Altered mitotic domains reveal fate map changes in Drosophila embryos mutant for zygotic dorsoventral patterning genes

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 1003-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Arora ◽  
C. Nusslein-Volhard
Keyword(s):  
Positional Information ◽  
Mitotic Division ◽  
Specific Pattern ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Dorsoventral Patterning ◽  
Fate Map ◽  
Positive Role ◽  
Dorsal Cells ◽  
Dorsal Pattern ◽  
Drosophila Embryos

The spatial and temporal pattern of mitoses during the fourteenth nuclear cycle in a Drosophila embryo reflects differences in cell identities. We have analysed the domains of mitotic division in zygotic mutants that exhibit defects in larval cuticular pattern along the dorsoventral axis. This is a powerful means of fate mapping mutant embryos, as the altered position of mitotic domains in the dorsoventral pattern mutants correlate with their late cuticular phenotypes. In the mutants twist and snail, which fail to differentiate the ventrally derived mesoderm, mitoses specific to the mesoderm are absent. The lateral mesectodermal domain shows a partial ventral shift in twist mutants but a proportion of ventral cells do not behave characteristically, suggesting that twist has a positive role in the establishment of the mesoderm. In contrast, snail is required to repress mesectodermal fates in cells of the presumptive mesoderm. In the absence of both genes, the mesodermal and the mesectodermal anlage are deleted. Mutations at five loci delete specific pattern elements in the dorsal half of the embryo and cause partial ventralization. Mutations in the genes zerknullt and shrew affect cell division only in the dorsalmost cells corresponding to the amnioserosa, while the genes tolloid, screw and decapentaplegic (dpp) affect divisions in both the prospective amnioserosa and the dorsal epidermis. We demonstrate that in each of these mutants dorsally placed mitotic domains are absent and this effect is correlated with an expansion and dorsal shift in the position of more ventral domains. The loss of activity in each of the five genes results in qualitatively similar alterations in the mitotic pattern; mutations with stronger ventralizing phenotypes affect increasingly greater subsets of the dorsal cells. Double mutant analysis indicates that these genes act in a concerted manner to specify dorsal fates. The correlation between phenotypic strength and the progressive loss of dorsal pattern elements in the ventralized mutants, suggests that one of these gene products, perhaps dpp, may provide positional information in a graded manner.

A positive role for Short gastrulation in modulating BMP signaling during dorsoventral patterning in theDrosophilaembryo

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (19) ◽  
pp. 3831-3841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Decotto ◽  
Edwin L. Ferguson
Keyword(s):  
Family Members ◽  
Positional Information ◽  
Dorsal Side ◽  
Bmp Signaling ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Functional Difference ◽  
Ligand Specificity ◽  
Dorsoventral Patterning ◽  
Positive Role ◽  
Negative Function

Positional information in the dorsoventral axis of the Drosophila embryo is encoded by a BMP activity gradient formed by synergistic signaling between the BMP family members Decapentaplegic (DPP) and Screw (SCW). short gastrulation (sog), which is functionally homologous to Xenopus Chordin, is expressed in the ventrolateral regions of the embryo and has been shown to act as a local antagonist of BMP signaling. Here we demonstrate that SOG has a second function, which is to promote BMP signaling on the dorsal side of the embryo. We show that a weak, homozygous-viable sog mutant is enhanced to lethality by reduction in the activities of the Smad family members Mad or Medea, and that the lethality is caused by defects in the molecular specification and subsequent cellular differentiation of the dorsal-most cell type, the amnioserosa. While previous data had suggested that the negative function of SOG is directed against SCW, we present data that suggests that the positive activity of SOG is directed towards DPP. We demonstrate that Chordin shares the same apparent ligand specificity as does SOG, preferentially inhibiting SCW but not DPP activity. However, in Drosophila assays Chordin does not have the same capacity to elevate BMP signaling as does SOG, identifying a functional difference in the otherwise well conserved process of dorsoventral pattern formation in arthropods and chordates.

Mutations affecting the cytoskeletal organization of syncytial Drosophila embryos

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 1245-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Sullivan ◽  
P. Fogarty ◽  
W. Theurkauf
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Division ◽  
P Element ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Nuclear Movement ◽  
Microtubule Organization ◽  
Cytoskeletal Organization ◽  
New Genes ◽  
Movement Organization ◽  
Cytoplasmic Organization ◽  
Drosophila Embryos

Cytoplasmic organization, nuclear migration, and nuclear division in the early syncytial Drosophila embryo are all modulated by the cytoskeleton. In an attempt to identify genes involved in cytoskeletal functions, we have examined a collection of maternal-effect lethal mutations induced by single P-element transposition for those that cause defects in nuclear movement, organization, or morphology during the syncytial embryonic divisions. We describe three mutations, grapes, scrambled, and nuclear-fallout, which define three previously uncharacterized genes. Females homozygous for these mutations produce embryos that exhibit extensive mitotic division errors only after the nuclei migrate to the surface. Analysis of the microfilament and microtubule organization in embryos derived from these newly identified mutations reveal disruptions in the cortical cytoskeleton. Each of the three mutations disrupts the actin-based pseudocleavage furrows and the cellularization furrows in a distinct fashion. In addition to identifying new genes involved in cytoskeletal organization, these mutations provide insights into cytoskeletal function during early Drosophila embryogenesis.

Pattern formation in the Drosophila embryo

1981 ◽  
Vol 295 (1078) ◽  
pp. 567-594 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Diffusion ◽  
Positional Information ◽  
Early Embryo ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Chemical System ◽  
Fate Map ◽  
Reaction Diffusion Systems ◽  
Epigenetic Code ◽  
Combinatorial Code

Three plausible hypotheses about developmental commitments in the Drosophila embryo propose that: (1) a micromosaic of localized determinants in the egg trigger somatic commitments; (2) monotonic anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral gradients in the egg specify positions by a series of threshold values; (3) sequential subdivision of the early embryo into ‘anterior’ or ‘posterior’ ‘middle’ or ‘end’, ‘dorsal’ or ‘ventral’, ‘odd’ or ‘even’ compartmental domains encodes the somatic commitment in each region in a combinatorial epigenetic code. Evidence in favour of such a combinatorial code includes its capacity to account for major features of transdetermination and for many single and coordinated homoeotic transformations. In particular, both these metaplasias often cause transformations between ectodermal tissues such as antenna and genitalia, whose anlagen lie far apart on the blastoderm fate map. This phenomenon is not naturally explained by monotonic gradient models. In contrast, not only transformation between distant regions of the fate map, but also the observed geometries of compartmental boundaries on the wing, and probable ones in the early embryo, are naturally explained by reaction-diffusion models. These systems form a discrete succession of differently shaped monotonic and nonmonotonic eigenfunction gradient patterns of the same morphogens, as the tissue containing the chemical system changes in size and shape, or in other parameters. The successive mirror symmetries in non-monotonic gradients predict that distant regions of the embryo make similar developmental commitments, and also predict specific classes of pattern mutants forming mirror symmetric structures along the embryo on a variety of length scales. Finally, reaction diffusion systems spontaneously generate transverse gradients of the underlying chemicals when more than one eigenfunction is amplified at once, and therefore specify two-dimensional positional information within domains. Although it is attractive, no feature of the combinatorial code hypothesis is verified. Current data relating to whether the sequential formation of compartmental boundaries actually reflects the commitment of the two isolated ‘polyclones’ to alternative fates, whether any genes act continuously to maintain disc commitments, and whether homoeotic mutants actually ‘switch’ disc determined states, are assessed.

Laser scanning confocal microscopic analysis of cytoskeletal and nuclear reorganization in live Drosophila embryos

1993 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 174-175
Author(s):  
William Theurkauf
Keyword(s):  
Laser Scanning ◽  
Microscopic Analysis ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Early Embryo ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Cortical Actin ◽  
Nuclear Reorganization ◽  
Cytoskeletal Elements ◽  
Microtubule Structure ◽  
Drosophila Embryos

Cell division in eucaryotes depends on coordinated changes in nuclear and cytoskeletal components. In Drosophila melanogaster embryos, the first 13 nuclear divisions occur without cytokinesis. During the final four divisions, nuclei divide in a uniform monolayer at the surface of the embryo. These surface divisions are accompanied by dramatic changes in cortical actin and microtubule structure (Karr and Alberts, 1986), and inhibitor studies indicate that these changes are essential to orderly mitosis (Zalokar and Erk, 1976). Because the early embryo is syncytial, fluorescent probes introduced by microinjection are incorporated in structures associated with all of the nuclei in the blastoderm. In addition, the nuclei divide synchronously every 10 to 20 min. These characteristics make the syncytial blastoderm embryo an excellent system for the analysis of mitotic reorganization of both nuclear and cytoskeletal elements. However, the Drosophila embryo is a large cell, and resolution of cytoskeletal filaments and nuclear structure is hampered by out-of focus signal.

An activity gradient of decapentaplegic is necessary for the specification of dorsal pattern elements in the Drosophila embryo

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 807-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.A. Wharton ◽  
R.P. Ray ◽  
W.M. Gelbart
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Gene Dosage ◽  
Early Embryo ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
In The Wild ◽  
Intercellular Signalling ◽  
Overlapping Domains ◽  
Dorsal Pattern

decapentaplegic (dpp) is a zygotically expressed gene encoding a TGF-beta-related ligand that is necessary for dorsal-ventral patterning in the Drosophila embryo. We show here that dpp is an integral part of a gradient that specifies many different cell fates via intercellular signalling. There is a graded requirement for dpp activity in the early embryo: high levels of dpp activity specify the amnioserosa, while progressively lower levels specify dorsal and lateral ectoderm. This potential for dpp to specify cell fate is highly dosage sensitive. In the wild-type embryo, increasing the gene dosage of dpp can shift cell fates along the dorsal-ventral axis. Furthermore, in mutant embryos, in which only a subset of the dorsal-ventral pattern elements are represented, increasing the gene dosage of dpp can specifically transform those pattern elements into more dorsal ones. We present evidence that the zygotic dpp gradient and the maternal dorsal gradient specify distinct, non-overlapping domains of the dorsal-ventral pattern.

A group of genes required for maintenance of the amnioserosa tissue in Drosophila

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1343-1352 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.H. Frank ◽  
C. Rushlow
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Cell Loss ◽  
Dorsal Side ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Epithelial Tissue ◽  
Dorsoventral Patterning ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Germ Band ◽  
Initial Development

The amnioserosa is an extraembryonic, epithelial tissue that covers the dorsal side of the Drosophila embryo. The initial development of the amnioserosa is controlled by the dorsoventral patterning genes. Here we show that a group of genes, which we refer to as the U-shaped-group (ush-group), is required for maintenance of the amnioserosa tissue once it has differentiated. Using several molecular markers, we examined amnioserosa development in the ush-group mutants: u-shaped (ush), hindsight (hnt), serpent (srp) and tail-up (tup). Our results show that the amnioserosa in these mutants is specified correctly and begins to differentiate as in wild type. However, following germ-band extension, there is a premature loss of the amnioserosa. We demonstrate that this cell loss is a consequence of programmed cell death (apoptosis) in ush, hnt and srp, but not in tup. We discuss the role of the ush-group genes in maintaining the amnioserosa's viability. We also discuss a possible role for the amnioserosa in germ-band retraction in light of these mutants' unretracted phenotype.

scholarly journals Successive specification of Drosophila neuroblasts NB 6-4 and NB 7-3 depends on interaction of the segment polarity genes wingless, gooseberry and naked cuticle

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (17) ◽  
pp. 3253-3261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirupama Deshpande ◽  
Rainer Dittrich ◽  
Gerhard M. Technau ◽  
Joachim Urban
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Positional Information ◽  
Dorsoventral Patterning ◽  
Expression Domain ◽  
Direct Role ◽  
Segment Polarity Genes ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Unique Identity

The Drosophila central nervous system derives from neural precursor cells, the neuroblasts (NBs), which are born from the neuroectoderm by the process of delamination. Each NB has a unique identity, which is revealed by the production of a characteristic cell lineage and a specific set of molecular markers it expresses. These NBs delaminate at different but reproducible time points during neurogenesis (S1-S5) and it has been shown for early delaminating NBs (S1/S2) that their identities depend on positional information conferred by segment polarity genes and dorsoventral patterning genes. We have studied mechanisms leading to the fate specification of a set of late delaminating neuroblasts, NB 6-4 and NB 7-3, both of which arise from the engrailed (en) expression domain, with NB 6-4 delaminating first. In contrast to former reports, we did not find any evidence for a direct role of hedgehog in the process of NB 7-3 specification. Instead, we present evidence to show that the interplay of the segmentation genes naked cuticle (nkd) and gooseberry (gsb), both of which are targets of wingless (wg) activity, leads to differential commitment to NB 6-4 and NB 7-3 cell fate. In the absence of either nkd or gsb, one NB fate is replaced by the other. However, the temporal sequence of delamination is maintained, suggesting that formation and specification of these two NBs are under independent control.

The zygotic segmentation mutant tailless alters the blastoderm fate map of the Drosophila embryo

1987 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 464-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Mahoney ◽  
Judith A. Lengyel
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Fate Map ◽  
Blastoderm Fate Map

Positioning adjacent pair-rule stripes in the posterior Drosophila embryo

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (10) ◽  
pp. 2945-2955 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. Langeland ◽  
S.F. Attai ◽  
K. Vorwerk ◽  
S.B. Carroll
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Posterior Border ◽  
Adjacent Pair ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Competitive Mechanism ◽  
Pair Rule ◽  
Drosophila Embryos ◽  
Do So

We present a genetic and molecular analysis of two hairy (h) pair-rule stripes in order to determine how gradients of gap proteins position adjacent stripes of gene expression in the posterior of Drosophila embryos. We have delimited regulatory sequences critical for the expression of h stripes 5 and 6 to 302 bp and 526 bp fragments, respectively, and assayed the expression of stripe-specific reporter constructs in several gap mutant backgrounds. We demonstrate that posterior stripe boundaries are established by gap protein repressors unique to each stripe: h stripe 5 is repressed by the giant (gt) protein on its posterior border and h stripe 6 is repressed by the hunchback (hb) protein on its posterior border. Interestingly, Kruppel (Kr) limits the anterior expression limits of both stripes and is the only gap gene to do so, indicating that stripes 5 and 6 may be coordinately positioned by the Kr repressor. In contrast to these very similar cases of spatial repression, stripes 5 and 6 appear to be activated by different mechanisms. Stripe 6 is critically dependent upon knirps (kni) for activation, while stripe 5 likely requires a combination of activating proteins (gap and non-gap). To begin a mechanistic understanding of stripe formation, we locate binding sites for the Kr protein in both stripe enhancers. The stripe 6 enhancer contains higher affinity Kr-binding sites than the stripe 5 enhancer, which may allow for the two stripes to be repressed at different Kr protein concentration thresholds. We also demonstrate that the kni activator binds to the stripe 6 enhancer and present evidence for a competitive mechanism of Kr repression of stripe 6.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document