Going by ideological debates concerning (un)justifiable state intervention,
protection of individual liberty, and the question of state's role, this
article analyses Malthus's theory on population. It states a thesis that
theory on population leads Malthus toward the idea of a minimal state and
represents a basis for criticism of an interventionist state and its
paternalistic role. The article consists of an introduction, four sections
and a conclusion. The introduction cites goals of the work and gives basic
notes on Malthus's theory on population and its socio-historical context.
Special consideration is paid on reasons that lead to desertion of his ideas
with a special focus on changes within liberal ideology, that lead to
dissociation from classical liberalism and a merging of liberalism with
socialism. The first part examines basic principles of Malthus's theory on
population - primarily the idea that the population multiply faster than the
food supply, and that population, when unchecked, increases in geometrical
ratio, while subsistence increases only in arithmetical ratio. Afterwards,
this Malthus's idea is linked to the status of the poor, and is concluded
that the state intervention is useless, being that the troubles this part of
the population faces are a consequence of their own actions. Therefore, the
role of the state should not be care for the poor. In the second part
positive and preventive checks to population are examined. Preventive checks
are further analyzed because Malthus gives them more importance. The third,
central part, is dedicated to Malthus's criticism of the Poor Laws and,
within it, his opposition to the state's intervention is further analyzed.
According to Malthus, laws that are passed in order to improve the status of
the poor have an opposite effect. Even though their aim is to decrease
poverty, they increase it. Their tendency is to lead to an increase in
population, without the simultaneous increase in food resources that are
needed to satisfy the needs of that number of people. The poor, when given an
increase in wages, tend to marry more and form families with a larger number
of children that they can't support themselves. In that way, they become more
dependent on the state, and this leads to an increase in poverty. The fourth
part analyzes the misgivings of Malthus's theory, especially its negligence
of technological advancement. And it is because of this omission that Malthus
couldn't come to a different theory concerning population growth, rather than
the one that he had formed. Finally, after all the important elements of
Malthus's theory on population are analyzed, the importance of his thought
and a theory of minimal state are examined. Stated and defended is the stance
that the theory of minimal state is not value-neutral, and that the only
minimal state that can exist is a liberal minimal state, and therefore Thomas
Robert Malthus belongs to that tradition within the liberal thought.