scholarly journals Typology of Student Learning in Qira’ah Subject with Multiple Intelligence Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-96
Author(s):  
Abdul Muid ◽  
Aulia Mustika Ilmiani ◽  
Ahmad Fikri
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Multiple Intelligences ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Boarding School ◽  
Multiple Intelligence ◽  
School Students ◽  
Learning Abilities ◽  
Learning Types

This study tries to reveal the typology of student learning in Qira'ah subjects, the Multiple Intelligence of students in these subjects, and the relationship between student learning typology in Qira'ah subjects from the perspective of Multiple Intelligences. The Subjects in this study were students of the Jam'iyah Ihsaniyah al-Mukhtariyah Kerinci Islamic Boarding School. This research uses qualitative and quantitative methods. The results showed that the type of student learning in Qira'ah subjects consisted of Auditory learning types, followed by Visual learning types and some students had Kinesthetic learning styles. The intelligence possessed by students when taking Qira'ah lessons is Linguistic or Verbal intelligence which functions to utilize language to communicate. Visual Intelligence is useful for analyzing facts and realities that are seen directly and Kinesthetic Intelligence to directly capture the material. In the Qira'ah subject at the Jam'iyah Ihsaniah al-Mukhtariyah Kerinci Islamic Boarding School, students' learning styles are closely related to multiple intelligences to develop directed and effective learning abilities and processes.

scholarly journals An Investigation between Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabriye Şener ◽  
Ayten Çokçalışkan
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Multiple Intelligences ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Multiple Intelligence ◽  
School Students ◽  
Student Centered ◽  
Perceptual Learning Style ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Design Activities

Exploring learning style and multiple intelligence type of learners can enable the students to identify their strengths and weaknesses and learn from them. It is also very important for teachers to understand their learners’ learning styles and multiple intelligences since they can carefully identify their goals and design activities that can teach to the different intelligences, and design student-centered activities. This study aims to reveal secondary school students’ multiple intelligences and learning styles. It also aims to describe gender differences and the relationship between learning styles and multiple intelligences of the students. The research study employed a quantitative research design and the data were collected from the students of a state school in the winter term of 2015-2016 Education Year. The data were gathered by means of the two instruments: The Perceptual Learning-Style Preference Questionnaire (PLSPQ), and the Multiple Intelligence Inventory. It was observed that the students had almost all these types of learning styles but mostly they were found to be tactile and auditory learners. The three intelligence groups: Naturalistic, Visual and Kinesthetic intelligences types received the highest score. The analyses also indicated that there was a significant difference between males and females. It was seen that most of the intelligence types and learning styles had a moderate positive correlation.

scholarly journals The Effect of Cooperative Learning Model Type Two Stay Two Stray and Learning Style on Social Sciences Learning Outcomes of Grade IV Elementary School Students

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wachid Yuli Irfanto ◽  
Mustaji Mustaji ◽  
Muhammad Jacky
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Posttest Score ◽  
Pretest Score ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
School Students

This study aims to determine the existence of significant differences in students who carry out learning using the two stay two stray model and learning styles towards learning outcomes. The design used in this study is the Pre-Experimental Design design of the One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design. The technique of data analysis using validity and reliability tests. The average results of the pretest and posttest values obtained in the research subjects (class IV) showed that there was an increase before the treatment and after treatment, both students who had the type of visual learning style, audiovisual and kinesthetic. In the type of visual learning style, the pretest score was 65.24 while the posttest score was 79.17. For the type of audio-visual learning style, the pretest score was 66.74, while the posttest score was 82.26 and for the last type, the kinesthetic learning style obtained a pretest score of 67.32 while the posttest score was 84.75. All types of student learning styles experience increased learning outcomes when given treatment with model two stay two strays. So from that shows that the learning model of two stay two stray with visual learning style, audiovisual and kinesthetic experiences a significant increase in improving student learning outcomes.

scholarly journals Profil Kemampuan Representasi Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-28
Author(s):  
Aula Amalia ◽  
Nurina Happy ◽  
FX Didik Purwosetiyono
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
School Students ◽  
Verbal Representation ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Student Learning Styles

This study aims to determaine the profile of the representation ability of juniorhigh school students in terms of learning styles. This type of research wasdescriptive qualitative research. The subjects taken were three junior highschool students of eight grade, each of whom had a visual learning style, andauditory learning style, and kinesthetic learning style. The data was collectedusing a learning style scale, written tests, interviews and documentation. Thedata analysis technique was carried out in 3 stages, reduction, datapresentation, and drawing conclucions or verification. The validity of the dataused time triangulation, comparaing the results of the representation abilitytest with the results of interviews in the first and second stages. The analysiswas developed based on indicators of representational ability by taking inroaccount student learning styles. Based on the results of the analysis, it isknown that subjects with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles havelow verbal representation abilities. 

scholarly journals FACILITATING LEARNING STYLES IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 514
Author(s):  
Widia Indra Kartika ◽  
Syifa Lailatul Mutmainnah ◽  
Nurlia Agustina ◽  
Moh Salimi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
School Students ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Visual Learners ◽  
Auditory Learners ◽  
Student Learning Styles

<p><em>Educators need to understand student learning styles so that the delivery of material or the learning process becomes smooth and successful. Educators need to understand also ways to facilitate students according to learning styles. The purpose of this study is to (1) describe student learning styles; (2) describe ways to facilitate student learning styles. The results of this study are: (1) learning style is a learning process of students in accordance with their skills and abilities which consist of visual learning styles, auditory learning styles, and kinesthetic learning styles. (2) ways to facilitate visual learners through vision or depiction, auditory learners learn through hearing, and kinesthetic learners learn through motion or touch.</em></p>

scholarly journals A STUDY OF MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCE IN RELATING TO LEARNING STYLE AMONG HIGHER SECONDARY STUDENTS

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 310-319
Author(s):  
Jeevitha S ◽  
Vanitha J
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Multiple Intelligences ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Secondary Students ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Multiple Intelligence ◽  
Differential Analysis ◽  
School Students ◽  
Main Motive

Students’ reveal different learning styles and multiple intelligences, and only by accommodating these several abilities can teachers appropriately plan and conduct tasks and evaluate what students have learned. The present study describes the types of learning styles and multiple intelligences of students, as well as instructional methods that work best with students’ relevant learning traits. The main motive is to study on multiple intelligence in relating to learning style among higher secondary students in Coimbatore district. This research is under taken with a view to examining the relationship with multiple intelligence and learning style of different high school students with a sample size 300. The investigation is analyzed by the descriptive analysis and differential analysis. The result concluded from the study that there is no substantial change with respect to gender, locality, groups and board of institution in their mean score of multiple intelligence and learning style. The correlation is not significant with the multiple intelligence and learning style.

scholarly journals PROFIL BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA SMP KELAS VIII DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR

KadikmA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Egha Fitriyah Ningsih
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Test Methods ◽  
School Students ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Interview Methods

The purpose of this study was to describe the creative thinking profile of grade VIII junior high school students in terms of learning styles in solving quadrilateral problems. This research is a descriptive study using a qualitative approach. The subjects of this research were students VIII A at SMPN 1 Genteng, namely two students from each different type of learning style. Collecting data using questionnaires, test methods, and interview methods. Students' creative thinking is categorized into four indicators, namely fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. The results showed that students in visual learning styles could fulfill all indicators of creative thinking, namely fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. Auditory learning style students can fulfill three indicators of creative thinking, namely fluency, originality, and elaboration.

scholarly journals PROSES PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA SMA BERDASARKAN KECERDASAN MAJEMUK

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-144
Author(s):  
Suhartini Sumadi ◽  
Teguh Yuliandri Putra ◽  
Heny Sri Astutik
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Multiple Intelligences ◽  
Multiple Intelligence ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
School Students ◽  
Science Olympiad ◽  
High School Math ◽  
Problem Solving Process

This study aims to analyze the mathematics problem-solving process of high school students based on multiple intelligences. In research, multiple intelligence is divided into dominant linguistic intelligence, interpersonal and kinesthetic intelligence, dominant musical intelligence, logical-mathematical and naturalistic, existential, intrapersonal, and visual dominant intelligence. The type of research used in this research is descriptive exploratory, and the approach used is qualitative and quantitative approaches. Determination of research subjects was carried out using purposive sampling based on multiple intelligences, to obtain 3 high school students of class X as research subjects. The research instrument used was a multiple intelligence test and two problem-solving tests adopted from the American High School Math Exam (AHSME) Problems and the Provincial High School Mathematics National Science Olympiad questions. The data obtained were analyzed, utilizing data reduction. The research results show that students with multiple different intelligence bits have different ways of solving them, but there are also similarities in solving problems.

scholarly journals Investigating Middle School Students Generalization of Number Pattern Based on Learning Style

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 2624-2632
Author(s):  
Andi Mulawakkan Firdaus, Dwi Juniati, Pradnyo Wijayanti
Keyword(s):  
Middle School ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Middle School Students ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
School Students ◽  
Pattern Generalization ◽  
Number Pattern ◽  
Alternative Solutions

Pattern generalization is an important aspect of mathematics contained in every topic in teaching. This study aims to investigate middle school students’ generalization of number patterns based on learning style. Descriptive qualitative, portraying or describing the events that are the center of attention (problem-solving abilities, student learning styles) qualitatively.This study explored 4 participants (12 to 13 years old) with their constructed number pattern they had generalized during individual task-based interviews. Questions that include indicators of the problem solving process in terms of student learning styles, and interviews. The data analysis used was namely data reduction, data presentation, drawing conclusions. We found that students who are converger, diverger, accommodator, and assimilator understands the problem by knowing what is known and asked and explains the problem with their own sentences. The converger and assimilator students look back without checking the counts involved, the diverger students do not see other alternative solutions and do not check the counts involved, accommodator students consider that the solutions obtained are logical, ask themselves whether the question has been answered, check the counts that are done, reread the question, and use other alternative solutions. The implication of this study indicated that students of the type of converger, diverger, accommodator, and assimilator are able to solve problems through the stages of implementing plans by interpreting problems in mathematical form, implementing strategies during the process and counting takes place. Based on several studies on pattern generalization, there have not been researchers who have revealed the number pattern generalization of high school students based on learning styles.

scholarly journals Students' Mathematical Connection Skills Reviewed From Learning Styles

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ujang Suprianto ◽  
Heni Pujiastuti
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematical Connections ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mathematical Connection ◽  
Student Learning Styles

The purpose of this study is to determine the distribution of student learning styles, to determine the average mathematical communication skills that have Auditory, Visual, and Kinestatic learning styles. and to find out if there are significant differences in the ability of mathematical connections between students who have auditory, visual, and kinesthetic learning styles. This research was conducted at SMAN 17 Pandeglang in class XII MIPA. The instrument used was in the form of a learning style questionnaire and a test of mathematical connection abilities. This type of research is a comparative study with a quantitative approach. Based on the results of data processing, that the distribution of student learning styles is included in the Auditory learning style of 34% of students, Visual 46% of students, and Kinesthetic 19% of students. By using a scale of 0-50, the average mathematical connection ability of students is 29.58, whereas when viewed from each distribution of learning styles, the average mathematical ability of auditory students is 24.89, visual students 28.33, and kinestatic students 34,40. Based on the results of the analysis with the ANOVA test and t test (Dunnet) that there is a significant difference in the ability of students' mathematical connections between auditory, visual and kinesthetic learning styles with a significant level of ? = 0.05, and the results of the value of Fcount &gt; Ftable = 3.62 &gt; 3,42, where the kinesthetic learning style has higher mathematical connection ability than auditory and visual learning styles.

scholarly journals The Effect of Value Clarification Technique Learning Models and Learning Styles on the Achievement Learning Outcomes of Class VIII MTs Al-Hasanah Tanjung Leidong, Labura District

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1371-1377
Author(s):  
Siti Halimah ◽  
Zulfahmi Lubis ◽  
Saidatun Nisa Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Class Viii

The purpose of this study was to determine: (1) the influence of the value clarification technique (VCT) learning model on student learning result. (2) Knowing the influence of learning styles on student learning result. (3) Knowing the interaction between learning models and learning styles on student learning result.   The population of this study were students of class VIII MTs Al-Hasanah Tanjung Leidong Labuhan Batu Utara consisting of three classes. The sample chosen for the class with the VCT learning model was class VIII-3 with 30 students, while students who were taught using the expository model were 32 students. The cluster random sampling technique is influenced by analysis of variance at a significant level (α = 0.05) followed by Scheffe. The results of this study are: (1) the average value of students taught with the VCT learning model (= 33.6) is higher than students taught with the expository learning model (= 24.68) with Fcount 0.0023 < Ftable 3,988. (2) The average value of learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak with visual learning styles (= 27.5), auditory (= 29.56) and kinesthetic (= 28.26) with Fcount = 0.068 < Ftable = 3,988. (3) There is an interaction between learning models and learning styles on students' learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak with Fcount 28.96 < Ftable 3,988. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that students with visual and auditory characteristics, the appropriate learning model is the VCT, while students with the kinesthetic learning style are expository. The implication is that teachers must be trained in how to understand student learning styles. Thus it is suggested that in planning the learning process the characteristics of students must be considered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document