scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Usaha Terhadap Pencabutan Izin Reklamasi oleh Pemerintah Daerah

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1767
Author(s):  
Inigo Putera Bagus Juwono
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Form ◽  
Civil Court ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
Good Government ◽  
The Government

AbstractAvailability lands in Indonesia doesn’t get along with growth citizen in Indonesia. The government is giving a solution to the building of the reclamation, but under the construction of the reclamation always inflict variety of problems. Permission cancellation for reclamation is action legal by government in order to annulment permission for its reclamation, government should pay attention in aspect of: authority, procedure and substantion. Besides, annulment permission reclamation by government based on legislation and principle general a good government. A legal form of legal protection by receiving authorization of reclamation In this case, the businessman or developers do administrative efforts and filing suit to civil court of justice. If there are parties that are affected with the verdict, can file an appeal to civil court of justice, it can be even comitted cassation law to supreme court of Indonesia.Keywords: Reclamation; Permission; Cancellation.AbstrakKetersediaan lahan di Indonesia tidak sejalan dengan pertumbuhan penduduk yang semakin meningkat. Pemerintah memberikan solusi dengan pembangunan pulau reklamasi, akan tetapi dalam pembangunan pulau reklamasi tersebut kerap kali menimbulkan berbagai macam permasalahan. Pencabutan izin pulau reklamasi merupakan salah bentuk tindakan hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh pemerintah. Dalam pencabutan izin reklamasi tersebut, pemerintah hendaknya memperhatikan keabsahan pemerintah dalam aspek wewenang, aspek prosedur dan aspek substansi. Selain itu, pencabutan izin reklamasi oleh pemerintah wajib berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan dan Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik. Bentuk perlindungan hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh penerima izin reklamasi dalam hal ini pelaku usaha ataupun pengembang dengan melakukan upaya administratif dan mengajukan gugatan ke Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Apabila ada pihak yang merasa dirugikan dengan putusan tersebut, dapat mengajukan banding ke Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara, bahkan dapat dilakukan upaya hukum kasasi kepada Mahkamah Agung. Kata Kunci: Reklamasi; Izin; Pencabutan.

scholarly journals DIMENSION OF WHISTLEBLOWING SYSTEM: URGENSITY OF LEGISLATION STRENGTHENING

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 371
Author(s):  
Bobby Briando ◽  
Sri Kuncoro Bawono ◽  
Tony Mirwanto
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
Victim Protection ◽  
The Government

Eradication of corruption in Indonesia is still the main agenda of the government in building good governance. One method to expose corruption is to use a whistleblower role that can help find the criminal mode of corruption. Whistleblower mechanism is divided into three main dimensions: Human, Structure and Process. But in practice whistleblower reporters in corruption cases in Indonesia have not received maximum legal protection. In Indonesia the normative regulation governing pursuant to Law No.13 of 2006 concerning Witness and Victim Protection as well as Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No.4 Year 2011 on Treatment of Criminal Reporting and Witness of Actors Cooperation The results show that from three dimensions of whistleblower system still does not yet have binding legislation. Whistleblower reporters only accept lightening relief. Specific whistleblower legislation is urgent. In legislation, at least, it should be in accordance with Whistleblower's protection.

Leading Decisions of the Supreme Court of Israel and Extracts of the Judgment

1998 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-178
Author(s):  
Omi Morgenstern Leissner
Keyword(s):  
Affirmative Action ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
The State ◽  
Oil Refinery ◽  
Single Woman ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
The Government

Israel Women's Network v. The Government of Israel (1994) 48(v) P.D. 501The petitioner, the Israel Women's Network, petitioned the Supreme Court of Justice against the appointment of a new member to the Ports and Railways Council and against the appointment of two new directors on behalf of the State to the board of directors of the State-controlled Oil Refinery. All three of the new appointees were men, such that neither of the two councils included a single woman in their composition. The petitioner disputed the constitutionality of these appointments arguing that in the particular circumstances and in line with sec. 18A of the Government Companies Law, the appointees ought to have been women. By a majority decision the Supreme Court held that the respondent did not fulfill the duty of affirmative action required by sec. 18A of the Law, and that the cancellation of the appointments made was justified.

scholarly journals El Estado como garante de los derechos de los pueblos originarios en Argentina / The argentinian State as guarantor of aboriginal’s rights

2019 ◽  
pp. 164-171
Author(s):  
María Florencia Blanco Pighi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Right To Health ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
Derechos Humanos ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
Human Rights Treaties ◽  
International Human ◽  
The Right

Los derechos humanos de los pueblos originarios, entre ellos, el derecho a la salud, son reconocidos por la Constitución Argentina, por tratados internacionales ratificados por nuestro país, por la normativa interna y por las constituciones provinciales. La Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación, mediante el fallo en análisis, establece que la protección de estos derechos debe asegurarse por la vía más idónea, y que, al existir una acción de amparo en curso, la medida cautelar de interposición más reciente, debe ser rechazada.   The Argentinian Constitution, the international human rights treaties ratified by Argentina, the argentine internal regulations and the constitution of several provinces, recognize the aboriginal´s human rights, including the right to health. In the judgment in analysis, the Argentinian Supreme Court of Justice, states that the protection of those rights needs to be accomplish by the most suitable way. When a legal protection action is in curse, the most recently filed action must be rejected.

“Contract Clause” Litigation in Colombia; A Comparative Study in Judicial Review

1948 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 1103-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. C. Grant
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

The 1910 amendments to the Colombian constitution provided:Art. 40. In every case of incompatibility between the Constitution and the law the constitutional provisions shall be applied by preference.Art. 41. To the Supreme Court of Justice is confided the guardianship of the integrity of the Constitution. Consequently, in addition to the powers conferred upon it by this Constitution and the statutes, it shall have the following: To decide definitively as to the enforceability of bills that have been vetoed as unconstitutional by the Government, or as to all laws and decrees accused before it by any citizen as unconstitutional, first hearing the Attorney-General of the Nation.The first function, “to decide definitively as to the enforceability of bills that have been vetoed as unconstitutional,” was merely a restatement of the plan copied from Ecuador in 1886 and still in use, although it has proved a major disappointment.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN DEMOSI PADA PEKERJA PT. MEGAH MITRA SUKSES (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 146/PDT.SUS-PHI/2016/PN.JKT.PST JO PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 257K/PDT.SUS-PHI/2017)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 744
Author(s):  
Kesuma Melati ◽  
Stanislaus Atalim
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Not Given ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
A Company

Demotion occurs in a company mainly because of its negative influence on the morale of the workers concerned and can affect the achievement and morale of other workers in the company. Decline in the position of authority, facilities, status and even salary is a punishment for workers. Demosi is not given its arrangement in Law number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower and other laws and regulations related to employment. Thus, this demotion arrangement can be regulated individually in work agreements, company regulations or collective labor agreements.The company does have the right to move workers in other parts but may not violate Human Rights and violate the provisions of Article 32 paragraph 2 of the Manpower Act which stipulates that placing someone who is not because of his expertise is against the law. Workforce placement must also pay attention to expertise, dignity and human rights and legal protection. The problem examined is how legal protection for workers due to demotion policy at PT. Magnificent Success Partner? And Is the legal consideration of the judge in the decision Number 146/Pdt.Sus-PHI/ 2016/PN.JKT.PST Jo Decision of the Supreme Court Number 257K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2017 in accordance with the Manpower Act?Demotion will continue to occur if there are no strict rules regarding demotion, the government should make a regulation in the Labor Law regarding demotion, so that the rules regarding demotion become clear and do not harm the workers.

scholarly journals Settlements in the Supreme Court of Israel

AJIL Unbound ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 41-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Kretzmer
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
International Humanitarian Law ◽  
Humanitarian Law ◽  
High Court ◽  
Palestinian Territories ◽  
National Courts ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government

One of the unique features of Israel's legal, military, and political control over the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) has been the review by the Supreme Court of Israel of the actions and decisions of the authorities in those territories. Sitting as a High Court of Justice that has the competence to review the actions of all persons exercising public functions under law, the Court has entertained thousands of petitions relating to the legality of such varied actions as house demolitions, deportations, land requisition, entry permits, and establishment of settlements. There can be little doubt that the very existence of judicial review has had a restraining effect on the authorities. While the Court has not ruled against the government that often, and has provided legitimization for acts of dubious legality, such as punitive house demolitions and deportations, it has handed down some important rulings on questions of principle. Furthermore, in the shadow of the Court, many petitions have been settled without a court ruling, allowing for a full or partial remedy for the Palestinian petitioner.

HUKUM DAN TEKLOGI SUATU KAJIAN TEORITIS TERHADAP PENOMENA LAYANAN TRANSFORTASI ONLINE

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Aria Dimas Harapan
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Theoretical Study ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Creative Economy ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Times

ABSTRACTThe essence of this study describes the theoretical study of the phenomenon transfortation services online. Advances in technology have changed the habits of the people to use online transfortation In fact despite legal protection in the service based services transfortation technological sophistication has not been formed and it became warm conversation among jurists. This study uses normative juridical research. This study found that the first, the Government must accommodate transfotation online phenomenon in the form of rules that provide legal certainty; second, transfortation online as part of the demands of the times based on technology; third, transfortation online as part of the creative economy for economic growth . 

Interview with Omar Shakir

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 127-137
Author(s):  
Noura Erakat
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Committee Member ◽  
Editorial Committee ◽  
Rutgers University ◽  
Human Rights Advocacy ◽  
University Professor ◽  
The Government ◽  
Israeli Supreme Court

In late November 2019, the Israeli Supreme Court upheld the Ministry of Interior's order to deport Human Rights Watch (HRW) director for Israel and Palestine, Omar Shakir. The court based its decision on a 2017 amendment to Israel's 1952 Entry into Israel Law enabling the government to refuse entry to foreigners who allegedly advocate for the boycott of Israel. The same law was invoked to deny entry to U.S. congresswomen Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar in the summer of 2019. The campaign against Shakir began almost immediately after he was hired by HRW in 2016, and the court's decision marked the culmination of a multi-year battle against the deportation order. In this interview, JPS Editorial Committee member, Rutgers University professor, and author Noura Erakat discusses the details of his case with Shakir in an exchange that also examines the implications of the case for human rights advocacy, in general, and for Palestinians, in particular. The interview was edited for length and clarity.

DEKADENSI PEMILIHAN HAKIM AGUNG OLEH DPR RI

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-104
Author(s):  
Rustam Magun Pikahulan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Due Diligence ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Institutional Status ◽  
The Government

Abstract: The Plato's conception of the rule of law states that good governance is based on good law. The organization also spreads to the world of Supreme Court justices, the election caused a decadence to the institutional status of the House of Representatives as a people's representative in the government whose implementation was not in line with the decision of the Constitutional Court. Based on the decision of the Constitutional Court No.27/PUU-XI/2013 explains that the House of Representatives no longer has the authority to conduct due diligence and suitability (elect) to prospective Supreme Judges proposed by the Judicial Commission. The House of Representatives can only approve or disapprove candidates for Supreme Court Justices that have been submitted by the Judicial Commission. In addition, the proportion of proposed Supreme Court Justices from the judicial commission to the House of Representatives (DPR) has changed, whereas previously the Judicial Commission had to propose 3 (three) of each vacancy for the Justices, now it is only one of each vacant for Supreme Court Judges. by the Supreme Court. The House of Representatives no longer has the authority to conduct due diligence and suitability (elect) to prospective Supreme Judges proposed by the Judicial Commission. The House of Representatives can only "approve" or "disagree" the Supreme Judge candidates nominated by the Judicial Commission.

REGULATION URGENCY CONCERNING ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTION GUIDELINES IN SPACE ADMINISTRATION

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakhmat Bowo Suharto
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Welfare State ◽  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Spatial Development ◽  
Administrative Sanction ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Welfare State

The spatial development can be supported by sustainable development, efforts are needed to divert space through the imposition of sanctions on administration in the spatial field. In the context of a legal state, sanctions must be taken while ensuring their legality in order to provide legal protection for citizens. The problem is, the construction of administrative regulations in Law No. 26 of 2007 and PP No. 15 of 2010 contains several weaknesses so that it is not enough to provide clear arrangements for administrative officials who impose sanctions. For this reason, an administration is required which requires administrative officials to request administrative approval in the spatial planning sector. The success of the regulation requires that it is the foundation of the welfare state principle which demands the government to activate people's welfare. 15 of 2010, the main things that need to be regulated therein should include (1) the mechanism of imposing sanctions: (2) determination of the type and burden of sanctions; and (3) legal protection and supervision by the region.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document