scholarly journals Device associated and surgical site infections, quality indicators in a tertiary care hospital: A 5 year study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-146
Author(s):  
Bilolikar AK ◽  
Banerjee J ◽  
Thomas KM
Keyword(s):  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Bench Mark ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Statistical Tool ◽  
Hospital Infection Control ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Purpose: In the present study, an attempt is made to understand the pattern of HAIs (Healthcare Associated Infections) [device associated infections such as Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI), Ventilator Associated Event (VAE), Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) & Surgical Site Infection (SSI) by analyzing statistical tool of quality indicators] and to establish a bench mark for HAIs in a single hospital for a period of 5 years. Methods: The Microbiologist & ICN’s conduct rounds in ICU’s & wards and collect data for active surveillance. The details of culture positive samples are collected by Microbiologist from the laboratory for passive surveillance. The surveillance forms (active & passive) capture details of individual patients. The data collection forms are prepared and updated as per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) guidelines. The data is analyzed and presented in the meeting of Hospital Infection Control Committee meeting & discussed with clinicians. Results: The cumulative (5 years) CAUTI rate is 0.45, VAE is 2.42, CLABSI is 1.35 & SSI is 0.21. HAI rates were highest for VAE (2.42/1000 ventilator days), the next was CLABSI (1.35/1000 central line days), followed by CAUTI (0.45/1000 urinary catheter days). SSI rate was 0.21/ 100 surgeries. Conclusions: Before the study was started, the benchmark were 2 for CAUTI, 5.5 for VAE, 3 for CLABSI and 2 for SSI. We could able to reduce the baseline benchmark and established our new benchmark as 1 for CAUTI, 3 for VAE, 2 for CLABSI and 1 for SSI that can be used in developing HAI prevention policies by the institution.

Does the Centers for Disease Control’s NNIS System Risk Index Stratify Patients Undergoing Cardiothoracic Operations by Their Risk of Surgical-Site Infection?

2000 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Claude Roy ◽  
Loreen A. Herwaldt ◽  
Richard Embrey ◽  
Kristen Kuhns ◽  
Richard P. Wenzel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Index ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Index Score ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
University Of Iowa ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
System Risk ◽  
The University ◽  
Risk Index Score

AbstractBackground:In 1991, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention devised the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) System risk index to stratify populations of surgical patients by the risk of acquiring surgical-site infections (SSIs).Objective:To determine whether the NNIS risk index adequately stratifies a population of cardiothoracic surgery patients by the risk of developing SSI.Design:Casecontrol study.Setting:The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, a 900-bed, midwestern, tertiary-care hospital.Patients:201 patients with SSIs identified by prospective infection control surveillance and 398 controls matched by age, gender, type of procedure, and date of procedure. All patients underwent cardiothoracic operative procedures between November 1990 and January 1994.Results:The SSI rate was 7.8%. Seventy-four percent of cases and 80% of controls had a NNIS risk index score of 1; 24% of cases and 16% of controls had a score of 2 (P=.05). Patients with a NNIS risk score ≥2 were 1.8 times more likely to develop an SSI than those with a NNIS score <2 (odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.94,P=.01). The duration of the procedure was the only component of the index that stratified the population by risk of SSI.Conclusions:The risk of SSI after cardiothoracic operations increases as the NNIS risk index score increases. However, this index only dichotomized the patient population on the basis of the procedure duration. More research is needed to develop a risk index that adequately stratifies the risk of SSI after cardiothoracic operations.

Impact of modified CDC/NHSN surveillance definition on the incidence of CAUTI: a study from an Indian tertiary care hospital

2020 ◽  
pp. 175717742098204
Author(s):  
Bijayini Behera ◽  
Jayanti Jena ◽  
Ashoka Mahapatra ◽  
Jyoti Biswala
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Candida Spp ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are one of the most common infections encountered in healthcare settings. Candida spp. were excluded as the causative agents of CAUTIs as per Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions in 2015. Aim: To determine the impact of the 2015 definition change on the CAUTI rate of patients admitted to medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs) of a tertiary care and teaching hospital in India. Method: CAUTI rates were compared in both the ICUs over a period of two years with inclusion and exclusion of Candida spp. Results: Out of the total 116 CAUTI episodes during the study period, a mean of 9.08 CAUTIs per 1000 catheter days were observed in both the ICUs when Candida spp. were included, but the mean CAUTI rate was reduced to 4.78/1000 catheter days when Candida spp. were excluded. Discussion/Conclusion: The mean CAUTI rate decreased by 46.03% solely by excluding Candida spp. This significant reduction in CAUTI rates may be applicable to institutions having high rates of candiduria in catheterised patients, but may not be applicable in centres where the incidence of candiduria is already low. Disregarding Candida as a causative agent of CAUTI did not impact rates of central line-associated bloodstream infections during the study period.

Comparison of Hospitalwide Surveillance and Targeted Intensive Care Unit Surveillance of Healthcare-Associated Infections

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1361-1366 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Weber ◽  
Emily E. Sickbert-Bennett ◽  
Vickie Brown ◽  
William A. Rutala
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surveillance Data ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Surgical Services ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Step Down ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Objectives.To assess the surveillance coverage obtained with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-recommended surveillance of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), which is focused on intensive care units (ICUs) and emphasizes device-related infections (ie, those associated with central venous catheters, ventilators, and/or urinary catheters), compared with the surveillance coverage achieved by comprehensive hospitalwide surveillance. In addition, we assessed whether the infection rates in step-down units more resemble those in wards or ICUs.Methods.Review of prospectively obtained, comprehensive hospitalwide surveillance data from 2004 through 2005 for an acute care tertiary care hospital with approximately 700 beds. Surveillance data was obtained by trained infection control professionals using standard CDC criteria for HAIs.Results.CDC-recommended ICU surveillance for catheter-related bloodstream infection (BSI) and ventilator-associated pneumonia would have detected only 87 (21.4%) of 407 catheter-related BSIs and only 66 (37.9%) of 174 respiratory tract infections that occurred in the medical and surgical services. Only 31 (34.8%) of 89 infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and 7 (31.8%) of 22 infections caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus occurred in our adult ICUs.Conclusions.Rates of HAIs were highest in the ICUs, intermediate in step-down units, and lowest in the wards. The rates of infections in the step-down units were more similar to those in the wards than to those in the ICUs. To prevent HAIs, more comprehensive surveillance may be indicated.

scholarly journals Phenotypic characterization and susceptibility of gram negative bacteria from surgical site infections in a tertiary care hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 1371
Author(s):  
Akhilesh P. S. Tomar ◽  
Anjali Kushwah
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Phenotypic Characterization ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Bacterial Isolates ◽  
Case Definitions ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Control And Prevention

Background: Gram negative bacteria are the common isolates among the cases of Surgical Site Infections (SSI). Resistant and specially Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) Gram negative isolates are a serious challenge for the treatment to clinicians. Present study was undertaken for phenotypic characterization and susceptibility pattern of Gram negative bacterial isolates from cases of surgical site infections in a tertiary care institute.Methods: This descriptive cross sectional hospital based study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital over a period of one and half year from January 2012 to June 2013. Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) SSI case definitions were used to label a case as SSI. Only culture proven cases, out of clinically suspected was included in the study for evaluation.Results: During the study period a total of 5949 patients were operated and screened for SSI in the wards under surveillance. Out of which 556 were clinically suspected as a case of SSI. With 408 culture proven cases of SSI the rate of SSI in present study was (6.86%). Rates of SSI were more in dirty (22.54%) and contaminated (13.78%) type of wounds. Among Gram negative bacterial isolates (n=343) from SSI, E. coli (45.18%) was the commonest followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16.03%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.42%). Unpleasant trend in antimicrobial resistance observed during study is a serious concern.Conclusions: The data presented in this study clearly indicate the continuous need of surveillance of SSI. This will clearly help health care personnel in curtailing down the incidences of SSI.

scholarly journals 775. Risk Factors for Healthcare Associated Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) to Identify Novel Infection Prevention Areas - A Case-Control Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S484-S485
Author(s):  
Aung Myat Oo ◽  
Pin Hong Jin ◽  
Edwin Philip ◽  
Molly Kue Bien How ◽  
May Kyawt Aung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Control Study

Abstract Background The International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium surveillance reported Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rate of 4.1 per 1000 central-line days in 703 ICUs in 50 countries. Methods At the Singapore General Hospital (SGH) a 1,700-bed tertiary care hospital, we conducted a retrospective matched case control study over a 3-year period from 2018 to 2020, to identify risk-factors associated with the development of healthcare associated CLABSI in adult inpatients. Cases and controls were patients ≥18 years of age with central lines in situ for at least 48hrs from date of admission. Case definition was based on National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) framework to diagnose Bloodstream Infection (BSI) and CLABSI events. Controls had to be admitted within 30 days of the date of admission of the case patients and should not have developed CLABSI. Cases were matched to controls on a 1:2 ratio. Results 127 cases and 252 controls were included in the analysis. Cases and controls did not differ in age, gender, BMI, presence of diabetes mellitus or presently enforced infection prevention measures (e.g. Central line bundle care). More cases were receiving chemotherapy (10.2% versus 0.8%, p&lt; 0.001), were on TPN (17.3% versus 8.3%, p=0.015) and had been admitted to critical care (73.2% versus 60.7%, p=0.017). Cases were also more likely to have peripherally inserted central venous catheters (37% versus 25%, p=0.017) and have the insertion done in the radiology department under radiological guidance (69.3% versus 55.2%, p=0.011). The median length of stay (LOS) was 44 days (IQR: 0 – 86.8) for cases and 19 days (IQR: 0 - 66.6) for controls (p&lt; 0.001). Inpatient mortality was 25.2% (n=32) for cases 13.9% (n=35) for controls (p-value &lt; 0.010). In multivariate analysis, receiving chemotherapy (OR 11.1, 95%CI: 2.2 – 54.3, p=0.003), being admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) (OR 2.0, 95%CI: 1.1 – 3.8, p=0.019), having a Peripherally Inserted Central Cather (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.4, p=0.045), and being colonized with MRSA (OR 1.9, 95%CI: 1.2 – 3.2, p=0.013) were associated with healthcare associated CLABSI. Conclusion Novel approaches are required to reduce risk of healthcare associated CLABSI, focusing on interventions for chemotherapy administration, care within ICUs and PICC lines. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Healthcare associated infections caused by non-fermenting Gram negative rods (NFGNR): six years of experience of a tertiary hospital

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 06-12
Author(s):  
Zahidul Hasan ◽  
Md. Kamrul Islam ◽  
Arifa Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Blood Stream Infection ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Blood Stream ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Acinetobacter Spp ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Recently non-fermenting Gram negative rods (NFGNR) are playing an important role in healthcare associated infections. This observational study in a tertiary care hospital of Dhaka city conducted during 01August 2007 to 30 June 2013 found that 34.8% isolated organisms from patients with healthcare associated infections were NFGNR. Majority (74.3 %) of these infections were occurring inside critical care areas. Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter together constituted 79.6% of the total NFGNR whereas Burkholderia cephacia complex (15.4%), Stenotrophomonas (4.3%) and Chryseobacterium species (0.7%) combined constituted remaining 20.4%. Out of total NFGNRs, Pseudomonas was responsible for highest number of catheter associated urinary tract infections (55.6%), ventilator associated pneumonia (46.3%), respiratory tract infection (65.8%) and surgical site infection (70.6%). Blood stream infection was predominantly caused by Burkholderia cephacia complex (33.5%) and Acinetobacter spp. (39.5%). Other than colistin most of the organisms were resistant to antibiotics commonly recommended for NFGNR.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjmm.v7i2.19326 Bangladesh J Med Microbiol 2013; 07(02): 6-12

scholarly journals Providing safe care for patients in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era: A case series evaluating risk for hospital-associated COVID-19

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Elizabeth B. Habermann ◽  
Aaron J. Tande ◽  
Benjamin D. Pollock ◽  
Matthew R. Neville ◽  
Henry H. Ting ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Strict Adherence ◽  
Large Tertiary Care ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Serology Testing ◽  
Pcr Test

Abstract Objective: We evaluated the risk of patients contracting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during their hospital stay to inform the safety of hospitalization for a non–COVID-19 indication during this pandemic. Methods: A case series of adult patients hospitalized for 2 or more nights from May 15 to June 15, 2020 at large tertiary-care hospital in the midwestern United States was reviewed. All patients were screened at admission with the severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. Selected adult patients were also tested by IgG serology. After dismissal, patients with negative serology and PCR at admission were asked to undergo repeat serologic testing at 14–21 days after discharge. The primary outcome was healthcare-associated COVID-19 defined as a new positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test on or after day 4 of hospital stay or within 7 days of hospital dismissal, or seroconversion in patients previously established as seronegative. Results: Of the 2,068 eligible adult patients, 1,778 (86.0%) completed admission PCR testing, while 1,339 (64.7%) also completed admission serology testing. Of the 1,310 (97.8%) who were both PCR and seronegative, 445 (34.0%) repeated postdischarge serology testing. No healthcare-associated COVID-19 cases were detected during the study period. Of 1,310 eligible PCR and seronegative adults, no patients tested PCR positive during hospital admission (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0%–0.3%). Of the 445 (34.0%) who completed postdischarge serology testing, no patients seroconverted (0.0%; 95% CI, 0.0%–0.9%). Conclusion: We found low likelihood of hospital-associated COVID-19 with strict adherence to universal masking, physical distancing, and hand hygiene along with limited visitors and screening of admissions with PCR.

scholarly journals Evaluation of HiCrome KPC Agar for the Screening of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Colonization in the ICU Setting of a Tertiary Care Hospital

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashoka Mahapatra ◽  
K Nikitha ◽  
Sutapa Rath ◽  
Bijayini Behera ◽  
Kavita Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae Carbapenemase ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Rectal Swabs ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Indian Setting ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background Spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is a significant concern in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Approaches to routine screening for CRE colonization in all ICU patients vary depending on institutional epidemiology and resources. The present study was aimed to evaluate the performance of HiCrome Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) agar for the detection of CRE colonization in ICU settings taking the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended method as reference. Methods Two-hundred and eighty rectal swabs (duplicate) from 140 patients were subjected to CRE detection in HiCrome KPC agar and MacConkey agar (CDC criteria). Results Using CDC method, total 41 CRE isolates were recovered comprising of 29 E scherichia coli, 11 Klebsiella, and 1 Enterobacter spp. On the other hand, 49 isolates of CRE recovered from 140 rectal swabs using HiCrome KPC agar, out of which 33 were E. coli, 15 Klebsiella, and 1 Enterobacter sp. Statistical Analysis Sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive predictive values of CRE screening by HiCrome KPC agar were found to be 100% (91.4–100), 91.9% (84.8–95.8), 83.6% (70.9–91.4), and 100% (95.9–100), respectively, taking the CDC recommended method as reference. Conclusion HiCrome KPC agar has high sensitivity in screening CRE colonization. Further studies are needed to establish its applicability for detecting the predominant circulating carbapenemases in the Indian setting.

scholarly journals Hospital Preparedness for a Community Measles Outbreak in Ribeirao Preto, Brazil

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s253-s253
Author(s):  
Silvia Fonseca ◽  
Ivana Lucca ◽  
Franceliana Sgobi ◽  
Andre Fioravante ◽  
Alexandre Celia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Maculopapular Rash ◽  
Sao Paulo ◽  
Suspected Case ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
São Paulo ◽  
Measles Outbreak ◽  
Hospital Infection Control ◽  
Hospital Preparedness ◽  
Measles Vaccination

Background: Measles was considered eradicated in Brazil in 2016, but the virus reemerged in the country in 2018, causing large outbreaks. Ribeirao Preto has been measles free since 1997, but the outbreak in Sao Paulo City, 180 miles away in June 2019, alerted us to the possibility of measles patients coming to our emergency room (ER). The preparedness challenge was considerable: most healthcare workers (HCWs) had never seen a measles case before, and confirmatory measles laboratory tests were not readily available to us. Objective: To describe the hospital preparedness for the coming community measles outbreak. Methods: Hospital So Francisco is a 170-bed, general, tertiary-care hospital with 10,000 ER visits monthly. Measles preparedness consisted of measles training classes for HCWs, and flow charts with pictures and measles information in every ER office, also sent to HCW cell phones. We also designated areas for suspected measles patients for prompt medical evaluation; and we implemented mass measles vaccination for all hospital HCWs regardless of vaccination status, excluding pregnant or immunosuppressed HCWs. We considered a measles suspected case any person with fever, 1 of 3 symptoms (cough, coryza or conjunctivitis), and a generalized maculopapular rash with head-to-toe distribution. All contacts for suspected cases were recommended to obtain a measles vaccination. Detection of viral RNA in a biological sample and or a positive IgM result in serum was used to confirm a clinically suspected case. The study period spanned July 2019 to September 2019. Results: Measles training occurred for 3 weeks in July–August and reached 200 HCWs. The measles vaccination was offered July 23 to August 15; 1,362 HCWs were already vaccinated (93% of target population). In total, 35 clinical suspected measles cases were seen in the ER, and 3 of these were HCWs who had received the measles vaccine in their incubation period. Also, 3 patients were admitted to the hospital and 1 to the intensive care unit; there were no deaths. Overall, 8 patients had laboratory-confirmed measles, and 1,343 community contacts of these patients were vaccinated. We did not detect measles transmission to inpatients or to other HCWs after mass vaccination began. In the same period, Sao Paulo state had >7,000 laboratory-confirmed measles cases and 12 deaths. Conclusions: Community measles outbreaks are a challenge for the hospital infection control team, and they can potentially disrupt the daily activities in the hospital. We were able to adequately prepare for the largest state outbreak in 20 years without secondary cases or deaths.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document