A Laboratory Study of Coinjection of Water and CO2 to Improve Oil Recovery and CO2 Storage: Effect of Fraction of CO2 Injected

SPE Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Ajoma ◽  
Thanarat Sungkachart ◽  
Saria ◽  
Hang Yin ◽  
Furqan Le-Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Laboratory Experiments ◽  
Water Pressure ◽  
Co2 Storage ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Molar Fraction ◽  
Co2 Injection ◽  
The Core ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Co2 ◽  
Water Saturated

Summary To determine the effect on oil recovery and carbon dioxide (CO2) storage, laboratory experiments are run with various fractions of CO2 injected (FCI): pure CO2 injection (FCI = 1), water-saturated CO2 (wsCO2) injection (FCI = 0.993), simultaneous water and gas (SWAG) (CO2) injection (FCI = 0.75), carbonated water injection (CWI) (FCI = 0.007), and water injection (FCI = 0). All experiments are performed on Bentheimer sandstone cores at 70°C and 11.7 MPa (1,700 psia). The oil phase is composed of 65% hexane and 35% decane by molar fraction. Before any fluid is injected, the core is filled with oil and irreducible water. Pressure difference across the core and production rate of gas are measured during the experiment. The collected produced fluids are analyzed in a gas chromatograph to determine their composition. Cumulative oil recovery after injection is found to be 78 to 83% for wsCO2, 78% for SWAG, 74% for pure CO2, 53% for CWI, and 35% for water. Net CO2 stored is also found to be the highest for wsCO2 (59 to 65% of the pore volume), followed by that for CO2 injection (56%) and that for SWAG (42%). These results suggest that wsCO2 injection might outperform pure CO2 injection at both oil recovery and net CO2stored.

A Laboratory Investigation of the Effect of Ethanol-Treated Carbon Dioxide Injection on Oil Recovery and Carbon Dioxide Storage

SPE Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Saira ◽  
Emmanuel Ajoma ◽  
Furqan Le-Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Molar Fraction ◽  
Co2 Injection ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Injection ◽  
Treated Carbon ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Co2 ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Experimental Runs

Summary Carbon dioxide (CO2) enhanced oil recovery is the most economical technique for carbon capture, usage, and storage. In depleted reservoirs, full or near-miscibility of injected CO2 with oil is difficult to achieve, and immiscible CO2 injection leaves a large volume of oil behind and limits available pore volume (PV) for storing CO2. In this paper, we present an experimental study to delineate the effect of ethanol-treated CO2 injection on oil recovery, net CO2 stored, and amount of ethanol left in the reservoir. We inject CO2 and ethanol-treated CO2 into Bentheimer Sandstone cores representing reservoirs. The oil phase consists of a mixture of 0.65 hexane and 0.35 decane (C6-C10 mixture) by molar fraction in one set of experimental runs, and pure decane (C10) in the other set of experimental runs. All experimental runs are conducted at constant temperature 70°C and various pressures to exhibit immiscibility (9.0 MPa for the C6-C10 mixture and 9.6 MPa for pure C10) or near-miscibility (11.7 MPa for the C6-C10 mixture and 12.1 MPa for pure C10). Pressure differences across the core, oil recovery, and compositions and rates of the produced fluids are recorded during the experimental runs. Ultimate oil recovery under immiscibility is found to be 9 to 15% greater using ethanol-treated CO2 injection than that using pure CO2 injection. Net CO2 stored for pure C10 under immiscibility is found to be 0.134 PV greater during ethanol-treated CO2 injection than during pure CO2 injection. For the C6-C10 mixture under immiscibility, both ethanol-treated CO2 injection and CO2 injection yield the same net CO2 stored. However, for the C6-C10 mixture under near-miscibility,ethanol-treated CO2 injection is found to yield 0.161 PV less net CO2 stored than does pure CO2 injection. These results suggest potential improvement in oil recovery and net CO2 stored using ethanol-treated CO2 injection instead of pure CO2 injection. If economically viable, ethanol-treated CO2 injection could be used as a carbon capture, usage, and storage method in low-pressure reservoirs, for which pure CO2 injection would be infeasible.

X-Ray Computed Tomography of CO2 Behavior in Water Saturated Sandstone for Geological Storage

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suguru Uemura ◽  
Ryoto Kataoka ◽  
Shohji Tsushima ◽  
Shuichiro Hirai
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Water Pressure ◽  
Co2 Storage ◽  
Packed Bed ◽  
Geological Storage ◽  
Co2 Geological Storage ◽  
X Ray ◽  
X Ray Computed ◽  
Water Saturated

The CO2 Geological storage is considered as an effective technology for reducing the emissions of CO2 into the atmosphere. CO2 storage is a technically feasible and effective method for CO2 mitigation because it is based on enhanced oil recovery technology, and storage sites hold significant potential. Currently, field tests for CO2 geological storage are proceeding in many parts of the world. However, the behavior of injected CO2 is still not completely understood. The CO2 storage potential and risk of leakage from reservoirs must be accurately estimated to realize practicable CO2 storage. For this reason, laboratory-scale experimental analysis of the behavior of CO2 injected in sandstone are an important issues. In this study, CO2 distribution and its behavior in sandstone were observed by micro-focus X-ray computed tomography (CT). The X-ray CT can fluoroscope the CO2 in the porous media and reconstruct a three-dimensional CO2 distribution image. A sample was kept under high pressure conditions in a cylindrical pressure vessel and filled with CO2 saturated water. Pressure in the vessel was kept at 7.5 MPa, which is the same condition as a saline aquifer at 750 m depth. Liquid or supercritical CO2 was injected from the end face of water saturated samples. Temperature conditions were set to 20 or 40°C according to the experimental objectives of the CO2 phase. In the experimental results, CO2 distribution in the silica-packed bed and sandstone was clearly visualized with high spatial resolution compared to its diameter. The possibility of improvement in storage technology discussed.

Water-saturated CO2 injection to improve oil recovery and CO2 storage

2020 ◽  
Vol 266 ◽  
pp. 114853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Ajoma ◽  
Saira ◽  
Thanarat Sungkachart ◽  
Jiachao Ge ◽  
Furqan Le-Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Co2 Storage ◽  
Co2 Injection ◽  
Water Saturated

scholarly journals Sequential Injection of Carbonated Water: A Possible Process for Coupling CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery and Storage

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-376
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Co2 Storage ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Water Flooding ◽  
Core Flooding ◽  
Displacement Efficiency ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Carbonated Water ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Co2

Low salinity and carbonated water flooding have been investigated as possible techniques of improved/enhanced oil recovery. Carbonated water injection consists of dissolving carbon dioxide CO2 in water prior to injection and could be considered as a way to store greenhouse gas safely. Low salinity water flooding is a process of diluting high salinity injection water to a very low level of salinity. In this project, the effect of combining the two techniques in a sequential flooding was studied. The primary aim of this study is to optimize the oil recovery and evaluate CO2 storage during this process, employing low permeability carbonate cores and different sequential carbonated and non-carbonated brines flooding. Formation brine, seawater, low salinity carbonated and non-carbonated were used in this work. Core samples grouped as composite cores with similar over all reservoir permeability. Different sequences of brines were employed to determine the optimum system. The experiment's result showed that carbonated water performs better than the noncarbonated brines. A new technique for estimate CO2 retention based on the displacement efficiency of the carbonated water flooding system is presented. The interfacial tension, contact angle measurements results indicated that wettability is the dominant mechanism of the studied systems. A sequential composite core flooding consists of carbonated low salinity followed by low salinity and seawater injection (CLSW- LSW-SW) is the optimum flooding system among the studied systems. Technically, CLSW flooding displayed an excellent incremental displacement efficiency ∆DE of 21.4% and CSW exhibited the best CO2 retention per incremental ∆Np.

Experimental and Modeling Study of Salt Precipitation During Injection of CO2 Contaminated With H2S Into Depleted Gas Fields in the Northeast of the Netherlands

SPE Journal ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (06) ◽  
pp. 1058-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.. Bolourinejad ◽  
R.. Herber
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Carbonic Acid ◽  
Co2 Storage ◽  
Mineral Dissolution ◽  
Co2 Injection ◽  
Salt Precipitation ◽  
Geological Time ◽  
Core Samples ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Co2 ◽  
Gas Fields

Summary Depleted gas fields are among the most probable candidates for subsurface storage of carbon dioxide (CO2). With proven reservoir and qualified seal, these fields have retained gas over geological time scales. However, unlike methane, injection of CO2 changes the pH of the brine because of the formation of carbonic acid. Subsequent dissolution/precipitation of minerals changes the porosity/permeability of reservoir and caprock. Thus, for adequate, safe, and effective CO2 storage, the subsurface system needs to be fully understood. An important aspect for subsurface storage of CO2 is purity of this gas, which influences risk and cost of the process. To investigate the effects of CO2 plus impurities in a real case example, we have carried out medium-term (30-day) laboratory experiments (300 bar, 100°C) on reservoir and caprock core samples from gas fields in the northeast of the Netherlands. In addition, we attempted to determine the maximum allowable concentration of one of the possible impurities in the CO2 stream [hydrogen sulfide (H2S)] in these fields. The injected gases—CO2, CO2+100 ppm H2S, and CO2+5,000 ppm H2S—were reacting with core samples and brine (81 g/L Na+, 173 g/L Cl−, 22 g/L Ca2+, 23 g/L Mg2+, 1.5 g/L K+, and 0.2 g/L SO42−). Before and after the experiments, the core samples were analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) for mineralogical variations. The permeability of the samples was also measured. After the experiments, dissolution of feldspars, carbonates, and kaolinite was observed as expected. In addition, we observed fresh precipitation of kaolinite. However, two significant results were obtained when adding H2S to the CO2 stream. First, we observed precipitation of sulfate minerals (anhydrite and pyrite). This differs from results after pure CO2 injection, where dissolution of anhydrite was dominant in the samples. Second, severe salt precipitation took place in the presence of H2S. This is mainly caused by the nucleation of anhydrite and pyrite, which enabled halite precipitation, and to a lesser degree by the higher solubility of H2S in water and higher water content of the gas phase in the presence of H2S. This was confirmed by the use of CMG-GEM (CMG 2011) modeling software. The precipitation of halite, anhydrite, and pyrite affects the permeability of the samples in different ways. After pure CO2 and CO2+100 ppm H2S injection, permeability of the reservoir samples increased by 10–30% and ≤3%, respectively. In caprock samples, permeability increased by a factor of 3–10 and 1.3, respectively. However, after addition of 5,000 ppm H2S, the permeability of all samples decreased significantly. In the case of CO2+100 ppm H2S, halite, anhydrite, and pyrite precipitation did balance mineral dissolution, causing minimal variation in the permeability of samples.

scholarly journals Investigation of Oil Recovery in Fractured Carbonate Rock by

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
H. Karimaie ◽  
O. Torsæter
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Co2 Injection ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
Asmari Limestone ◽  
Fractured Carbonate ◽  
Efficient Recovery ◽  
Live Oil ◽  
Non Equilibrium

The purpose of the three experiments described in this paper is to investigate the efficiency of secondary andtertiary gas injection in fractured carbonate reservoirs, focusing on the effect of equilibrium gas,re-pressurization and non-equilibrium gas. A weakly water-wet sample from Asmari limestone which is the mainoil producing formation in Iran, was placed vertically in a specially designed core holder surrounded withfracture. The unique feature of the apparatus used in the experiment, is the capability of initializing the samplewith live oil to obtain a homogeneous saturation and create the fracture around it by using a special alloy whichis easily meltable. After initializing the sample, the alloy can be drained from the bottom of the modified coreholder and create the fracture which is filled with live oil and surrounded the sample. Pressure and temperaturewere selected in the experiments to give proper interfacial tensions which have been measured experimentally.Series of secondary and tertiary gas injection were carried out using equilibrium and non-equilibrium gas.Experiments have been performed at different pressures and effect of reduction of interfacial tension werechecked by re-pressurization process. The experiments showed little oil recovery due to water injection whilesignificant amount of oil has been produced due to equilibrium gas injection and re-pressurization. Results alsoreveal that CO2 injection is a very efficient recovery method while injection of C1 can also improve the oilrecovery.

scholarly journals Impact of Low Salinity Water Injection on CO2 Storage and Oil Recovery for Improved CO2 Utilization

2021 ◽  
Vol 229 ◽  
pp. 116127
Author(s):  
Krishna Raghav Chaturvedi ◽  
Durgesh Ravilla ◽  
Waquar Kaleem ◽  
Prashant Jadhawar ◽  
Tushar Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Co2 Storage ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Co2 Utilization ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Low Salinity Water ◽  
Salinity Water ◽  
Low Salinity Water Injection

Advances in Midland Basin Expand Boundaries of CO2 EOR in Marginal Pay Areas

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (06) ◽  
pp. 65-66
Author(s):  
Judy Feder
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Co2 Injection ◽  
Co2 Flooding ◽  
Improved Oil Recovery ◽  
Midland Basin ◽  
The North ◽  
Production Wells ◽  
Original Oil In Place ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Co2

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Judy Feder, contains highlights of paper SPE 200460, “A Case Study of SACROC CO2 Flooding in Marginal Pay Regions: Improving Asset Performance,” by John Kalteyer, SPE, Kinder Morgan, prepared for the 2020 SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, originally scheduled to be held in Tulsa, 18–22 April. The paper has not been peer reviewed. As one of the first fields in the world to use carbon dioxide (CO2) in enhanced oil recovery (EOR), the Scurry Area Canyon Reef Operators Committee (SACROC) unit of the Kelly-Snyder field in the Midland Basin of Texas provides a unique opportunity to study, learn from, and improve upon the development of CO2 flood technology. The complete paper reviews the history of EOR at SACROC, discusses changes in theory over time, and provides a look at the field’s future. Field Overview and Development History The first six pages of the paper discuss the field’s location, geology, and development before June 2000, when Kinder Morgan acquired the SACROC unit and took over as operator. Between initial gas injection in 1972 and 2000, approximately 1 TCF of CO2 had been injected into the Canyon Reef reservoir. Since 2000, cumulative CO2 injection has sur-passed 7 TCF and yielded cumulative EOR of over 180 million bbl. The reservoir is a primarily limestone reef complex containing an estimated original oil in place (OOIP) of just under 3 billion bbl. The reservoir ranges from 200 ft gross thickness in the south to 900 ft in the north, where the limestone matrix averages 8% porosity and 20-md permeability. The Canyon Reef structure is divided into four major intervals, of which the Upper Canyon zone provides the highest-quality pay. The field was discovered in 1948 at a pressure of 3,122 psi. By late 1950, 1,600 production wells had been drilled and the reservoir pressure plummeted, settling as low as 1,700 psi. Waterflooding begun in 1954 enabled the field to continue producing for nearly 20 years, at which time the operators deter-mined that another recovery mechanism would be needed to maximize recovery and reach additional areas of the field. The complete paper discusses various CO2 injection programs that were developed and applied—including a true tertiary response from a miscible CO2 flood in 1981—along with their outcomes. Acquisition and CO2-Injection Redevelopment In June 2000 Kinder Morgan acquired the SACROC Unit and took over as operator. Approximately 6.7 billion bbl of water and 1.3 TCF of CO2 had been injected across the unit to that date, but the daily oil rate of 8,700 B/D was approaching the field’s economic limit. An estimated 40% of the OOIP had been produced through the combination of recovery methods that each previous operator had used. Expanding on the conclusions of its immediate predecessor, the operator initiated large-scale CO2-flood redevelopment in a selection of project areas. These redevelopments were based on several key distinctions differentiating them from previous injection operations.

Novel Dual-Tubing Technique to Eliminate the Shut-in Period in CO2 Huff-n-Puff Injection for Heavy Oil Carbonate Reservoirs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zakaria Hamdi ◽  
Nirmal Mohanadas ◽  
Margarita Lilaysromant ◽  
Oluwole Talabi
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Heavy Oil ◽  
Injection Rate ◽  
Co2 Injection ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Production Time ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Dual Porosity Model ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Co2 ◽  
First Time

Abstract Some heavy oil production can be established using conventional methods; however, these methods are often somewhat ineffective with low recovery factors of less than 20%. Carbon dioxide (CO2) huff-n-puff or cyclic CO2 injection is one of the Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods that can be used in stimulating aging wells to recover some residual oil. The shut-in stage of this method results in a significant delay in the production time, and hence lower oil recovery. For the first time, in this paper, an attempt is made to overcome this issue by a novel approach, employing dual tubing completions. The aim of this is to increase the oil recovery with the production during soak time. Also, a majority of the remaining heavy oil reservoirs are carbonates, hence the research was focused on the same conditions. Numerical simulation is done using dual-tubing conditions in a dual-porosity model with conventional tubing as a base case. Optimization studies are done for injection rate, injection time, soaking time, production time, and huff-n-puff cycles. The results show that the recovery factor can increase significantly, with no discontinuity in production. Preliminary economic studies for the cases also showed a net increase in profit of 7% (1.3 million Dollars for the case chosen). This demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed method which can be implemented into conventional operations, for a more sustainable economy in the era of low oil prices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document