scholarly journals Sanksi Hukum terhadap Anggota Kepolisian yang Melakukan Pungutan Liar

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-156
Author(s):  
I Putu Gede Budihartawan ◽  
I Ketut Sukadana ◽  
I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha

Illegal levies commonly known as extortion are generally carried out by unscrupulous employees from an agency and even by unscrupulous officers, including police officers. The police officers who are tasked with protecting and protecting the public should not commit such illegal payments. This deviation committed by members of the police caused problems and unrest in the community. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing how the regulation prohibits illegal levies on members of the Indonesian police force and how the legal sanctions against members of the police who carry out illegal levies. The research method used in this study was the normative method. In this study a statutory and conceptual approach was used. Prohibition of Illegal Levies is regulated in article 6 letter W of Government Regulation No.2 of 2003. Legal sanctions against members of the police who carry illegal levies are subject to the provisions of articles 368, 378, 423 of the Criminal Code. The regulation of prohibitions and sanctions against illegal levies must be emphasized so that irresponsible persons do not cause unrest in the community.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 308-314
Author(s):  
I Kadek Arya Andika ◽  
I Nyoman Sugiartha ◽  
I Nyoman Sutama

The corona virus or what is known as Covid-19 is an infectious disease caused by a new type of coronavirus that was discovered at the end of 2019 in the city of Wuhan, China, which has spread throughout the world, has killed hundreds of people and infected tens of thousands of others. Previously, Indonesia was one of the countries that had not been infected, and finally in February the corona virus entered Indonesia. The spread of the corona virus causes panic among Indonesian people. The purpose of this study is to uncover legal sanctions against state officials who violate health protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research method used is a normative legal research method where the reference is based on a conceptual approach to legislation. Sources of materials and laws used are primary and secondary. The data collection technique used is to collect references related to research. Furthermore, the data will be processed and analyzed using legal data processing methods systematically. The results of this study indicate that cases of spread and death rates caused by the corona virus are now increasing quite rapidly, a number of countries have even taken action by prohibiting every citizen from traveling abroad or receiving visits from foreign nationals (lockdown). In order to deal with the unrest experienced by the Indonesian people and efforts to prevent the transmission of the corona virus which is increasingly increasing the number of positive patients, the government issued several regulations or policies, namely Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2020, concerning Large-Scale Social Restrictions. (PSBB) in the context of accelerating the handling of the 2019 coronavirus disease (covid-19).


Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 340
Author(s):  
Ida Bagus Putra Pratama ◽  
I Made Dedy Priyanto

Research on legal certainty the amount of basic capital establishment of limited liability company based on the norms of conflict between article 32 paragraph (1) of the limted liability company law concerning "the limited liability company capital of at least Rp 50,000,000.00" with article 1 paragraph (3) of government regulations The limited liability of the company's capital of limited liability concerning "the founding capital of the company is determined by agreement”. 2 problem are formulated: (1) What is the form for deposit of stock capital on the provisions of article 33 of the limited liability company law, (2) How is the legal certainty of the number of basic capital of the limited liability After the validity of government regulation change of the limited liability company. This purpose research is finding form of the deposit of stock capital and the basic capital of the limited liability company before and after enforcement of government regulation of limited liability of the company. The legal research method used normative legal research method with statute approach and conceptual approach. Capital deposits of shares can be made in the form of money and other forms of immovable tangible objects such as land and intangible objects in the form of bill of Rights; and arrangements regarding the underlying capital applicable in the establishment of the limited liability company is Article 1 paragraph (3) of government regulation of the limited liability of the company.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 237
Author(s):  
Sumaryono Sumaryono ◽  
Sri Kusriyah Kusriyah

Fraudulent criminal acts that have been regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) with various modes, one of which is fraud by shamans with a multiplied money mode has made law enforcers increasingly have to rack their brains to be able to prove it. This study aims to examine and analyze law enforcement by the judge in decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora with consideration of the criminal elements. The research method used is a sociological juridical approach. The specifications of the study were conducted using descriptive analytical methods. The data used for this study are primary and secondary data. The data consists of primary data and secondary data using field research methods, interviews, and literature studies. Based on the research it was concluded that the case ruling number 61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN Bla with a fraud case with shamanism practices in the mode of duplicating the judge's money considering that the Defendants have been indicted by the Public Prosecutor with alternative indictments, so the Panel of Judges paid attention to the facts The aforementioned law decides on the first alternative indictment as regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) of the 1st Criminal Code by considering the elements of that article.Keywords: Criminal Law Enforcement; Fraud; Multiple Money.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 421-425
Author(s):  
I Made Ari Nurjaya ◽  
I Nyoman Sumardhika ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati

One of the legal products made by notary as a part of their authorities is a deed, both authentic deeds and underhand-made deeds. In addition to these deeds, a notary also has the authority to issue a certificate which is commonly referred to as a covernote. A certificate or covernote is a statement or note in the form of information confirming that a land ownership deed is in the process of a certificate making that is due to a process of roya, transfer of name of land ownership and splitting of one certificate into two. This study examines two issues related to notary authority, namely the basis for the notary’s authority in issuing a covernote and the legal consequences of making the covernote. This study uses a normative legal research method and a conceptual approach as well as a statutory approach. The results showed that the covernote issued by a notary was actually an ordinary certificate, not a legal product of a notary. Covernote only contains an explanation of the deed that is in the process of certification which has not been completed and will be completed within a period determined by the notary itself, so the covernote is not legally binding. The notary is authorized to make a covernote, but it is not regulated in the laws and regulations so that, if it is concluded, the covernote is not a legal product of a notary. The legal consequences for the notary if they fail to carry out the covernote, they can be held liable to solve them immediately. The legal consequence of not fulfilling the contents of the covernote is a violation of Article 1366 of the Criminal Code because notaries are considered negligent in carrying out their duties and authorities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-213
Author(s):  
Ida Bagus Agung Pariama Manuaba ◽  
I Nyoman Sujana ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma

Judge's considerations are matters which are the basis or are considered by the judge in deciding a crime case. Crime Theft is an act that is classified as a general crime in which a crime against the property of another person. Theft with weighting is a criminal act of theft which in its implementation is accompanied by certain elements so that it is more severe and threatened with higher penalties. Child is a person who is not yet eighteen (18) years old, including those who are still in the womb. In settling a child case, the judge must consider the report in the trial regarding the child concerned. This study aims to determine the criminal considerations and sanctions imposed by the judge on criminal theft with weighting carried out by children. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. The legal materials studied are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results of this study indicate the judge's judgment in imposing a crime against a child who commits a crime of theft by weighting it based on the elements of the crime committed as well as things that alleviate and incriminate the crime against the child. Criminal sanctions imposed by a judge against a child who commits an act of theft by weighting based on the Court's Decision and the provisions of Article 363 paragraph (1) of the 4th KtoP Jungto Article 65 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and other laws relating to the case state that the child is proven legally and convincingly guilty as well as convicting a child of seven months in prison.


Author(s):  
Basri Mulyani

This article aims to examine the case of the distribution of clothing and food packages phase II in East Lombok Regency, or better known as Eid packages in terms of the legal considerations of the judge's decision. The point of policy confusion in state administrative law with criminal law or better known as administrative corruption. Government officials who must implement the policy, when the program is running, must deal with the criminalization of the policies that it implements. Based on these issues it is interesting to discuss related to the legal considerations of the judge's decision to release the accused and whether all government officials have the right to discretion in carrying out their positions. The research method used is a descriptive normative method, with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach. The results of the discussion revealed that criminal law is used carefully and operationalized truly as the last drug (ultimum remedium) and not necessarily used as the main drug (primum remedium) so that government officials are no longer afraid to carry out work in the public interest and community welfare.


LEGALITAS ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Alex Subagyo Dan Irman Syahriar

Basically the damage to other people's belongings is very detrimental to the owner of the damaged goods only partially or completely so that the owner of the goods can no longer use his belongings, other than that the goods that have been damaged are valuable to the owner by damaging the goods very disturbing the peace of the owner of the goods . How is the application of the law to the crime of destruction of goods in a demonstration and how is the criminological point of view of the crime of destruction of goods in a demonstrationThis type of research used in this study is a type of normative legal research, which is a legal research method that uses a statutory approachThe results showed that the threat of punishment in article 170 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, regarding legal sanctions for perpetrators of violence against people or goods in public is threatened with imprisonment for five years and six months, whereas in Article 406 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code with the same result, namely violence against goods, the perpetrators were threatened with imprisonment for up to two years and eight months or a maximum fine of four Rp. 4,500 (four thousand and five hundred). Every human being has an interest, where interests are divided into three namely individual interests, group interests and general interests. Crime, violence and "mass vandalism" in Indonesia are products of social systems with various values that are not mutually harmonious, and are not always compatible, harmonious and balanced.


Esensi Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-63
Author(s):  
Arman Tjoneng ◽  
Christin Septina Basani ◽  
Novalita Sidabutar

Abstract The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has become a super institution with extraordinary restraint. With the new Corruption Eradication Commission Law, some people think that the KPK has been weakened, which has been an institution loved by the public, even though the government denies that the new KPK Law has not weakened the KPK at all. One of the new things is the formation of the KPK Supervisory Body, one of which has the authority to grant permission to the KPK to conduct searches, which in fact has an impact on the problems at hand. The method used is a normative legal research method. The approach used is a statutory approach. The data used are secondary data obtained by literature study and primary data obtained by conducting interviews with related party respondents. There has been a shift in the meaning of Barriers to Justice as stated in Article 221 of the Criminal Code with Article 221 of the Corruption Eradication Law where Article 221 of the Criminal Code views Obstruction of Justice as a material offense while for Article 21 of the Corruption Eradication Law, Judicial Obstruction is seen as a formal offense. On the other hand, the actions of the Supervisory Board in granting licenses for searches, confiscation, etc. are not automatically considered a disturbance of justice unless it can be proven that the elements of wrongdoing committed by the Supervisory Board can be proven.   Keywords : Corruption, Authority, Obstruction Of Justice.   ABSTRAK Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) telah menjadi lembaga super dengan pengekangan yang luar biasa. Dengan adanya Undang-Undang KPK yang baru, sebagian orang menilai telah terjadi pelemahan KPK yang selama ini menjadi institusi yang dicintai masyarakat, padahal pemerintah membantah bahwa Undang-Undang KPK yang baru sama sekali tidak melemahkan KPK. Salah satu hal baru yaitu adalah pembentukan Badan Pengawas KPK yang salah satunya memiliki kewenangan untuk memberikan izin kepada KPK untuk melakukan penggeledahan, yang ternyata berdampak pada permasalahan yang sedang dihadapi. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan statutori. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang diperoleh dengan studi pustaka dan data primer diperoleh dengan melakukan wawancara dengan responden pihak terkait. Telah terjadi pergeseran makna Hambatan Keadilan sebagaimana tertuang dalam Pasal 221 KUHP dengan Pasal 221 Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Korupsi dimana Pasal 221 KUHP memandang Obstruksi Keadilan sebagai delik material sedangkan untuk Pasal 21 Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Korupsi, Obstruksi Peradilan dipandang sebagai delik formal. Di sisi lain, tindakan Dewan Pengawas dalam pemberian izin penggeledahan, penyitaan, dan lain-lain tidak serta merta dianggap sebagai gangguan keadilan kecuali dapat dibuktikan bahwa unsur-unsur perbuatan salah yang dilakukan Dewan Pengawas dapat dibuktikan. Kata Kunci: Korupsi, Otoritas, Obstruksi Keadilan.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1751
Author(s):  
I Made Sudirga

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap produk wine salak desa sibetan berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah No 51 tahun 2007 tentang Indikasi Geogerafis. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yakni pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap wine salak produksi desa Sibetan, kecamatan Bebandem kabupaten karangasem ditinjau dari Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 51 Tahun 2007 tentang Indikasi-Geografis belum mampu meningkatkan perekonomian masyarakat setempat terbukti belum terdaftarnya sebagai indikasi geografis dan hal ini berdampak pada nilai jual wine tersebut yang terbilang murah seukuran produksi wine serta pemasarannya belum luas hanya sebatas wisatawan yang berkunjung saja. The purpose of this study was to analyze the legal protection of salak wine products in the Sibetan village based on Government Regulation No. 51 of 2007 concerning Geographical Indications. This paper uses an empirical legal research method. The approach used in this research is the statute approach and the conceptual approach. The results showed that the legal protection of salak wine produced in Sibetan village, Bebandem sub-district, Karangasem district in terms of Government Regulation Number 51 of 2007 concerning Geographical Indications has not been able to improve the local economy, it is proven that it has not been registered as a geographical indication and this has an impact on the selling value of the wine. which is relatively inexpensive about the size of wine production and its marketing is not extensive, only limited to visiting tourists.


Author(s):  
Syamsiar Arief

 AbstractThe basis for investigating members of the National Police who are suspected of committing criminal offenses is the existence of reports or complaints from the public. The report or complaint is submitted through the Head of the Complaints Service Section for the Professional and Security Sector, and then proposes to the Head of Sub-Division through the Head of the Investigation Unit to call and examine members as witnesses to victims and other witnesses. The Police Investigator in addition to carrying out the duties and functions of the Police also has authority in the investigation and law enforcement of members or persons who commit criminal acts. Apart from the foregoing, investigators must pay attention to and settle as well as possible reports or complaints from the public in accordance with their duties and functions as investigators. Investigations of members of the Indonesian National Police who commit criminal acts are carried out by investigators as stipulated in the criminal procedure applicable to the general court environment, which is confirmed in Article 2 of Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2003 concerning the Technical Implementation of General Judicial Institutions for members of the Police Force. Republic of Indonesia. The examination of members of the Indonesian National Police is carried out in accordance with the rank, namely according to the provisions of Article 5 of Government Regulation where the examination of members of the Indonesian National Police in the course of an investigation is carried out with regard to rank. Keywords: Code of Ethics, Criminal Acts, Police , Violations.AbstrakDasar penyidikan terhadap Anggota Polri yang disangka melakukan tindak pidana adalah adanya laporan atau pengaduan dari masyarakat. Laporan atau pengaduan tersebut disampaikan melalui Kepala Bagian Pelayanan Pengaduan Bidang Profesi dan Pengamanan, selanjutnya mendisposisikan kepada Kepala Sub Bagian Provos melalui Kepala Unit Penyidik untuk melakukan pemanggilan dan pemeriksaan terhadap anggota sebagai saksi korban dan saksi lainnya. Penyidik Polri selain sebagai pengemban tugas dan fungsi Kepolisian juga memiliki kewenangan dalam penyidikan dan penegakan hukum terhadap anggota atau oknum yang melakukan tindak pidana. Selain dari hal tersebut diatas, aparat penyidik wajib memperhatikan dan menyelesaikan dengan sebaik-baiknya laporan dan atau pengaduan dari masyarakat sesuai tugas dan fungsinya selaku penyidik. Penyidikan terhadap anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia yang melakukan tindak pidana, dilakukan oleh penyidik sebagaimana diatur dalam hukum acara pidana yang berlaku di lingkungan peradilan umum, yang dipertegas dalam Pasal 2 Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 tahun 2003 tentang Pelaksanaan Teknis Institusional Peradilan Umum bagi anggota Kepolisian. Negara Republik Indonesia. Pemeriksaan terhadap anggota Polri dilaksanakan sesuai jenjang kepangkatan yakni sesuai ketentuan Pasal 5 Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 3 Tahun 2003 tentang pelaksanaan teknis institusional peradilan umum bagi anggota Polri dimana pemeriksaan terhadap anggota Polri dalam rangka penyidikan dilakukan dengan memperhatikan kepangkatan. Pemeriksaan dalam rangka penyidikan dilakukan sesuai dengan Pasal 5 Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 3 Tahun 2003 berdasarkan kepangkatannya.Kata Kunci : Kode Etik, Pelanggaran, Polisi, Tindak Pidana.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document