IU/L and PoD2 serum CRP ≥ 180 mg/l) had significantly higher incidence of PSC, a return to theatre, prolonged lengths stay (all P≤ 0.05) and a four-fold increase in perioperative mortality compared patients in the intermediate and low risk groups (7 deaths in the high risk group versus 2 and nil in the intermediate and low risk groups respectively). Conclusions: A high risk profile, defined as PoD0 serum amylase ≥ 130 IU/L and PoD2 serum CRP ≥ 180 mg/l, should raise the clinician’s awareness of the increased risk of clinically significant PSC and a complicated postoperative course following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

scholarly journals MORPHOFUNCTIONAL AND PSYCHO-PHYSIOLOGICAL FEATURES OF TEENAGERS’ DEVELOPMENT IN CORRELATION WITH LIFESTYLE FACTORS

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-8
Author(s):  
Нина Блинова ◽  
Nina Blinova ◽  
Наталья Кошко ◽  
Nataliya Koshko ◽  
Ольга Дорошина ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Activity ◽  
Complex Analysis ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Lifestyle Factors ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Memory And Attention ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Nutrition Balance ◽  
High Level ◽  
The Impact

The current paper features the impact the lifestyle of modern teenagers has on their psycho-physiological development. It shows an analysis of the nutrition and motor activity of adolescents aged 12-13 and the gender differences in their psycho-physiological and morphofunctional development. A complex analysis of lifestyle factors (day regimen, nutrition balance, level of motor activity) have allowed the authors to classify 66,7 % of adolescents as«low risk» of health disorders development and 33,3 % as an «increased risk» group. The«low risk» group has a greater number of representatives with harmonious physical development, a high level of neurodynamic indicators, memory and attention. A correlation analysis of lifestyle and indicators of morphofunctional and psycho-physiological development has been carried out. The interrelation between the features of nutrition and the motor activity of adolescents has been established by the indicators of psycho-physiological development.

scholarly journals Increased Disease Progression in HLA-a, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DBP1 Matched Recipients of Unrelated Donor Transplants with Peripheral Blood Is Independent of Risk Groups By Disease Risk Index

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2005-2005
Author(s):  
Betul Oran ◽  
Rima M Saliba ◽  
Yudith Carmazzi ◽  
Elizabeth J. Shpall ◽  
Katayoun Rezvani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The use of unrelated donors matched in all alleles of HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 loci has been associated with superior outcomes compared with those having 1 or more mismatches. Recent studies showed increased transplant-related mortality (TRM) with the use of HLA-DPB1 mismatched donors supporting the notion that the ideal volunteer unrelated donor should fully match at HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 and lack -DPB1 mismatches. The issue of the effect of HLA-DPB1 mismatch on the disease progression rate is still controversial and we aimed to investigate the impact of HLA-DPB1 mismatch in the graft versus host direction on transplant outcomes in patients categorized according to the recently defined disease risk index (DRI) for disease risk classification. Our study cohort included 1,211 transplant patients with hematological malignancies whohave received an hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from an unrelated HLA-A, -B, -C,-DRB1 matched donor by high resolution typing (8/8 matched) after 2005 through 2014. The study cohort had a median age of 55 (range, 19-77); the hematopoietic stem cell source was peripheral blood (PB) in 698 and bone marrow (BM) in 513 patients. Disease risk index (DRI) at HSCT was high or very high in 382 (33%), intermediate in 598 (51%), low in 185 (16%) patients. Of the pairs, 1,154 (95%) were matched atHLA-DQB1 and 1,116 (92%) at HLA- DRB3/4/5 by high resolution testing. However, 633 (52%) had mismatch at one of the DPB1 alleles and 208 (17%) had two mismatches. There was association between matching for DPB1and matching for DRB3/4/5 (p=0.002) but not with DQB1. In PB recipients, there was a highly significant decreaseof disease progression in DPB1 mismatched pairs (one and two allele; HR=0.7, p=0.01 and HR=0.6, p=0.01 respectively) as compared tothose pairs with DPB1 matched. The impact of mismatches at one or two alleles were not different on disease progression (HR=1.2, p=0.4). However, the impact of DPB1 mismatch on disease progression was not uniform in different disease risk groups by DRI. Mismatch at DPB1 significantly decreased disease progression only in the intermediate risk group (HR=0.5, p=0.002) but not in low risk and high/very high disease groups by DRI (HR=0.9, p=0.8 and HR=0.7, p=0.1 respectively) (Figure 1a-c). In BM recipients, increasing number of DPB1 incompatibilities decreased disease progression (HR=0.9, p=0.4 and HR=0.6, p=0.1 for 1 and 2 allele mismatches respectively) but did not reach significance. Mismatches at HLA-DQB1 and -DRB3/4/5 had no impact on disease progression in both PB and BM recipients. Pairs with one or two allele-level DPB1 mismatches increased TRM compared with DPB1 matched pairs in PB (HR=1.5, p=0.04 and HR=1.9, p=0.006 respectively) and BM recipients (HR=1.8, p=0.03 and HR=1.9, p=0.05). There was no difference between two and one allele DPB1 mismatched for TRM in PB and BM recipients. Multivariate analyses revealed that the negative impact of DPB1 mismatch on TRM was not uniform in younger or (?) older patients. Interestingly, DPB1 mismatches increased TRM only in younger (aged<55) patients (HR=2.3, p=0.02) if they were PB recipients but only in older patients (HR=2.03, p=0.046) if they were BM recipients. We next analyzed the impact of DPB1 matching on progression free survival (PFS) and did not observe any impact of DPB1 mismatches on PFS in PB (HR=0.9, p=0.9) and BM (HR=1.12, p=0.6) recipients. Subgroup analyses by DRI to identify a specific risk group that the use of HLA-A, -B, -C and -DRB1 matched but DPB1 mismatched unrelated donor might lead to improved PFS did not reveal any particular risk group in both PB and BM recipients. Thus, in recipients of HLA-A, -B-C and DRB1 allele-level matched unrelated donors a mismatch for DPB1 is associated with a significantlydecreased risk of disease progression with no impact on PFS in intermediate risk group by DRI. Further analysis permissive vs. non-permissive DPB1 mismatches would be warranted. Figure 1. The cumulative incidence of disease progression by DPB1 mismatch and Disease Risk Index in peripheral blood recipients. Figure 1. The cumulative incidence of disease progression by DPB1 mismatch and Disease Risk Index in peripheral blood recipients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document