scholarly journals STRATEGI ON RELEASING NON-PRODUCTIVE OF FOREST CONVERSION AREA FOR TORA PROGRAM IN RIAU PROVINCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Ignatius Adi Nugroho ◽  
Sambas Basuni ◽  
Gita Junaedi ◽  
Achmad Ponco Kusumah ◽  
Kurniawan Hardjasasmita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Development Process ◽  
Agrarian Reform ◽  
Forest Area ◽  
Poor People ◽  
Forest Conversion ◽  
Total Conversion ◽  
Reform Program ◽  
The Government ◽  
Releasing Process ◽  
Primary Forests

Development process needs lands as natural resources. Unfortunately, availability of land is relatively limited. Therefore, it needs releasing process of forestland to become non forestland. In the process of releasing the forestland, there are some policies which need stakeholders to consider so the minimum required forestland of 30% is fulfilled. Releasing forestland area is possible to undertake on non-productive forest conversion area which is also for the government agrarian reform programs which is called Nawacita. The objective of this research is tooffer answer about the indicative forestland which can be used for development needs, particularly for poor people who live near the forest. The results indicate that non-productive of conversion forest can provide land for development in Riau Province for about 205,847.86 hectares (93.01%) from the total conversion forest area based on agrarian reform program. Permanent forested land which needs to be maintained as forest area is 1,102.42 hectares, because most of the area are still primary forests. For the effectiveness of releasing conversion forest area, socialization programs to inform the community is needed.

scholarly journals Use of forest land for national-priority infrastructures in Nepal

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-64
Author(s):  
U. R. Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Forest Area ◽  
Forest Conversion ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Infrastructure Projects ◽  
Forest Land ◽  
National Priority ◽  
Equivalent Area ◽  
Strict Enforcement ◽  
The Government ◽  
Forest Lands

 Forest conversion has been identified as one of the several bottlenecks affecting upon the major infrastructure projects in Nepal, especially in the energy and transport sectors. Nepal’s policy requires at least 40% of its land cover under forest. This means if any forest land is converted to non-forest land, it must be compensated with an equivalent area, preferably in the similar ecotype in the nation. In addition, a specified number of trees must be planted for the number of trees felled in the project site, and the site must be managed and protected for five years by the developers. These provisions have led to growing resentment between the developers and the Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation (MFSC), leading to delay in providing forest lands for infrastructure projects. With a view to develop mechanisms for the government to rapidly provide forest land for nationally important infrastructure projects, the Government databases were examined to analyze the forests handed over to the developers for non-forestry uses. The data showed that a total of 14,028.4 ha of forest area were handed over to the developers for non-forestry uses until the end of 2015. On an average, 263.8 ha forest area was found to be handed over to the developers between the period of 2010–2013. However, there is a declining trend of forest handed over for non-forestry purposes in the recent years. The decline could be due to the strict enforcement of the legal provision which limits the conversion of forest areas to non-forest areas except in the case of the “national priority projects”. It has been recommended that the conversion of forest for infrastructure development should be examined with a holistic perspective by taking all the related components of forest conversion into consideration, from providing forest land for replacement planting. It is recommended that the Forest Product Development Board (FPDB), a parastatal organization under the MFSC, should be entrusted with the work of plantation related to forest conversion. The fund for this work should flow directly from the developers to the FPDB. The possibility of forming a land bank to facilitate the work of the FPDB is also recommended.Banko Janakari, Vol. 27, No. 1, Page: 60-64

scholarly journals Konflik Tata Ruang Kehutanan Dengan Tata Ruang Wilayah (Studi Kasus Penggunaan Kawasan Hutan Tidak Prosedural Untuk Perkebunan Sawit Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah)

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eko N Setiawan ◽  
Ahmad Maryudi ◽  
Ris H Purwanto ◽  
Gabriel Lele
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Oil Palm ◽  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Forest Area ◽  
Forest Conversion ◽  
Spatial Integration ◽  
Central Kalimantan ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
The Government ◽  
Spatial Plan

AbstractLaw No. 26 Year 2007 on Spatial Planning (UUPR) mandated that all levels of government administration, ranging from the national, provincial, district/ city are obligated to prepare Spatial Plan (RTR). Until 2012, Central Kalimantan is one of the provinces which have not completed its Spatial Plan; one of the reasons was the lack of spatial integration of forestry spatial planning and provincial spatial planning of Central Kalimantan.The absence of spatial integration of forestry and provincial spatial planning of Central Kalimantan has the implication in triggering conflicts of land use. Forest areas were converted into oil palm plantations without any official procedures. There are 282 units of oil palm companies, occupying 3.9 millions hectares of forest area, with non-procedural procedures to convert forest area into oil palm plantation.To resolve this problem, the Government has revised the regulation of forest conversion by issuing PP No. 60/2012, provides opportunities for oil palm plantations, which under the Law of Forestry located in forest area but based on RTRWP of Central Kalimantan lies on APL or cultivation area, given the opportunity to re-apply the permit/license.  IntisariUndang- Undang No. 26 Tahun 2007 tentang Penataan Ruang (UUPR) mengamanatkan bahwa semua tingkatan administrasi pemerintahan, mulai dari nasional, provinsi, kabupaten/kota diwajibkan menyusun Rencana Tata Ruang (RTR). Kalimantan Tengah sampai dengan tahun 2012 merupakan salah satu Provinsi yang belum menyelesaikan Tata Ruang, salah satu penyebabnya karena belum adanya padu serasi antara tata ruang kehutanan dengan tata ruang Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah.Implikasi dari tidak adanya padu serasi antara tata ruang kehutanan dengan tata ruang provinsi Kalimantan Tengah adalah terjadinya konflik dalam penggunaan ruang, dimana terjadi penggunaan kawasan hutan tidak prosedural untuk perkebunan sawit di dalam kawasan hutan di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah sebanyak 282 unit perusahaan sawit seluas 3,9 juta hektar.Upaya penyelesaian permasalahan penggunaan kawasan hutan untuk perkebunan sawit di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah diakukan dengan revisi kebijakan tentang alih fungsi hutan PP nomor 60 tahun 2012 yang memberikan kesempatan bagi perkebunan sawit yang berdasarkan Undang-Undang Kehutanan berada di dalam kawasan hutan namun berdasarkan RTRWP Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah berada di kawasan APL maupun budidaya, diberikan kesempatan untuk mengurus perijinannya.

Kebijakan Reforma Agraria di Indonesia (Kajian Komparatif Tiga Periode Pelaksanaan: Orde Lama Orde Baru, dan Orde Reformasi)

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rayyan Dimas Sutadi ◽  
Ahmad Nashih Luthfi ◽  
Dian Aries Mujiburrohman
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Agrarian Reform ◽  
Product Policy ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Old Order ◽  
Reform Program ◽  
Reform Period ◽  
The Government ◽  
General Explanation ◽  
Ownership Control

Abstract: One of the policy undertaken by the Government of Indonesia in take care of the rearrangement of ownership, control, utilization and the use of land is Agrarian Reform. The implementation of agrarian reform that has produced various kinds of legal products still raises figures of inequality in the rearrangement of ownership, control, utilization and the use of land, it’s make the implementation of agrarian reform program was like walking in place. Therefore the purpose of this study is to analyze agrarian reform policies in the three implementation periods in terms of the regulations that have been issued by comparison of each era of implementation of the four principles of land governence.The method in this research is use normative law research method, this research were reviewed from various aspects such as aspects of theor, philosophy, comparison, structure/composition, consistency, general explanation, and explanation in each articles. This approach is undertaken in order to understand the philosophy of the rule of law overtime, as well as to understand the changing and evolving of philosophy underlying the rule of law relating to the topic that was researched.The result of the research conduct that the legal product policy produced in three era of agrarian reform period in Indonesia the implementation of the Old Order era can be carried out well, because of the five main regulations and legislation produced can be used the four principles of land governence. The conclusion is the resulting law product policy can be used as a reference in the implementation of agrarian reform in Indonesia. Keyword: Agrarian Reform, Law Policy Product, Land Governence. Intisari: Salah satu kebijakan yang dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Indonesia dalam menangani penataan ulang kepemilikan, penguasaan, pemanfaatan, dan penggunaan tanah yaitu Reforma Agraria. Pelaksanaan reforma agraria yang sudah menghasilkan berbagai macam produk hukum kebijakan masih memunculkan angka ketimpangan struktur penguasaan, pemilikan, penggunaan, dan pemanfaatan tanah, seolah-olah pelaksanaan program reforma agraria seperti berjalan di tempat. Oleh karena itu tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menganalisa kebijakan reforma agraria pada tiga periode pelaksanaan yang ditinjau dari peraturan-peraturan yang telah dikeluarkan dengan perbandingan masing-masing era pelaksanaan terhadap empat prinsip kebijakan pengelolaan pertanahan.Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dalam penelitian ini dikaji dari berbagai aspek seperti aspek teori, filosofi, perbandingan, struktrur/komposisi, konsistensi, penjelasan umum, dan penjelasan pada tiap pasal. Pendekatan ini dilakukan dalam kerangka untuk memahami filosofi aturan hukum dari waktu ke waktu, serta memahami perubahan dan perkembangan filosofi yang melandasi aturan hukum tersebut yang berhubungan dengan topik yang diteliti. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan produk hukum yang dihasilkan dalam tiga era periode reforma agraria di Indonesia periode pelaksanaan pada era orde lama  reforma agraria dapat dijalankan dengan baik, karena dari kelima pokok peraturan dan perundangan yang dihasilkan memenuhi empat prinsip kebijakan pengelolaan pertanahan. Sehingga dapat dikatakan kebijakan produk hukum yang dihasilkan dapat dijadikan sebagai rujukan dalam pelaksanaan reforma agraria di Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Reforma Agraria, Produk Hukum Kebijakan, Tata Kelola Pertanahan.

scholarly journals Kendala Pelaksanaan Landreform di Indonesia: Analisa terhadap Kondisi dan Perkembangan Berbagai Faktor Prasyarat Pelaksanaan Reforma Agraria

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
NFN Syahyuti
Keyword(s):  
Land Reform ◽  
Agrarian Reform ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Complete Data ◽  
New Order ◽  
Land Area ◽  
Political Will ◽  
Reform Era ◽  
Reform Program ◽  
The Government

<strong>English</strong><br />Land reform program was once successful in Indonesia in 1960’s although it included only land area and limited number of receiving farmers. The New Order government never carried out land reform program explicitly, but it was substituted with programs of certification, transmigration, and Nucleus Estate Smallholders development. All of those programs aimed at enhancing people’s access to land ownership. The governments in the reform era improve some regulations related with agrarian reform but no real program of land reform. Theoretically, there are four imperative factors as prerequisites for land reform program, namely political will of the government, solid farmers’ organization, complete data, and sufficient budget. At present, all of those factors are still difficult to realize and, thus, land reform in Indonesia is hard to be implemented simultaneously. <br /><br /><br /><strong>Indonesian</strong><br />Program landreform pernah dicoba diimplementasikan di Indonesia pada era tahun 1960-an, meskipun hanya mencakup luasan tanah dan petani penerima dalam jumlah yang sangat terbatas. Kemudian, sepanjang pemerintahan Orde Baru, landreform tidak pernah lagi diprogramkan secara terbuka, namun diganti dengan program pensertifikatan, transmigrasi, dan pengembangan Perkebunan Inti Rakyat, yang pada hakekatnya bertujuan untuk memperbaiki akses masyarakat terhadap tanah. Sepanjang pemerintahan dalam era reformasi, telah dicapai beberapa perbaikan dalam hukum dan perundang-undangan keagrariaan, namun tetap belum dijumpai program nyata tentang landreform. Secara teoritis, ada empat faktor penting sebagai prasyarat pelaksanaan landreform, yaitu kesadaran dan kemauan dari elit politik, organisasi petani yang kuat, ketersediaan data yang lengkap, serta dukungan anggaran yang memadai. Saat ini, kondisi keempat faktor tersebut masih dalam kondisi lemah, sehingga dapat dikatakan implementasi landreform secara serentak dan menyeluruh di Indonesia masih sulit diwujudkan.

scholarly journals Peasant Empowerment Trough Quasi-Agrarian Reform Program, Evidence from Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-56
Author(s):  
Af Sigit Rochadi
Keyword(s):  
Agrarian Reform ◽  
Formal Property ◽  
Indonesian Government ◽  
Structural Problems ◽  
Reform Program ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government ◽  
Empowerment Program

This article introduces the concept of quasi agrarian reform and critique of the de Soto theory of formal property.  According to writer, agrarian reform, both redistribution and legalization of assets, must be run in Indonesia. The Indonesian government follows the de Soto theory by implementing the Farmers Empowerment Program. The objective of the quasi agrarian reform program is to encourage farmers to take credit in banks provided by the Government under the scheme Credit for the People (KUR).The importance of agrarian reform in Indonesia to empower farmers to solve various structural problems, such as poverty, unemployment and inequality. Implementation of an asset legalization program in this paper is called quasi agrarian reform, not in line with the original aspirations. Farmers prefer security in possession of land while the government wants it further that is the willingness of farmers to pledge their land in banks.

scholarly journals SUBJEK AGRARIA PADA LOKASI KONFLIK KAWASAN TRANSMIGRASI (STUDI KASUS: UNIT PEMUKIMAN TRANSMIGRASI ARONGO, KABUPATEN KONAWE SELATAN)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Aryuni Salpianja Jabar ◽  
Danial Danial ◽  
Albasri Albasri ◽  
Yoenita Djayadisastra ◽  
Wa Ode Lusianai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Agrarian Reform ◽  
Conflict Analysis ◽  
Depth Information ◽  
Reform Program ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Local Residents ◽  
The Government

The presence of an agrarian reform program in the current administration provides new hope for the management of more prosperous agricultural land, not least on transmigration lands. Especially in the determination of the Land of Agrarian Reform Objects (TORA) transmigration land received a share of 0.6 million hectares from 9 million hectares of the government's target. Unfortunately, until now there are still many images of transmigration lands that are far from expectations. This means that there are still many transmigration lands involved in conflicts both vertically and horizontally. This paper aims to analyze conflicts on transmigration lands located in UPT. Arongo, South Konawe Regency, Southeast Sulawesi Province. Conflict analysis is directed at mapping agrarian subjects involved in a conflict. Qualitative descriptive methods are used to obtain in-depth information related to the agrarian subject. The results showed conflict in the UPT transmigration land. Arongo consists of 3 agrarian subjects namely elements of government, private and community. The government element is represented by the local government, transmigration service and National Land Agency. Community elements consist of local residents, migrants who are not directly affected and transmigrants whose land is directly affected. Community elements were also formed within the United Farmers Konawe Selatan and Konsorsium Pembaruan Agraria (KPA). While PT. Merbau Jaya Indah Raya Group is part of the agrarian subject of the private element.

scholarly journals INDUSTRIALIZATION IN TANZANIA: THE NEED FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 39-51
Author(s):  
Kitojo Wetengere
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Social Inclusion ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Poor People ◽  
The Poor ◽  
The People ◽  
Policy Measures ◽  
The Government ◽  
Disadvantaged People

The objective of this study was to examine industrialization in Tanzania and the need to include the disadvantaged people in the development process. This study used a documentary review methodology. The study found that although industrialization is key to economic growth, if not properly managed, it tends to marginalize the poor people. This calls for social inclusion policy measures. The study, therefore, recommends that, if industrialization is to benefit the disadvantaged, agriculture, which employs the majority of the people, should be industrialized. Further, since the benefits of industrialization may not necessarily accrue to the poor, the above need to be accompanied by conscious efforts of the government and the private sector to provide social and economic services to the disadvantaged poor. Keywords: Industrialization; Social Inclusion; Butter & Bread vs. Yeast & Bread; Economic Growth vs. Economic Development

scholarly journals Reformasi Agraria Joko Widodo-Jusuf Kalla dalam Konsep dan Realita Kepemimpinan yang Fasilitatif (Facilitative Leadership)

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Khairul Ikhsan, Adji Suradji Muhammad
Keyword(s):  
Agrarian Reform ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Facilitative Leadership ◽  
Collaborative Processes ◽  
Reform Program ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Rights

The The focus of the discussion in this paper will examine leadership theoretically and case studies are seen as an important element in bringing stakeholders to direct them to carry out collaborative processes or what we call Facilitative Leadership. But this concept of leadership is not a traditional leadership concept that has been known. Jokowi-Jusuf Kalla's leadership contains the agenda of the Agrarian Reform which starts from the regions and villages. In the Nine Priority Agenda, also known as Nawacita, it was stated that agrarian reform in the form of direct pledging guarantees legal certainty in land ownership rights, resolving land disputes and opposing the criminalization of the resumption of community land rights. It is interesting to study how the correlation of the National Agrarian Reform Program by the Government of President Joko Widodo is if we relate it to the concept of facilitative leadership.

scholarly journals Konflik Tata Ruang Kehutanan Dengan Tata Ruang Wilayah (Studi Kasus Penggunaan Kawasan Hutan Tidak Prosedural Untuk Perkebunan Sawit Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah)

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Eko N Setiawan ◽  
Ahmad Maryudi ◽  
Ris H Purwanto ◽  
Gabriel Lele
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Oil Palm ◽  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Forest Area ◽  
Forest Conversion ◽  
Spatial Integration ◽  
Central Kalimantan ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
The Government ◽  
Spatial Plan

AbstractLaw No. 26 Year 2007 on Spatial Planning (UUPR) mandated that all levels of government administration, ranging from the national, provincial, district/ city are obligated to prepare Spatial Plan (RTR). Until 2012, Central Kalimantan is one of the provinces which have not completed its Spatial Plan; one of the reasons was the lack of spatial integration of forestry spatial planning and provincial spatial planning of Central Kalimantan.The absence of spatial integration of forestry and provincial spatial planning of Central Kalimantan has the implication in triggering conflicts of land use. Forest areas were converted into oil palm plantations without any official procedures. There are 282 units of oil palm companies, occupying 3.9 millions hectares of forest area, with non-procedural procedures to convert forest area into oil palm plantation.To resolve this problem, the Government has revised the regulation of forest conversion by issuing PP No. 60/2012, provides opportunities for oil palm plantations, which under the Law of Forestry located in forest area but based on RTRWP of Central Kalimantan lies on APL or cultivation area, given the opportunity to re-apply the permit/license.  IntisariUndang- Undang No. 26 Tahun 2007 tentang Penataan Ruang (UUPR) mengamanatkan bahwa semua tingkatan administrasi pemerintahan, mulai dari nasional, provinsi, kabupaten/kota diwajibkan menyusun Rencana Tata Ruang (RTR). Kalimantan Tengah sampai dengan tahun 2012 merupakan salah satu Provinsi yang belum menyelesaikan Tata Ruang, salah satu penyebabnya karena belum adanya padu serasi antara tata ruang kehutanan dengan tata ruang Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah.Implikasi dari tidak adanya padu serasi antara tata ruang kehutanan dengan tata ruang provinsi Kalimantan Tengah adalah terjadinya konflik dalam penggunaan ruang, dimana terjadi penggunaan kawasan hutan tidak prosedural untuk perkebunan sawit di dalam kawasan hutan di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah sebanyak 282 unit perusahaan sawit seluas 3,9 juta hektar.Upaya penyelesaian permasalahan penggunaan kawasan hutan untuk perkebunan sawit di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah diakukan dengan revisi kebijakan tentang alih fungsi hutan PP nomor 60 tahun 2012 yang memberikan kesempatan bagi perkebunan sawit yang berdasarkan Undang-Undang Kehutanan berada di dalam kawasan hutan namun berdasarkan RTRWP Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah berada di kawasan APL maupun budidaya, diberikan kesempatan untuk mengurus perijinannya. 

scholarly journals Land conversion to the poor people in the perspective of utilitarianism theory by bentham

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 00053
Author(s):  
Yusrizal ◽  
Muhammad Yamin Lubis
Keyword(s):  
Agrarian Reform ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Poor People ◽  
Land Conversion ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Reform Program ◽  
General Welfare ◽  
Benefit Theory

The politics of Indonesia’s national land law is based on the principle of fulfilling the constitutional rights of every citizen of the land. The land according to Indonesian positive law is used for the general welfare of Indonesian People. In 2001, with the issuance of MPR RI Decree No.IX / MPR-RI / 2001 concerning Agrarian Reform and Natural Resource Management is the momentum of the agrarian reform program. Agrarian reform is implemented gradually by allocating land for the poor. The problem is: the distribution of the land is not right on target, the existence of a land mafia, bribery of the National Land Agency and the annexation of community land by the investor. Karo Regency became one of the areas which received land allocation from conversion forest.This research method is empirical legal research. This research uses primary data. This research use legal benefit theory (utilitarian) by Jeremy Bentham. Based on legal benefit theory, that agrarian reform by giving land conversion to the poor is an alternative effort of government to give decent living and fulfillment of constitutional rights of Indonesian citizen and eradicate poverty.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document