Real-world conditional survival analysis of women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18087-e18087
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Szamreta ◽  
Matthew J. Monberg ◽  
Kaushal Desai ◽  
Xin Chen ◽  
Megan Othus

e18087 Background: A critical question in determining long-term prognosis for women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer (OC) is whether or not their risk of death changes with time. The emergence of large, well-populated real-world datasets permits assessment of conditional survival (CS) given prior overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: The Tempus EMR clinical dataset consists of patients from both National Cancer Institute designated centers and a sample of community oncology centers in the U.S. This study included adult women with a primary diagnosis of ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer from 1982 to 2018; women treated with a poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor were excluded due to low numbers & limited follow-up (final n = 2,031). The effects of patient attributes on OS were estimated using Cox regression. We calculated CS as the Kaplan-Meier probability of surviving an additional y years (from first line chemotherapy initiation), given no OS or PFS event in the previous x (< y) years. Results: Median age was 61 years and 68% of patients were Caucasian. The majority (92%) had epithelial histology, 58% were stage 3 or 4, and 49% were ECOG 0 or 1. Median OS was 37 months (95% CI: 36-39), and OS differed by age, stage, and performance status; adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for OS were 1.3 (95% CI: 1.0, 1.5) for age > 65 versus < 45, 2.4 for stage 4 versus stage 1 (95% CI: 1.7, 3.4), and 1.4 for ECOG 2 to 4 versus 0 or 1 (95% CI: 1.2, 1.7). Conditional 1- or 5-year survival rate did not vary based on prior OS. However, CS rates among women alive without disease progression increased with time: 1-year and 5-year survival rates (with 95% CI) were 86% (84-87) and 28% (26-31), respectively, in women alive without progression at 6 months, but increased to 94% (89-97) and 53% (44-62) in women alive without progression at 3 years. Conclusions: Long-term prognosis, as shown by conditional survival rates, did not improve based on time alive since initiation of chemotherapy. However, women with longer time without disease progression had lower rates of death and a better prognosis. [Table: see text]

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 290-290
Author(s):  
Jinan Liu ◽  
Premal H. Thaker ◽  
Janvi Sah ◽  
Eric M Maiese ◽  
Linda Kalilani ◽  
...  

290 Background: PARP inhibitor (PARPi) and bevacizumab have been integrated into the first-line (1L) maintenance therapy for patients (pts) with ovarian cancer (OC). However, due to adverse events, the rate of PARPi maintenance discontinuation was 12% in the SOLO1 clinical trial. We aimed to better understand the rate and cause of maintenance therapy discontinuation in real-world practice. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using de-identified electronic health record (EHR)–derived data from the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health database. From January 1, 2016, to February 29, 2020, data were obtained for pts with newly diagnosed stage III/IV epithelial OC who received primary debulking surgery followed by 6–9 cycles of 1L platinum-based chemo or neoadjuvant chemo followed by interval debulking surgery. Index date was the end of 1L systemic therapy. Results: Of 675 pts with stage III/IV OC who underwent primary systemic therapy, 144 (21.3%) received 1L maintenance therapy and were included in the analysis. Mean age was 65.0 y. Most pts were treated in community practice (93.1%), had ECOG score of 0–1 at diagnosis (81.3%), and were shown to be BRCA wild type (66.7%). Bevacizumab was the most common 1L maintenance therapy (n = 69, 47.9%), followed by olaparib (n = 46, 31.9%), paclitaxel (n = 18, 12.5%), rucaparib (n = 10, 6.9%), and gemcitabine (n = 1, 0.7%). Overall, 34 (23.6%) pts discontinued 1L maintenance therapy. The most common reason for discontinuation was disease progression (n = 19, 13.2%), followed by treatment-related toxicity (n = 13, 9.0%; Table). Of 56 pts who received PARPi (olaparib or rucaparib) 1L maintenance therapy, 21 (37.5%) pts discontinued treatment: 11 (19.6%) because of disease progression, 9 (16.0%) treatment-related toxicity, and 1 for other reasons. Conclusions: In pts with advanced OC who received 1L maintenance therapy in clinical practice, disease progression was the most common reason for maintenance therapy discontinuation. The rates of toxicity-related discontinuations were comparable with those reported in clinical trials.[Table: see text]


Leukemia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Surapol Issaragrisil ◽  
...  

AbstractIn the ENESTnd study, with ≥10 years follow-up in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase, nilotinib demonstrated higher cumulative molecular response rates, lower rates of disease progression and CML-related death, and increased eligibility for treatment-free remission (TFR). Cumulative 10-year rates of MMR and MR4.5 were higher with nilotinib (300 mg twice daily [BID], 77.7% and 61.0%, respectively; 400 mg BID, 79.7% and 61.2%, respectively) than with imatinib (400 mg once daily [QD], 62.5% and 39.2%, respectively). Cumulative rates of TFR eligibility at 10 years were higher with nilotinib (300 mg BID, 48.6%; 400 mg BID, 47.3%) vs imatinib (29.7%). Estimated 10-year overall survival rates in nilotinib and imatinib arms were 87.6%, 90.3%, and 88.3%, respectively. Overall frequency of adverse events was similar with nilotinib and imatinib. By 10 years, higher cumulative rates of cardiovascular events were reported with nilotinib (300 mg BID, 16.5%; 400 mg BID, 23.5%) vs imatinib (3.6%), including in Framingham low-risk patients. Overall efficacy and safety results support the use of nilotinib 300 mg BID as frontline therapy for optimal long-term outcomes, especially in patients aiming for TFR. The benefit-risk profile in context of individual treatment goals should be carefully assessed.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaka Okagawa ◽  
Tetsuya Sumiyoshi ◽  
Hitoshi Kondo ◽  
Yusuke Tomita ◽  
Takeshi Uozumi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recent studies have shown that mixed predominantly differentiated-type (MD) early gastric cancer (EGC) might have more malignant potential than pure differentiated-type (PD) EGC. However, no study has analyzed all differentiated-type EGC cases treated endoscopically and surgically. This study aimed to compare the differences in clinicopathological features and long-term prognosis between MD- and PD-EGC. Methods We evaluated all patients with differentiated-type EGCs who were treated endoscopically and surgically in our hospital between January 2010 and October 2014. The clinicopathological features and long-term prognosis of MD-EGC were compared with those of PD-EGC. Results A total of 459 patients with 459 lesions were evaluated in this study; of them, 409 (89.1%) and 50 (10.9%) were classified into the PD and MD groups, respectively. Submucosal invasion was found in 96 (23.5%) patients of the PD group and in 33 (66.0%) patients of the MD group (p < 0.01). The rates of positive lymphatic and vascular invasion and ulceration were significantly higher in the MD group than in the PD group (p < 0.01). The proportion of patients with lymph node metastasis was also significantly higher in the MD group than in the PD group (5 (10%) vs 6 (1.5%), p < 0.01). The 5-year overall and EGC-specific survival rates in the PD group were 88.3 and 99.5%, respectively, while they were 94.0 and 98.0% in the MD group, respectively. Conclusions MD-EGC has more malignant potential than PD-EGC. However, the long-term prognosis of MD-EGC is good and is not significantly different from that of PD-EGC when treated appropriately.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 496-500
Author(s):  
Shahrzad Sheikh Hasani ◽  
Mitra Modares Gilani ◽  
Setareh Akhavan ◽  
Azam-Sadat Mousavi ◽  
Elham Saffarieh ◽  
...  

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the 3-year overall survival among the epithelial ovarian cancer patients based on the histology, age, and the stage of the disease in Iran during 2011-2017. Materials and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional retrospective study that was conducted on 179 newly diagnosed patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, who had referred to the gynecologic cancers clinic in a referral training hospital in Tehran during 2011-2017. The patients’ data including the demographic characteristics of the patients, the stage of the disease, and the treatment type were analyzed based on the pathologic responses. Results: Among 220 newly diagnosed patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, 179 of them were suitable for the follow-up. There were 93 death and 85 living cases among these patients and the mean age of the patients was 50.5 ± 11.3. In addition, most of the patients were in stage 3 (60.9%) and 6.7% of them were in stage 4. The most common pathology was serous adenocarcinoma (70.9%). In this study, the overall survival rate had no connection with the type of tumor histology but it was related to the stage of the disease (P=0.05). Finally, there was no mortality in stage one and among the mucinous adenocarcinoma cases. Conclusions: The survival in the epithelial ovarian cancer was related to the stage of the disease and among all the pathologies, mucinous adenocarcinoma and clear cell carcinoma had the best survival rate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18710-e18710
Author(s):  
Jinan Liu ◽  
Premal H. Thaker ◽  
Janvi Sah ◽  
Eric M. Maiese ◽  
Oscar Bee ◽  
...  

e18710 Background: With the advent of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), options for first-line (1L) maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer (OC) have evolved in the US. This study described the use of 1L maintenance and assessed predictors of 1L maintenance use among PARPi-eligible patients (pts) with OC in a real-world setting. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included pts with newly diagnosed stage III/IV epithelial OC who received 6–9 cycles of 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) and primary or interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy between Jan 1, 2016, and Feb 29, 2020, from the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record–derived deidentified database. The end of the last cycle of 1L PBC was defined as the index date. Those pts who started second-line chemotherapy within 2 months of the index date were excluded. Logistic regression was used to analyze variables with regard to 1L maintenance use. Results: In total, 463 pts were included; 21% received maintenance therapy, 79% received active surveillance. Baseline characteristics are shown in the table. Overall maintenance therapy use increased over the study period, from 7.7% to 37.7%. Pts with BRCA wild type were significantly less likely to receive maintenance therapy (odds ratio [OR]: 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16–0.59) than pts with BRCA mutation. Pts treated in 2018 (OR: 2.73; 95% CI, 1.25–5.98) and 2019 (OR: 8.78; 95% CI, 4.15–18.55) were significantly more likely to receive maintenance therapy than pts treated in 2017. Age, race, practice type, ECOG score, and residual disease status were not significant predictors of 1L maintenance use. Conclusions: Nearly 40% of pts with advanced stage OC received upfront maintenance therapy with an increasing trend over time, particularly in those with biomarker guidance. Research is warranted toward addressing barriers to the appropriate use of maintenance therapy.[Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18715-e18715
Author(s):  
Kristina Zakurdaeva ◽  
Olga A. Gavrilina ◽  
Anastasia N. Vasileva ◽  
Sergei Dubov ◽  
Vitaly S. Dubov ◽  
...  

e18715 Background: Pts with hem diseases are at high risk of COVID-19 severe course and mortality. Emerging data on risk factors and outcomes in this patient population is of great value for developing strategies of medical care. Methods: CHRONOS19 is an ongoing nationwide observational cohort study of adult (≥18 y) pts with hem disease (both malignant and non-malignant) and lab-confirmed or suspected (clinical symptoms and/or CT) COVID-19. Primary objective was to evaluate treatment outcomes. Primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. Long-term follow-up was performed at 90 and 180 days. Data from 14 centers was collected on a web platform and managed in a deidentified manner. Results: As of data cutoff on January 27, 2021, 575 pts were included in the registry, 486 of them eligible for primary endpoint assessment, n(%): M/F 243(50%)/243(50%), median age 56 [18-90], malignant disease in 452(93%) pts, induction phase/R/R/remission 160(33%)/120(25%)/206(42%). MTA in 93(19%) pts, 158(33%) were transfusion dependent, comorbidities in 278(57%) pts. Complications in 335(69%) pts: pneumonia (67%), CRS (8%), ARDS (7%), sepsis (6%). One-third of pts had severe COVID-19, 25% were admitted to ICU, 20% required mechanical ventilation. All-cause mortality at 30 days – 17%; 80% due to COVID-19 complications. At 90 days, there were 14 new deaths: 6 (43%) due to hem disease progression. Risk factors significantly associated with OS are listed in Tab 1. In multivariate analysis – ICU+mechanical ventilation, HR, 53.3 (29.1-97.8). Acute leukemias were associated with higher risk of death, HR, 2.40 (1.28-4.51), less aggressive diseases (CML, CLL, MM, non-malignant) – with lower risk of death, HR, 0.54 (0.37-0.80). No association between time of COVID-19 diagnosis (Apr-Aug vs. Sep-Jan) and risk of death. COVID-19 affected treatment of hem disease in 65% of pts, 58% experienced treatment delay for a median of 4[1-10] weeks. Relapse rate on Day 30 and 90 – 4%, disease progression on Day 90 detected in 13(7%) pts; 180-day data was not mature at the time of analysis. Several cases of COVID-19 re-infection were described. Conclusions: Thirty-day all-cause mortality in pts with hem disease was higher than in general population with COVID-19. Longer-term follow-up (180 days) for hem disease outcomes and OS will be presented. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document