Vaccines for Tourism Business Actors: Fulfilment or Violation of Human Rights?

Tourism sector is the largest source of income for Bali province of Indonesia. Unfortunately, the Covid-19 pandemic forced the closure of tourism. Therefore, Bali’s economic growth is experiencing decrease to -10.98%. To accelerate the reopening of tourism, the government has launched the national vaccine movement that also covers tourism business actors. Unfortunately, some parties resist the vaccination because the vaccine is not believed yet to be safe. By using doctrinal legal research, this study examined two problems: the right to health in the context of tourism and the construction of government policies against vaccine resistance by tourism business actors. It examined legal principles and synchronization of laws on human rights related to vaccination. The state is responsible to provide vaccination for the citizens in fulfilling the right to life and health. Each local government produces policy to deal with vaccine refusal. Jakarta and West Java are two provinces that impose fines for residents who refuse vaccines. On the other hand, Bali province does not impose sanctions on such residents. To ensure safety after the reopening of tourism, any local government can propose the record of vaccination as a requirement for every person who will return to work in the tourism sector.

Download Full-text

Longitudinal Form and the Human Conceptus

The Linacre Quarterly ◽

10.1080/20508549.1999.11878332 ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 63 (1) ◽

pp. 14-24

Author(s):

Ashley K. Fernandes

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Human Life ◽

Right To Life ◽

Very Old ◽

The World ◽

Moral Precept ◽

The Government ◽

The Right

Human rights are not a privilege conferred by the government They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or sovereign … I have no new teaching for America. I seek only to recall you to faithfulness to what you once taught the world Your nation was founded on the proposition — very old as a moral precept, but startling and innovative as political insight — that human life is a gift of immeasurable worth, and that it deserves, always and everywhere, to be treated with the utmost dignity and respect — Mother Theresa of Calcutta (1994) 1

Download Full-text

The Roles of Local Government in Preventing Woman Trafficking in Laws No 21 of 2007 Perspective That Concer to Crime of Human Trafficking in District of Bone

International Journal of Scientific Research and Management ◽

10.18535/ijsrm/v6i10.sh03 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 6 (10) ◽

Author(s):

Nur Paikah

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Local Government ◽

Human Trafficking ◽

Human Being ◽

Role Of Government ◽

Positive Rights ◽

Women And Children ◽

The Government ◽

The Right

This research aims to analyze the process the role of government of human trafficking. Research was conducted at Bone Regency. Methods used the case study method by using a qualitative approach. The results showed human trafficking is one of the crimes against humanity, because this act has violated human rights, and the majority are victims of women and children. Referring to the Law that, every human being, especially women and children, has the right to live peacefully and properly as they should. Therefore, the right of life of every human being cannot be reduced by anyone and under any circumstances including not allowed to be traded, especially women and children. This is where the role of the government, especially the local government of Bone Regency, seeks to guarantee the protection of positive rights for them for their lives. In this case the local government of Bone Regency provides protection and prevention of human trafficking, especially women and children as a form of respect, recognition and protection of human rights is stated explicitly in Article 58 of Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning Crime of Trafficking in Persons.

Download Full-text

Aturan Pembebasan Narapidana dengan Program Asimilasi dan Integrasi di Tengah Wabah Covid-19 di Tinjau Dari Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Ham Nomor 10 Tahun 2020

INICIO LEGIS ◽

10.21107/il.v2i2.13050 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2 (2) ◽

pp. 164-182

Author(s):

Halim Dimas Ferdiansyah ◽

Syamsul Fatoni

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

The Difference ◽

The Government ◽

Release Program ◽

The Right ◽

Occupancy Rates

ABSTRAKDasar pertimbangan dikeluarkannya Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 10 Tahun 2020 tentang Persyaratan Pemberian Hak Asimilasi dan Integrasi bagi Narapidana dan Anak dalam rangka pencegahan dan penanggulangan penyebaran COVID-19. dengan banyaknya tingkat hunian di penjara, hal ini telah menimbulkan kekhawatiran bagi pemerintah. Namun, terpidana yang dibebaskan mengulangi kejahatannya lagi dan menimbulkan kecemasan publik. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan antara Permenkumham Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 dengan Permenkumham Nomor 20 Tahun 2020 dan kesesuaian prinsip pembinaan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 1995 tentang pemasyarakatan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan pemberian hak asimilasi dan integrasi narapidana dalam Permenkumham Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 diberikan sesuai dengan persyaratan substantif dan administratif secara lengkap. Namun dalam Permenkuham Nomor 10 Tahun 2020 terdapat beberapa perbedaan dalam hal pemberian hak asimilasi dan integrasi, baik persyaratan substantif maupun administratif, sehingga Permenkumham Nomor 10 Tahun 2020 memudahkan narapidana mendapatkan hak asimilasi dan integrasi. serta pelaksanaan ketentuan pemberian asimilasi dan integrasi dalam Permenkumham Nomor 10 Tahun 2020 tidak sesuai dengan prinsip pembinaan dalam undang-undang pemasyarakatan. Ketidaksesuaian tersebut dikarenakan adanya narapidana yang kembali melakukan tindak pidana, hal ini menunjukkan kegagalan dalam melakukan pembinaan terhadap narapidana. Pasalnya, program pembebasan hanya berfokus pada pencegahan penularan COVID-19 di lapas Kata kunci: asimilasi, integrasi, narapidana, perbedaan dan kesesuaian Permenkumham ABSTRACTThe basis for the consideration of the issuance of Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 10 of 2020 concerning the Requirements for Granting Assimilation and Integration Rights for Prisoners and Children in the context of preventing and overcoming the spread of COVID-19. with many occupancy rates in prisons, it caused a concern of the government. However, the convict who was released repeated the crime again and caused public anxiety. The purpose of this research was to find out the difference between Permenkumham (Regulation of the minister of Law and human righs) Number 3 of 2018 and Permenkumham Number 20 of 2020 and the suitability of the principles of development with Law Number 12 of 1995 concerning correctionalism. The method used in this research was a type of normative legal research using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicated that the differences in the provision of assimilation rights and integration of prisoners in Permenkumham No.3 of 2018 were given in accordance with the complete substantive and administrative requirements. However, in Permenkuham No.10 of 2020 there are several differences in terms of granting assimilation and integration rights, both substantive and administrative requirements, so that Permenkumham No.10 of 2020 made it easier for inmates to get the right of assimilation and integration. and the implementation of the provisions for assimilation and integration in Permenkumham No.10 of 2020 is not in accordance with the principles of guidance in the correctional law. This mismatch was due to the presence of prisoners who had returned to committing criminal acts, this indicated a failure to provide guidance to prisoners. This was because the release program only focuses on preventing transmisfsion of COVID-19 in prisons. Keywords: Assimilation, Integration, Prisoners, Differences and suitability of Permenkumham

Download Full-text

ETIKA PENYADAPAN OLEH KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM HAK ASASI MANUSIA

Mizan Journal of Islamic Law ◽

10.32507/mizan.v4i1.608 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Sugeng Widodo ◽

Mufidah Mufidah

Keyword(s):

Qualitative Research ◽

Human Rights ◽

Research Method ◽

Privacy Rights ◽

Right To Life ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Library Research ◽

The Government ◽

The Right ◽

Laws And Regulations

The rise of corruption cases certainly forces the government to prevent corrupt measures, the wiretapping in Indonesia by the KPK, also in terms of tackling other criminal acts. So of course there is Ethics, Ethics so far has not been touched by the KPK because in conducting wiretapping it is only limited to following the laws and regulations even though in regard to laws and regulations there should be ethics that must be maintained to guarantee the right to life of one's privacy. The research method used in this study is the qualitative research method with the type of library research library research, using the statutory approach, and theories (conceptual approach), and the Case Approach (doctrinal approach) which is examined through various literatures relating to the regulation of privacy rights, also relating to the regulation of wiretapping of the KPK.Keywords: Ethics, Wiretapping by the KPK, Wiretapping in the Human Rights PerspectiveMaraknya kasus korupsi tentu memaksa pemerintah terhadap langkah-langkah preventive koruptor, maka penyadapan di Indonesia yang dilakukan oleh KPK, juga dalam hal menanggulangi tindakan-tindakan kriminal lainnya. Maka tentu ada Etika, Etika selama ini belum tersentuh oleh KPK karena dalam melakukan penyadapan hanya sebatas mengikuti peraturan perundang-undangan, padahal berkenaan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan seharusnya ada etika yang harus dijaga untuk menjamin hak kehidupan privasi seseorang. Metode penelitian yang dilakukan dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian kepustakaan ( library research), menggunakan Pendekatan Perundang-undangan (statutory approach), dan Teori-teori (conceptual approach), serta Pendekatan Kasus (doktrinal approach) yang diteliti melalui berbagai literatur yang berkaitan dengan pengaturan hak-hak privasi, juga berkaitan dengan pengaturan penyadapan KPK. Kata Kunci : Etika, Penyadapan oleh KPK, Penyadapan dalam Presfektif HAM

Download Full-text

PEMBUANGAN BAYI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA

Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS) ◽

10.36733/jhshs.v3i2.2962 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 3 (2) ◽

pp. 136-145

Author(s):

Ni Nyoman Muryatini

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Rule Of Law ◽

Descriptive Analysis ◽

Legal Issues ◽

Deterrent Effect ◽

Right To Life ◽

Legal Research ◽

Legal Instrument ◽

Biological Parents ◽

The Right

This study focuses on the disposal of the baby by the biological parents through killing the baby first then discarding. The study aims to find out the crime of child disposal from the perspective of human rights. The method used in this research is normative legal research, which is descriptive analysis to find a rule of law in order to answer the legal issues faced. The results showed that the right to life which is part of human rights has been owned by babies since they were in the womb as God's creatures. No one can take away someone's right to life. The increase in cases in the last three years proves that there is no deterrent effect on the perpetrators of crime. The urgency of making the right legal instrument is needed for perpetrators of child disposal crimes. Penelitian ini dibatasi oleh pembuangan bayi yang dilakukan oleh orang tua kandung, dengan membunuh bayi terlebih dahulu kemudian dibuang. Adapun tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui tindak kejahatan pembuangan bayi bila ditinjau dari perspektif hak asasi manusia. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif, yang bersifat deskriptif analisis untuk menemukan suatu aturan hukum guna menjawab isu hukum yang dihadapi.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwahak hidup yang merupakan bagian dari hak asasi manusia telah dimiliki oleh bayi semenjak berada di dalam kandungan sebagai mahluk ciptaan Tuhan. Tidak ada seorang pun yang dapat merampas hak hidup seseorang. Meningkatnya kasus dalam tiga tahun terakhir, membuktikan tidak adanya efek jera terhadap para pelaku kejahatan. Urgensi pembuatan instrumen hukum yang tepat diperlukan bagi pelaku kejahatan pembuangan bayi.

Download Full-text

Overpowering the law enforcing agency and human rights challenges

BORDER CROSSING ◽

10.33182/bc.v8i1.579 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

pp. 181-199 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

AKM Ahsan Ullah ◽

Lutfunnessa Sagor

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Secondary Data ◽

Snowball Sampling ◽

Right To Life ◽

Daily Newspapers ◽

Human Rights Organizations ◽

Constitutional Right ◽

The Government ◽

The Right ◽

Depth Interviews

This research seeks to explore and understand the extent of human rights is violated by an elite force in Bangladesh. The constitutional right to life should not be derogated or suspended, and no person should be stripped of his or her basic human rights. (Number) of victims and human rights activists were recruited via snowball sampling and in-depth interviews were conducted. Secondary data was obtained via daily newspapers, magazines and bulletins published by various human rights organizations in Bangladesh. This is due to the elite force ignoring the existing constitutional guarantee of the right to life. The participants views were that the government has to ensure human rights are maintained. It should limit the jurisdiction of the elite force and conform to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Download Full-text

The Communist Party of China’s Approach to Human Rights and the Death Penalty

Asia Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law ◽

10.1163/15718158-01802001 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 18 (2) ◽

pp. 117-154

Author(s):

Huang Gui

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Communist Party ◽

Leadership Role ◽

Right To Life ◽

Human Rights Protection ◽

Legal Provisions ◽

The Government ◽

The Right ◽

Individual Human

Under the Constitution of China, the Communist Party (cpc) does not merely play a leadership role in the political field, but also in the legal arena. Legislation must reflect the Party’s outlook and achieve its policies, including any legal provisions governing particular systems, such as arrangements for the death penalty. After introducing the relationship between the cpc and legislation, this article will discuss the shift in the cpc’s approach to human rights and changes to the death penalty system in the Maoist, Deng Xiaoping and post-Deng eras. In the Maoist era, the government rejected human rights, but its policy on execution – at least on paper – was cautious and even stricter than during the other eras; the cpc recognised and accepted human rights in the Deng era, but emphasised national security and stability. As a result, individual human rights were not fully taken into account. Execution was considered an important measure to control crime and the scope of the relevant legislation was expanded. Post-Deng, human rights have developed gradually. Human rights protection has been incorporated into the Constitution and individual human rights have become more valued, but the cpc still focuses on state security, development and stability, and has not valued the right to life to the same extent as the right to subsistence. Although steps to reform the death penalty are being taken, 46 crimes are still punishable by death. The cpc should change its outlook and focus on the right to life, and abolish the death penalty de facto and de jure.

Download Full-text

Kebijakan Kewajiban Vaksin Covid-19 Bukan Bentuk Pelanggaran HAM oleh Pemerintah

INICIO LEGIS ◽

10.21107/il.v2i2.13051 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2 (2) ◽

pp. 183-193

Author(s):

Aprilina Pawestri ◽

Ida Wahyuliana

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Large Change ◽

John Stuart Mill ◽

Government Policies ◽

Economic Conditions ◽

Human Rights Violations ◽

Corona Virus ◽

Pros And Cons ◽

The Government ◽

The Right

ABSTRAKKeberadaan corona virus di Indonesia membawa perubahan yang sangat besar pada kondisi ekonomi, kesehatan, pendidikan dan lain sebagainya. Berbagai kebijakan di ambil salah satunya adalah pemberian vaksin secara masal dan bertahap. Namun kebijakan ini menimbulkan pro dan kontra dalam masyarakat. Khususnya kebijakan kewajiban vaksin yang dinilai melanggar hak asasi manusia. Karena seharusnya pilihan vaksin adalah sukarela. Ini diperkuat dengan munculnya sanksi bagi yang menolak dilakukan vaksinasi. Kajian ini lakukan untuk mengurai permasalahan apakah kewajiban vaksinasi COVID-19 merupakan bentuk pelanggaran hak asasi manusia yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah. Untuk menjawab rumusan tersebut digunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan konseptual. Dan hasil penelitian ini bahwa kebijakan pemerintah menetapkan kewajiban vaksin tidak bisa lantas di justifikasi sebagai bentuk pelanggaran hak asasi manusia. Karena masyarakat juga memiiki kewajiban sebagai warganegara di bidang kesehatan sebagaimana Pasal 9 ayat 1 UU No. 36 Tahun 2009. Diperkuat Komnas HAM dan sejalan dengan teori yang di sebutkan John Stuart Mill bahwa setiap individu memiliki hak untuk bertindak berdasarkan keinginan mereka selama tindakan mereka tidak merugikan orang lain. Dengan tetap mengupayakan langkah persuasif dengan menimalkan sanksi administratif. Kata Kunci: kebijakan, kewajiban vaksin, pelanggaran HAM ABSTRACTThe existence of corona virus in Indonesia brings a very large change in economic conditions, health, education and so on. Various policies are taken, one of which is the provision of vaccines en masse and gradually. But this policy raises pros and cons in society. Especially the policy of vaccine obligations that are considered to violate human rights. The vaccine option should be voluntary. This is reinforced by the emergence of sanctions for those who refuse vaccinations. This study was conducted to unravel the problem of whether the COVID-19 vaccination obligation is a form of human rights violations committed by the government. To answer the formulation is used normative research methods with legal and conceptual approaches. And the results of this study that government policies set vaccine obligations can not be then justified as a form of human rights violations. Because the community also has obligations as citizens in the field of health as Article 9 paragraph 1 of Law No. 36 of 2009. Strengthened Komnas HAM and in line with the theory mentioned by John Stuart Mill that every individual has the right to act on their wishes as long as their actions do not harm others. By continuing to pursue persuasive steps by imposing administrative sanctions.Keywords: policies, vaccine obligations, human rights violations

Download Full-text

KONSTITUSIONALITAS KEBIJAKAN NEW NORMAL DALAM PERLINDUNGAN HAK HIDUP WARGA NEGARA

Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi ◽

10.20961/hpe.v8i1.44287 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

pp. 52

Author(s):

Ruth Crista Vanesa Hariyanto

Keyword(s):

Public Policy ◽

Human Rights ◽

Natural Law ◽

Right To Life ◽

Economic Rights ◽

New Normal ◽

Existing Problems ◽

Natural Law Theory ◽

The Government ◽

The Right

AbstractThis study aims to answer two problems: first, outlining the correlation of the Right to Life with Economic Rights in New Nornal Policy; and secondly, analyzing theConstitutionality of New Normal Policy. The policy created during the Covid-19 Pandemic not infrequently reaping contracdictions. Especially the last one echoed by the governments is the existence of a New Normal Policy which is actually considered unconstitutional because with this policy the government is felt to have ignored the right of Right to Life of citizen and priorited Economic Right. For this reason, this article uses natural law theory as a means of interpretation of two existing problems. In accordance with this, this acricle argues that the New Normal Policy is a constitutional policy because it is in accordance with the spirit of Article 28A UUD NRI 1945. Keywords: Human Rights, New Normal, Public Policy, Constitutionalism.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjawab dua permasalahan: pertama, menguraikan korelasi Hak untuk Hidup dengan Hak Ekonomi dalam Kebijakan Nornal Baru; dan kedua, menganalisis Konstitusionalitas Kebijakan Normal Baru. Kebijakan yang dibuat saat Pandemi Covid-19 tak jarang menuai kontradiksi. Terlebih yang terakhir digaungkan oleh pemerintah adalah adanya New Normal Policy yang justru dinilai inkonstitusional karena dengan kebijakan ini pemerintah dirasa telah mengabaikan hak atas Hak Hidup warga negara dan mengutamakan Hak Ekonomi. Untuk itulah, artikel ini menggunakan teori hukum kodrat sebagai alat interpretasi dari dua masalah yang ada. Sejalan dengan hal tersebut, acricle ini berpendapat bahwa New Normal Policy merupakan kebijakan konstitusional karena sesuai dengan semangat Pasal 28A UUD NRI 1945.Kata Kunci: Hak Asasi Manusia, Normal Baru, Kebijakan Publik, Konstitusionalisme.

Download Full-text

The Interpretation of Freedom of Religion and Believe: How Do University Understand This to Society?

The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education ◽

10.15294/ijicle.v2i1.37325 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 15-28

Author(s):

Rurin Sisilia Prasetyani ◽

Shally Saniyya Novina

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Human Freedom ◽

Freedom Of Religion ◽

Political Rights ◽

Right To Life ◽

Basic Rights ◽

Protestant Christians ◽

Religion And Ethnicity ◽

The Government ◽

The Right

This paper is based on the condition of freedom of religion and belief and people's understanding of the meaning of freedom of religion and belief which is still wrong and ambiguous. In fact, as dignified beings, humans have a number of basic rights that must be protected, such as the right to life, the right to political rights, the right to assemble, as well as the right to religion and belief. Human rights values teach that these basic human rights are protected and respected. Human rights teach the principle of equality and human freedom so that there can be no discrimination, exploitation and violence against humans in any form and also there should not be any restrictions and restrictions on basic human freedoms, including the right to freedom of religion. The Indonesian nation is a pluralistic nation. There are various kinds of ethnicity, race, religion, and ethnicity that cause diversity in Indonesia. Although the majority of Indonesian people are followers of Islam, however, in Indonesia there are also several other official religions recognized by the government, namely, Catholic Christians, Protestant Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, and Confucians. Therefore, every person has the right to freedom of religion or belief, that means no one may be subject to coercion that would interfere with his freedom to adhere to or embrace a religion or belief of his own choice.

Download Full-text