scholarly journals Prognostic and Predictive Impact of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in High Risk Grade 2 Glioma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waqar Haque ◽  
Caitlyn Teh ◽  
E. Brian Butler ◽  
Bin S. Teh
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Grade Ii Glioma

Abstract BackgroundMGMT promoter methylation has been associated with favorable prognosis and survival outcomes in patients with glioblastoma and grade 3 glioma. However, the effects of promoter methylation of MGMT in patients with grade 2 gliomas have not been established. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the prognostic impact and predictive values of MGMT methylation in patients with grade 2 glioma.MethodsThe National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried (2004-2016) for patients with newly diagnosed grade 2 glioma. Demographics and clinical characteristics of these patients were examined. Statistics included Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) analysis alongside Cox proportional hazards modeling.ResultsA total of 11,223 patients met the selection criteria; 1,252 patients (11%) had MGMT testing. Of the patients who had MGMT testing, 58.5% were MGMT methylated (mMGMT), and 43.5% were MGMT unmethylated (uMGMT). mMGMT patients had greater median overall survival (77.3 months) than both uMGMT patients (42.6 months) and patients with no MGMT status reported (61.9 months (p<0.001 for both). mMGMT was also associated with improved OS, when compared to patients with uMGMT, for patients receiving adjuvant chemoradiation or adjuvant radiation therapy.ConclusionsThis is the largest study to date demonstrating both the prognostic and predictive impact of MGMT methylation on patients with grade II glioma. The current results show that mMGMT is a prognostic factor and possibly a predictive biomarker for grade II glioma patients. MGMT methylation status can be used to determine and stratify patients by risk levels, and thus select patients for treatment intensification.

scholarly journals BIOM-02. IDENTIFYING MGMT ALTERATIONS AS BIOMARKERS OF SURVIVAL IN LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA WITH BRAIN METASTASES

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii1-ii1
Author(s):  
Yasin Mamatjan ◽  
Jeffrey Zuccato ◽  
Fabio Moraes ◽  
Michael Cabanero ◽  
Wumairehan Shali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation Status

Abstract EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas (EGFRm-LUAD) have a higher risk of developing brain metastases (BM) compared to non-EGFR-mutant tumors. BM development has significant prognostic impact and leads to poorer patient survival. MGMT promoter methylation is known to determine response to therapy in other cancer types including intracranial gliomas but has not been investigated in EGFRm-LUAD BM. This work aims to assess whether MGMT promoter methylation predicts patient survival or BM development in EGFRm-LUAD patients. A large cohort of 90 primary EGFRm-LUAD tumors, of which 33 (37%) developed BM, were profiled using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC Bead chip. Using the previously reported MGMT-STP27 approach that uses two CpG sites to predict MGMT methylation status, Cox modeling was performed to assess whether MGMT methylation status correlates with overall survival independent of other clinical factors. MGMT methylation significantly predicted poorer survival in EGFRm-LUAD patients that developed BM (p=0.0003) and did not develop BM (p=0.003). A multivariate cox analysis, adjusting for cancer stage and smoking status as potential confounders, showed that MGMT methylation (HR=6.2, 95%CI:2.2–17.4, p=0.0005) and BM development (HR=2.6, 95%CI:1.3–5.3, p=0.007) were both independently predictive of worse overall survival in EGFRm-LUAD patients. This finding of poorer survival in MGMT methylated EGFRm-LUAD is validated in an independent LUAD patient cohort. Total mutation burden, calculated by the number of mutations per megabase of DNA, was substantially higher in MGMT methylated tumours with an interquartile range (IQR) of 58 (30–71) compared to MGMT unmethylated tumours with the IQR of 5.5 (4.3–6.1) resulting p-value of 0.01 for this comparison. Overall, this work shows that MGMT promoter methylation status is an important prognostic biomarker in LUAD patients. MGMT promoter methylation status in EGFRm–LUAD patients with BM may be used to guide patient treatment with potentially a greater extent of treatment for high-risk patients.

scholarly journals The Impact of MGMT Promoter Methylation and Temozolomide Treatment in Serbian Patients with Primary Glioblastoma

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Nikola Jovanović ◽  
Tatjana Mitrović ◽  
Vladimir J. Cvetković ◽  
Svetlana Tošić ◽  
Jelena Vitorović ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Promoter Hypermethylation ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Primary Glioblastoma ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
The Impact

Background and objective: Despite recent advances in treatment, glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most lethal and aggressive brain tumor. A continuous search for a reliable molecular marker establishes the methylation status of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter as a key prognostic factor in primary glioblastoma. The aim of our study was to screen Serbian patients with primary glioblastoma for an MGMT promoter hypermethylation and to evaluate its associations with overall survival (OS) and sensitivity to temozolomide (TMZ) treatment. Materials and methods: A cohort of 30 Serbian primary glioblastoma patients treated with radiation therapy and chemotherapy were analyzed for MGMT promoter methylation and correlated with clinical data. Results: MGMT methylation status was determined in 25 out of 30 primary glioblastomas by methylation-specific PCR (MSP). MGMT promoter hypermethylation was detected in 12 out of 25 patients (48%). The level of MGMT promoter methylation did not correlate with patients’ gender (p = 0.409), age (p = 0.536), and OS (p = 0.394). Treatment with TMZ significantly prolonged the median survival of a patient (from 5 to 15 months; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Due to a small cohort of primary GBM patients, our study is not sufficient for definitive conclusions regarding the prognostic value of MGMT methylation for the Serbian population. Our preliminary data suggest a lack of association between MGMT promoter methylation and overall survival and a significant correlation of TMZ treatment with overall survival. Further population-based studies are needed to assess the prognostic value of the MGMT promoter methylation status for patients with primary glioblastoma.

scholarly journals Superiority of temozolomide over radiotherapy for elderly patients with RTK II methylation class, MGMT promoter methylated malignant astrocytoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1162-1172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antje Wick ◽  
Tobias Kessler ◽  
Michael Platten ◽  
Christoph Meisner ◽  
Michael Bamberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Predictive Biomarker ◽  
Copy Number Variations ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Mgmt Promoter

Abstract Background O6-methylguanine DNA-methyl transferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status is predictive for alkylating chemotherapy, but there are non-benefiting subgroups. Methods This is the long-term update of NOA-08 (NCT01502241), which compared efficacy and safety of radiotherapy (RT, n = 176) and temozolomide (TMZ, n = 193) at 7/14 days in patients &gt;65 years old with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma. DNA methylation patterns and copy number variations were assessed in the biomarker cohort of 104 patients and in an independent cohort of 188 patients treated with RT+TMZ-containing regimens in Heidelberg. Results In the full NOA-08 cohort, median overall survival (OS) was 8.2 [7.0–10.0] months for TMZ treatment versus 9.4 [8.1–10.4] months for RT; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.76–1.15) of TMZ versus RT. Median event-free survival (EFS) [3.4 (3.2–4.1) months vs 4.6 (4.2–5.0) months] did not differ, with HR = 1.02 (0.83–1.25). Patients with MGMT methylated tumors had markedly longer OS and EFS when treated with TMZ (18.4 [13.9–24.4] mo and 8.5 [6.9–13.3] mo) versus RT (9.6 [6.4–13.7] mo and 4.8 [4.3–6.2] mo, HR 0.44 [0.27–0.70], P &lt; 0.001 for OS and 0.46 [0.29–0.73], P = 0.001 for EFS). Patients with glioblastomas of the methylation classes receptor tyrosine kinase I (RTK I) and mesenchymal subgroups lacked a prognostic impact of MGMT in both cohorts. Conclusion MGMT promoter methylation is a strong predictive biomarker for the choice between RT and TMZ. It indicates favorable long-term outcome with initial TMZ monotherapy in patients with MGMT promoter-methylated tumors primarily in the RTK II subgroup.

scholarly journals Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of B4GALT1 Hypermethylation and Its Clinical Significance as a Novel Circulating Cell-Free DNA Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Picardo ◽  
Antonella Romanelli ◽  
Laura Muinelo-Romay ◽  
Tommaso Mazza ◽  
Caterina Fusilli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Therapy Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Aberrant Expression ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Methylation Specific Pcr ◽  
Specific Pcr

Epigenetic modifications of glyco-genes have been documented in different types of cancer and are tightly linked to proliferation, invasiveness, metastasis, and drug resistance. This study aims to investigate the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapy-response predictive value of the glyco-gene B4GALT1 in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. A Kaplan–Meier analysis was conducted in 1418 CRC patients (GEO and TCGA datasets) to assess the prognostic and therapy-response predictive values of the aberrant expression and methylation status of B4GALT1. Quantitative methylation-specific PCR (QMSP) and droplet digital quantitative methylation-specific PCR (dd-QMSP) were respectively used to detect hypermethylated B4GALT1 in metastasis and plasma in four cohorts of metastatic CRC cases (mCRC). Both the downregulated expression and promoter hypermethylation of B4GALT1 have a negative prognostic impact on CRC. Interestingly a low expression level of B4GALT1 was significantly associated with poor cetuximab response (progression-free survival (PFS) p = 0.01) particularly in wild-type (WT)-KRAS patients (p = 0.03). B4GALT1 promoter was aberrantly methylated in liver and lung metastases. The detection of hypermethylated B4GALT1 in plasma of mCRC patients showed a highly discriminative receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve profile (area under curve (AUC) value 0.750; 95% CI: 0.592–0.908, p = 0.008), clearly distinguishing mCRC patients from healthy controls. Based on an optimal cut-off value defined by the ROC analysis, B4GALT1 yield a 100% specificity and a 50% sensitivity. These data support the potential value of B4GALT1 as an additional novel biomarker for the prediction of cetuximab response, and as a specific and sensitive diagnostic circulating biomarker that can be detected in CRC.

Methylation of ESR1 and Tumour Suppressor Genes Together Constitute an Independent Outcome Predictor in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 803-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corine J. Hess ◽  
Johannes Berkhof ◽  
Fedor Denkers ◽  
Gert J. Ossenkoppele ◽  
Gerrit Jan Schuurhuis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Total Population ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Methylation Index ◽  
Group B ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) promoter methylation has been observed for the estrogen receptor (ESR1) as well as for a number of Tumor Suppressor Genes (TSGs). These individual aberrancies were suggested to be part of a general methylation defect in subsets of AML patients, rather than random events. The objective of this study was to assess whether aberrant promoter methylation of multiple genes, as observed in AML samples, are associated and whether such associations render impact on clinical outcome. By Methylation-Specific Multiplex Ligation Probe Amplification (MS-MLPA) the methylation status of 26 TSGs was determined in bone marrow samples of 119 primary AML patients and 5 control individuals. No promoter methylation was detected in any of the controls, while at least one TSG was methylated in 59/119 patients. Methylation was observed in 12 out of 26 assessed sites, most frequently for ER, CDKN2B/p15, and IGSF4 (28–36% of all patients). A substantial intra-class correlation of 0.38 existed between methylation of different TGSs. ESR1 methylation (34/119) strongly predicted concurrent methylation of TSGs, OR 7.33 (95%CI 4.13–12.99). A regression model that included both the ESR1 methylation status and the number of methylated TSGs (methylation index), showed both parameters to be independent oppositely directed predictors for overall survival (OS), HR 0.06 (95%CI 0.01–0.33; p=.001) and HR 1.92 (95%CI 1.19–3.10; p=.007), respectively. In line with this observation, a higher methylation index was found to yield a significant negative effect on patient OS in both the ESR1 methylated (ESR1+) and ESR1 unmethylated (ESR1−) subgroups. Combining ESR1 methylation status with the absence or presence of promoter methylation of other TSGs (TSG+ or TSG−); yielded 4 patient subgroups with large differences in OS in univariate analysis (p=.0001, figure 1A). In multivariate analysis that included, FLT3-status, age at diagnosis, cytogenetics and achievement of CR, the predictive impact of the 4-group division on OS was maintained, HR 2.12 (95%CI 1.04–4.29; p=.037). Moreover, the combination identified a good prognostic patient subgroup (n=15, median OS 39 month) within the intermediate cytogenetic risk group (n=54, median OS 8.3 month), figure 1B. In conclusion, concurrent methylation occurs frequent in AML and is best predicted by ESR1 methylation. Methylation of ESR1 and methylation of other TSGs represent processes with independent predictivity. When combined, they constitute a unique and powerful factor for predicting overall survival, both in the total AML population as well as within the intermediate cytogenetic risk group. Figure 1. Overall Survival based on the methylation status of ER (ER+/ER) combined with the absence or presence of methylation of TSGs (TSG+/TSG−) for the total population (A) and confined to the intermediate cytogenetic risk group (B) Figure 1. Overall Survival based on the methylation status of ER (ER+/ER) combined with the absence or presence of methylation of TSGs (TSG+/TSG−) for the total population (A) and confined to the intermediate cytogenetic risk group (B)

Comparison of DNA Methylation and Expression Status Prior Azacytidine Treatment and their Relationship to Overall Survival and Clinical Response of MDS Patients

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3777-3777
Author(s):  
Monika Belickova ◽  
Anna T Jonasova ◽  
Jitka Vesela ◽  
Eliska Stara ◽  
Andrea Hrustincova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Partial Remission ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Aberrant Expression ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Expression Status

Abstract Background Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal disorders of hematopoietic stem cells characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis. High-risk MDS patients are treated by hypomethylating agents, of which they benefit significantly. However, only half of the patients respond positively to the treatment. Aberrant DNA methylation and mRNA expression in MDS were documented in several studies, but their prognostic impact in response to hypomethylating therapy is still unclear. The aim of the project was to find a relationship between methylation and expression status prior to azacytidine (AZA) treatment and the overall survival and clinical response of MDS patients. Methods We performed methylation and expression profiling in CD34+ cells from 30 samples from MDS patients before AZA treatment and after 4-8 treatment cycles. HumanMethylation27 BeadChips and HumanHT-12 v4 Expression BeadChips (Illumina) were used to generate profiles. DNA and RNA were isolated from same CD34+ cells separated from bone marrow by magnetic beads. The β-values represent quantitative measurements of DNA methylation levels of specific CpGs, and range from 0 for completely unmethylated to 1 for completely methylated DNA. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used for comparison of β-values and expression levels between responders and nonresponders. Results To determine whether DNA methylation and expression might predict a response to AZA treatment, we compared methylation and expression status at baseline with clinical responses in 30 MDS patients. Twelve patients of 30 (40%) achieved complete remission or partial remission, 10 had stable disease (33.3%), and 8 showed progression (26.7%). Median survival after initiation of AZA treatment in progression patient group was 8.7 months, stable group 21.2 months, and group with complete or partial remission 24.5 months. We found significant differences in methylation status in 20 genes (p<0.05) between groups of responders and nonresponders and the largest methylation differences showed CALCA (0.61 vs. 0.16, p<0.05), MAGEE2 (0.71 vs. 0.30, p<0.05), HMP19 (0.62 vs. 0.23, p<0.05), MEOX1 (0.36 vs. 0.84, p<0.05), and KCNQ1DN genes (0.33 vs. 0.84, p<0.05). The aberrant expression status did not correlate with the response to AZA. We also measured methylation changes caused by AZA treatment. In the group of patients with progression, we did not find any change in the methylation profile after treatment. On the contrary, we found significant methylation changes after AZA treatment in the group of patients responding to treatment (e.g. AMT, NOTCH, and WT1genes). Conclusions Our finding of different DNA methylation levels at baseline between groups of responders and nonresponders as well as detection of decreased methylation after AZA treatment in the group of patients with clinical response may represent useful prediction markers of treatment success. However, the data require detailed examination along with confirmative cohort of patients. Supported by grant (NT/13899, NT/14377, NT/14539, NT/13847) and the project for conceptual development of research organization (00023736) from the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Methylation of MGMT in paired primary and recurrent GBMs.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 65-65
Author(s):  
Li Bie ◽  
Feng Xian Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Recurrent Tumors ◽  
Mgmt Promoter ◽  
The Relationship

65 Background: Epigenetic sliencing of the MGMT gene promoter in primary glioblastomas of patients subsequently treated with TMZ is associated with prolonged survival. Further, several studies have observed a change in MGMT silencing in paired primary and recurrent glioblastoma. However, the relationship between this “MGMT switch” and patients outcome is largely unknown. Methods: The study involved primary and recurrent tumor tissue samples from 53 glioblastoma patients diagnosed and treated within the First Hospital of Jilin University from January 2003 to November 2010. After surgical treatment, all patients were subjected to radiotherapy with concomitant administration of TMZ. Patients that experienced recurrent tumors received TMZ. 53 patients underwent 58 further operations after recurrence (5 pats received a third surgery). MGMT promoter methylation levels were determined using qMSP. The relationship between “MGMT switch” and clinical outcome was investigated. Results: 53 (M/F=33/20; median age: 49.2±3.6, 19.5-72.3 ys) underwent a first operation for GBM. qMSP analysis revealed MGMT promoter methylation in 19 pats (35.8%, A, OS 31.5 ms); no methylation in 34 pats (64.2%, B, OS 7.9 ms). In the recurrent tumors, MGMT promoter methylation was detected in 25 pats (47.2%); and no methylation in 28 pats (52.8%). Comparison of individual pairs of primary and recurrent GBMs revealed a changed methylation status in 10 (18.9%), including 8 changed from unmethylated to methylated tumors (15.1%, C, OS 29.4 ms), 2 changed from methylated to unmethylated tumors (3.8%, D, OS 10.5 ms). Median overall survival (OS) was 12.1 months. MGMT promoter methylation was significantly associated with a favorable clinical outcome (A vs B, p=0.0027). The outcome of patients were not significant different between group A and group C (p>0.01). Conclusions: The methylation status of the MGMT promoter was altered in 10 (18.9%) of 53 recurrent GBM after chemoradiotherapy. 8 patients the promoter changed from unmethylated to methylated and these patients had a median overall survival similar to the better prognosis of patients who had a methylated promoter in their primary tumor. 2 pats where a change from methylated to unmethylated was observed had a poorer outcome.

Impact of M1a and M1b staging in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3590-3590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagen F. Kennecke ◽  
Jason Yu ◽  
Sharlene Gill ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Charles Davic Blanke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
7Th Edition ◽  
The Impact

3590 Background: In 2009, pts with M1 colorectal cancer were divided into two subsets for the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition. Pts with metastases (mets) confined to one organ or site at initial diagnosis became stage M1a while multiple sites or peritoneal mets became M1b. The objectives of the study are to evaluate the impact of site of mets and M1a/b staging among pts with M1 colorectal cancer. Methods: All pts referred to the BC Cancer Agency from 1999-2007 with newly diagnosed M1 colon or rectal cancer were included. Demographic, treatment, and outcome data were prospectively collected. The prognostic impact of individual sites of mets was assessed by hazard ratio estimates from univariate Cox models. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models were used to determine variables associated with overall survival in the entire cohort and in those undergoing resection of their primary tumor. Results: 2,049 pts with M1 disease were included. Median age was 66 years; 71% had colonic origin; 70% had their primary tumor resected; and 69% received chemotherapy. In univariate analysis, solitary mets were associated with improved survival. In multivariable analysis, M1a/b status still had significant prognostic effect. The effect remained significant in the subgroup analysis of pts with resected primary tumors when histology, T and N stage were included. Conclusions: Pts with solitary mets, including peritoneum, have superior overall survival as compared to those with multiple sites of mets. AJCC 7th edition staging that includes M1a/b provides significant prognostic information and should be considered in clinical practice and trials of pts with M1 disease who otherwise have few prognostic factors. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Prognostic Factors and a Nomogram Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with Limb Chondrosarcomas: A Population-Based Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Xinjie Wu ◽  
Yanlei Wang ◽  
Wei Sun ◽  
Mingsheng Tan
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Training Group ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Predictive Values

Introduction. We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting the overall survival of patients with limb chondrosarcomas. Methods. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database was used to identify patients diagnosed with chondrosarcomas, from which data was extracted from 18 registries in the United States between 1973 and 2016. A total of 813 patients were selected from the database. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models on the training group to identify independent prognostic factors and construct a nomogram to predict the 3- and 5-year survival probability of patients with limb chondrosarcomas. The predictive values were compared using concordance indexes ( C -indexes) and calibration plots. Results. All 813 patients were randomly divided into a training group ( n = 572 ) and a validation group ( n = 241 ). After univariate and multivariate Cox regression, a nomogram was constructed based on a new model containing the predictive variables of age, site, grade, tumor size, histology, stage, and use of surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy. The prediction model provided excellent C -indexes (0.86 and 0.77 in the training and validation groups, respectively). The good discrimination and calibration of the nomograms were demonstrated for both the training and validation groups. Conclusions. The nomograms precisely and individually predict the overall survival of patients with limb chondrosarcomas and could assist personalized prognostic evaluation and individualized clinical decision-making.

scholarly journals Tim-3 protein expression with MGMT methylation status in glioblastoma and association with survival

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
ji zhang ◽  
Xiaoli Wang ◽  
Shengquan Ye ◽  
Lijiao Liang ◽  
Yi Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Expression ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Mgmt Promoter Methylation ◽  
Mgmt Methylation ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Mgmt Promoter

Abstract Background Understanding the molecular landscape of glioblastoma (GBM) is increasingly crucial for its therapy. Immune checkpoint molecules motivated the emergence of immune checkpoint-targeting therapeutic strategies. However, the prognostic significance of the immune checkpoint molecule T cell immunoglobulin mucin-3 (Tim-3) on tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) and O-6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status remains to be fully elucidated. We aimed to develop an MGMT methylation status-associated immune prognostic signature for predicting prognosis in GBMs.Patients and Methods: A total of 84 patients with newly diagnosed GBM were involved. MGMT methylation status was retrospectively analyzed and the expression level of Tim-3 protein was investigated using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The correlation between Tim-3 protein expression and MGMT methylation status, and the prognosis was explored.Results The obtained data showed that Tim-3 protein was expressed at different levels in GBMs. Mesenchymal expression of Tim-3 protein in these tissues was 73.81% (62/84), including low 15.48% (13/84), moderate 7.14% (6/84) and strong expression 51.19% (43/84), respectively. Of the 48 patients whose tumors tested positive for MGMT methylation, the remaining 36 patients was negative.Conclusions We profiled the immune status in GBM with MGMT promoter methylation and established a local immune signature for GBM, which could independently identify patients with a favorable prognosis, indicating the relationship between prognosis and immune. MGMT promoter methylation with lower Tim-3 protein expression was statistically significantly associated with better survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document