scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Project Based Learning Ecosystems Dioramas with Jelajah Alam Sekitar Approach against Students’ Critical Thinking Ability and Creativity

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-314
Author(s):  
Ratih Kurniyanti ◽  
Nana Kariada Tri Martuti ◽  
Siti Alimah

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of Project Based Learning ecosystems dioramas with Jelajah Alam Sekitar approach against students’ critical thinking ability and creativity, and to analyze the relationship between critical thinking ability and students' creativity in Project Based Learning ecosystems dioramas with Jelajah Alam Sekitar approach. This research method is pre-experimental design with pre-test and post-test one group design. The results showed that Project Based Learning ecosystems dioramas with Jelajah Alam Sekitar approach was effective against students' critical thinking ability and creativity. The average of critical thinking ability in post-test is 84.96 and average of creativity in post-test is 84.50. The completeness of classical learning shows "High" criteria, the classical completeness rate in post-test of critical thinking and creativity is same (89.21%). The results of the N-gain mean on the test scores of critical thinking ability and creativity are in the "High" criteria. N-gain of critical thinking ability shows "High" category (66.66%) and N-gain creativity shows "High" category (79.42%). The results of the analysis of the two average difference test (one right side) on the critical thinking ability test has t table of 1.97 < t count of 20.89. The creativity test has t table of 1.97 < t count of 31.80, so it shows a significant difference between the achievements at the pre-test and post-test. Based on these results it can be concluded that the Project Based Learning ecosystems dioramas with Jelajah Alam Sekitar approach are effective against students' critical thinking ability and creativity. The relationship between critical thinking ability and creativity shows the relation of 0.38, has a "Low" criteria, so it can be concluded that the relationship between critical thinking ability and student creativity in Project Based Learning ecosystems dioramas with Jelajah Alam Sekitar approach is low.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fita Rahmawati ◽  
Ali Muhtadi

This research aimed (1) to produce an integrative thematic textbook with Problem- Based Learning that is appropriate to improve the critical-thinking ability of elementary students at grade IV and (2) to examine the effectiveness of the textbook. The design of the research was R&D by Borg and Gall. The product tests were limited test, expanded test, and operational test. The researches were conducted at SDN Semanu II, SDN Karangrejek II, and SDN Gombang II in Gunungkidul District. The subjects of the research were 110 students and 4 teachers of grade IV. The instruments of data collection were interview guidelines, observation sheets, and expert validation sheets, questionnaires of teachers’ response, students’ response scale, and test of criticalthinking ability. The effectiveness of the product was tested using quasi experiment. The data were analyzed descriptive qualitatively and quantitatively through the test of difference with significance level 0.05. The result of this research was in the form of appropriate textbook based on the assessment from media expert and material expert that categorized the textbook as “very good”. The developed product was effective to improve the students’ critical-thinking ability. The average post-test score proved it, in which experimental classes 1 and 2 gained 80.48 and 80.39. The average post-test score in control class was only 67.73. The difference of average scores was significant at calculated t score 5.579 and two-tails significance at 0.000 for the difference test between the post-test of experimental class 1 and the control class. Meanwhile, the difference of average scores was significant at calculated t score 5.845 and two-tails significance was at 0.000 for the difference test between the post-test of experimental class 2 and the control class.


Author(s):  
Lela Ivanovska ◽  
Viktorija Petkovska

The present study was conducted to identify the relationship between critical thinking and metacognitive awareness listening strategies of Intermediate EFL learners. It also, investigated difference between the learners with high and low critical thinking ability on their performance in metacognitive listening strategies use. The participants of this study were 120 first year university students from the Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies, Bitola, Macedonia. Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Questionnaire, Meta-Cognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire and listening comprehension tests were used as instruments of this study. The results of this study revealed that there was a strong positive significant correlation between critical thinking ability and metacognitive listening strategies. In order to investigate difference between learners with high and low critical thinking ability and their metacognitive listening strategies use an independent sample t-test was employed, and the results showed a significant difference between the learners with high and low critical thinking ability and their metacognitive listening strategies use.


BIO-PEDAGOGI ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Dwi Eka Yanti ◽  
Puguh Karyanto ◽  
Bowo Sugiharto

<p>This research aimed to find out whether or not there is an effect of Project Based Learning (PjBL) on the critical thinking ability of the X graders of SMA Negeri 2 Karanganyar in biology subject in the school year of 2012/2013. This study was a quasi-experimental research using Post-test Non Equivalent Group Design using cluster sampling. The population of research was all X graders of SMA Negeri 2 Karanganyar in the school year of 2012/2013 consisting of 288 students, while the sample consisted of two classes: control one containing 33 students and experiment one containing 35 students. The control class employed varied lecturing learning method and the experiment one employed Project Based Learning (PjBL) model. Technique of collecting data used was test item and observation sheet. The research hypothesis testing was done using t-test.The result of research showed that Project Based Learning (PjBL) model affected the students’ critical thinking ability. The mean score of critical thinking ability in the experiment class employing Project Based Learning (PjBL) model in learning was higher than that in control class employing varied lecturing method.The conclusion of research was that Project Based Learning (PjBL) model affected significantly the critical thinking ability of the second semester of the X graders of SMA Negeri 2 Karanganyar in the school year of 2012/2013.</p><p align="center"> </p><p>Key Words: Project Based Learning (PjBL) , critical thinking ability.</p>


Author(s):  
Maria Erna ◽  
R. Usman Rery ◽  
Wiji Astuti ◽  
Sulismayati

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada mata pelajaran Termokimia melalui penerapan strategi Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) (POGIL) di kelas 11 SMAN 8 Pekanbaru. Penelitian ini menggunakan One Group Pretest-Posttest Design yang diadakan di SMAN 8 Pekanbaru pada tahun akademik 2017/2018. Objek penelitian adalah XI MIA 1 yang terdiri dari 32 siswa. Pengumpulan data siswa menggunakan teknik tes pretest dan posttest. Keberhasilan pembelajaran dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa ditunjukkan oleh peningkatan kriteria berpikir kritis dari hasil pretest dan posttest yang menganalisis persentase skor berpikir kritis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Siswa mengalami peningkatan dari kategori berpikir kritis sangat rendah ke kategori sangat tinggi dengan persentase 15,625%, dari kategori rendah ke kategori sangat tinggi adalah 40,625%, dari kategori rata-rata ke kategori sangat tinggi adalah 9,375%, dari kategori sangat rendah hingga kategori tinggi adalah 12,5%, dan dari kategori rendah ke kategori tinggi adalah 21,875%. Berdasarkan analisis data, dapat disimpulkan bahwa penerapan strategi Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) mampu meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada mata pelajaran Termokimia di SMAN 8 Pekanbaru.   The research was held to determine the improvement of student’s critical thinking ability on Thermochemistry subject through implementation of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) strategy at 11th Grade of SMAN 8 Pekanbaru. This research used One Group Pretest-Posttest Design which held in SMAN 8 Pekanbaru at academic year of 2017/2018. The object of research is XI MIA 1 that consist of 32 students. The data collection of students used test technique which are pretest and posttest. The success of learning in improvement of student’s critical thinking ability is showed by improvement of criteria of critical thinking from pretest and posttest results that analyzed the score percentage of critical thinking. The result of research showed that there was an improvement of student’s critical thinking ability. The students have an increase from the very low category of critical thinking to very high category with percentage of 15,625%, from low category to very high category is 40,625%, from average category to very high category is 9,375%, from very low category to high category is 12,5%, and from low category to high category is 21,875%. Based on data analyze, it can be concluded that implementation of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) strategy is able to improve student’s critical thinking ability on Thermochemistry subject at SMAN 8 Pekanbaru.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
Oktariani Oktariani ◽  
Asyti Febliza ◽  
Nurul Fauziah

This research was conducted to identify and describe prospective teachers’ critical thinking skills profile as readiness to face the industrial revolution 4.0. This research was a descriptive research. Research subjects were  chemistry education students who are prospective chemistry teachers. The instruments used in this study were the Critical Thinking Ability Test and Critical Thinking Ability Questionnaire. The instrument used is valid and reliable. The results of the study showed that the critical thinking skills of prospective chemistry teacher students are still in sufficient criteria with average score 46,7. It was also found that students' critical thinking skills in 5th  semester  were better than those in semester 3rd and 1st with average score 57,46 and 41. This result was also supported by differences in student performance for each indicator of critical thinking skills. Chemistry students show better performance on indicators of building basic skills compared to other critical thinking skills indicators. Meanwhile, the indicators on building strategies and tactics of chemistry education students still showed  poor performance than other indicators. This needs to be improved immediately in order to prepare prospective chemistry teachers who are ready to compete in facing the industrial revolition 4.0. Improvements can be made by designing learning methods, teaching materials and evaluation tools that can improve students' critical thinking skills.Keywords: critical thinking skill, education 4.0., prospective chemistry teachers, revolutioanl industry 4.0ABSTRAK.Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengidentifikasi dan mendeskripsikan profil keterampilan berpikir kritis calon guru kimia sebagai kesiapan dalam menghadapi revolusi industri 4.0. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif. Subjek penelitian merupakan mahasiswa pendidikan kimia yang merupakan calon guru kimia. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah tes keterampilan berpikir kritis dan kuisioner keterampilan berpikir kritis. Instrumen yang digunakan sudah valid dan reliabel.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keterampilan berpikir kritis calon guru kimia masih berada pada kriteria cukup yaitu dengan skor rata-rata 46,7. Selain itu juga ditemukan bahwa keterampilan berpikir kritis mahasiswa semester 5 lebih baik dibandingkan semester 3 dan semester 1 dengan skor rata-rata masing-masingnya yaitu 57, 46 dan 41.  Hasil ini juga didukung dengan adanya perbedaan performa mahasiswa untuk masing-masing indikator keterampilan berpikir kritis. Calon guru kimia menunjukkan  performa yang lebih baik pada indikator membangun keterampilan dasar dibandingkan dengan indikator keterampilan berpikir kritis lainnya. Sementara itu, pada indikator membangun strategi dan taktik calon guru kimia masih menunjukkan performa yang kurang baik dibandingkan dengan indikator yang lainnya. Hal ini perlu segera diperbaiki guna mempersiapkan calon guru kimia yang siap bersaing menghadapi era revolusi industri 4.0. Perbaikan dapat dilakukan dengan cara merancang metode pembelajaran, bahan ajar dan alat evaluasi yang dapat mengasah keterampilan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Kata kunci: calon guru kimia, keterampilan berpikir kritis, pendidikan 4.0, revolusi industri 4.0


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rindang Hayom Sasami ◽  
Sujarwo Sujarwo

This research aimed to analyse the feasibility of the use of maquette and the effectiveness of maquette in improving students’ critical thinking ability. The research model employed was the development research model developed by Borg & Gall. The research subjects were third graders. The testing was divided into preliminary field testing, main field testing, and operational field testing. The analysis of the medium feasibility was based on the assessment by media experts, the assessment by subject matter experts, students’ response, and teacher’s response. The analysis of maquette effectiveness was carried out using a t-test (two independent samples) to figure out the difference and gain score of the experimental class for the purpose of identifying the improvement after the use of maquette. In the feasibility analysis, a score of 88 in the category “feasible” was gained from the assessment by a media expert and a score of 85 in the category “highly feasible” was gained from the assessment by a subject matter expert. From the preliminary field testing, scores of 60.5 and 65 in the category “highly feasible” were gained for the students’ response and teacher’s response, respectively. Meanwhile, from the main field testing, scores of 56.1 and 66.5 in the category “highly feasible” were gained for the students’ response and teacher’s response to the maquette use, respectively. The t-test results show a significant value in the critical thinking, namely.000 <.05, indicating a significant difference between the control class and the experimental class. The gain score was 0.5 and fell into the “moderate” category. Thus, it can be concluded that maquette is effective in improving critical thinking ability.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wahyu Hardiyanto ◽  
Rusgianto Heri Santoso

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan problem-based learning (PBL) setting think talk write (TTW) dan problem-based learning (PBL) setting think pair share (TPS) serta mendeskripsikan perbedaan keefektifan antara PBL setting TTW dan PBL setting TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah tes prestasi belajar, tes kemampuan berpikir kritis dan angket self-efficacy siswa. Data yang dikumpulkan dianalisis dengan menggunakan one sample t-test, dan analisis multivariat (MANOVA). One sample t-test dilakukan untuk menguji keefektifan pendekatan PBL setting TTW dan keefektifan pendekatan PBL setting TPS, sedangkan analisis multivariat (MANOVA) dilakukan untuk menguji perbedaan keefektifan antara kedua treatment tersebut ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan PBL setting TTW dan pendekatan PBL setting TPS efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Selain itu hasil analisis multivariat menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan yang signifikan antara pendekatan PBL setting TTW dengan pendekatan PBL setting TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. The Effectiveness of PBL Setting TTW and TPS Seen from Students Learning Achievement, Critical Thinking and Self-Efficacy  AbstractThis study aims to describe the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) setting think talk write (TTW) and PBL setting think pair share (TPS) and describe the difference of the effectiveness between PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS in terms of learning achievements, critical thinking ability and self-efficacy of grade students. This research is quasi-experimental research. The research instruments to collect the data are a learning achievement test, a test to examine the ability to think critically and a self-efficacy questionnaire. One sample t-test was conducted to examine the effectiveness PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS. Meanwhile, multivariate test (MANOVA) was carried out to determine the difference between PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS. The results show that both PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS are effective in terms of students learning achievements, critical thinking ability, and self-efficacy and there is no significant difference between the effectiveness of PBL setting TTW and the effectiveness of PBL setting TPS in terms of learning achievements, critical thinking ability and student self-efficacy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Ishmatud Diyanah ◽  
A. Rosyid Al Atok

This study aimed to describe the application and analysis of student's critical thinking skills in learning that used a jigsaw cooperative model with monopoly game media. The study used classroom action research with a quantitative descriptive approach. The application of the jigsaw type cooperative learning model with monopoly game media was applied in several stages, namely group formation, rolling dice in turns, followed by transaction activities in the form of a combination of answering questions, renting, selling, and buying assets until finally one of the students became an absolute rich person called a monopolist. The student's critical thinking ability before taking action measured through the pretest. It showed that the percentage of completeness obtained by students was 65.6% with a minimum completeness criterion of 75. The student's critical thinking ability after the action in cycle I showed that there was a change in the percentage of completeness obtained by students of 66.67% of the pretest results to 76.67% of the post-test results. In the second cycle, there was a change of 76.67% from the pretest results to 90% from the post-test results, thus student's critical thinking skills in learning that used a jigsaw cooperative model with monopoly game media increased by 10% in cycles I and 13,33% in cycle II.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
NI NYOMAN SRI ARTINI . ◽  
PROF.DR. I MADE CANDIASA, MI.Komp. . ◽  
DR. I MADE KIRNA, M.Si. .

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis (1) perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kritis antara siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran kooperatif Group Investigation dengan siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran langsung, (2) pengaruh interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan bakat numerik siswa terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa, (3) perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kritis antara siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran kooperatif Group Investigation dengan siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran langsung, pada siswa yang memiliki bakat numerik tinggi, (4) perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kritis antara siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran kooperatif Group Investigation dengan siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran langsung, pada siswa yang memiliki bakat numerik rendah. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan rancangan yang digunakan adalah two way pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. Populasi penelitian adalah siswa kelas XI IA SMAN 2 Semarapura tahun pelajaran 2013/2014 sebanyak 171 orang. Sampel 76 orang siswa yang dipilih dengan teknik simple random sampling dengan uji kesetaraan kelas. Data dalam penelitian ini berupa keterampilan berpikir kritis dan bakat numerik siswa yang dikumpulkan dengan tes keterampilan berpikir kritis dan bakat numerik. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan uji ANAVA dua jalur dan dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe untuk menguji komparasi pasangan nilai rata-rata tiap kelompok perlakuan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan (1) terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara keterampilan berpikir kritis kelompok siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif Group Investigation dan model pembelajaran langsung (Fh=14,153;pF’(0,05)=4,41).Kata Kunci : Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Group Investigation, Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis, Bakat Numerik. This research aimed to analyze (1) the difference of critical thinking ability among the students who joined Group Investigation cooperative learning model with the students who take the direct learning model, (2) interaction effect between learning model and students’ numerical talent towards students’ critical thinking ability, (3) the difference of critical thinking ability among the students who joined Group Investigation cooperative learning model with the students who take the direct learning model, on high numerical talent students, (4) the difference of critical thinking ability among the students who joined Group Investigation cooperative learning model with the students who take the direct learning model, on low numerical talent students. The research type was a quasi experimental research with two ways pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The research population was grade XI A1 students of SMAN 2 Semarapura Academic Year 2013/2014, with the amount 171 students. The sample was 76 students chosen by simple random sampling technique and class equality test. The data research was critical thinking ability and students’ numerical talent collected by critical thinking ability test and numerical talent. The hypothesis testing used ANOVA two paths followed by Scheffe test to test the comparative value pairs on average each treatment group. The research result showed (1) there was a significant difference between critical thinking ability of the students using Group Investigation cooperative learning model and direct learning model (Fh=14,153;p˂0,05). The students learnt using Group Investigation cooperative learning model showed better critical thinking ability and numerical talent. (2) There was an interaction effect between learning model and numerical talent towards critical thinking ability (Fh=4,502;p˂0,05). (3) There was a significant difference between critical thinking ability students’ levels that using Group Investigation cooperative learning model and direct learning model on high numerical talent students (Fh=16,68˃F’(0,05)=4,41). (4) There was a significant difference between critical thinking ability of the students using Group Investigation cooperative learning model and direct learning model for low numerical talent students (Fh=1,29˃F’(0,05)=4,41). keyword : Group Investigation Cooperative Learning Model, Critical Thinking Ability, Numerical Talent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document