scholarly journals Prognosis of COVID-19 Pneumonia Can Be Early Predicted Combining Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, CRB Score and Baseline Oxygen Saturation.

Author(s):  
Pilar Nuevo-Ortega ◽  
Carmen Reina-Artacho ◽  
Francisco Dominguez-Moreno ◽  
Victor Manuel Becerra-Muñoz ◽  
Luis Ruiz-Del-Fresno ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: In potentially severe diseases in general and COVID-19 in particular, it is vital to early identify those patients who are going to develop complications. The last update of a recent living systematic review dedicated to predictive models in COVID-19,[1] critically appraises 145 models, 8 of them focused on prediction of severe disease and 23 on mortality. Unfortunately, in all 145 models, they found a risk of bias significant enough to finally "not recommend any for clinical use". Authors suggest concentrating on avoiding biases in sampling and prioritising the study of already identified predictive factors, rather than the identification of new ones that are often dependent on the database. Our objective is to develop a model to predict which patients with COVID-19 pneumonia are at high risk of developing severe illness or dying, using basic and validated clinical tools.Methods: prospective cohort of consecutive patients admitted in a teaching hospital during the “first wave” of the COVID-19 pandemic. Follow-up to discharge from hospital. Multiple logistic regression selecting variables according to clinical and statistical criteria. Results: 404 consecutive patients were evaluated, 392 (97%) completed follow-up. Mean age was 61 years; 59% were men. The median burden of comorbidity was 2 points in the Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, CRB was abnormal in 18% of patients and basal oxygen saturation on admission lower than 90% in 18%. A model composed of Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, CRB score and basal oxygen saturation can predict unfavorable evolution or death with an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.89), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.94), respectively.Conclusion: prognosis of COVID-19 pneumonia can be predicted in the out-of-hospital environment using two classic prognostic scales and a pocket pulse oximeter.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pilar Nuevo-Ortega ◽  
Carmen Reina-Artacho ◽  
Francisco Dominguez-Moreno ◽  
Victor Manuel Becerra-Muñoz ◽  
Luis Ruiz-Del-Fresno ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: In potentially severe diseases in general and COVID-19 in particular, it is vital to early identify those patients who are going to develop complications. The last update of a recent living systematic review dedicated to predictive models in COVID-19,[1] critically appraises 145 models, 8 of them focused on prediction of severe disease and 23 on mortality. Unfortunately, in all 145 models, they found a risk of bias significant enough to finally "not recommend any for clinical use". Authors suggest concentrating on avoiding biases in sampling and prioritising the study of already identified predictive factors, rather than the identification of new ones that are often dependent on the database. Our objective is to develop a model to predict which patients with COVID-19 pneumonia are at high risk of developing severe illness or dying, using basic and validated clinical tools.Methods: prospective cohort of consecutive patients admitted in a teaching hospital during the “first wave” of the COVID-19 pandemic. Follow-up to discharge from hospital. Multiple logistic regression selecting variables according to clinical and statistical criteria. Results: 404 consecutive patients were evaluated, 392 (97%) completed follow-up. Mean age was 61 years; 59% were men. The median burden of comorbidity was 2 points in the Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, CRB was abnormal in 18% of patients and basal oxygen saturation on admission lower than 90% in 18%. A model composed of Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, CRB score and basal oxygen saturation can predict unfavorable evolution or death with an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.89), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.94), respectively.Conclusion: prognosis of COVID-19 pneumonia can be predicted in the out-of-hospital environment using two classic prognostic scales and a pocket pulse oximeter.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 215145931880644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Jiang ◽  
Andrew Chia Chen Chou ◽  
Nivedita Nadkarni ◽  
Caris En Qi Ng ◽  
Yun San Chong ◽  
...  

Introduction: This study aims to assess the correlation of the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) with 5-year mortality in a surgically treated hip fracture population. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 1057 patients aged 60 years and above who underwent surgery for hip fracture with a minimum of 5-year follow-up (92.2% 5-year follow-up rate) in a tertiary hospital. Manual review of patients’ electronic hospital records was performed to record demographic data, comorbidities, and length of stay. Mortality data were extracted from the hospital’s electronic medical records and corroborated with the National Electronic Health Record. Results: Of the 1057 patients, 283 (26.8%) were male. The majority of patients were 80 years of age and above (42.5%), with the oldest patient operated on age 102 with a mean age of 77.8 (8.6) years. Four hundred eighteen (39.5%) patients sustained extracapsular intertrochanteric fractures. The mean follow-up duration was 8 years and 3 days with an overall survivorship of 37.2%. A multiple regression model constructed with ACCI, age, gender, and fracture pattern demonstrated satisfactory predictive ability with a concordance statistic of 0.68. Patients with a higher ACCI category (≥6) had an increased 5-year mortality rate (41.8%) with an odds ratio of 13.6 (6.7-31.8, P < .001) compared to those with an ACCI category of 3 and below (89.3%). Discussion: The study demonstrates that ACCI correlated with 5-year mortality after surgical treatment of hip fracture. This information is pertinent in the counseling of patients with regard to their midterm survival following hip fracture surgery and may inform policy makers of the varied midterm survival rates in patients with differing ACCI scores and educate the allocation of health-care resources. Conclusion: The ACCI correlates with 5-year mortality after surgical treatment of hip fracture.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 114-114
Author(s):  
Ahmed I. Ghanem ◽  
Remonda M Khalil ◽  
Gehan Abd Elatti Khedr ◽  
Amy Tang ◽  
Amr A. Elsaid ◽  
...  

114 Background: Life expectancy is very essential in deciding treatment options in men with prostate cancer (PCa); however, the impact of comorbidities on outcomes is not well-established. We investigated the influence of Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) on survival endpoints in men with localized PCa who were treated with prostate radiotherapy (RT). Methods: Men with intermediate and high risk PCa who were treated with definitive RT between 1/2007 and 12/2012 were included. Groups were created according to their baseline CCI score at diagnosis into no, mild and severe comorbidity (CCI 0, 1 or 2+). The groups were then compared based on patients’ characteristics and prognostic factors. Kaplan-Meier curves and Uni/multivariate analyses (MVA) were used to examine the impact of CCI groups on overall (OS), disease specific (DSS), and biochemical relapse free (BRFS) survival. Results: 257 patients were identified after excluding low risk, metastatic cases and those with inadequate follow up. Median follow-up was 92 months (range: 2-135) and median age was 73 years (range: 48-85). 53% of the cases were black and 67% were of intermediate risk. Median RT dose was 76 Gy and 47% received androgen deprivation therapy. CCI groups 0, 1 and 2+ encompassed 76 (30%), 54 (21%) and 127 (49%) patients, respectively. Groups were generally well-balanced. 10 and 15 years OS was significantly different across CCI groups (76% & 53%, 46% & 31% and 55% & 14%, for CCI-0, 1 and 2+ respectively; p < 0.001). CCI-0 had better DSS than CCI-2+ ( p = 0.03) with no difference for CCI-0 vs 1 ( p = 0.1). BRFS was non-different among CCI groups ( p = 0.99). On MVA, increased CCI was deterministic for OS ( p < 0.001) after adjusting for age, Gleason’s score and T-stage. For DSS, only age and T3 vs T1/2 were independently prognostic ( p < 0.001); whereas CCI-1 vs 0 was only marginal ( p = 0.05). Conclusions: Higher CCI was a significant predictor of shorter OS in intermediate and high-risk PCa. Baseline comorbidities should be taken into consideration during patient counselling for treatment options and in designing prospective trials for men with localized prostate cancer.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 215-215
Author(s):  
Michael Andre Liss ◽  
Kathryn Osann ◽  
Ross Moskowitz ◽  
Adam Kaplan ◽  
John Billimek ◽  
...  

215 Background: Comorbidities significantly influence how physicians approach the treatment of prostate cancer and should be evaluated prior to the prostate biopsy. The Total Illness Burden Index for Prostate Cancer (TIBI-CaP) patient questionnaire and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) usually calculated by the physician, may provide information on competing risks but have not been compared prospectively. Methods: A prospective observational cohort study was performed of 133 participants prior to obtaining a transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Eleven patients had incomplete data or missing follow-up; therefore, a total of 122 (92%) patients were retained for a mean of 21 months (range 4 – 31 months). The TIBI-CaP and CCI scores were compared between subgroups defined by non-elective hospital admission, elective surgery, non-prostate malignancy and survival status using t-tests. Results: Patients averaged 64.5 years at enrollment. One patient died in the study from a metastatic sarcoma. The overall hospital admission rate was 17% (21/122), most commonly from cardiovascular or pulmonary complications. Forty-six men (38%) were diagnosed with cancer on the prostate biopsy. The most common treatments were prostatectomy (39%), active surveillance (26%), or external beam radiation therapy (20%). Twenty-three percent (28/122) had elective surgery and 5% (6/122) were diagnosed with a non-prostate malignancy. Mean TIBI-CaP scores were higher in men who were admitted to the hospital (5.1 vs. 3.5, p=0.03), had elective surgery (4.8 vs. 3.4, p=0.05) or non-prostate cancer (5.5 vs 3.7, p=0.17). No significant differences were observed in CCI scores In stepwise logistic regression, a TIBI-CaP score > 5.0 was associated with 3.5 times higher risk for hospital admission (95% CI: 1.3–10.0, p=0.02). Conclusions: The patient-reported measure of comorbidity (TIBI-CaP) identified patients at high risk for non-elective hospital admission over at 20 month average follow up period and may aid medical decision making specifically in the prostate biopsy population better than that of the Charlson Comorbidity Index.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19045-e19045
Author(s):  
Beth Barber ◽  
Zhongyun Zhao ◽  
Song Wang ◽  
Volker Jean Wagner

e19045 Background: To describe patients with metastatic melanoma being treated with mono-therapy, dacarbazine (DTIC) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Methods: Using a large U.S. medical claims database, patients were identified between 2005 and 2010 using ≥2 melanoma diagnoses (ICD-9-CM: 172.xx, V10.82) and ≥2 diagnoses for metastasis (ICD-9-CM: 197.xx, 198.xx). Patients who received mono-therapy with DTIC or GM-CSF as the first documented drug therapy after metastatic diagnosis were identified. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics and treatment duration were compared between patients treated with DTIC and those who received GM-CSF. Furthermore, comparisons were also made between the two treatment groups after 1-to-1 matching on age, gender, and baseline comorbidities. Results: A total of 81 patients with metastatic melanoma receiving first-line DTIC and 24 patients with metastatic melanoma receiving first-line GM-CSF were included in this analysis. On average, DTIC patients were 8.5 years older (p = 0.009) and had higher baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (D0.43, p = 0.005) than GM-CSF patients. The mean duration of first line treatment was 94 days on DTIC and 135 days on GM-CSF. The mean length of follow-up from the start of first line was 257 days on DTIC and 451 days on GM-CSF. After each GM-CSF patient was matched with a DTIC patient on age, gender, and baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index score, the mean duration of first line treatment was 79 days on matched DTIC and 135 days on GM-CSF, and the mean length of follow-up from the start of first line was 317 days on matched DTIC and 451 days on GM-CSF. Conclusions: Patients with metastatic melanoma who received DTIC treatment were older and had higher comorbidity index scores but shorter treatment duration than those who received GM-CSF; the difference in treatment duration remained after DTIC patients were matched with GM-CSF patients on age, gender and comorbidity index scores.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S266-S267
Author(s):  
Shemra Rizzo ◽  
Ryan Gan ◽  
Devika Chawla ◽  
Kelly Zalocusky ◽  
Xin Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Over 32 million cases of COVID-19 have been reported in the US. Outcomes range from mild upper respiratory infection to hospitalization, acute respiratory failure, and death. We assessed risk factors associated with severe disease, defined as hospitalization within 21 days of diagnosis or death, using US electronic health records (EHR). Methods Patients in the Optum de-identified COVID-19 EHR database who were diagnosed with COVID-19 in 2020 were included in the analysis. Regularized multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for severe disease. Covariates included demographics, comorbidities, history of influenza vaccination, and calendar time. Results Of the 193,454 eligible patients, 36,043 (18.6%) were hospitalized within 21 days of COVID-19 diagnosis, and 6,397 (3.3%) died. Calendar time followed an inverse J-shaped relationship where severe disease rates rapidly declined in the first 25 weeks of the pandemic. BMI followed an asymmetric V-shaped relationship with highest rates of disease severity observed at the extremes. In the multivariable model, older age had the strongest association with disease severity (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of significant associations in Figure). Other risk factors were male sex, uninsured status, underweight and obese BMI, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, and individual comorbidities including hypertension. Asthma and overweight BMI were not associated with disease severity. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians experienced higher odds of disease severity compared to Whites. Figure. Significant associations (odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals) with COVID-19 severity (hospitalization or death), adjusted for geographical division. Reference and abbreviation categories: Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) = 0; Age = 18-30; Sex = Female; Race/Ethnicity = White; Insurance = Commercial; Body mass index (BMI) = 18.5-25; Calendar time = 0-25 weeks; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Conclusion Odds of hospitalization or death have decreased since the start of the pandemic, with the steepest decline observed up to mid-August, possibly reflecting changes in both testing and treatment. Older age is the most important predictor of severe COVID-19. Obese and underweight, but not overweight, BMI were associated with increased odds of disease severity when compared to normal weight. Hypertension, despite not being included in many guidelines for vaccine prioritization, is a significant risk factor. Pronounced health disparities remain across race and ethnicity after accounting for comorbidities, with minorities experiencing higher disease severity. Disclosures Shemra Rizzo, PhD, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (Shareholder)Genentech, Inc. (Employee) Ryan Gan, PhD, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (Shareholder)Genentech, Inc. (Employee) Devika Chawla, PhD MSPH, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (Shareholder)Genentech, Inc. (Employee) Kelly Zalocusky, PhD, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (Shareholder)Genentech, Inc. (Employee) Xin Chen, PhD, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (Shareholder)Genentech, Inc. (Employee) Yifeng Chia, PhD, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (Shareholder)Genentech, Inc. (Employee)


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (20) ◽  
pp. 4682
Author(s):  
Antonio Vena ◽  
Giovanni Cenderello ◽  
Elisa Balletto ◽  
Laura Mezzogori ◽  
Alessandro Santagostino Santagostino Barbone ◽  
...  

Monoclonal antibodies, such as bamlanivimab and etesevimab combination (BEC), have been proposed for patients with mild or moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, few studies have assessed the factors associated with the early administration of BEC or the impact of early BEC treatment on the clinical evolution of the patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adults with COVID-19 who received BEC at three institutions in the Liguria region. The primary endpoint was to investigate the clinical variables associated with early BEC infusion. Secondary endpoints were 30-day overall mortality and the composite endpoint of requirement of hospital admission or need for supplemental oxygen during the 30-day follow-up period. A total of 127 patients (median age 70 years; 56.7% males) received BEC. Of those, 93 (73.2%) received BEC within 5 days from symptoms onset (early BEC). Patients with a higher Charlson comorbidity index were more likely to receive early treatment (odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–2.45; p = 0.03) in contrast to those reporting fever at presentation (OR 0.26, 0.08–0.82; p = 0.02). Early BEC was associated with lower likelihood of hospital admission or need for supplemental oxygen (OR 0.19, 0.06–0.65; p = 0.008). Five patients who received early BEC died during the follow-up period, but only one of them due to COVID-19-related causes. Early bamlanivimab and etesevimab combination was more frequently administered to patients with a high Charlson comorbidity index. Despite this, early BEC was associated with a lower rate of hospital admission or need for any supplementary oxygen compared to late administration. These results suggest that efforts should focus on encouraging early BEC use in patients with mild–moderate COVID-19 at risk for complications.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Prevedello ◽  
Claire Steckelmacher ◽  
Marianne Devroey ◽  
Jacques Creteur ◽  
Jean-Charles Preiser

Abstract Objective: Survivors of intensive care often present long-term sequelae, including cognitive impairment and psychological discomfort. Follow-up programs have therefore been developed to assess and manage these long-term complications. Studying the effectiveness of such programs can be limited by the number of patients lost during follow-up. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate patient characteristics predictive of participation to an intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up program. Design: In this prospective, nested, case-control study, all patients with an ICU stay of at least five days were invited to participate in an ICU follow-up program. Having attended 2 follow-up sessions at ICU and hospital discharge, they were given an appointment for their 3-month follow up. Patients were divided into two groups (“participants and “non-participants”) according to whether or not they attended this appointment. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of participation.Settings: An ICU follow-up program from a mixed ICU at a university hospital.Participants: All patients selected to participate to the ICU follow-up program were included in this study. They were allocated into two groups depending on their attendance in the follow-up program. Intervention: NoneMain results: Of the 199 patients included during the study period, 80 (40.2%) were classified as “participants”. These patients had a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index, a longer ICU length of stay (LOS), more frequently received ventilatory support for at least 24 hours and more frequently received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) than non-participant patients. In the multivariable analysis, ICU LOS longer than 10 days was associated with a 3.3 times increased likelihood of participating in the follow-up; a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index also predicted an increased likelihood of participating to the ICU follow-up clinic.Conclusions: Fewer comorbidities and longer intensive care LOS were independent predictors of participation in ICU follow-up.


2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 344-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalil Yousef ◽  
Michael R. Pinsky ◽  
Michael A. DeVita ◽  
Susan Sereika ◽  
Marilyn Hravnak

Background Patients in step-down units are at higher risk for developing cardiorespiratory instability than are patients in general care areas. A triage tool is needed to identify at-risk patients who therefore require increased surveillance. Objectives To determine demographic (age, race, sex) and clinical (Charlson Comorbidity Index at admission, admitting diagnosis, care area of origin, admission service) differences between patients in step-down units who did and did not experience cardiorespiratory instability. Methods In a prospective longitudinal pilot study, 326 surgical-trauma patients had continuous monitoring of heart rate, respirations, and oxygen saturation and intermittent noninvasive measurement of blood pressure. Cardiorespiratory instability was defined as heart rate less than 40/min or greater than 140/min, respirations less than 8/min or greater than 36/min, oxygen saturation less than 85%, or blood pressure less than 80 or greater than 200 mm Hg systolic or greater than 110 mm Hg diastolic. Patients’ status was classified as unstable if their values crossed these thresholds even once during their stay. Results Cardiorespiratory instability occurred in 34% of patients. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was the only variable associated with instability conditions. Compared with patients with no comorbid conditions (50%), more patients with at least 1 comorbid condition (66%) experienced instability (P = .006). Each 1-unit increase in the Charlson Index increased the odds for cardiorespiratory instability by 1.17 (P = .03). Conclusion Although the relationship between Charlson Comorbidity Index and cardiorespiratory instability was weak, adding it to current surveillance systems might improve detection of instability.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 2375-2390 ◽  
Author(s):  
M W Christensen ◽  
U S Kesmodel ◽  
K Christensen ◽  
K Kirkegaard ◽  
H J Ingerslev

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Do young women with early ovarian ageing (EOA), defined as unexplained, and repeatedly few oocytes harvested in ART have an increased risk of age-related events? SUMMARY ANSWER At follow-up, women with idiopathic EOA had an increased risk of age-related events compared to women with normal ovarian ageing (NOA). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Early and premature menopause is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), osteoporosis and death. In young women, repeated harvest of few oocytes in well-stimulated ART cycles is a likely predictor of advanced menopausal age and may thus serve as an early marker of accelerated general ageing. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A register-based national, historical cohort study. Young women (≤37 years) having their first ART treatment in a public or private fertility clinic during the period 1995–2014 were divided into two groups depending on ovarian reserve status: EOA (n = 1222) and NOA (n = 16 385). Several national registers were applied to assess morbidity and mortality. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS EOA was defined as ≤5 oocytes harvested in a minimum of two FSH-stimulated cycles and NOA as ≥8 oocytes in at least one cycle. Cases with known causes influencing the ovarian reserve (endometriosis, ovarian surgery, polycystic ovary syndrome, chemotherapy etc.) were excluded. To investigate for early signs of ageing, primary outcome was an overall risk of ageing-related events, defined as a diagnosis of either CVD, osteoporosis, type 2 diabetes, cancer, cataract, Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disease, by death of any-cause as well as a Charlson comorbidity index score of ≥1 or by registration of early retirement benefit. Cox regression models were used to assess the risk of these events. Exposure status was defined 1 year after the first ART cycle to assure reliable classification, and time-to-event was measured from that time point. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Median follow-up time from baseline to first event was 4.9 years (10/90 percentile 0.7/11.8) and 6.4 years (1.1/13.3) in the EOA and NOA group, respectively. Women with EOA had an increased risk of ageing-related events when compared to women with a normal oocyte yield (adjusted hazard ratio 1.24, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.43). Stratifying on categories, the EOA group had a significantly increased risk for CVD (1.44, 1.19 to 1.75) and osteoporosis (2.45, 1.59 to 3.90). Charlson comorbidity index (1.15, 0.93 to 1.41) and early retirement benefit (1.21, 0.80 to 1.83) was also increased, although not reaching statistical significance. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Cycles never reaching oocyte aspiration were left out of account in the inclusion process and we may therefore have missed women with the most severe forms of EOA. We had no information on the total doses of gonadotrophin administered in each cycle. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS These findings indicate that oocyte yield may serve as marker of later accelerated ageing when, unexpectedly, repeatedly few oocytes are harvested in young women. Counselling on life-style factors as a prophylactic effort against cardiovascular and other age-related diseases may be essential for this group of women. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was received for this study. All authors declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document