Modern tendencies of of state property management

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 184-193
Author(s):  
Игнатова ◽  
Tatyana Ignatova ◽  
Мартыненко ◽  
Tatyana Martynenko

The article examines main purposes and tendencies of state property management in Russian Federation and reveals their interrelation to the concept of development of the country and after-crisis development of national economy. In the article the main goals and trends in the management of state property of the Russian Federation are structured, their relationship to the concept of development of the country and the challenges of post-crisis development are shown. The author considers the problem of law violations which govern the privatization of state property and its lease. It is revealed that the common thing now is the withdrawal of assets from the companies in which the state has a stake. It is proved that the management system of state property is formed; its structural elements are examined .

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-243
Author(s):  
Константин Лебедев ◽  
Konstantin Lebedev ◽  
Ольга Лебедева ◽  
Olga Lebedeva

The scientific and practical problems of investment and social development of the tourist industry are investigated. The analysis of condition and tendencies of investment processes development in tourism branch is carried out, as well as priority directions of investment in the national industry of tourism are revealed. It is established that successful development of the tourism industry is impossible without active influence of the state on conditions of its functioning. Participation of the state will consist in development of the actions containing the following: establishment of tax privileges, protection against the double taxation; sale, rent of the ground or objects of infrastructure priced below market rates; direct grants, granting of guarantees under investments with the purpose of attraction of foreign investors. The system of actions in context of creation of the favorable investment environment in tourism sphere is offered. It include establishment of the rate of profit tax for priority directions of activity (incoming and internal tourism); tax exemption of means invested in construction or reconstruction of tourism objects; credit relaxation for making investments with indemnification of difference in rates by the state for firms focused on incoming and internal tourism; adjustment of investment insurance system in tourism and so forth. Complex model of maintenance of tourism industry competitiveness, which takes into account system action of the investment factors providing functioning and development of economic subjects at horizontal level (technologies, infrastructure, competition, demand, adjacent branches), is developed. The given factors are included in uniform vertical of management (national economy - tourism - regional tourist complex - tourism enterprise) and are subordinated to the strategic purpose - to maintenance of tourism sphere competitiveness in system of national economy of the Russian Federation. It is proved that maintenance of steady development of the tourism industry appreciably should be based on infrastructure modernization of tourism and recreational sphere. It is necessary to introduce the special investment mode for assistance to construction and reconstruction of hotels and other objects of a tourism infrastructure that will induce foreign and domestic investors to put means in the tourism industry.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
Tat'yana Agapova ◽  
Andrey Minakov

The article deals with the issues of economic security of the Russian Federation. The aim is to propose measures to increase the level of economic security of the Russian Federation based on improving the strategic management system. Research methods: analysis of theoretical sources, analysis of statistical indicators, comparison. The article discusses the concept of economic security, the current strategy of economic security of the Russian Federation, the existing threats to the economic security of the Russian Federation, as well as ways to improve state strategic management to increase the economic security of the state.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-59
Author(s):  
Elena D. Solovyeva ◽  
Tatyana A. Tkachuk ◽  
Darya A. Kem

The article presents the composition and characteristics of the use of land resources of the Novosibirsk region. Land administration by the state is carried out by the executive bodies of state power at the level of the Russian Federation and its subjects, the legislative body in the field of rule-making, and also by local authorities. A review of the state and use of land by categories and forms of ownership was made with the result, which received positive as well as negative aspects in the management of land resources of the Novosibirsk region. As a result of the analysis of the activities of state structures managing land resources, tendencies to duplication of tasks and powers were discovered.


2020 ◽  
pp. 87-95
Author(s):  
Stanislav Chebotarev ◽  
Alexey Petryanin

The article examines the most harmful particular types of economic dysfunctions that significantly undermine the economic security of the Russian Federation. Using the method of deduction and retrospective technique, their negative impact on the micro- and macroeconomic development of the national economy is presented. The following forms of economic dysfunctions are proposed for consideration: inflation, dollarization and capital outflow. Demonstrated are the economic and legal mechanisms of counteracting them, indicating the progressive decriminalization and economic recovery. New types of economic dysfunctions have been identified that require a prompt response from the state and bona fide participants in economic relations.


2021 ◽  
pp. 31-41
Author(s):  
Rustam R. Gumerov

Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 786 of May 26, 2021 «On the Management System of State Programs of the Russian Federation» (hereinafter — Resolution No. 786) approved new rules for the development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of state programs of the Russian Federation. In the development of the resolution, the Order of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation No. 500 dated August 17, 2021 adopted methodological recommendations for the development and implementation of state programs of the Russian Federation that meet new requirements. Programs should acquire a homogeneous structure that includes five main elements: a list of strategic priorities, a passport of the state program containing goals and indicators with their decomposition by region, passports of federal, departmental projects and complexes of process measures (structural elements of the state program), plans for the implementation of structural elements and a regulatory «substrate» — acts necessary for the implementation of the program. For each state program, as well as its individual elements, a list of socially significant indicators linked to national development goals should be formed. In all state programs, the project part will be allocated, providing for the implementation of specific tasks and obtaining unique results for a limited period of time. One of the first (if not the first) to approve the updated version of the State Program for the Development of Agriculture and Regulation of Agricultural Products, Raw Materials and Food Markets (hereinafter also referred to as the State Program, Program), which comes into force on January 1, 2022. On the example of the updated version of the State Program, the article provides a critical and constructive analysis of systemic problems that may arise in the development of state programs of the Russian Federation as part of the implementation of a new system of program-targeted management.


2021 ◽  
pp. 30-49
Author(s):  
Mikhail N. Dudin ◽  
◽  
Sergey V. Shkodinsky ◽  
Daler I. Usmanov ◽  
◽  
...  

Subject/Topic. The article is devoted to the study of the concept, parameters, barriers and scenarios for ensuring the digital sovereignty of the Russian Federation in the era of Industry 4.0. Methodology. To study the concept of digital sovereignty as a scientific shortage, the authors used general scientific methods (observation, comparison, measurement, analysis and synthesis, the method of logical reasoning), when conducting an analytical study of indicators of the digital maturity of the national economy of the Russian Federation, the dynamics of high-tech challenges and threats specific scientific methods were used (static analysis, expert assessments, graphical method), to form scenarios of the future trajectory of the development of digital sovereignty, methods of strategic management – SWOT analysis, PEST analysis, Foresight tools. The validity and reliability of the results of scientific research is ensured by the correctness and rigor of the construction of the logic and research scheme. Scientific and applied research of Russian and foreign scientists in the field of innovative development, digital economy and public administration was used as a methodological and fundamental basis for the study. The initial statistical data for the analysis were taken from open sources of thematic reviews and analytical reports of the consulting agencies VC.RU, the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation, the Skolkovo Research Center, Digital IQ, PWC, statistical collections of the Higher School of Economics and Rosstat. Results. Currently, digital sovereignty is considered from a political, economic and technological point of view, which determines the presence of a pluralism of points of view on its meaningful definition in the scientific literature. The authors propose to understand by digital sovereignty the criterion of sustainability of the architecture of a socio-economic business model in front of external and internal digital challenges and threats of various origins, as well as its ability to adapt and proactively protect its own interests in the digital sphere. The development of the digital sovereignty of the Russian Federation is presented according to four scenarios: 1st – the Russian Federation is unable to build an effective national infrastructure and is dependent on these groups, digital sovereignty has become an object and means of influence of world leaders on the behavior of entire states and allied formations, an emphasis on military the political role of digital sovereignty; 2nd – the Russian Federation joins the digital infrastructure to the Asian group, and the Chinese conglomerate pursues a policy of soft absorption with the gradual assimilation of the cultural and value paradigms of the population into non-Chinese paradigms; 3rd – the collapse of the oligo-polistic power, the FAMGA group (USA) and the BAT group (China), the entire world economy is being reshaped into autonomous digital ecosystems that build relationships among themselves on the principles of win-win partnership; 4th – the USA, EU, Russia is actively developing digital infrastructure in Asia, Africa, South America to form a new colonial system built on the basis of digital technologies. Conclusions/Relevance. As part of the scientific study, it was found that the digital sovereignty of the state directly depends on the level of digital maturity of the national economy and the digital responsibility of society's behavior. Taking into account the passage of the global economic system to the point of no return – the onset of the era of Industry 4.0 - the issue of ensuring the digital sovereignty of the state is becoming a new priority in the agenda for future development. Application. The results obtained in the process of scientific research can be used by the authorities and management as a theoretical and practical basis for making appropriate decisions in the field of improving the processes of digital transformation of various levels of society, and by business representatives – for adjusting business development strategies based on taking into account relevant digital challenges and threats.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-88
Author(s):  
I. V. Vyakina

Purpose: the article analyzes the tax policy of the Russian Federation and judicial practice of the cases related to tax legislation from the standpoint of business safe development and protection of state interests; contains measures that allow the formation of adequate tax relations between the state and business aimed at the development of the national economy.Methods: tax relations consider in two aspects: from the position of state interests, on the one hand, and subjective perception of business, on the other. In the research process, economic and statistical methods for processing analytical data, graphical and tabular methods for visualizing research results used, as well as methods for complex, system, comparative and structural-functional analysis and traditional general scientific methods: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparisons, generalizations, analogies, etc.Results: the author has performed an analysis of the structure and dynamics of tax revenues to the budget system of the Russian Federation and the results of the consideration of tax legislation application in terms of meeting the claims of various parties and the amounts recovered from lawsuits of tax authorities and taxpayers. The features of the regulatory framework to protect the interests of the state and business in the field of tax relations have considered. The key threats and opportunities for development at different levels of the functioning of tax relations have identified and specific measures aimed at improving the mechanism of tax relations between the state and business have proposed.Conclusions and Relevance: analysis of judicial practice shows an increase in the fiscal focus of the results of the consideration by the Arbitration courts of the cases related to tax legislation. The formation of a set of specific organizational and legal measures in the field of taxation aimed at improving business protection is necessary for protection of the state interests and the safe development of the national economy. They are the organization of effective interaction of business with regulatory authorities; reduction of taxation of investments in fixed assets; development of mechanisms for protecting the rights of investors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 151-165
Author(s):  
D. V. GORDIENKO ◽  

The aim of the work is to assess the impact of the implementation of the integration project of the Eurasian economic Union (EAEU) with the participation of Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan and Armenia on the protection of the national economy of the Russian Federation from external and internal threats. The author uses a methodological approach based on the consideration of various forms of ensuring the economic security of the state. An approach to assessing the level of economic security of the Russian Federation in various variants of the construction of the EAEU is proposed, which allows us to identify the priorities of cooperation or confrontation in the construction of the Union. The results of this work can be used to justify the strategy for implementing the integration project until 2025.


2021 ◽  
pp. 148-155
Author(s):  
E. L. Kruglova

The article describes and analyses the results of the monitoring carried out following the results of the training of specialists trained for organizations of the national economy of the Russian Federation in accordance with the state plan for the training of management personnel. The data of the last monitoring of the 2019/2020 academic years were compared with the results of previous years using general scientific and specific sociological methods. Based on the results of the analysis, the author proposes changes and innovations in the methodology for assessing the professional competence of the graduates of the Program. The assessment methodology has a clear structure, stages, uses mathematical tools to calculate the level of competence in order to exclude subjectivity in the analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document