scholarly journals Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Jual Beli Tanah (Studi Kasus : Putusan No. 74/Pid.B/2017/Pn Gin)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 651-655
Author(s):  
Ngakan Made Wira Diputra ◽  
I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani

Crime on this earth will never end. The most frequent criminal treatment in the community is the crime of fraud related to an object. The crime of fraud has been regulated starting from Article 378 to Article 395 of the Criminal Code. This study aims to examine the criminal sanctions against the crime of fraud in the sale and purchase of land and reveal the judges' considerations against the perpetrators of the crime of fraud in the sale and purchase of land according to the case study: Decision No. 74/Pid.B/2017/PN Gin. This study uses a normative legal research method with a legislation approach and a case study approach. The legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials collected by library and interview techniques. Furthermore, the research data was processed and analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results of the study revealed that the criminal sanction applied was in the form of a principal sentence by looking at the indictment of the public prosecutor which applied more to Article 378 of the Criminal Code so that in the case study the defendant was sentenced to a year in prison. The Panel of Judges made this decision after hearing statements from the defendant, victim witnesses, and evidence presented by the public prosecutor

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
Thessa Anial John

<p>Abstract</p><p>This article aims to study the bank’s responsibility towards fraud against customer with a case study of Bank Mega Fraud against PT. Elnusadeposito funds. This research is a normative legal research using constitutional and case study approach. The result of this research show that Bank Mega liquefyPT. Elnusadeposito funds carelessly without PT.Elnusa consent is an act against the law. Bank Mega hasfailed to fulfil it’s responsibility towardsthe customer as regulated Article 37 B paragraph (1) UndangUndang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 concerning banking service that stipulate every bank must guarantee the public funds deposited in the bank concerned The action of Bank Mega has caused losses both material and immaterial loss so that Bank Mega has to give responsibility and compensation for damage and consumer loss according to Article 19 paragraph (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 regarding consumer protection.</p><p>Keywords: Responsibility; prudential principles; banks; and customers.</p><p>Abstrak</p><p>Artikelini bertujuan mengkaji tanggung jawab perbankan terhadap pembobolan dana nasabah dengan</p><p>studi kasus terhadap Bank Mega dalam kasus pembobolan dana deposito PT.Elnusa, Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan melakukan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan kasus.Berdasarkan hasil dari penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa tindakan Bank Mega mencairkan dana deposito milik PT.Elnusa secara tidak hati-hati dan tanpa sepengetahuan PT. Elnusa merupakan tindakan yang melanggar hukum. Bank Mega telah tidak memenuhi kewajibannya terhadap nasabah sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 37 B ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perbankan yang menyebutkan bahwa setiap bank wajib menjamin dana masyarakat yang disimpan pada bank yang bersangkutan. Tindakan Bank Mega telah menimbulkan kerugian baik materiil maupun immateriil sehingga Bank Mega selaku pelaku usaha berdasarkan Pasal 19 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen bertanggung jawab untuk memberikan ganti rugi atas kerusakan, pencemaran, dan/atau kerugian konsumen akibat mengkonsumsi barang dan/atau jasa yang dihasilkan.</p><p>Kata Kunci: Tanggung jawab; prinsip kehati-hatian; bank; dan nasabah.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-61
Author(s):  
I Dewa Gede Windhu Indrakusuma

Maltreatment is an act that causes injury or pain to someone which is done on purpose. The maltreatment consisted of light maltreatment and severe torture. This study aims to determine the criminal sanctions against the planned perpetrators of maltreatment and to analyze the considerations of the judge's decision against the perpetrators of the planned maltreatment. This type of research is normative legal research using a statutory approach. The technique of collecting legal materials is done by interviewing techniques. The results of the study show that the criminal sanction against the perpetrator of the planned maltreatment is a maximum of four years in prison as regulated in Article 353 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, while in the case of decision Number 19 / pidB / 2019 / PNBLI, the perpetrator I Made Merta is subject to imprisonment for four months according to Article 353 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code where the elements contained therein are all fulfilled. Then, the judges' considerations in the perpetrators of the planned maltreatment included considerations of a juridical nature, namely things that were burdensome and things that were mitigating, whereas in the case study decision Number 19 / pidB / 2019 / PNBLI the judge considered more about the history of the defendant, namely the defendant. polite and admit that his actions in court have never been convicted and there has been peace between witnesses victim I Gede Jasa, so the judge sentenced Article 353 of the Criminal Code, which is four (4) months.


Crimen ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-254
Author(s):  
Veljko Delibašić ◽  
Tijana Kostić

This paper addresses the issue of suspended sentence since it is a criminal sanction frequently applied in Serbia and statutory provisions regulating suspended sentence are also subject to frequent modification which altogether emphasizes the need of its continuous study. Within the general purpose of criminal sanctions, the purpose of a suspended sentence is to avoid imposing the sentence on an offender for a minor offence in cases when it can be reasonably expected that a warning with a threatened sentence shall suffice to prevent the offender from perpetrating other crimes. Suspended sentence can be granted only when the offender has been sentenced to less than two years imprisonment, however, on condition (which was tightened in 2019) that the crime does not fall within the category of criminal offences for which an eight-year prison sentence (before it was 10 years) or longer can be delivered. Subjective reasons due to which suspended sentence cannot be granted have been also extended, so therefore, suspended sentence can be granted only if more than five years have elapsed from the time the judgment became final by which the offender was sentenced either to imprisonment or was pronounced a suspended sentence for a crime with premeditated intent. In view of the fact that a fine is still a form of punishment and, accordingly, a stricter criminal sanction than suspended sentence which is a non-custodial measure meaning a more lenient sanction, it would be quite acceptable if the legislator, as a limiting factor, also envisaged a fine for a crime with premediated intent. As regards a five year term calculated from the finality of judgment, a better solution would be that the period be calculated from the day of the sentence being served, prescribed or the day a pardon has been granted, i.e. from the day when the adherence monitoring period to probation conditions has expired. Furthermore, recently introduced statutory solutions would result in decrease in the number of suspended sentences in criminal sanctions structure. When it comes to suspended sentence supervision order, as it is rarely applied, it is necessary that minimum effort be invested in providing material conditions and human resources for carrying out this sanction which was found to be effective in many countries. A serious omission of legislators is that the Criminal Procedure Code, when defining the institution of hearing for pronouncing a criminal sanction, leaves an option to the public prosecutor to propose passing of a suspended sentence with determining fine, which is contrary to the Criminal Code. This omission should be corrected by giving priority to the Criminal Code i.e. by excluding the option for the public prosecutor to propose such a sanction.


Public Voices ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle C. Pautz ◽  
Laura Roselle

Perceptions of government and civil servants are shaped by a variety of factors including popular culture. In the public administration literature the significant role that film and other narrative forms have on citizens’ perceptions is duly noted, and there is ample research on politicians and military heroes in film, but a focus on civil servants remains largely elusive. Among the sparse literature centered on civil servants are studies that employ a case study approach or focus on a few films. In contrast, our research employs a large sample of 150 films. These films comprise the top ten box-office grossing films from 1992 through 2006; therefore we examine the films most likely to have been seen by a majority of movie-watching Americans. More than 60 percent of the films in our sample portray government as bad, inefficient, and incompetent. However, the data on more than 300 civil servants yield intriguing findings. Surprising, in light of the negative depiction of government, is the positive depiction of individual civil servants. Half of civil servants were positively portrayed, and only 40 percent were negatively depicted. Americans may view government negatively, but they see in film positive depictions of how individual civil servants can and do make a positive difference.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 237
Author(s):  
Sumaryono Sumaryono ◽  
Sri Kusriyah Kusriyah

Fraudulent criminal acts that have been regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) with various modes, one of which is fraud by shamans with a multiplied money mode has made law enforcers increasingly have to rack their brains to be able to prove it. This study aims to examine and analyze law enforcement by the judge in decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora with consideration of the criminal elements. The research method used is a sociological juridical approach. The specifications of the study were conducted using descriptive analytical methods. The data used for this study are primary and secondary data. The data consists of primary data and secondary data using field research methods, interviews, and literature studies. Based on the research it was concluded that the case ruling number 61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN Bla with a fraud case with shamanism practices in the mode of duplicating the judge's money considering that the Defendants have been indicted by the Public Prosecutor with alternative indictments, so the Panel of Judges paid attention to the facts The aforementioned law decides on the first alternative indictment as regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) of the 1st Criminal Code by considering the elements of that article.Keywords: Criminal Law Enforcement; Fraud; Multiple Money.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Maimunah Binti Mohd Rijal ◽  
Rukiah Muhammad Ali

This article examined the problem to reduce divorces outside the court. The Malaysian government has established sanctions for the perpetrators. This research was conducted employing a case study approach with descriptive-analysis method. The results showed that the implementation of divorce sanctions outside the Syariah Subordinate Court of Selangor was less effective in reducing divorces. The high number of divorce cases were found in the country of Selangor, increasing by 71.8% of cases from 2012 to 2017. However, the cases in the West Gombak Syariah Subordinate Court has decreased slightly between 2015 and 2017, indicated by only a few cases were registered. Two factors influenced the implementation of divorce sanctions outside the Syariah Subordinate Court. First, the Selangor Islamic Family Law has regulated the divorce law outside the court in a detailed and clear. Still, the socialization for the public was lacking, and the society took this rule seriously so that the sanction implementation for divorce cases outside the court became a legal solution. Second, the high number of divorce cases found outside the court required a legal policy to impose a legal sanction on the perpetrators. Abstrak: Artikel ini mengkaji masalah untuk mengurangi talak di luar Mahkamah, pemerintah Malaysia telah menetapkan sanksi bagi pelaku. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan pendekatan studi kasus dengan metode deskriptif-analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: Pelaksanaan sanksi talak di luar Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Selangor masih kurang efektif dalam mengurangi perceraian. Kasus perceraian ditemukan cukup banyak di negeri Selangor sebanyak 71.8% kasus meningkat dari tegang waktu tahun 2012 hingga 2017 namun kisaran kasus di Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Gombak Barat agak sudah sedikit menurun dari tahun 2015 hingga 2017 hanya ditemukan beberapa kasus yang terdaftar. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pelaksanaan sanksi talak di luar Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Selangor ada dua. Pertama, Enakmen Hukum Keluarga Islam Negeri Selangor telah diatur hukum perceraian di luar mahkamah secara rinci dan jelas, namun masyarakat masih kurang sosialisasi dan mengambil berat terhadap aturan ini sehingga penerapan sanksi atas kasus talak di luar mahkamah muncul sebagai solusi hukumnya. Kedua, banyaknya temuan kasus talak di luar mahkamah mengharuskan adanya kebijakan hukum berupa penjatuhan sanksi hukum bagi pelakunya. Kata Kunci: Efektivitas, Sanksi, Talak, Luar Mahkamah


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 320
Author(s):  
Sulikah Asmorowati ◽  
Mia Fairuza

The development of tourism on the coast of Pulau Merah Banyuwangi has resulted in the welfare felt directly by the people around the coast. This article discussed the results of development of the Pulau Merah coast by using the inclusive development paradigm, they are consists of benefits, participation, and ecology aspects. This qualitative research has used a case study approach. Data collection was conducted through interviews of 27 informants. The results of this study indicated that in the development of tourism in Pulau Merah, especially the achievement of inclusive development was good. This is caused in three aspects of inclusive development; the aspects of benefits, participation, and ecology are well implemented. The benefits of the development of Pulau Merah have been felt evenly by the people. Community participation of Pulau Merah coast is quite high. The public awareness of the importance of ecology on the coast of Pulau Merah is also high.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
I Nyoman Gede Murdiana ◽  
A.A.A.N Sri Rahayu Gorda

An agreement will not always be able to run according to the agreement of the parties. Certain conditions can be found, such as, the occurrence of various things that result in an agreement cannot be implemented, namely the buy-back right by the seller which has been agreed upon and results in losses for the buyer and on a court decision that sentences the seller to carry out the agreement seven days after the verdict, but the implementation of the sale and purchase agreement has not yet been carried out. This paper examines the legal protection for the buyer against the sale and purchase agreement for building use rights in terms of default. This type of research is a normative juridical legal research applying a case study approach and statue approach. The preventive legal protection for the buyer, namely legal protection is by requesting for irrevocable power of attorney, referred to as absolute power of attorney. Meanwhile, repressive legal protection is legal protection after the occurrence of a dispute, namely based on the consideration of a judge's decision which can provide a sense of certainty and justice to the aggrieved buyer.   Suatu perjanjian tidak selamanya akan dapat berjalan sesuai dengan kesepakatan para pihak. Kondisi tertentu dapat ditemukan terjadinya berbagai hal yang berakibat suatu perjanjian tidak dilaksanakan yaitu dengan hak membeli kembali oleh penjual yang telah disepakati dan mengakibatkan kerugian bagi pihak pembeli dan atas putusan pengadilan yang menghukum pihak penjual untuk melaksanakan perjanjian tujuh hari setelah putusan, akan tetapi pelaksanaan perjanjian jual beli tersebut belum juga terlaksana. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan studi kasus dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Perlindungan hukum secara preventif bagi pihak pembeli yaitu perlindungan hukum yaitu permintaaan pemberian kuasa yang tidak dapat ditarik kembali yang disebut surat kuasa mutlak. Sedangkan perlindungan hukum secara represif adalah perlindungan hukum setelah terjadinya sengketa yaitu berdasarkan pertimbangan putusan hakim yang bisa memberikan rasa kepastian dan keadilan terhadap pembeli yang dirugikan.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 566
Author(s):  
Lisa Noviani Maghfiroh

<p>This paper aims to explain e-resources as a provider of information in the National Library of the Republic of Indonesia. In this paper using qualitative research methods descriptive case study approach in the National Library of the Republic of Indonesia with data collection methods through literature review. The result of the discussion is to know the role of e-resources as a provider of quality information and guidelines for accessing e-resources owned PNRI provided for the wider community so that the public and users of National Library of the Republic of Indonesia can obtain the information<br />needed cheap and cheap.</p><p>Keywords : E-resources, Information, National Library of the Republic of Indonesia, PNRI</p>


Author(s):  
Rido Rikardo

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan memahami bagaimana Tugas dan Kewenangan Kejaksaan dalam Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI nomor: 02 tahun 2012 tentang penyesuaian batasan tindak pidana ringan dan jumlah denda dalam KUHP dalam kaitannya dengan perkara tindak pidana ringan Harta Kekayaan di dalam KUHP dalam proses Pra Penuntutan (Studi Kasus Perkara Pencurian di Kejaksaan Negeri Kampar) dan Apakah kendala dan hambatan yang dihadapi Jaksa Peneliti dalam Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor : 02 tahun 2012 tentang penyesuaian batasan tindak pidana ringan dan jumlah denda dalam KUHP dalam Tindak Pidana Ringan lingkup Harta Kekayaan. Penelitian ini dilakukan secara sosiologis yakni berdasarkan fakta fakta yang ada dilapangan. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa Jaksa Penuntut Umum dalam melaksanakan tugasnya dibidang para penuntutan dalam menerima berkas perkara Penyidikan oleh Pihak Kepolisian harus dengan seksama melihat apakah suatu perkara masuk dalam kategori Tindak Pidana Ringan yang dimaksudkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 atau tidak dengan berbagai pertimbangan yang dapat dipahami oleh Penyidik Kepolisian tentu saja hal ini akan memberikan rasa keadilan baik bagi Tersangka maupun bagi korban tindak pidana dan masyarakat pada umumnya.Kata kunci: kewenangan; penyelesaian; dendaABSTRACTThis study aims to find out and understand how the Duties and Authority of the Prosecutor's Office in Applying the Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation number: 02 of 2012 concerning the adjustment of minor criminal offenses and the amount of fines in the Criminal Code in relation to cases of minor criminal offenses. (Case Study of Theft Case in the Kampar District Prosecutor's Office) and What are the obstacles and obstacles faced by the Research Prosecutor in Applying the Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation No. 02/2012 concerning the adjustment of minor criminal offenses and the amount of fines in the Criminal Code in Minor Crimes in the scope of Assets. this is done sociologically, based on facts in the field. The results of the study found that the Public Prosecutor in carrying out his duties in the field of prosecution in receiving case files Investigations by the Police must carefully see whether a case is included in the category of Minor Crimes as intended by Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 or not with various considerations that can understood by Police Investigators, of course this will give a sense of justice both to the Suspect and to victims of crime and the community at large.Keywords: authority; settlement; fines


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document