Efficacy and Safety of Bivalirudin Versus Heparin Anticoagulation Therapy for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus heparin as the anticoagulant in patients undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO). Methods We conducted a search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for all the studies in which bivalirudin was compared to heparin as the anticoagulant for ECMO. Efficacy outcomes were defined as the time to reach therapeutic levels, time within therapeutic range (TTR), thrombotic events, circuit thrombosis, circuit exchanges. Safety outcomes were reported as Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), major bleeding events, minor bleeding events. Other outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, mortality, 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality. Results Ten studies were included, involving 1091 patients (Bivalirudin was administered in 405 patients while 686 patients were treated with heparin). A significant reduction in thrombotic events [OR 0.51, 95%CI 0.36,0.73, p=0.0002, I2=0%], major bleeding events [OR 0.31, 95%CI 0.10,0.92, p=0.04, I2=75%] and in-hospital mortality [OR 0.63, 95%CI 0.44,0.89, p=0.009, I2=0%] treated with bivalirudin were found compared with heparin. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the time to reach therapeutic levels[MD 3.53, 95%CI -4.02,11.09, p=0.36, I2=49%], TTR[MD 8.64, 95%CI -1.72,18.65, p=0.10, I2=77%], circuit exchanges[OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.27,3.12, p=0.90, I2=38%], Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT)[OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.02,2.52, p=0.24, I2=0%], minor bleeding events[OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.38,2.29, p=0.87, I2=0%], hospital LOS[MD -2.93, 95%CI -9.01,3.15, p=0.34, I2=45%], ICU LOS[MD -4.22, 95%CI -10.07,1.62, p=0.16, I2=0%], mortality[OR 1.84, 95%CI 0.58,5.85, p=0.30, I2=60%] and 30-day mortality[OR 0.75, 95%CI 0.38,1.48, p=0.41, I2=0%]. The benefit of bivalirudin over heparin was not significant for patients undergoing ECMO for major bleeding events while ruling out the Rivosecchi’s study (OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.71-1.14). Subgroup analysis by patient’s type revealed that studies in children generated lower rate of thrombotic events and major bleeding events compared with adults. Conclusion Our meta-analysis suggests that bivalirudin use as the anticoagulant for ECMO are associated with lower thrombotic events, major bleeding events and in-hospital mortality. Meanwhile, the differences are more pronounced in children than adults. However, the results should be interpreted with caution and further larger, randomized trials are needed to confirm the results.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Obese Patients with Venous Thromboembolism

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-121765 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3675-3675

Author(s):

Renata Almeida Sa ◽

Fatimah Al-Ani ◽

Alejandro Lazo-Langner ◽

Martha L Louzada

Keyword(s):

Body Weight ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Minor Bleeding ◽

Obese Patients ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Major Bleeding Events

Background: Obesity is a well-known risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), however, obese patients are under-represented in clinical trials (1;2). Four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been approved for the treatment of acute VTE (3-6), including the direct Factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban and the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran. Given the lack of data in this population, it is unclear if DOACs can be used safely. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs for the treatment of VTE in obese patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-centre cohort study in London (Canada) to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs for the treatment of acute VTE in obese patients. We screened electronic and hard copy charts of adult patients referred to our thrombosis clinic for treatment of an objectively confirmed acute VTE between January 2012 and December 2017. Patients treated with DOACs or Warfarin were selected and followed from diagnosis of the index event until cessation of anticoagulation or up to 1 year. Our study population was analyzed by BMI (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2versus < 30 kg/m2) and body weight (≥120 kg vs. <120 kg). Patients were excluded if they were on anticoagulation therapy for conditions other than VTE (e.g; atrial fibrillation), cancer-associated thrombosis, or missing data. The primary outcome measure was VTE recurrence during the anticoagulation treatment period and was defined according to the ISTH criteria (7). Our secondary outcome was the occurrence of bleeding events A bleeding event is defined as: a) Major Bleeding: bleed resulting in a hemoglobin drop of > 20 g/L, clinically overt and requiring more than 2 units of packed red blood cells, a hemorrhage requiring permanent cessation of anticoagulation and any retroperitoneal or intracranial hemorrhage; b) Minor Bleeding: bleed with no or little clinical significance, associated with no cost and does not require medical evaluation; and c) clinically significant non-major bleeding: does not fulfill criteria for major or minor bleeding but requires patients to be seek medical attention and/or minor procedures (8). Groups were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, as appropriate. The significance level was set at 0.05. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for VTE recurrence and bleeding among DOAC groups and patients treated with Warfarin were analyzed by logistic regression. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25 (IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Results: Of 1143 potentially eligible patients, 777 fulfilled our inclusion criteria: 278 (35.8%) obese patients treated with DOACs, 266 (34.2%) non-obese patients on DOACS and 233 (30%) obese patients on Warfarin. Of the patients on DOACs, 80% (n= 436) were on rivaroxaban, while the remaining 20% were either on apixaban or edoxaban (n= 108). Among patients on DOACs VTE recurrence was observed in 2.1% (N=6) of patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and 2.8% (N=2) of patients with 120 kg or more, with no differences in the risk of VTE recurrence (Table 1). The proportion of major bleeding events for patients on DOACs was 1.1% (N=3) for patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and 1.4% (N=1) for patients with 120kg or more. There were no significant differences with respect to major and total bleeding risk (Table1). When comparing obese patients on DOACs vs Warfarin we did not find differences in the risk of VTE recurrence among patients with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 [RR 2.59 95% IC (0.51-12.96), p= 0. 247] or body weight ≥120 kg [RR 4.33 95% IC (0.21-89.43), p= 0. 337] (Table 2). Among obese patients those treated with DOACs had a similar proportion and risk of total bleeding and major bleeding events compared to those on warfarin (Table 2). Conclusions: Our retrospective study suggests that DOACs at standard doses appear to have similar efficacy and safety in obese patients as defined herein. However, since most of our patients were treated with rivaroxaban, information on other agents is inconclusive. Information on patients with extreme body weight was limited. Disclosures Louzada: Bayer: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Rivaroxaban for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

Science Progress ◽

10.1177/00368504211012160 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 104 (2) ◽

pp. 003685042110121

Author(s):

Bo Liang ◽

Yi Liang ◽

Li-Zhi Zhao ◽

Yu-Xiu Zhao ◽

Ning Gu

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Cochrane Central Register ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Major Bleeding Events

All cancers can increase the risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), and anticoagulants should be considered as an optimal treatment for patients suffering from cancer-associated VTE. However, there is still a debate about whether the new oral anticoagulant, rivaroxaban, can bring better efficacy and safety outcomes globally. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for relevant published papers before 1 September 2019, with no language restrictions. The primary outcomes are defined as the recurrence of VTE. The secondary outcomes are defined as clinically relevant non-major bleeding, adverse major bleeding events, and all-cause of death. The data were analyzed by Stata with risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Four trials encompassing 1996 patients were included. Rivaroxaban reduced recurrent VTE with no significant difference (RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.43–1.07). Similarly, there were no significant differences in adverse major bleeding events (RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.37–2.00), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.73–2.12) and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.40–1.44). In a selected study population of cancer patients with VTE, rivaroxaban is as good as other anticoagulants. Further, carefully designed randomized controlled trials should be performed to confirm these results.

Download Full-text

Intermediate-to-therapeutic versus prophylactic anticoagulation for coagulopathy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Thrombosis Journal ◽

10.1186/s12959-021-00343-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Sirui Zhang ◽

Yupei Li ◽

Guina Liu ◽

Baihai Su

Keyword(s):

Hospital Mortality ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Pooled Analysis ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Risk Of Bleeding ◽

Therapeutic Anticoagulation ◽

Secondary Outcomes ◽

Prophylactic Anticoagulation

Abstract Background Anticoagulation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients has been associated with survival benefit; however, the optimal anticoagulant strategy has not yet been defined. The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of intermediate-to-therapeutic versus prophylactic anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis on the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality and other patient-centered secondary outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to August 10th 2021. Cohort studies and randomized clinical trials that assessed the efficacy and safety of intermediate-to-therapeutic versus prophylactic anticoagulation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients were included. Baseline characteristics and relevant data of each study were extracted in a pre-designed standardized data-collection form. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcomes were incidence of thrombotic events and incidence of any bleeding and major bleeding. Pooled analysis with random effects models yielded relative risk with 95 % CIs. Results This meta-analysis included 42 studies with 28,055 in-hospital COVID-19 patients totally. Our pooled analysis demonstrated that intermediate-to-therapeutic anticoagulation was not associated with lower in-hospital mortality (RR=1.12, 95 %CI 0.99-1.25, p=0.06, I2=77 %) and lower incidence of thrombotic events (RR=1.30, 95 %CI 0.79-2.15, p=0.30, I2=88 %), but increased the risk of any bleeding events (RR=2.16, 95 %CI 1.79-2.60, p<0.01, I2=31 %) and major bleeding events significantly (RR=2.10, 95 %CI 1.77-2.51, p<0.01, I2=11 %) versus prophylactic anticoagulation. Moreover, intermediate-to-therapeutic anticoagulation decreased the incidence of thrombotic events (RR=0.71, 95 %CI 0.56-0.89, p=0.003, I2=0 %) among critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU), with increased bleeding risk (RR=1.66, 95 %CI 1.37-2.00, p<0.01, I2=0 %) and unchanged in-hospital mortality (RR=0.94, 95 %CI 0.79-1.10, p=0.42, I2=30 %) in such patients. The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Conclusions We recommend the use of prophylactic anticoagulation against intermediate-to-therapeutic anticoagulation among unselected hospitalized COVID-19 patients considering insignificant survival benefits but higher risk of bleeding in the escalated thromboprophylaxis strategy. For critically ill COVID-19 patients, the benefits of intermediate-to-therapeutic anticoagulation in reducing thrombotic events should be weighed cautiously because of its association with higher risk of bleeding. Trial registration The protocol was registered at PROSPERO on August 17th 2021 (CRD42021273780). Graphical abstract

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Long‐Term Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Network Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Journal of the American Heart Association ◽

10.1161/jaha.120.019184 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Houyong Zhu ◽

Xiaoqun Xu ◽

Xiaojiang Fang ◽

Fei Ying ◽

Liuguang Song ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

High Risk ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Coronary Syndrome ◽

High Risk Factors ◽

Cerebrovascular Events

Background Long‐term antithrombotic strategies for patients with chronic coronary syndrome with high‐risk factors represent an important treatment dilemma in clinical practice. Our aim was to conduct a network meta‐analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long‐term antithrombotic strategies in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Methods and Results Four randomized studies were included (n=75167; THEMIS [Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Intervention Study], COMPASS [Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies], PEGASUS‐TIMI 54 [Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 54], and DAPT [Dual Anti‐platelet Therapy]). The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs) were calculated as the measure of effect size. The results of the network meta‐analysis showed that, compared with aspirin monotherapy, the ORs for trial‐defined major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were 0.86; (95% CI, 0.80–0.93) for ticagrelor plus aspirin, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78–1.02) for rivaroxaban monotherapy, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64–0.85) for rivaroxaban plus aspirin, and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60,–0.86) for thienopyridine plus aspirin. Compared with aspirin monotherapy, the ORs for trial‐defined major bleeding were 2.15 (95% CI, 1.78–2.59]) for ticagrelor plus aspirin, 1.51 (95% CI, 1.23–1.85) for rivaroxaban monotherapy, and 1.68 (95% CI, 1.37–2.05) for rivaroxaban plus aspirin. For death from any cause, the improvement effect of rivaroxaban plus aspirin was detected versus aspirin monotherapy (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65–0.90), ticagrelor plus aspirin (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66–0.95), rivaroxaban monotherapy (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69–0.97), and thienopyridine plus aspirin (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41–0.82) regimens. Conclusions All antithrombotic strategies combined with aspirin significantly reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and increased the risk of major bleeding compared with aspirin monotherapy. Considering the outcomes of all ischemic and bleeding events and all‐cause mortality, rivaroxaban plus aspirin appears to be the preferred long‐term antithrombotic regimen for patients with chronic coronary syndrome and high‐risk factors.

Download Full-text

Risk of major bleeding during extended oral anticoagulation in patients with first unprovoked venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Systematic Reviews ◽

10.1186/s13643-019-1175-5 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Faizan Khan ◽

Miriam Kimpton ◽

Tobias Tritschler ◽

Grégoire Le Gal ◽

Brian Hutton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Anticoagulant Therapy ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Oral Anticoagulation ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Major Bleeding Events

Abstract Background The optimal duration of anticoagulation after a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains controversial. Deciding to stop or continue anticoagulant therapy indefinitely after completing 3 to 6 months of initial treatment requires balancing the long-term risk of recurrent VTE if anticoagulation is stopped against the long-term risk of major bleeding if anticoagulation is continued. However, knowledge of the long-term risk for major bleeding events during extended anticoagulation in this patient population is limited. We plan to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the risk for major bleeding events during extended oral anticoagulation in patients with first unprovoked VTE. Methods Electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be systematically searched with the assistance of an information specialist (from inception to March 1, 2019) to identify randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies reporting major bleeding during extended oral anticoagulation in patients with first unprovoked VTE, who have completed at least 3 months of initial anticoagulant therapy. Study selection, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction will be performed independently by at least two investigators. The number of major bleeding events and person-years of follow-up will be used to calculate the rate (events per 100 person-years) with its 95% confidence interval for each study cohort, during clinically relevant time periods of extended anticoagulant therapy. Results will be pooled using random effect meta-analysis. Discussion The planned systematic review and meta-analysis will provide reliable estimates of the risk for major bleeding events during extended anticoagulation. This information will help inform patient prognosis and assist clinicians with balancing the risks and benefits of treatment to guide management of unprovoked VTE. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42019128597.

Download Full-text

Clinical impact of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with gynecologic cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.1994.12.11.2317 ◽

1994 ◽

Vol 12 (11) ◽

pp. 2317-2320 ◽

Cited By ~ 25

Author(s):

G L Goldberg ◽

D G Gibbon ◽

H O Smith ◽

C DeVictoria ◽

C D Runowicz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Platelet Count ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Gynecologic Cancer ◽

Minor Bleeding ◽

Clinical Effects ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Transfusion Therapy ◽

Platelet Counts ◽

Major Bleeding Events ◽

Platelet Transfusions

PURPOSE AND METHODS This retrospective analysis of 501 patients with gynecologic cancer treated with chemotherapy evaluates the relationship between platelet count and clinical bleeding, as well as the clinical effects of platelet transfusion therapy. Thrombocytopenic patients were divided into six groups according to platelet counts, and major or minor bleeding manifestations were documented. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a platelet count less than 100,000/microL. RESULTS Thrombocytopenia occurred in 182 (36.3%) patients over 808 of 1,546 chemotherapy cycles (52%). No intracranial or life-threatening bleeding occurred in any patient. The majority of patients (139 [76.4%]) had no clinical bleeding. Minor bleeding, such as purpura, occurred in 34 patients (18.7%) and 44 cycles (5.4%). Major bleeding occurred in nine patients (4.9%) and 10 cycles (1.3%). Five major bleeding events occurred in 49 patients with platelet counts between 0 and 10,000/microL. Forty-three of these patients received platelet transfusions. Thirty-eight of 43 transfused patients (88.3%) had no bleeding. Of the remaining five patients, two were transfused prophylactically with no effect. Three major bleeding events occurred in patients with platelet counts that ranged from 11,000 to 20,000/microL, but these were due to chronic instrumentation or trauma. In patients with platelet counts more than 20,000/microL, major bleeding occurred only from necrotic metastatic lesions. Random-donor platelet transfusions provided inconsistent increments in platelet counts. Overall, 27.5% of patients achieved the expected increase in platelet number based on units of platelet concentrate transfused. The use of single-donor or human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched platelets did not provide greater increments in those patients who were refractory to random-donor platelets. CONCLUSION Platelet counts > or = 10,000/microL are not associated with spontaneous major bleeding. Prophylactic platelet transfusions in patients with gynecologic malignancies and chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia should be limited to those with platelet counts < or = 10,000/microL, provided they are not bleeding and have no major anatomic or pathophysiologic precursors of bleeding.

Download Full-text

Primary Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients with Solid Tumors Receiving Chemotherapy: A Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1157.1157 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1157-1157

Author(s):

Minh Phan ◽

Sonia John ◽

Ana Isabel Casanegra ◽

Alfonso Tafur

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Solid Tumors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Mortality Data ◽

Significant Heterogeneity ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Vte Prophylaxis ◽

Major Bleeding Events ◽

Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis

Abstract Abstract 1157 Background: Venous thromboembolism [VTE] is the second highest cause of mortality among patients with cancer. However, pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for patients with solid tumor is only recommended during hospitalization. Primary outpatient thromboprophylaxis is not a widely accepted practice. Objective: Determine safety and efficacy of outpatient primary VTE prophylaxis in patients with solid tumors. Data sources: A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE up to June 2012. Key search words included venous thromboembolism, malignancy, anticoagulants, and chemotherapy. Studies were considered for our meta-analysis if they included outpatient primary pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in adult patients with active solid cancer. All the information was independently reviewed by 2 of the authors [MP, SJ] and a third reviewer resolved discrepancies. The measure of association was calculated with R (R: A Language and Environment for Statistical, R Development Core Team, www.R-project.org), R META package (Version 0.8–2, Author: Guido Schwarzer). The Q statistic was calculated and a formal test of homogeneity was conducted. Random-effects model was preferred in case of heterogeneity. Results: A total of 1371 abstracts were reviewed and 29 manuscripts were fully abstracted. Eight randomized controlled trials including 6706 patients were analyzed. There were less VTE events with outpatient prophylaxis: odds ratio [OR] of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.40–0.70). Six studies used low or ultra-low molecular weight heparin and two studies used warfarin. In the subgroup analysis of heparin based primary prophylaxis, there was a significant reduction in VTE events [OR 0.47, 95% CI, 0.34–0.64], no significant heterogeneity [FIG 1]. In addition, there was no difference in major bleeding events between groups [OR 1.48, 95% CI, 0.89–2.46]. Five studies reported mortality data; there was significant heterogeneity between studies. Conclusions: Heparin based outpatient VTE prophylaxis in patients with solid tumors reduced by half the risk of VTE with no significant differences in major bleeding events. The current publications do not allow a meaningful grouped analysis of survival data, improved patient selection is necessary in order to adequately target VTE prevention strategies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Calculation of HAS-BLED Score Is Useful for Early Identification of Venous Thromboembolism Patients at High Risk for Major Bleeding Events: A Prospective Outpatients Cohort Study

Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis ◽

10.1055/s-0037-1607433 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 44 (04) ◽

pp. 348-352 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Reinhard Raggam ◽

Franz Hafner ◽

Alexander Avian ◽

Gerald Hackl ◽

Gerhard Cvirn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Odds Ratio ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

Minor Bleeding ◽

Prospective Evaluation ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Major Bleeding Events

AbstractThe aim of this study was prospective evaluation of the performance of the HAS-BLED score in predicting major bleeding complications in a real-world outpatient cohort, during long-term anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE), treated with a broad spectrum of anticoagulants. We analyzed 111 outpatients objectively diagnosed with VTE and treated long-term with various anticoagulants. Patients were grouped in three cohorts based on the anticoagulant regimen. Calculation of the HAS-BLED score and documentation of bleeding events were performed every 6 months for 1 year. Patients with a HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 had an increased risk for major bleeding events (odds ratio [OR]: 13.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96–692.58, p = 0.028) and a trend to higher risk for minor bleeding events as well (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 0.87–5.85, p = 0.091) when compared with patients with a HAS-BLED score < 3.This indicates that a HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 allows for identification of patients with VTE on long-term anticoagulation at an increased risk for major bleeding events, irrespective of the anticoagulant agent used.

Download Full-text

Systemic Anticoagulation is Associated With Decreased Mortality in COVID-19 Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-688472/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Yi Bian ◽

Yue Le ◽

Ping Zhang ◽

Zhigang He ◽

Ye Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Hospital Mortality ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Distress Syndrome ◽

Hospital Death ◽

Lower Probability ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Systemic Anticoagulation

Abstract Background: Accumulating evidence has revealed that coagulopathy and widespread thrombosis in the lung are common in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This raises questions about the efficacy and safety of systemic anticoagulation (AC) in COVID-19 patients. Method: This single-center, retrospective, cohort study unselectively reviewed 2272 patients with COVID-19 admitted to the Tongji Hospital between Jan 25 and Mar 23, 2020. Propensity score-matching between patients adjusted for potential covariates was carried out with the patients divided into two groups depending on whether or not they had received AC treatment (AC group, ³7 days of treatment; non-AC group, no treatment). This yielded 164 patients in each group. Result: In-hospital mortality of the AC group was significantly lower than that of the non-AC group (14.0% vs. 28.7%, P =0.001). Treatment with AC was associated with a significantly lower probability of in-hospital death (adjusted HR=0.273, 95% CI, 0.154 to 0.484, P<0.001). The incidence of major bleeding and thrombocytopenia in the two groups was not significantly different. Subgroup analysis showed the following factors were associated with a significantly lower in-hospital mortality in patients who had received AC treatment; severe cases (13.2% vs. 24.6%, P=0.018), critical cases (20.0% vs 82.4%, P=0.003), patients with a D-dimer level ≥0.5 μg/mL (14.8% vs. 33.8, P<0.001), and moderate (16.7% vs. 60.0%, P=0.003) or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) cases at admission (33.3% vs. 86.7%, P=0.004). During the hospital stay, critical cases (38.3% vs. 76.7%, P<0.001) and severe ARDS cases (36.5% vs. 76.3%, P<0.001) who received AC treatment had significantly lower in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: AC treatment decreases the risk of in-hospital mortality, especially in critically ill patients, with no additional significant, major bleeding events or thrombocytopenia being observed.Trials registration - ChiCTR2000039855

Download Full-text

Complications and mortality of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the treatment of neonatal respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

10.21203/rs.2.11328/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Jing Xiong ◽

Li Zhang ◽

Lei Bao

Keyword(s):

Respiratory Failure ◽

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Membrane Oxygenation ◽

Venovenous Ecmo ◽

Complications And Mortality ◽

Overall Mortality

Abstract Background Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been increasingly used for severe neonatal respiratory failure refractory to conventional treatments. To systematically evaluate the complications and mortality of venovenous ECMO in the treatment of neonatal respiratory failure. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. The retrieval period was from the establishment of the database to February 2019. Two investigators independently screened articles according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of article was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). The meta-analysis was performed by Stata 15.0 software. Results Four observational studies were included, with a total of 347 newborns. The overall mortality at hospital charge was 12% (5% - 18%) with a heterogeneity of I2 = 73.8% (p = 0.01). Two studies reported mortality during ECMO and after decannulation, with 10% (0.8% -19.2%) and 6.1% (2.6% - 9.6%) respectively. The most common complications associated with venovenous ECMO were: pneumothorax (20.6%), hypertension (20.4%), cannula dysfunction (20.2%), seizure (14.9%), renal failure requiring hemofiltration (14.7%), infectious complications (10.3%), thrombi (7.4%), intracranial hemorrhage or infarction (6.6%), hemolysis (5.3%), cannula site bleeding (4.4%), gastrointestinal bleeding (3.7%), oxygenator failure (2.8%), other bleeding events (2.8%), brain death (1.9%), and myocardial stun (0.9%). Conclusion The overall mortality at discharge of venovenous ECMO in the treatment of neonatal respiratory failure was 12%. Although complications are frequent, the survival rate during hospitalization is still high. Further larger samples, and higher quality of randomized controlled trials (RCT) are needed to clarify the efficacy and safety of this technique in the treatment of neonatal respiratory failure.

Download Full-text