scholarly journals Penyelesaian Perkara Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum Menurut Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-311
Author(s):  
Rachmawati Rachmawati
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Equal Opportunity ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Individual Responsibility ◽  
Inductive Method ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Penal Law ◽  
The Law

The repressive juvenile justice paradigm has begun to be abandoned and replaced by the concept of solving a child criminal case with a restorative concept that views all parties, perpetrators, victims, and communities having equal opportunity to resolve conflicts caused by a crime. The restorative concept is in conformity with the conventions agreed upon by countries in the world in the Convention on the rights of the child in 1990 with international instruments including Beijing Rule dated 29 November 1985. The study of the crime against children in Islam has existed before the rule of the child in the ancient conventional low. The objective of punishment in Islam is not only to recognize the retributive objectives as the main objective in criminal prosecution but also to recognize other objectives such as the rehabilitation of the perpetrator and also the restorative between the perpetrator and the victim. Here is the interesting thing that will be studied comprehensively related Maqasid Al Syari’ah in applying restorative justice especially in case of child face to law. See the complexity that accompanied restorative justice in children facing the law, the authors are interested to examine the settlement of lawsuits children in accordance with the law no 11 of 2012 analysis Maqasid Al syari’ah this research is library research, descriptive analysis and analyze data qualitative with inductive method. The approach used is normative juridical, by looking at restorative justice in the penal law of Indonesia, this research aims to know the value of Maqasid Al Syari’ah in process of settlement of child crime case and examining view of Islam law to restorative justice value contained in law no 11 of 2012. After the research, it can be conclude that the application of restorative justice has long been adopted in the Islamic legal system, precisely on qiyas-diyat criminal acts. In the context of children, the application of restorative justice is more accommodated, given the urgency and for the benefit of the child as the nation’s successor. Whereas in viewing restorative justice in the SPPA act indicates the existence of reconciliation effort of forgiveness, correction of relationship, there is also structural responsibility as balancing individual responsibility, all of which obviously accommodated in the purpose of punishment Al-isti’adah.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TERHADAP FATWA DEWAN SYARI’AH NASIONAL MAJELIS ULAMA INDONESIA (DSNMUI) TENTANG UANG ELEKTRONIK SYARIAH (Studi Kartu Flazz BCA, Go-Pay, dan Grab-Pay)

JURISDICTIE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Novia Nengsih
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
Electronic Money ◽  
Payment Model ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Technological Developments ◽  
The Law ◽  
Conventional Banks ◽  
Nominal Amount

<p>Technological developments have transformed the cash-money payment model into e-money, but the law on the use of e-money is still a debate in Indonesian Moslim society. This paper aims to analyze the legal use of e-money based on DSN-MUI fatwa No: 116/DSN-MUI /IX/2017 concerning Sharia Electronic Money. This research is a library research with descriptive analysis approach. E-money that was studied in this study was the BCA Flazz cards, Go-Pay, and Grab-Pay. Based on the Fatwa of MUI DSN on Shari’ah electronic money, the e-money system used in Indonesia today is not permitted because the issuer places the nominal amount of electronic money in conventional banks, if the card is lost the nominal amount of money in the issuer is also lost, and electronic money holders cannot be taken or cashed back.</p><p>Perkembangan teknologi telah mentransformasi model pembayaran dari cash-money menjadi e-money, tetapi hukum penggunaan e-money masih menjadi perdebatan di kalangan masyarakat Muslim Indonesia. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hukum penggunaan e-money berdasarkan fatwa DSN-MUI No: 116/DSN-MUI/IX/2017 tentang Uang Elektronik Syariah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan (library research) dengan menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif analisis. E-money yang menjadi kajian dalam penelitian ini adalah kartu Flazz BCA, Go-Pay, dan Grab-Pay. Berdasarkan fatwa DSN MUI tentang Uang elektronik Syari’ah, maka sistem e-money yang dipakai di Indonesia hari ini tidak diperbolehkan karena penerbit menempatkan jumlah nominal uang elektronik di bank konvensional, apabila kartu hilang maka jumlah nominal uang yang ada di penerbit juga hilang, dan uang elektronik pemegang tidak bisa diambil atau diuangkan kembali.</p>

scholarly journals Restorative Justice Approach on The Under Age (Minors) Violator of The Traffic Case Accident (Laka) That Lead to Death in Polres Majalengka

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 705
Author(s):  
Malik AL-Ghazali
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Intervention ◽  
Rights Of The Child

The research is qualitative research in the form of descriptive analysis using sociological juridical approach. Types and sources of data used are primary data and secondary data. Data collected through the study of literature and interviews, while the juridical analysis using qualitative analysis. The approach used for the treatment of children in conflict with the law based on values, principles and norms. Pure approach puts the welfare and well-being approach to legal intervention. The punishment model approach to restorative justice called today considered more feasible. For the sake of freedom and rights of the child (fundamental rights and freedom of children) as well as the various interests related to the welfare of children. A limiting factor in the application of Restorative Justice against children in violation of the Act Traffic is due to the factor of legislation often misinterpretation, the factor of law enforcement is the lack of knowledge and skills of investigators in solving criminal cases traffic, factors of infrastructure, a factor of society who do not know information about Restorative justice, Cultural factors personal character actors and victims and their families who do not support the case outside of court settlement or peace. Efforts of traffic guards to avoid conflicts / complaints by victims neutral officer, the offender is directed to the relationship and extend our condolences to the victims, conduct deliberations and request assistance from the Institute of Corrections.Keywords: Restorative Justice; Traffic Accident; Child Actors.

scholarly journals RESTORATIVE JUSTICE: SUATU TINJAUAN TERHADAP PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 263
Author(s):  
Septa Candra
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Legal Cases ◽  
The Future ◽  
Justice Model ◽  
The Law ◽  
Criminal Matters

Restorative Justice adalah merupakan suatu bentuk model pendekatan baru dalam penyelesaian perkara pidana. Model pendekatan restorative justice ini sebenarnya telah digunakan dibeberapa negara dengan fokus pendekatannya kepada pelaku, korban dan masyarakat dalam proses penyelesaian kasus hukum yang terjadi diantara mereka. Walaupun model pendekatan ini masih banyak diperdebatkan dalam tataran teori oleh para ahli, namun dalam kenyataannya tetap tumbuh dan eksis serta mempengaruhi kebijakan dan praktek hukum di banyak negara. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini yaitu bagaimana mekanisme penerapan pendekatan restorative justice dalam penyelesaian kasus hukum di Indonesia dan bagaimana konsep restorative justice dapat menjadi bagian dari pembaharuan hukum pidana di masa yang akan datang. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif analitis dan bersifat kualitatif, dapat disimpulkan bahwa Indonesia dengan angka kejahatan yang relatif tinggi, patut pula untuk dipertimbangkan model restorative justice ini menjadi bagian dari pendekatan dalam penyelesaian kasus-kasus hukum yang terjadi selama ini. Dalam perkembangannya prinsip restorative justice sudah diintrodusir melalui sejumlah ketentuan dalam RUU KUHP dan diversi terhadap anak, terutama untuk memberikan keseimbangan perhatian diantara stakeholders hukum pidana (pelaku, korban, masyarakat dan negara). Tentunya, model pendekatan ini diharapkan dapat menjadi bagian dari pembaharuan hukum pidana Indonesia di masa yang akan datang guna mencapai keadilan, kepastian dan kemanfaatan sebagai tujuan dari hukum itu sendiri.<p>Restorative justice is a new approach model to solve criminal matters. Restorative justice model is an approach that has actually been used in several countries with focus its approach to offenders, victims and the community in the process of settlement of legal cases that have happened among them. Even though the model has still been widely debated in the level of theory, but in fact, it still grows and exists, also influences policy and practice of the law in many countries. Based on the reasons, the focus of this study, namely: How is a mechanism of a restorative justice approach in solving legal cases in Indonesia? How is the concept of restorative justice that can be a part of the reform of criminal law in the future? The research applies descriptive analysis study and uses qualitative method. The result of the study shows that Indonesia as a law state with criminal figures relatively high ought also to be considered that the model of restorative justice may become an approach for solving legal cases. Restorative justice principles in development have already been introduced through a number of provisions in the Criminal Code Bill and diversion of children, especially to provide a balance among stakeholders in criminal law (perpetrators, victims, community and nation). Of course, this model is expected to be a part of the Indonesian criminal law reform in the future to bring justice, certainty and expediency as the purpose of the law itself.</p>

scholarly journals Analysis of MUI Fatwa Number 17 of 2020 Regarding Kaifiat Prayer Guidelines for Health Workers Who Wear Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) When Treating and Handling Covid-19 Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 247
Author(s):  
Frina Oktalita ◽  
Darlin Rizki
Keyword(s):  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
The Body ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Personal Protection ◽  
Personal Protection Equipment ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Law

This study aims to analyze the MUI fatwa no. 17 of 2020 concerning the guidelines for prayer for health workers who wear personal protective equipment (PPE) when handling and caring for COVID-19 patients. This study tries to describe the ijtihad method used by MUI in establishing a law. This study uses a type of library research with descriptive analysis. The results of this study state that health workers (PPE) must continue to pray even though it’s not possible to purify themselves (ablution or tayamum). With consideration, 1) if the body (lahiriyah) in hadas condition, it is not obligate his pray (I'adah), 2) if the PPE is unclean then it is necessary to repeat the prayer. The fatwa cannot be separated from the syar'i argument which is the basis for issuing the fatwa, particularly using the talfiq manhaji method. The fatwa can be used as an alternative to confusion over the law, and is intended to create benefits, especially for health workers who treat and handle Covid-19 patients.

scholarly journals Pendekatan dalam Penanganan Sengketa Pilkada Menunjang Kinerja Kepolisian dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Sebagai Pelindung, Pengayom dan Pelayan Masyarakat

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
husain kasim
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Police Officers ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Mass Violence ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
The Law

This study aims to: 1) knowing the basic law enforcement restorative justice approach in handling criminal acts riots, 2) to know how to implement a restorative justice approach and the factors that influenceThe experiment was conducted at the Police Resort Ternate, North Maluku province, with a population of security officers who work directly handling and protection against acts of mass violence with less sampling as many as 50 people through random sampling techniques. Data were collected by questionnaire and interview techniques. Data analysis was performed using qualitative descriptive analysis and interpretation.The results showed that: 1) The perpetrator of criminal acts of rioting should be avoided from the formal criminal justice system. The best solution that must be done is through the act of diversion (transfer) the completion of its case outside the criminal justice system, but there is no definite legal basis for implementing diversion measures in addition to referring to the Law 2 of 2002, which only specifies that police officers have the authority of police discretion. 2) Treatment of the criminal action in a dispute over the election unrest in North Maluku, which was held on Sat. Criminal Police Ternate is through mediation. This means that the principle of restorative justice has been implemented on Sat. Criminal Police Ternate, however, efforts to address criminal acts there are influences from the substance of the law, law enforcement officers, legal culture of society and their own community.

scholarly journals Seni Beatbox pada Nasyid Islami dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-389
Author(s):  
Ainil Maqsurah ◽  
Kasman Bakry ◽  
Sa’adal Jannah
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Human Body ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Musical Instrument ◽  
Musical Instruments ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences

Legal discussion about music in Islam is a forbidden matter. Although there are opinions that allow, but this opinion is weak with the arguments of the Qur'an, the traditions and ijmak of the scholars of the Salaf in their forbidden. The beatbox in Islamic nasheed is in the form of rhythmic sounds such as drum beats, musical instruments, or imitations of other sounds, especially turntables, through human speech instruments such as the mouth, tongue and lips that accompany Islamic nashid as the sounds musical instrument replacement. The purpose of this study was to determine the beatbox law in Islamic nasyid. The research method applies qualitative studies with library research methods and descriptive analysis and uses a normative approach. The results showed that the legal consequences of beatbox art were indeed discussed by the scholars, but the strongest opinion was that it was not allowed. The sounds that come from the human body and the sound resembles the sound of a musical instrument, so the law is haram, both playing it and hearing it. As for Islamic nasheed which does not contain forbidden cases, then the law may.

scholarly journals MENCARI HUKUM YANG BERKEADILAN BAGI ANAK MELALUI DIVERSI

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 175
Author(s):  
Rr. Putri A. Priamsari
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Legal Counsel ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
Judicial Proceedings ◽  
The Law

<p><em>According to UNICEF, no less than 4000 Indonesian children are brought </em><em> </em><em>to court every year with reports of relatively minor crimes such as theft, persecution, spreading hoaxes and others. Where children who are faced with the law generally are not accompanied by legal counsel or social services. Indonesia has had a umbrella </em><em>act </em><em>in protecting children's welfare, namely Law Number 4 of 1979 concerning Child Welfare which was then followed by Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection which has now been replaced with Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection as implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989, New York). Taking into account that the handling of child cases dealing with the law must really guarantee the protection of the best interests of the child and must aim at the creation of Restorative Justice, both for Children and Victims of Children and to create Restorative Justice, before resorting to judicial proceedings at the prosecution level General must strive for Diversion. Provisions regarding this diversion are also regulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2014 concerning Diversion. The enactment of the 2014 PERMA is intended so that juvenile justice in Indonesia can be carried out more efficiently, while still considering its welfare.</em></p><p><em> </em><em></em></p>

scholarly journals PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE SEBAGAI MODEL PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP ANAK (Studi Penanganan Perkara Anak Berhadapan Dengan Hukum pada Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Dumai Kelas IA)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 318-335
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sacral Ritonga ◽  
Mahmud Mulyadi ◽  
Mustamam Mustamam
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
District Court ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Formal Process ◽  
Secondary Sources ◽  
Justice Process ◽  
The Law

The completion of the ABH case through the implementation of diversion was carried out using a restorative justice approach, requiring the consent of the victim and / or the family of the victim's child and the child's willingness. Thus, it is understood that the settlement of ABH cases cannot always be implemented diversion.The problems in this study, concerning the concept of restorative justice in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System, and regarding the concept of restorative justice as an effort to provide protection for children who are faced with the law, and factors that become obstacles and solutions in implementing restorative justice in the Legal Area of the Class IA District Court of Dumai.This research is empirical juridical research, by conducting research at law enforcement agencies / institutions in the Dumai State IA Class law, concerning the implementation of restorative justice in the Legal Area of the Class IA District Court of Dumai. This research is descriptive analysis, using primary and secondary sources. Data analysis used in this study is qualitative data analysis.Based on the results of the research, the concept of restorative justice in the SPPA Act was implemented through the application of Diversion at every level of the juvenile justice process. Diversion is the transfer of settlement of child cases dealing with the law from the formal process (judicial process) to the formal process, by means of deliberation and consensus which prioritizes restorative justice. The concept of restorative justice will provide protection for ABH, because through the implementation of child diversification it will be kept away from the formal justice process which allows the neglect of children's rights and traumatizes children. The obstacle in the implementation of restorative justice in the legal court area of the IA Dumai class is still a lack of human resources law enforcement officers. Supporting facilities and infrastructures are still very minimal. There is still a lack of socialization to the community.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK DALAM PERAMPASAN ILLICIT ENRICHMENT KAITANNYA DENGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
A.A Mirah Endraswari
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Burden Of Proof ◽  
Proof System ◽  
Presumption Of Innocence ◽  
Law System ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Penal Law ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Law

The way to prevention of corruption is to use the reversal burden of proof system to the official public wealth that is not fair ( illicit enrichment ), but in the implementation there is an indication against violation of human rights. This research will be discuss how rule about the reversal burden of proof in the penal law system of Indonesia ? and how to application the reversal burden of proof in deprivation the illicit enrichment which is related with the human rights ?. Method used in this research is normative law research. Data analysis is conducted on primary and secondary law materials and then comparing those both as well were processed and presented by descriptive analysis. Related norm about the reversal burden of proof system now is regulated in act No. 31 of 1999, act No 20 of 2001 and act No. 8 of 2010, but the character of reversal burden of proof system in Indonesia still limited because it can only be used during the trials. Then related illicit enrichment norm is not regulated in Indonesia act’s, while Indonesia has been ratified about illicit enrichment in Article 20 UNCAC. The pros and cons related to the implementation of reversal burden of proof to illicit enrichment it happens because it is considered to against of human rights, which is related to the principle of presumption of innocence and non – self incrimination. However, with regard to other legal principles and consider the interests of the wider, the regulation of the illicit enrichment should be regulated in the provisions of the law in Indonesia. Considering the purpose of the law it self is fighting corruption, money laundering and optimize return on assets of criminals who gained from the crime. Penanggulangan tindak pidana korupsi sebagai kejahatan yang sifatnya luar biasa (extraordinary crime ) membutuhkan penanganan yang sifatnya luar biasa pula. Adapun cara yang dapat ditempuh yaitu dengan menerapan sistem pembuktian terbalik  terhadap kekayaan pejabat Negara yang dimiliki secara tidak sah ( illicit enrichment ), namun dalam pelaksanaannya terdapat indikasi bahwa akan  bersinggungan dengan Hak Asasi Manusia ( HAM ). Dalam penelitian ini akan dibahas mengenai bagaimana pengaturan terkait pembuktian terbalik yang diatur dalam  sistem hukum pidana di Indonesia ? dan bagaimanakah penerapan sistem pembuktian terbalik dalam perampasan terhadap illicit enrichment dikaitkan dengan Hak Asasi Manusia ( HAM ) ?. Metode dalam penelitian ini menggunaan penelitian hukum normatif. Pada penelitian ini difokuskan pada hukum positif serta sumber bahan hukum baik berasal dari primer maupun sekunder. Analisis data dilakukan terhadap bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder yang selanjutnya diolah dan disajikan secara deskriptif analisis. Terkait tentang pengaturan sistem pembuktian terbalik saat ini telah diatur dalam ketentuan Undang – Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 jo Undang – Undang No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana korupsi serta Undang – Undang No. 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, namun sifatnya masih terbatas karena penggunaanya hanya dapat dilakukan pada saat persidangan saja. Sedangkan pengaturan terkait illicit enrichment saat ini belum diatur dalam ketentuan perundang – undangan, padahal Indonesia sendiri telah meratifikasi ketentuan illicit enrichment sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 20  UNCAC. Pro dan kontra terkait penerapan pembuktian terbalik pada illicit enrichment karena ada indikasi bersinggungan dengan Hak Asasi Manusia ( HAM ) khususnya pada asas presumption of innocence dan non – self incrimination. Meskipun demikian, dengan memperhatikan prinsip hukum lainnya  serta untuk    kepentingan yang lebih luas maka pengaturan illicit enrichment sudah seharusnya diatur dalam ketentuan perundang – undangan di Indonesia. Mengingat tujuan pengaturannya  itu sendiri yakni demi memberantas tindak pidana korupsi, tindak pidana pencucian uang serta pengembalian aset  - aset yang diperoleh dari tindak pidana tersebut.

JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM THROUGH DIVERSION AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE POLICY

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 168
Author(s):  
Dyah Listyarini
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Children's Rights ◽  
Children’S Rights ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

Indonesia as a state of law has ratified several international human rights instruments, especially the Convention on the Rights of the Child, in which the state should ensure the protection, respect, fulfillment, promotion, and enforcement of children's rights. In fact, many children have been treated unjustly in the fulfillment of their rights when conflicting with the law.  Methods of legal protection of the rights of children conflicting with the law are based on the provision that “every child has the right to survive, grow and develop as well as the right to protection from violence and discrimination”. Other ways to protect children’s rights may also include the policy that children conflicting with the law should be treated humanely in accordance with their dignity and rights; special personnel should be provided for their companion and counseling; sanctions should be appropriated for the best interests of the children; and special facilities and infrastructure for children should be equally provided. This means that appropriate sanctions should hence be supported through the process of resolving cases using the principle of “diverse and restorative justice  The concept of diverse and restorative justice can be applied to the crime of under 7th-year punishments and non-repeated crime. Methods for handling children who have conflicts with the law have hitherto emphasized on normative juridical processes such as investigation, prosecution, and examination of the case by the judge (in court). The processes, however, have not guidelines or technical manuals for law enforcement officers to implement the non-litigation settlement for children cases

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document