Patient (pt) characteristics, treatment patterns, outcomes and prognostic factors in plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma (PUC).

e16007 Background: PUC is uncommon and highly aggressive, with limited data on treatment patterns, outcomes and prognostic factors. We hypothesized that PUC is associated with clinical under-staging, poor outcomes and lack of chemotherapy (CT) response. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of pts with UC and plasmacytoid component (PUC), seen in our institution (2000 - 2018). Demographic and clinicopathologic data, treatment modalities, pathologic complete/partial response (pCR, pPR) to neoadjuvant CT (NAC), and overall survival (OS) from diagnosis and surgery (Sx) were captured. T-test, chi-square, and Cox-regression were used to explore potential prognostic associations. OS was estimated with KM method. Results: We identified 63 consecutive pts (51 men) with available data for analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 67 (44-89). During initial diagnostic workup, 32 (51%) pts had extravesical disease (cT3:24, cT4:8) and 23 (36.5%) hydronephrosis at imaging. Overall, 39 (62%) pts underwent Sx with curative intent, 25 (39.6%) were pre-treated with cisplatin-based NAC; adjuvant CT was given to 15 (24%). The remaining pts pursued bladder-sparing and/or palliative approaches. At time of Sx, 17/39 (43.6%) pts had pathologic upstaging, 10 (25.6%) had positive margins and 19 (48.7%) pN+ stage. In the NAC pt subset (25 pts), 5 (20%) had progression on scans, 19 (76%) had Sx; 2 pts had pCR (10.5%), 1 had pPR, 6 (31.5%) had pathologic upstaging. In the entire cohort, median follow-up was 8 months. Median OS was 20.7 months from diagnosis and 23.6 months from Sx. NAC was not significantly associated with longer OS (from Sx) (HR 1.53, 95%CI 0.16-15, p = 0.715) and the same was true for adjuvant CT (HR 0.64, 95%CI 0.1-4, p = 0.630). 15/39 pts recurred after Sx (38.4%), with 9/15 (60%) having peritoneal/retroperitoneal involvement. Conclusions: PUC frequently presented with advanced stage at diagnosis and demonstrated poor NAC response, frequent upstaging, positive margins and pN+ stage at Sx. More than half of patients who recurred after Sx, presented with (retro)peritoneal disease. Studies evaluating molecular biomarkers and drivers in PUC, and prospective clinical trials are being pursued.

Download Full-text

Survival Analysis of 3 Different Age Groups and Prognostic Factors among 402 Patients with Skeletal High-Grade Osteosarcoma. Real World Data from a Single Tertiary Sarcoma Center

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13030486 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (3) ◽

pp. 486

Author(s):

Richard E. Evenhuis ◽

Ibtissam Acem ◽

Anja J. Rueten-Budde ◽

Diederik S. A. Karis ◽

Marta Fiocco ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prognostic Factors ◽

Medical Center ◽

Age Groups ◽

High Grade ◽

Real World Data ◽

Poor Overall Survival ◽

Histopathological Response ◽

Curative Intent ◽

Entire Cohort ◽

High Grade Osteosarcoma

Age is a known prognostic factor for many sarcoma subtypes, however in the literature there are limited data on the different risk profiles of different age groups for osteosarcoma survival. This study aims to provide an overview of survival in patients with high-grade osteosarcoma in different age groups and prognostic variables for survival and local control among the entire cohort. In this single center retrospective cohort study, 402 patients with skeletal high-grade osteosarcoma were diagnosed and treated with curative intent between 1978 and 2017 at the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC). Prognostic factors for survival were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model. In this study poor overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were associated with increasing age. Age groups, tumor size, poor histopathological response, distant metastasis (DM) at presentation and local recurrence (LR) were important independent prognostic factors influencing OS and EFS. Differences in outcome among different age groups can be partially explained by patient and treatment characteristics.

Download Full-text

The significance of blood cell biomarkers in the prognosis of gastric cancer

10.21203/rs.3.rs-33702/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Pu Huang ◽

Yiran Zhang ◽

Anqiang Wang ◽

Zhao-de Bu

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Prognostic Factors ◽

Blood Cell ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Prognostic Significance ◽

Vascular Tumor ◽

Tumor Differentiation ◽

Chi Square ◽

Preoperative Serum

Abstract Background Studies have shown that inflammation-associated blood cell markers are associated with prognoses in a variety of tumors. However, the prognostic significance of these markers for gastric cancer (GC) is still not very clear. This article aims to explore its value of GC prognostic assessment.Methods From July 2011 to July 2016, 353 GC patients with surgical treatment were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients’ demographics were analyzed along with clinical and pathologic data. The chi-square test was used to evaluate relationships between the markers and other clinicopathological variables; The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression proportional hazard model were performed to evaluate prognostic factors.Results Univariate analysis indicated T stage, N stage, vascular tumor thrombus, tumor long diameter, Bormann Classification, preoperative MWR (monocyte/leukocyte ratio), preoperative serum CEA levels are prognostic factors for GC. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative MWR, tumor differentiation, and tumor length were independent prognostic factors in patients with GC. The boundary value of MWR is 0.8.Conclusion Preoperative MWR was convenient, simple marker of gastric cancer, might be useful for the evaluation of prognosis of patients with GC. Comparing with TNM stage, tumor differentiation was a more reliable pathological factor evaluating recurrence.

Download Full-text

Predictors of survival after surgery with curative intent for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

World Journal of Surgical Oncology ◽

10.1186/s12957-020-02060-x ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 18 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Joachim Geers ◽

Joris Jaekers ◽

Halit Topal ◽

Raymond Aerts ◽

Cindy Vandoren ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prognostic Factors ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Caudate Lobe ◽

Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma ◽

Rank Test ◽

Curative Surgery ◽

Curative Intent ◽

Term Survival ◽

Physical Status Classification

Abstract Background Several clinicopathological predictors of survival after curative surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) have been identified; however, conflicting reports remain. The aim was to analyse clinical and oncological outcomes after curative resection of pCCA and to determine prognostic factors. Methods Eighty-eight consecutive patients with pCCA underwent surgery with curative intent between 1998 and 2017. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Twenty-one prognostic factors were evaluated using multivariate Cox regression models. Results Postoperative complications were observed in 73 (83%) patients of which 41 (47%) were severe complications (therapy-oriented severity grading system (TOSGS) grade > 2), including a 90-day mortality of 9% (n = 8). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates at 5 and 10 years after surgery were 33% and 19%, and 37% and 30%, respectively. Independent predictors of OS were locoregional lymph node metastasis (LNM) (risk ratio (RR) 2.12, confidence interval (CI) 1.19–3.81, p = 0.011), patient American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system > 2 (RR 2.10, CI 1.03–4.26, p = 0.043), and depth of tumour penetration (pT) > 2 (RR 2.58, CI 1.03–6.30, p = 0.043). The presence of locoregional LNM (RR 2.95, CI 1.51–5.90, p = 0.002) and caudate lobe resection (RR 2.19, CI 1.01–5.14, p = 0.048) were found as independent predictors of DFS. Conclusions Curative surgery for pCCA carries high risks with poor long-term survival. Locoregional LNM was the only predictor for both OS and DFS.

Download Full-text

Is Longer MDS Duration Prior to Non-Intensive AML Treatment a Favorable Prognostic Factor? Results of the 00331 Multicenter Phase II Decitabine Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2185.2185 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2185-2185

Author(s):

Michael Lubbert ◽

Claudia Schmoor ◽

Björn Rüter ◽

Mathias Schmid ◽

Ulrich Germing ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prognostic Factors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Disease Duration ◽

Cox Regression ◽

De Novo ◽

Performance Status ◽

Treatment Modalities ◽

White Blood Count ◽

Large Trial ◽

Comorbidity Index

Abstract Abstract 2185 Background: Secondary (s)AML from MDS is more frequent in older AML patients, and associated with an overall worse outcome with standard chemotherapy than de novo AML, particularly after MDS of longer duration (1). The azanucleoside hypomethylating agents 5-azacytidine (Vidaza) and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (Decitabine, DAC) are active in MDS and, as recently shown, also AML. Compared to other predictors of response to these drugs, MDS duration prior to treatment thus far has received only limited attention, with two recent publications reporting conflicting results (2, 3). To independently validate our finding that shorter duration of MDS prior to DAC treatment may be a novel predictor of poor outcome (2, 4), we now applied this parameter to a large trial of low-dose DAC in AML pts (aged >60 years and judged ineligible for standard induction chemotherapy), about half of them with sAML from MDS with variable disease duration. Patients and Methods: Comparisons of response rate (RR, i.e. CR or PR) and overall survival (OS) from start of treatment according to MDS duration (pre-specified categorization according to quartiles) were performed post-hoc in 109 patients (pts) with previously untreated sAML (median age 72 years) treated with DAC (given over 72 hours, every 6 weeks, for up to 4 courses, followed by “maintenance” with 3 daily 1-hour infusions of DAC 20 mg/m2 every 4–6-weeks). Median WBC prior to treatment was 5.200/μl, median serum LDH 279U/l, 31.2% of pts had adverse cytogenetics, 82.6% had a performance status > 1, and 80.7% had a comorbidity index (HCT-CI) >=1. Comparisons by logistic regression and Cox regression (univariate and multivariate, adjusted for other prognostic factors showing an effect in this population of sAML pts) were performed. Results: Of the 227 AML patients treated within the 00331 trial, 109 (48%) had prior MDS with known MDS duration, with a median duration of 8 (25% quartile 3, 75% quartile 25, range 1–101) mths. The overall RR in these pts was 26/109 (24%), the overall 1 yr OS rate was 31% (94 deaths). A comparison of RR according to MDS duration revealed a trend to an increase in RR with longer duration of MDS [<3: 4/25 (16%), 3–8: 5/29 (17%), 8–25: 7/27 (26%), >=25 mths: 10/28 (36%), test for heterogeneity p=0.29, test for trend p=0.06]. Similarly, when OS from start of DAC was analyzed according to this parameter, for pts with previous MDS of longer duration there was a trend to better outcome [<3: 1 yr OS rate 23%, 3–8: 28%, 8–25: 26%, >=25 mths: 46%, test for heterogeneity p=0.17, test for trend p=0.16]. When these analyses were adjusted for other prognostic factors showing an effect in this population of sAML pts (comorbidity index, sLDH with respect to RR, and performance status, comorbidity index, and white blood count with respect to OS), the results were similar (effect of MDS duration with respect to RR: test for heterogeneity p=0.35, test for trend p=0.06, and effect of MDS duration with respect to OS: test for heterogeneity p=0.04, test for trend p=0.11). Conclusion: In this large cohort of uniformly treated pts with sAML, MDS of longer duration appeared to be associated with a better outcome, even after adjusting for important other prognostic factors. These results are supported by a similar analysis of MDS pts randomized in the 06011 EORTC intergroup trial (which compares DAC to Best Supportive Care), where MDS patients with longer (>=3 mths) disease duration prior to treatment also had better outcome (4). They warrant application of this discriminator in the evaluation also of other non-intensive AML treatment modalities. References 1. Estey et al., Blood 90:2969-77, 1997 2. Wijermans et al., Ann. Hematol. 84 Suppl 1:9-14, 2005 3. Kantarjian et al., Cancer 109:265-73, 2007 4. Lübbert, Suciu et al., Abstract submitted, ASH 2010 Disclosures: Off Label Use: decitabine is FDA-approved for treatment of MDS and AML with up to 30% blasts. In the present study, patients with AML and higher blast percentage were treated. Platzbecker: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Döhner: Pfizer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Complete Remissions (CRs) with Azacitidine Regimens Compared to Crs with 7+3 Induction Chemotherapy and the Effect on Overall Survival

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1613.1613 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1613-1613 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Megan Othus ◽

Mikkael A Sekeres ◽

Sucha Nand ◽

Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽

Frederick R. Appelbaum ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Prognostic Factors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Intensive Therapy ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Curative Intent ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background: CR and CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) are associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (pts) treated with curative-intent, induction therapy. For AML pts treated with azacitidine (AZA), response (CR, partial response, marrow CR, or hematologic improvement) is also associated with prolonged OS. We evaluate whether patients given AZA for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or AML had longer OS if they achieved CR. We also compare the effect size of CR on OS between AZA regimens and 7+3. Patients and Methods: We analyzed four SWOG studies: S1117 (n=277) was a randomized Phase II study comparing AZA to AZA+lenalidomide or AZA+vorinostat for higher-risk MDS and CMML pts (median age 70 years, range 28-93); S0703 (n=133) treated AML pts not eligible for curative-intent therapy with AZA+mylotarg (median age 73 years, range 60-88). We analyzed the 7+3 arms of S0106 (n=301 were randomized to 7+3, median age 48 years, range 18-60) and S1203 (n=261 were randomized to 7+3, median age 48 years, range 19-60). CR was defined per 2003 International Working Group criteria. In S1117 CR was assessed every 16 weeks and patients remained on therapy until disease progression. In S0703, S0106, and S1203 CR was assessed following 1-2 induction cycles; patients not achieving CR (S0106) or CRi (S0703 and S1203) were removed from protocol treatment. OS was measured from date of study registration. To avoid survival by response bias, we performed landmark analyses of OS. We present results based on the study-specific landmark date that 75% of pts who eventually achieved a CR had done so (S1117 144 days, S0703 42 days, S0106 44 days, S1203 34 days). Pts who did not achieve CR by this date were analyzed with pts who never achieved CR. Pts who died or were lost to follow-up before this date were excluded from analyses. As a sensitivity analysis we also analyzed based on the 90% date; results were not materially different. Log-rank tests were used to compare survival curves and Cox regression models were used for multivariable modeling including baseline prognostic factors age, sex, performance status, white blood cell count, platelet count, marrow blast percentage, de novo disease (versus antecedent MDS or therapy-related disease), study arm (for S1117 only), and cytogenetic risk (IPSS criteria for S1117, SWOG criteria for S0703, S0106, and S1203). The following analysis considers morphologic CR only. S0106 treated CR with incomplete count recover (CRi) pts as treatment failures (S0703 and S1203 did not) and CRi was not defined for S1117. Hematologic improvement was only defined for S1117 patients. Results: In univariate analysis, CR was significantly associated with prolonged survival among MDS pts treated with azactidine on S1117 (HR=0.55, p=0.017), confirming the results seen in AML pts treated with azacitidine (and mylotarg, S0703, HR=0.60, p=0.054) and 7+3 (S0106 HR=0.44, p<0.001; S1203 HR=0.32, p<0.0001) (Figure 1). For each study this relationship remained significant in multivariable analysis controlling for baseline prognostic factors (S1117 HR=0.25, p<0.001; S0703 HR=0.64, p=0.049; S0106 HR=0.45, p<0.001; S1203 HR=0.41, p<0.001). There was no evidence that the impact of CR varied across the four cohorts (interaction p-value = 0.76). In the full cohort, the effect of CR was associated with a HR of 0.45 (Table 1). Conclusion: Adjusting for pt characteristics, achievement of morphologic CR was associated with a 60% improvement in OS, on average, compared to that seen in pts who don't achieve a CR, regardless of whether pts were treated with 7+3 or AZA containing regimens, and suggesting that value CR is similar of whether pts receive more or less "intensive" therapy for these high grade neoplasms. Support: NIH/NCI grants CA180888 and CA180819 Acknowledgment: The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge the important contributions of the late Dr. Stephen H. Petersdorf to SWOG and to study S0106. Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier plots of landmark survival by response. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier plots of landmark survival by response. Table 1 Multivariable analysis, N=878 Table 1. Multivariable analysis, N=878 Disclosures Othus: Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Erba:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Gylcomimetics: Other: DSMB; Juno: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Jannsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, DSMB, Speakers Bureau; Celator: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Incidence and Survival Trends of Bladder Rhabdomyosarcoma:A SEER-based Analysis of 125 Cases

10.21203/rs.3.rs-19828/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Pin Li ◽

Huixia Zhou ◽

Hualin Cao ◽

Tao Guo ◽

Weiwei Zhu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prognostic Factors ◽

Survival Time ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Survival Curve ◽

Clinicopathological Characteristics ◽

Chi Square ◽

Cox Regression Analysis ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Significant Factors

Abstract Background To elucidate the bladder rhabdomyosarcoma clinicopathological characteristics and reveal the prognostic factors. Methods We screened data from SEER database (1975-2016) stratified by age group, evaluated the differences between groups with Chi-square and Fisher’s test, conducted the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and plotted the survival curve. The significant factors were brought into Cox regression analysis and calculated the HR(95%CI). Results About half of the patients who develop bladder RMS will be younger than 2 years of age. Embryonal RMS account for 76% of all histopathology types. Age at diagnosis more than 16-y (HR=6.595,95%CI:3.62-12.01, p=7.04e-10), NOT embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (HR=3.61, 95%CI:1.99-6.549, p =4.1e-06), without radiotherapy combined or surgery alone (HR=4.382, 95%CI:1.99-6.549, p =2.4e-05) and not performed the surgery (HR=2.982,95%CI:1.263-7.039, p =0.0126) were negatively correlated with 5-year survival time, while race( p =0.341), whether performed the lymphadenectomy( p =0.722) showed no influence on survival time. Cox regression results show that age, histology, SEER stage, treatment combined or alone influence the clinical outcomes. Conclusions We demonstrated the demographic and characteristic of bladder rhabdomyosarcoma, identified and excluded the prognostic factors for the 5-year overall survival and clinical outcomes.

Download Full-text

Competing Risk Analysis of Outcomes of Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Patients Undergoing Definitive Radiotherapy

Frontiers in Oncology ◽

10.3389/fonc.2021.730646 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

Author(s):

Yi-Lun Chen ◽

Chiao-Ling Tsai ◽

Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng ◽

Chun-Wei Wang ◽

Shih-Hung Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Prognostic Factors ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Reduction Rate ◽

Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Competing Risk ◽

Treatment Modalities ◽

Definitive Radiotherapy ◽

Systemic Treatments

PurposeWe investigated potential factors, including clinicopathological features, treatment modalities, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level, tumor responses correlating with overall survival (OS), local progression (LP), and distant metastases (DMs), in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) who received definitive radiotherapy (RT).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed demographic characteristics; biologically effective doses (BED10, calculated with an α/β of 10) of RT; and clinical outcomes of 57 unresectable LAPC (all pancreatic adenocarcinoma) patients receiving definitive RT using modern techniques with and without systemic therapy between January 2009 and March 2019 at our institution. We used Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 to evaluate the radiographic tumor response after RT. The association between prognostic factors and OS was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier analysis and a Cox regression model, whereas baseline characteristics and treatment details were collected for competing-risk regression of the association with LP and DM using the Fine–Gray model.ResultsA median BED10 of 67.1 Gy resulted in a disease control rate of 87.7%, and the median OS was 11.8 months after a median follow-up of 32.1 months. The 1-year OS rate, cumulative incidences of LP, and DM were 49.2%, 38.5%, and 62.9%, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that pre-RT NLR ≥3.5 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 8.245, p < 0.001), CA19-9 reduction rate ≥50% (adjusted HR = 0.261, p = 0.005), RT without concurrent chemoradiotherapy (adjusted HR = 5.903, p = 0.004), and administration of chemotherapy after RT (adjusted HR = 0.207, p = 0.03) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Positive lymph nodal metastases (adjusted subdistribution HR [sHR] = 3.712, p = 0.003) and higher tumor reduction after RT (adjusted sHR = 0.922, p < 0.001) were significant prognostic factors for LP, whereas BED10 ≥ 67.1 Gy (adjusted sHR = 0.297, p = 0.002), CA19-9 reduction rate ≥50% (adjusted sHR = 0.334, p = 0.023), and RT alone (adjusted sHR = 2.633, p = 0.047) were significant prognostic factors for DM.ConclusionOur results indicate that pre-RT NLR and post-RT monitoring of CA19-9 and tumor size reduction can help identify whether patients belong to the good or poor prognostic group of LAPC. The incorporation of new systemic treatments during and after a higher BED10 RT dose for LAPC patients is warranted.

Download Full-text

Are there geographic differences in the outcome of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with sunitinib (su)?

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e15598 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e15598-e15598

Author(s):

Daniel Keizman ◽

Maya Ish-Shalom ◽

Natalie Maimon ◽

Maya Gottfried ◽

Roberto Pili ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cox Regression ◽

Smoking Status ◽

Objective Response ◽

Geographic Location ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Categorical Variables ◽

Chi Square ◽

Imaging Evaluation ◽

Entire Cohort ◽

Geographic Differences

e15598 Background: Geographic differences in the outcome of pts have been described in various cancers. The VEGFR inhibitor su is a standard treatment (tx) for mRCC. The effect of geographic differences on the outcome of su tx in mRCC is poorly defined. Aims: To study the effect of geographic differences on outcome of su tx in mRCC. Methods: We performed an international multicentre retrospective study of unselected cohort of 275 mRCC pts, who were treated with su from 2004 to 2012 in 7 centers across the US and Middle East (ME; Israel). Clinicopathologic and prognostic factors, and tx outcome were compared between US (n=133) and ME (n=142) pts. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables, and two-sample t-test was used to compare continuous endpoints. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Cox regression. Results: Median age was 61 (US) vs 65 (ME, p=0.01). The groups were balanced regarding gender, Heng risk, past nephrectomy, RCC histology, presence of ≥ 2 metastatic sites, lung/liver/bone metastasis, use of angiotensin system inhibitors (ASI), prior cytokines/ targeted txt, su induced HTN, and su dose reduction/tx interruption secondary to side effects. The incidence of active smokers (28% vs 15%, p=0.01), bisphosphonates users (23% vs 13%, p=0.03) and pts with pre-tx neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≤ 3 (63% vs 49%, p=0.04) was higher among ME pts. In US vs ME pts, objective response was partial response/stable disease 77% (n=102) vs 79% (n=112), and progressive disease at first imaging evaluation within the first 3 months (mos) 23% (n=31) vs 21% (n=30) (p=0.77, OR 1.1). Median PFS was 8 vs 12 mos (HR=1.8, p<0.0001), and median OS 21 vs 22 mos (HR=0.94, p=0.9) in US vs ME pts. Factors associated with PFS in multivariate analysis of the entire cohort (n=275) were geographic location (US vs ME), Heng risk, RCC histology, su induced HTN, ASI use, pre-tx NLR, and smoking status. Conclusions: Geographic differences in clinicopathologic factors and PFS of pts with mRCC treated with su may exist. This should be further investigated, and if validated, applied in clinical practice and clinical trials.

Download Full-text

Differences in clinical characteristics and treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma between Asians and non-Asians.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2014.32.3_suppl.289 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽

pp. 289-289

Author(s):

Kit Man Wong ◽

Jonghun John Lee ◽

Amy Wong ◽

Geoffrey Liu ◽

Morris Sherman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Health Care ◽

Liver Transplant ◽

Meld Score ◽

Public Health Care ◽

Treatment Modalities ◽

Chi Square ◽

Curative Intent ◽

Chi Square Test ◽

Multifocal Disease

289 Background: Studies have demonstrated clinical differences in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between Asians (AS) and non-Asians (NAS). In the US, AS are less likely to undergo liver transplant compared to Caucasians. Despite the large immigrant population in Canada, there has been no prior comparison of HCC in AS and NAS in the context of the Canadian universal health care system. We retrospectively evaluated the ethnic differences in HCC at the largest cancer centre in Canada. Methods: We analyzed 268 patients who enrolled in a Genetic Epidemiology Study of HCC (April 2010 to February 2013), where patients were asked to complete a questionnaire and give a blood sample at their first visit. Relevant clinical data were extracted and analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test or Chi-square test. Results: The study population had a mean age of 61 years and 83% males. There were 45% AS, 49% Caucasians, and 6% other ethnicities. Etiologies of HCC included: Hepatitis B (HBV) 34%, Hepatitis C (HCV) 32%, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis 15%, alcohol 18%. Compared to NAS, HCC patients of Asian ancestry had significantly higher rates of HBV (60% vs. 12%, p<0.001). At diagnosis, 83% of patients were Child-Pugh A (mean MELD score 9.2). Ethnicity had no impact on Child-Pugh class, multifocal disease or macrovascular invasion. However, MELD scores were lower in AS (p=0.02). Overall, 71% of cases were initially treated with curative intent. Patients underwent various treatment modalities: liver transplant 13%, resection 31%, radiofrequency ablation 39%, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) 21%, radiation 17%, systemic therapy 27%. AS had higher resection rates (41% vs. 22%, p<0.001), while no differences were observed for other treatments. Duration of response was 11.7 months for TACE (AS 14.2, NAS 10.5), 7.5 months for sorafenib (AS 6.8, NAS 8.1). Rate of intolerance to sorafenib was 24% (AS 27%, NAS 22%, p=0.63). This analysis was limited by inherent bias in the selection of study patients. Conclusions: AS with HCC tend to have HBV and lower MELD scores, and to undergo resection in a public health care setting with no differences in the uptake of other therapies. An analysis of survival based on ethnicity will be reported.

Download Full-text

Diabetes mellitus indicate poor prognosis in uterine serous cancer patients

10.21203/rs.3.rs-261282/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Yunyun Liu ◽

Jing Li ◽

Zhibo Cheng ◽

Guocai Xu ◽

Yongpai Peng ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Risk Factors ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Prognostic Factors ◽

Poor Prognosis ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Figo Stage ◽

Chi Square ◽

Institutional Review ◽

Independent Risk Factors

Abstract Purpose. We aimed to find prognostic factors for uterine serous cancer(USC) patients in a retrospective study.Methods. 51 USC patients between 2010-2020 were enrolled. All pathological specimens were reviewd. The research protocol was approved by Institutional Review Board and all patients were informed consent before the study began. Statistics were done using SPSS 25.0, T test and chi-square analyses were used to compare differences, the overall survival(OS) was estimated with Kaplan-Meier(KM) analysis, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were utilized to find prognostic factors.Results. The median overall survival(OS) and progressive free survival(PFS) were 75.94 and 63.49 months, respectively. Diagnosed with diabetes mellitus(P=0.006, HR=6.792, 95%CI=1.726-26.722) and CA125＞28U/ml(P=0.006, HR=7.136, 95%CI=1.780-28.607) before surgery were independent risk factors for OS, advanced FIGO stage(P=0.001, HR=10.628, 95%CI=2.894-39.026) and DM(P=0.003, HR=6.327, 95%CI=1.875-21.354) were independent factors for PFS. Age≤52, , tumor size≥2.5cm and cervical mucosal infiltration may indicate poor prognosis but were not independent risk factors. Hypertension patients with routine medical treatment tend to survive longer, but there was no statistical differences in OS and PFS compared to patients with normal blood pressure.Conclusion. In addition to surgical and adjuvant treatments, gynecologists should focus more on the comorbid conditions of USC patiens, especially for DM.

Download Full-text