The Logic of Comparison: A Methodological Note on the Comparative Study of Political Systems

1966 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur L. Kalleberg

During the last ten years the study of comparative politics has undergone a methodological revolution. Reacting against the static, formalistic, “country-by-country” approach of earlier students of foreign governments, numerous contemporary political scientists have endeavored to create a more dynamic, empirically interpreted, and truly comparative method of analysis. This group of political scientists makes three general assumptions concerning the new approach.

Author(s):  
Pablo Beramendi

This article provides a partial but necessary review of the dominating themes, evolution, and pending tasks that await the comparative politics of federalism. The basic premise of this article is taken from rational choice institution-alism. The article fist delimits federalism as an institution, before it pays attention to the impact of federalism on democracy and the workings of the economy. An analysis of federalism as an endogenous institution is provided. The article also mentions a number of methodological considerations on the comparative study of the origins and consequences of federalism. It ends with a discussion of the various challenges that lie ahead of the field.


1984 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. H. Rigby

Perhaps we political scientists and sociologists should have left ‘legitimacy’ to the constitutional and international lawyers. Such a view is certainly suggested by the present cacophany of our definitions, taxonomies and applications of the term. When the contributors to a book on political legitimation in communist states, representing by no means the full range of scholarly views on the social and political systems of these countries, can variously characterize the political legitimation of the USSR today as dominated by ‘goal-rational’, ‘traditional’ or ‘paternalistic’ legitimation, or as a combination of ‘heteronomous-teleological’ and ‘autonomous-consensual’ or of ‘overt’ and ‘covert’ modes of legitimation, we evidently have a long way to go before our shared understandings of political legitmation could be adequate for the comparative study of political systems or for analysing political change.


1968 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 721-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. Stein

Until these recent studies by Riker, Watts, and Wildavsky appeared, the theory of federalism was embodied largely in the work of K. C. Wheare. Wheare published the first truly pathbreaking book in the comparative study of federalism shortly after World War II. He defined federalism as that system of government in which the federal and regional governments are both coordinate and independent. In applying this definition, he stressed the sharp division in the powers and functions of two coequal sovereignties as a basis for classifying systems of government as federal. Wheare's definition was derived primarily from his analysis of die American Constitution and, in particular, its formally sharp division of powers between national and state governments.


Religions ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 644
Author(s):  
Aryeh Amihay ◽  
Lupeng Li

This study offers a new approach for studying biblical myth in two directions: first, by expanding the scope of investigation beyond the clearly mythological elements to other areas of biblical literature, and second, by drawing comparisons to classical Chinese literature. This article thus reconsiders the relationship between myth and history in both biblical and Chinese literature, while seeking to broaden the endeavor of the comparative method in biblical studies. Two examples are offered: (1) the story of Moses’s call narrative and his relationship with Aaron in Exodus in light of the story of Xiang Liang and Xiang Ji in the Shiji; (2) the story of Saul and David in 1 Samuel compared with the story of Dong Zhuo and Lü Bu in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms. Both comparisons demonstrate the operation of Claude Lévi-Strauss’s inversion principle. Conclusions regarding each of these literatures are presented separately, followed by cross-cultural insights and shared aspects in the study of myth, historiography, and religion.


1974 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gonda

In a long series of important and stimulating publications Georges Dumézil has for almost half a century not only re-established a complex of theories with regard to the comparative study of ancient Indo-European mythology, but also applied a modernized comparative method. In investigating the foundations of the Indo-European socio-religious conceptions he bases his arguments and conclusions, it is true, to a certain extent on linguistic data, but these are always amplified and corroborated by a thorough consideration of the social structure, religious beliefs and ritual institutions of the ancient Indians, Romans, Germans, Celts and Greeks. Especially these last thirty-five years his work is of great originality in that he has founded and developed the theory of the trois fonctions, of the “three fundamental activities which the groups of priests, warriors and producers must fulfil and assure in order to maintain their community”. In this theory it is not the tripartite social organization of the prehistoric Indo-Europeans that is emphasized, but the principle of classification, the ideology to which, in Dumézil's opinion, this organization has given rise. Being reflected in the groupings of, and mutual relations between, the divine powers and in the very structure of Indo-European mythology and view of the world it is here again the ideological rather than the strictly sociological aspects that invite the reader's attention.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-26
Author(s):  
Abdulrahman Ahmed Alsuwaidi ◽  
Arieff Salleh Rosman

The case management system is an innovative system in the national legislations, it was created because of the slow judiciary procedures and the accumulated cases in the courts. It is also an attempt to settle the juristic dispute before resorting to the jurisdiction. This study aims to identify the alternative methods of disputes settlement in the Islamic sharia; reconciliation, mediation, adjudication. It also sheds a light on the case management system in modern judicial systems and its practical implementations through the comparative study, the demonstration of its goals and its date of inception, the evaluation of the system through the illustration of the advantages and disadvantages, the identification of the main obstacles it encounters, and the Comparison between the case management system in the law and the alternative systems to settle disputes in the Islamic sharia in order to reach conclusions and recommendations by following the scientific methodology of the study using a descriptive, analytical, historical and comparative method. The most important recommendations of the study; first, the need to implement the rules of Islam in the jurisdiction. Second, the need to expand the power of those involved in the a case management system by enabling them to settle disputes in a final manner. Third, the need to pass a special and independent law that organizes the offices of the a case management and clarifies the duties and powers of those who are responsible. يعتبر نظام إدارة الدعوى القضائية نظاما مستحدث ا في التشريعات الوطنية، أوجدته الحاجة بسبب بطء إجراءات التقاضي وتكدس الدعاوى القضائية في المحاكم، ومحاولةً لحل النزاع القانوني قبل اللجوء إلى القضاء، كما وتهدف هذه الدراسة للتعرف على الطرق البديلة لحل النزاعات في الشريعة الإسلامية وهي الصلح والوساطة والتحكيم، وتسليط الضوء على نظام إدارة الدعوى في الأنظمة القضائية الحديةة، والتطبيقات العملية له من خلال الدراسة المقارنة، وبيان أهدافه، وتاريخ نشأته، وتقييم النظام من خلال بيان المزايا والعيوب، وتحديد أهم المعوقات الي تواجهه، ومقارنة نظام إدارة الدعوى في القانون، بالأنظمة البديلة لحل النزاعات في الشريعة الإسلامية، وذلك بهدف الوصول إلى النتائج والتوصيات، من خلال إتباع منهجية علمية باستخدام المنهج الوصيي التحليلي، والتاريخي، والمقارن. ومن أهم التوصيات الي خلصت إليها الدراسة أولاً: ضرورة إعمال أحكام الإسلام في القضاء. ثانيا:ً العمل على توسيع صلاحيات القائمين على نظام إدارة الدعوى، وذلك من خلال تمكينهم من اليصل في المنازعات بشكل نهائي. ثالةاً: ضرورة تنظيم قانون خاص ومستقل ينظم عمل مكاتب إدارة الدعوى، ويوضح فيه مهام وصلاحيات القائمين عليه


1968 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Shoup

The past decade has witnessed a rapid, but uneven, growth in comparative studies. While certain types of political systems have received the lion's share of attention, others have remained backwaters of comparative research, experiencing little or no development in the application of comparative techniques. The comparative study of communist states, until recently, fell into the latter category—relatively neglected and certainly not enjoying the reputation and prestige of work with newly emerging nations or Western political systems.Now this state of affairs is undergoing a change, or at least the promise of one. In the past several years, the possibility of developing comparative techniques in the study of communist political systems has become the object of growing interest and has provoked not a little discussion and debate.1The opportunities and the problems that face this field—especially in developing empirically oriented comparative analysis—are the subject of the present article.


Author(s):  
Bernardo Sordi

This chapter explains that the comparison of legal phenomena has always implied, alongside a synchronic and spatial juxtaposition, a certain relevance of the time factor. Here, the comparative method sought to develop a more complex and multi-faceted interpretation of the law, free from the constraints of national borders and sovereign states. It intended to reveal complexity, and to draw different legal experiences closer together. In so doing, it necessarily embraced the dimension of change and diversity. The comparative method and the historical method are thus rarely seen as antithetical; more often than not, the two approaches are jointly applied in an investigation that seeks to combine the synchronic and diachronic perspectives. The chapter reveals, however, that the dialogue between history and comparison was far from straightforward. At no time was the diachronic perspective pre-eminent, or capable of absorbing and guiding the comparative study. It rather limited itself to playing an essentially secondary, subservient role.


Slavic Review ◽  
1967 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfred G. Meyer

The intent of this article is to join in the slowly rising chorus of voices expressing dissatisfaction with the methods used so far in the analysis of Communist political systems. I shall argue, perhaps in rather circuitous fashion, that political scientists in the West have failed, by and large, to apply to the Communist world the rich store of concepts developed for the comparative study of political systems and that the concepts that have been used have been applied in ways that are objectionable. If, as is at times maintained, our discipline tends to be provincial or ethnocentric in its methods, this tendency has been most pronounced, perhaps, in the study of Communist systems. As a result, very little work done has been genuinely comparative. The discipline has failed to place the Communist world into any of the several systematic conceptual frameworks it has developed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document