scholarly journals RELEVANSI STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN PADA PT. AKR CORPORINDO, TBK PERIODE 2011-2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-134
Author(s):  
Erwin Munandar ◽  
Hamdan Fathoni
Keyword(s):  
Significant Influence ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Corporate Value ◽  
Management Decisions ◽  
High Position ◽  
The Impact

The value of the company becomes very important for the company or the holders of stock. Each party has its view on the value of the company, the similarity is to want the value of the company to be in a high position. Managerial ownership is the manager's shareholding where the manager is not only involved in managing the company but also involved in the impact of management decisions. Institutional ownership is the shareholding of another company that has a function as a management supervisor. This examination utilizes unmistakable techniques and quantitative methodologies utilizing optional information upheld by writing and documentation considers. The results showed partially both variables had no significant influence on the value of the company. Similarly, simultaneously it has no significant influence on the value of the company.Keywords: Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, Corporate Value.

How does ownership structure affect the financing and dividend decisions of firm?

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahar Tayachi ◽  
Ahmed Imran Hunjra ◽  
Kirsten Jones ◽  
Rashid Mehmood ◽  
Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Agency Cost ◽  
Debt Financing ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Ownership structure deals with internal corporate governance mechanism, which plays important role in minimizing conflict of interests between shareholders and management Ownership structure is an important mechanism that influences the value of firm, financing and dividend decisions. This paper aims to examine the impact of the ownership structures, i.e. managerial ownership, institutional ownership on financing and dividend policy. Design/methodology/approach The authors use panel data of manufacturing firms from both developed and developing countries, and the generalized method of moments (GMM) is applied to analyze the results. The authors collect the data from DataStream for the period of 2010 to 2019. Findings The authors find that managerial ownership and ownership concentration have significant and positive effects on debt financing, but they have significant and negative effects on dividend policy. Institutional ownership shows a positive impact on financing decisions and dividend policy for sample firms. Originality/value This study fills the gap by proving the policy implications for both firms and investors, as managers prefer debt financing, but at the same time try to ignore dividend payment. Therefore, investors may not invest in firms with a higher proportion of managerial ownership and may choose to invest more in institutional ownership, which lowers the agency cost.

scholarly journals Determinan Manajemen Laba Perusahaan di Sektor Konsumsi

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Muhammad Fajri
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Cash Flow ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Free Cash Flow ◽  
Earning Management ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Leverage Ratio ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Impact

The aim of this research is to provide empirical evidence on the impact of good corporate governance, free cash flow, and leverage ratio on earnings management. Good corporate governance is measured by audit committee’s size, the proportion of independent commissioners, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership. Discretionary accrual is the proxy of earning management. This research used 28 consumer goods companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2016 to 2018. Data were analyzed using panel data with random effect model. Based on the result of analysis concluded that all components of good corporate governance (audit committee’s size, the proportion of independent commissioners, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership), have no significant effect on earnings management, on other hand leverage ratio has a negative effect and no significant on earning management, and free cash flow has a positve and no significant effect on earnings management

scholarly journals IMPACT OF GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TOWARDS CORPORATE VALUE WITH ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AS MODERATING VARIABLE (EMPIRICAL STUDY OF FINANCIAL COMPANIES LISTED IN IDX FOR THE PERIOD 2017-2019)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-98
Author(s):  
Lydia Sibarani ◽  
Herlina Lusmeida
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Enterprise Risk Management ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Corporate Value ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
Multiple Regression Method ◽  
The Impact

Abstract- This research aims to observe and analyze the impact of Good Corporate Governance towards Corporate Value as well as analyzing whether Enterprise Risk Management is able to moderate its impact. Good Corporate Governance is proxied by the presence of Independent Commissioners, Audit Committee, as well as Managerial Ownership. The population of this research includes all financial companies that publish their annual report in Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) over the period of 2017-2019. Data were analyzed using the multiple regression method and the moderated regression analysis. The result of this research found that Independent Commissioners and Audit Committee gives positive and significant impact towards Corporate Value while Managerial Ownership gives negative and insignificant impact towards Corporate Value. Enterprise Risk Management is not able to moderate the impact of Independent Commissioner and Managerial Ownership towards Corporate Value but is able to moderate the impact of the Audit Committee towards Corporate Value. Keywords: Audit Committee; Corporate Value; Corporate Governance; Independent Commissioner; Managerial Ownership

scholarly journals The Impact Of Dividend Policy, Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership To Capital Structure On Manufacturing Company In Indonesia Stock Exchange (Idx) Period 2012-2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-39
Author(s):  
Ratna Putri Indah Puspita ◽  
Suherman Suherman
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Significant Negative Effect ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Capital Structure

This study aims to determine the effect of dividend policy, managerial ownership and institutional ownership on the capital structure of manufacturing companies listed on the IDX for the 2012-2016 period. The data used in this study is an annual report of the Manufacturing Sector listed on the IDX for the period 2012-2016. By using purposive sampling method, 56 companies were obtained and consisted of 280 observations. The model used in this research is panel data analysis using the Random Effect Model approach. The results of this study indicate that the dividend policy has a positive but not significant effect on DER, but has a significant positive effect on DAR. While managerial ownership is influential but not significantly negative on the capital structure (DER and DAR). Institutional ownership has a significant negative effect on DER, but has a negative but not significant effect on DAR. Profitability has a significant negative effect on the capital structure (DER and DAR), while the structure of assets and company size does not have a significant effect on the capital structure. (DER and DAR).

scholarly journals Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance and Capital Structure of Non-Financial Firms of Pakistan

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-46
Author(s):  
Hassan Ahmad ◽  
Nasreen Akhter ◽  
Tariq Siddiq ◽  
Zahid Iqbal
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Debt Ratio ◽  
Significant Negative Impact ◽  
The Impact

This study is undertaken with the purpose of investigating the impact of ownership structure and corporate governance on the capital structure of Pakistani listed firms from 2011-2014, feasible general least square is used to investigate the impact of ownership structure and corporate governance on capital structure of KSE 100 index firms. Explanatory variables include ownership concentration, managerial ownership, foreign ownership, institutional ownership, board size, board independence and CEO duality along with the three control variables namely firm size, firm profitability and liquidity. There is insignificant positive relationship between ownership concentration and capital structure, managerial ownership has a significant negative impact on debt ratio. Foreign ownership has also a significant negative impact on firm capital structure and institutional ownership has significant positive impact on capital structure. Board size is positively related to capital structure, board independence also positively related to firm’s debt ratio but CEO duality negatively related to the dependent variable, all these variables have significant impact on capital structure of Pakistani firms. 

scholarly journals FAKTOR DETERMINAN FINANCIAL DISTRESS UNTUK PERUSAHAAN PERTAMBANGAN DI INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-187
Author(s):  
Arief Bagas Prasetyo ◽  
Farida Titik Kristanti
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
Operating Capacity ◽  
Processing Techniques ◽  
The Impact

Abstrak: Faktor determinan Financial Distress Untuk Perusahaan Pertambangan Di Indonesia dan Malaysia. Studi ini bermaksud untuk mengetahui dampak likuiditas, leverage, operating capacity, instittutional ownership, managerial ownership, sertakomisaris independen padaFinancial Distress. Penelitian ini memakai penelitian deskriptif. Populasi serta sampel pada studi ialah perseroan sektor pertambangan yang tercatat di BursaEfek Indonesia dan Bursa Malaysia 2014-2018. Studi ini memakai purposive sampling serta diperoleh 12 perseoran di Indonesia dan 22 perseroan di Malaysia. Olah data yang dipakai studi ini memakai logistic regression. Studi menunjukkan pada perseroan pertambangan di Indonesia bahwa operatingcapacity scara parsial mempunyai pengaruh signifikan negatif pada financial distress. Sedangkan liquidity ,leverage, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, dan independent comissioner secara parsial tidak mempunyai pengaruh pada financial distress. Kemudian pada perseroan pertambangan di Malaysia menunjukkan bahwa liquidity, Managerial Ownership, dan Independent Commissioner secara parsial mempunyai pengaruh signifikan negatif pada financial distress. Sedangkan operating capacity,leverage, dan  Institutional Ownership secara parsial tidak mempunyai pengaruh pada financial distress.Kata kunci: Liquidity, Leverage, OperatingCapacity, Institutional Ownership, Managerial Ownership, Independent Commissioner, Financial DistressAbstract: Determinants ofFinancial Distressfor Mining Companies in Indonesia and Malaysia. Research intend todetermine the impact ofliquidity, leverage, operatingcapacity, institutional ownership, managerialownership, and independent commissioner onfinancial distress. This research uses descriptive research. Thepopulation and sample are miningsector firm registered onthe IDX and Malaysia Exchange 2014-2018. This study uses purposivesamplingmethod acquired 12 companies in Indonesia and 22 companies in Malaysia. The data processing techniques used logisticregression. Research showed mining companies in Indonesia that their operating capacityhas a negative impact on financial distress. Whereas, liquidity,leverage, institutionalownership, managerialownership, and the independentcommissioner didn’t have affects onfinancial distress. Then the mining companies in Malaysia showed that liquidity, Managerial Ownership, and Independent Commissionerhave a negative impact onfinancial distress. Meanwhile, operating capacity, leverage, and institutional ownership didn’t have affects on financial distress.Keywords: Liquidity, Leverage, OperatingCapacity, Institutional Ownership, Managerial Ownership, Independent Commissioner, Financial Distress

scholarly journals The Influence Of Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, And Dividend Policy On The Financial Performance Of Construction And Building Companies Listed On The Indonesia Stock Exchange 2013-2017

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-95
Author(s):  
Yeni Sofiana ◽  
Agus Sukoco ◽  
Joko Suyono
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Return On Assets

  Purpose: The purpose of this studyisdetermine the influence of managerial ownership, institutional ownership and dividend policy on corporate financial performance with indicators of Return On Assets (ROA).   Design/methodology/approach: The research method used is multiple linear regression analysis.    Findings: Dividend policy has a negative and significant influence on the company's financial performance.Simultaneously managerial ownership, institutional ownership and dividend policy have a significant influence on the company's financial performance. Research limitations/implications: This study uses secondary data from construction and building companies sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange.     Practical implications: The results of this study are managerial ownership has a positive and significant influence on the company's financial performance. Originality/value:  Paper type: This paper can be categorized as case study paper. 

scholarly journals Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Cost of Equity of ASEAN-5 Public Companies

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 334
Author(s):  
Randi Anto ◽  
Irene Rini Demi Pangestuti ◽  
Sugeng Wahyudi ◽  
Rezy Ayu Ramadhanti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Cost Of Equity ◽  
Public Companies ◽  
Concentrated Ownership ◽  
Book To Market Ratio ◽  
Corporate Social

This research aims to analyze the influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure, leverage, and ownership structure – consisting of institutional ownership, managerial ownership and concentrated ownership – on cost of equity with book-to-market ratio and firm size as control variables. The population was non-financial public companies listed in ASEAN. There was a total of 76 companies obtained using a purposive sampling technique. The data was analyzed using the multiple regression technique. The results show that the data is normally distributed and has met the requirements for using the multiple linear regression models. The findings indicate that the CSR and leverage have a positive and significant influence on cost of equity. Similarly, the institutional ownership also has a positive and significant influence on cost of equity. However, the managerial ownership and concentrated ownership have a negative and significant influence on cost of equity. Meanwhile, the book-to-market ratio has a negative and significant influence on cost of equity. In contrast, the firm size has a positive and significant influence on cost of equity.

scholarly journals TATA KELOLA PERUSAHAAN DAN NILAI PERUSAHAAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-128
Author(s):  
CYNTHIA LAVENIA YOHENDRA ◽  
MEINIE SUSANTY
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Dividend Payout ◽  
Return On Equity ◽  
Equity Ratio ◽  
The Relationship

The purpose of this research is to provide empirical evidence about the influence of managerial ownership, independent board of commissioners, audit committee, institutional ownership, size, debt to equity ratio, return on equity, liquidity and dividend payout ratio on Tobin’s Q as a measure of firm value. Sample of this research are 57 non financial companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange and the data were selected using purposive sampling method during the research period 2014 until 2016, thus totaled 171 data. Data were analyzed using multiple regression method. The empirical evidence of this research indicated that debt to equity ratio have significant influence with negative direction of the relationship while, return on equity and dividend payout ratio have significant influence on firm value with positive direction of the relationship. Besides that, managerial ownership, independent board of commissioners, audit committee, institutional ownership, size, and liquidity have no significant influence on firm value.

scholarly journals How CSR Moderates the Impact of Basic Industry and Chemicals Companies' Values in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
pp. 66-79
Author(s):  
Widya Sari ◽  
Leondy Wijaya ◽  
Sherly . ◽  
Sally Sofian
Keyword(s):  
Firm Value ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
P Value ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Basic Industry ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Positive Effect

The purpose of this study was to see how the influence of profitability and corporate governance on firm value with or without CSR as a moderating variable. The researchers collected data on companies in the Basic Industry and Chemicals sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange by accessing the website www.idx.co.id.  The population in this study consisted of 80 companies and a sample of 27 companies with a five-year research period. The research method used was quantitative, utilizing data analysis techniques based on the Partial Least Squares (PLS) model and Smart PLS software. The results showed that institutional ownership (p-value 0.064) has no effect on firm value, managerial ownership (p-value 0.462) has no effect on firm value, independent commissioners (p-value 0.836) has no effect on firm value, ROE (p-value 0.119) has no effect on firm value and the audit committee (p-value 0.012) has a positive effect on firm value, institutional ownership with CSR as a moderating variable (p-value 0.756) has no effect on firm value, managerial ownership with CSR as a moderating variable (p -value 0.141) has no effect on firm value, the audit committee with CSR as a moderating variable (p-value 0.084) has no effect on firm value, independent commissioners with CSR as a moderating variable (p-value 0.745) has no effect on firm value, ROE with CSR as a moderating variable (p-value 1.906) has no effect on firm value an, institutional ownership (P-value = 894) has no effect on CSR, managerial ownership (P-value = .361) has no effect on the audit committee CSR (P-value = .984) has no effect on CSR,  Independent Commissioner (P- value = .000) has a negative effect on CSR, ROE (P-value = .001) has a negative effect on CSR, CSR (P-value = .018) has a positive effect on firm value.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document