Overcoming Resistance to Targeted Therapies in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Progress to Date and Progress to Come

Author(s):  
Christopher Chen ◽  
Maria Di Bartolomeo ◽  
Salvatore Corallo ◽  
John H. Strickler ◽  
Lipika Goyal

Targeted therapies have transformed the treatment paradigm in diseases such as non–small cell lung cancer and melanoma but have shown relatively modest clinical benefit in gastrointestinal malignancies. Anti-EGFR therapy in RAS wild-type colorectal cancer, anti-HER2 therapy in HER2- amplified esophagogastric cancer, and FGFR and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) inhibitors in FGFR2 fusion-positive and IDH1-mutant biliary tract cancers offer antitumor efficacy, but the clinical benefit and durability of response in each case are typically limited. We review targeted therapies in each of these therapeutic areas and discuss their clinical efficacy, mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance, and strategies to overcome this resistance. We discuss lessons learned that we hope will lead to an expanded role for molecularly targeted therapy options for patients with gastrointestinal cancers.

Author(s):  
Pradnya Dinkar Patil ◽  
Frances Shepherd ◽  
David H. Johnson

The landscape of treatments for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved dramatically over the past 3 decades. A better understanding of the disease biology and identification of actionable genetic alterations heralded an era of targeted therapies that has led to unprecedented survival benefits in patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC. More recent breakthroughs in immunotherapy led to the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors that have changed the treatment paradigm for patients with advanced NSCLC because of their ability to produce durable responses, resulting in improved survival outcomes. Despite the unparalleled success of these agents, primary and acquired resistance to these therapies pose a formidable challenge. In this article, we provide an overview of the therapeutic advances in the treatment of NSCLC, mechanisms of resistance, and potential strategies to overcome resistance to targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (04) ◽  
pp. 345-350
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Slovak ◽  
Hyun S. Kim

AbstractThe reinfusion of autologous or allogeneic immune cells that have been educated and/or engineered ex vivo to respond to tumor-specific antigens is termed “adoptive cell therapy.” While adoptive cell therapy has made tremendous strides in the treatment of hematologic malignancies, its utilization for solid tumors has lagged somewhat behind. The purpose of this article is to concisely review the clinical research that has been done to investigate adoptive cell therapy as a treatment for gastrointestinal malignancies.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideko Isozaki ◽  
Ammal Abbasi ◽  
Naveed Nikpour ◽  
Adam Langenbucher ◽  
Wenjia Su ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.B. Lopez ◽  
G.P Royan ◽  
M.N. Lakhwani ◽  
M. Mahadaven ◽  
J. Timor

The objective of this study was to compare CA 72-4 with CEA and CA 19-9 in gastrointestinal malignancies. CA 72-4 was assayed by radioimmunoassay and CEA and CA 19-9 with the Abbott IMx analyser. The study included 52 patients with gastrointestinal cancer and 20 controls with benign gastrointestinal diseases. The 52 cases showed marker sensitivities of 39%, 49% and 35% for CA 72-4, CEA and CA 19-9, respectively, and 64% when the markers were combined. Marker expression in serum was highest in colorectal carcinoma followed by gastric and esophageal carcinoma. The sensitivities of the individual markers in colorectal, gastric and esophageal carcinomas, respectively, were: CA 72-4, 56%, 32% and 18%; CEA, 83%, 33% and 18%; CA 19-9, 53%, 25% and 18%. The sensitivity of the three markers in combination was 89%, 50% and 46% in colorectal, gastric and esophageal cancer, respectively. The specificity of CA72-4, CEA and CA 19-9 was 100%, 72% and 86%, respectively. However, CA 72-4 is not a useful a marker for gastrointestinal cancers because of its poor sensitivity. CEA, which had the best overall sensitivity and a reasonable specificity, was the most useful single marker, especially for colorectal cancer. Whereas the single markers were not useful in gastric and esophageal cancer, the combination of the three may be.


Antioxidants ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1942
Author(s):  
Stefania Pizzimenti ◽  
Simone Ribero ◽  
Marie Angele Cucci ◽  
Margherita Grattarola ◽  
Chiara Monge ◽  
...  

Melanoma is a highly aggressive cancer with the poorest prognosis, representing the deadliest form of skin cancer. Activating mutations in BRAF are the most frequent genetic alterations, present in approximately 50% of all melanoma cases. The use of specific inhibitors towards mutant BRAF variants and MEK, a downstream signaling target of BRAF in the MAPK pathway, has significantly improved progression-free and overall survival in advanced melanoma patients carrying BRAF mutations. Nevertheless, despite these improvements, resistance still develops within the first year of therapy in around 50% of patients, which is a significant problem in managing BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma. Understanding these mechanisms is one of the mainstreams of the research on BRAFi/MEKi acquired resistance. Both genetic and epigenetic mechanisms have been described. Moreover, in recent years, oxidative stress has emerged as another major force involved in all the phases of melanoma development, from initiation to progression until the onsets of the metastatic phenotype and chemoresistance, and has thus become a target for therapy. In the present review, we discuss the current knowledge on oxidative stress and its signaling in melanoma, as well as the oxidative stress-related mechanisms in the acquired resistance to targeted therapies.


2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 930
Author(s):  
Ba Da Yun ◽  
Ye Ji Choi ◽  
Seung Wan Son ◽  
Gabriel Adelman Cipolla ◽  
Fernanda Costa Brandão Berti ◽  
...  

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are differentially expressed in gastrointestinal cancers. These noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) regulate a variety of cellular activities by physically interacting with microRNAs and proteins and altering their activity. It has also been suggested that exosomes encapsulate circRNAs and lncRNAs in cancer cells. Exosomes are then discharged into the extracellular environment, where they are taken up by other cells. As a result, exosomal ncRNA cargo is critical for cell–cell communication within the cancer microenvironment. Exosomal ncRNAs can regulate a range of events, such as angiogenesis, metastasis, immune evasion, drug resistance, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. To set the groundwork for developing novel therapeutic strategies against gastrointestinal malignancies, a thorough understanding of circRNAs and lncRNAs is required. In this review, we discuss the function and intrinsic features of oncogenic circRNAs and lncRNAs that are enriched within exosomes.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1638-1643 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.A. Cirkel ◽  
F. Weeber ◽  
S. Bins ◽  
C.G.M. Gadellaa-van Hooijdonk ◽  
E. van Werkhoven ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16082-e16082
Author(s):  
Bill Diplas ◽  
Ryan Ptashkin ◽  
Andrea Cercek ◽  
Rona Yaeger ◽  
Kelly L Bolton ◽  
...  

e16082 Background: Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) represents non-random clonal selection of bone marrow-derived cells marked by somatic mutations in certain genes. The presence of CH is associated with development of atherosclerosis and leukemia, and accelerated by toxic exposures (chemotherapy, radiation, smoking) and aging (Jaiswal et al. NEJM 2017; Abelson et al. Nature 2018). The impact of these genetic alterations on cellular function is unknown, especially in the broader context of immunity and in response to cancer therapy. To determine the contribution of CH to therapeutic response and hematologic toxicity in cancer patients, we examined the outcomes of patients treated with cytotoxic and immunotherapy in relationship to CH status. Methods: We evaluated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) or esophagogastric cancer (EGC). DNA extracted from whole blood and tumor tissue were sequenced in tandem as part of the MSK-IMPACT hybridization capture-based sequencing assay. CH was defined as any mutation with a VAF of at least 2%, present in at least 10 reads, with at least 2:1 blood:tumor reads, or 1.5:1 blood:lymph node that was not found in gnomAD with a frequency > 0.005. Additional filtering and putative driver definitions (CH-PD) were described by Bolton et al. Nature Genetics 2020. Multivariate survival analyses were performed using a Cox Proportional Hazard model correcting for CH, CH-PD, prior smoking, prior chemotherapy, prior radiation, MSI status, and age at cancer diagnosis. Results: 654 patients with EGC (n = 348) and CRC (n = 306) who began treatment between 2006 and 2020 were included in the analysis. CH was present in 34.5% and 24.4% of each group, and 17.2% and 12.9% harbored CH-PD, respectively. CH and CH-PD were both associated with older age and smoking history, and CH was also associated with prior radiation and MSI-high status (p < 0.05). Patients with CH or CH-PD receiving first-line (1L) therapy for CRC or EGC demonstrated no difference in mPFS after multivariate analysis, though 1L EGC patients with CH-PD had inferior mOS (p = 9e-5). There was no difference in pre-1L WBC, ANC, or ALC, nor in G-CSF or PEG-G-CSF doses administered during 1L therapy between patients with CH or CH-PD versus those without. Similarly, presence of CH or CH-PD had no impact on mPFS or mOS in patients receiving immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) without concurrent chemotherapy after multivariate survival analysis. Conclusions: We confirmed that the mere presence of CH is not prognostic for overall survival, but that EGC patients with CH-PD mutations have inferior overall survival, which is consistent with previous findings. Presence of CH or CH-PD was not associated with differences in baseline leukocyte counts nor need for G-CSF support, nor did it impact PFS in either tumor type, suggesting limited utility of CH in solid tumor clinical decision-making.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 1505-1515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinay K Puduvalli ◽  
Jing Wu ◽  
Ying Yuan ◽  
Terri S Armstrong ◽  
Elizabeth Vera ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Bevacizumab has promising activity against recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). However, acquired resistance to this agent results in tumor recurrence. We hypothesized that vorinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with anti-angiogenic effects, would prevent acquired resistance to bevacizumab. Methods This multicenter phase II trial used a Bayesian adaptive design to randomize patients with recurrent GBM to bevacizumab alone or bevacizumab plus vorinostat with the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS) and clinical outcomes assessment (MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor module [MDASI-BT]). Eligible patients were adults (≥18 y) with histologically confirmed GBM recurrent after prior radiation therapy, with adequate organ function, KPS ≥60, and no prior bevacizumab or HDAC inhibitors. Results Ninety patients (bevacizumab + vorinostat: 49, bevacizumab: 41) were enrolled, of whom 74 were evaluable for PFS (bevacizumab + vorinostat: 44, bevacizumab: 30). Median PFS (3.7 vs 3.9 mo, P = 0.94, hazard ratio [HR] 0.63 [95% CI: 0.38, 1.06, P = 0.08]), median OS (7.8 vs 9.3 mo, P = 0.64, HR 0.93 [95% CI: 0.5, 1.6, P = 0.79]) and clinical benefit were similar between the 2 arms. Toxicity (grade ≥3) in 85 evaluable patients included hypertension (n = 37), neurological changes (n = 2), anorexia (n = 2), infections (n = 9), wound dehiscence (n = 2), deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (n = 2), and colonic perforation (n = 1). Conclusions Bevacizumab combined with vorinostat did not yield improvement in PFS or OS or clinical benefit compared with bevacizumab alone or a clinical benefit in adults with recurrent GBM. This trial is the first to test a Bayesian adaptive design with adaptive randomization and Bayesian continuous monitoring in patients with primary brain tumor and demonstrates the feasibility of using complex Bayesian adaptive design in a multicenter setting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document